W BIAŁYMSTOKU
Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19834Pełny rekord metadanych
| Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Moran, Seana | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-16T13:01:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-16T13:01:54Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 2, Issue 1, 2015, pp. 64-69 | pl |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19834 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The first premise is that creativity requires a focal perceiver perspective to be determined or assigned. As criteria for perception or judgment, what we currently consider “ dimensions” of creativity instead may be “ precursors.” Ultimately, creativity shifts meaning for the whole culture. The second premise is that creativity requires a temporal perspective: its assessment is time-dependent on the first instance the perceiver notices. If the perceiver accepts the creative “ it,” then it is shared for others to judge it, creating a diffusion and adaptation process. The strongest form of creativity, then, is when it stands the test of time, goes beyond its own zeitgeist, and is institutionalized for future generations. | pl |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl |
| dc.publisher | University of Białystok | pl |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ | - |
| dc.subject | Creativity judgment | pl |
| dc.subject | Vygotsky | pl |
| dc.title | Creativity is a Label for the Aggregated, Time – Dependent, Subjective Judgments by Creators and by Adopters | pl |
| dc.type | Article | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | © 2015 Seana Moran, published by University of Białystok. | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. | pl |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1515/ctra-2015-0009 | - |
| dc.description.Email | SMoran@clarku.edu | pl |
| dc.description.Affiliation | Clark University, USA | pl |
| dc.description.references | Barron, F., & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Becker, M. (1995). Nineteenth-century foundations of creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 3, 219-229. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Christensen, C. M. (1997), The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: Harper Collins. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Feldhusen, J. F., & Goh, B. E., (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 231-247. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 10-32; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Gardner, H. (1988). Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 8-26. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Guilford, J. P. (1970). Creativity: Retrospect and prospect. Journal of Creative Behavior, 4, 3, 149-170. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Moran, S. (2009). What role does commitment play among writers with different levels of creativity? Creativity Research Journal,21, 2-3, 243-257. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Moran, S. (2010). Commitment and creativity: Transforming experience into art. In C. Connery, V. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to meaning-making, play, and the arts (pp. 141-160). New York: Peter Lang. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contribution to the dialectic of creativity and development. In K. Sawyer et al., Creativity and development (pp. 61-90). New York: Oxford University Press. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107-120. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Plucker, J. A., & Runco, M. A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future direction in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21, 36-39. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 1, 151-158. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Sternberg, R. J. (1999). A propulsion model of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83-100. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 7, 677-688. | pl |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2354-0036 | - |
| dc.description.volume | 2 | pl |
| dc.description.issue | 1 | pl |
| dc.description.firstpage | 64 | pl |
| dc.description.lastpage | 69 | pl |
| dc.identifier.citation2 | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications | pl |
| Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2015, Vol. 2, Issue 1 | |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
| Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creativity_2_1_2015_S_Moran_Creativity_is_a_Label_for_the_Aggregated_Time_Dependent.pdf | 192,2 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL
