Creative Engagement in Everyday Life – Learning from Aesthetic Experience

Pole DC	Wartość	Język
dc.contributor.author	Pałęga, Anna K.	-
dc.date.accessioned	2026-03-16T12:36:04Z	-
dc.date.available	2026-03-16T12:36:04Z	-
dc.date.issued	2015	-
dc.identifier.citation	Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 2, Issue 2, 2015, pp. 212-226	pl
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19829	-
dc.description.abstract	In recent years the concept of aesthetics has become broader and more focused on the aesthetic experience resulting from the interaction between the person and the environment. A lot has been written about the way people experience settings that are explicitly designed as sites for aesthetic engagement, such as museums and art galleries, but very little attention has been given to ordinary people and how they make sense of such experiences in their everyday lives. This research study explores the everyday aesthetic experiences that lay people find meaningful in their daily encounters through a phenomenological approach. The findings indicate that everyday aesthetic experiences result from being open to creatively engage, are a blend of serendipitous events and planned encounters and a significant dimension of lived experience.	pl
dc.language.iso	en	pl
dc.publisher	University of Białystok	pl
dc.rights	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Deed	-
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	-
dc.subject	Everyday aesthetic experience	pl
dc.subject	Creativity	pl
dc.subject	Openness	pl
dc.subject	Meaning making	pl
dc.title	Creative Engagement in Everyday Life – Learning from Aesthetic Experience	pl
dc.type	Article	pl
dc.rights.holder	© 2015 Anna K. Pałęga, published by University of Białystok	pl
dc.rights.holder	This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.	pl
dc.identifier.doi	10.1515/ctra-2015-0021	-
dc.description.Email	contactania@yahoo.com	pl
dc.description.Affiliation	College of Management “Edukacja”, Poland	pl
dc.description.references	Atman, K. (1987). The role of conation (striving) in the distance learning enterprise. The American Journal of Distance Education, 1, 14-28.	pl
dc.description.references	Abrams, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous. New York: Random House.	pl
dc.description.references	Bannon, F. & Sanderson, P. (2000). Experience every moment: aesthetically significant dance education. Research in Dance Education, 1, 9-26.	pl
dc.description.references	Baumgarten, A. (1954). Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus. 1973. In Reflections on Poetry (K. A. Hoelther, Trans.). Barkeley, CA: University of California Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Bennett, R. (1971). Aesthetic behaviors in music. In R. Bennett, In toward an aesthetic education. Reston: VA: Music Educators National Conference.	pl
dc.description.references	Berger, P. & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.	pl
dc.description.references	Berleant, A. (2010). Sensibility and sense: The aesthetic transformation of the human world. Imprint Academic.	pl
dc.description.references	Conation. 2014. In Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved December 2014, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conation	pl
dc.description.references	Csikszentmihalyi, M. C. (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Csikszentmihalyi, M. C. & Robinson, R. E. (1990). The art of seeing: an interpretation of the aesthetic encounter. Malibu, California: J.Paul Getty Museum and the Getty Center for Education in the Arts.	pl
dc.description.references	Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28, 235-261.	pl
dc.description.references	Haapala, A. (2005). On the aesthetics of the everyday. Familiarity, strangeness, and the meaning of place. In A. Light & J. Smith (Eds.), The Aesthetics of Everyday Life (pp. 39-55). NY: Columbia University Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Jung, C. & Jaffe, A. (1965). Memories, dreams, reflections. New York: Random House.	pl
dc.description.references	Kolbe.com (2014). http://www.Kolbe.com. Visited December 2014.	pl
dc.description.references	Korsmeyer, C. (1977). On distinguishing 'aesthetic' from 'artistic'. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 11, 45-57.	pl
dc.description.references	Leddy, T. (1995). Everyday surface qualities: ‘Neat’, ‘messy’, ‘clean’, ‘dirty’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticis, 3, 259–268.	pl
dc.description.references	Leddy, T. (2005). The nature of everyday aesthetics. In A. Light & J. M. Smith (Eds), The aesthetics of everyday life. New York: Columbia University Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhytmanalysis. Space time and everyday life. London: Continuum.	pl
dc.description.references	Lieblich, A. (1989). Transition to adulthood during military service. New York: SUNY Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Lieblich, A., Zilber, T. & Tuval-Maschiah, R. (2008). Narrating human actions: The subjective experience of agency, structure, communion, and serendipity. Qualitative Inquiry, 4, 613-631.	pl
dc.description.references	Mandoki, K. (2007). Everyday Aesthetics: Prosaics, the play of culture and social identities. Williston: Ashgate.	pl
dc.description.references	Maslow, A. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: The Viking Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Melchionne, K. (2002). Front yards. In A. Berleant (Ed.), The Environment and the Art. VT: Ashgate Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1945).	pl
dc.description.references	Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.	pl
dc.description.references	Pałęga, A. (2011). Everyday aesthetic experiences. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest LLC.	pl
dc.description.references	Saito, Y. (2001). Everyday aesthetics. Philosophy and Literature, 25 (1), 87-95.	pl
dc.description.references	Saito, Y. (2007). Everyday Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Scarry, E. (1999). On Beauty and being just. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Pres.	pl
dc.description.references	Shusterman, R. (2004). Complexities of aesthetic experience: Response to Johnson. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 38, 109-112.	pl
dc.description.references	Smith, J. (2007). Hermeneutics, human science and health: Linking theory and practice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2, 3-11.	pl
dc.description.references	Smith, J. & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology. London: Sage.	pl
dc.description.references	Smith, R. (1989). The sense of art: A study in aesthetic education. NY: Routledge.	pl
dc.description.references	van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Welsch, W. (2005). Sport Viewed Aesthetically, or Even as Art. In A. a. Light (Ed.), The aesthetics of everyday life. New York: Columbia University Press.	pl
dc.identifier.eissn	2354-0036	-
dc.description.volume	2	pl
dc.description.issue	2	pl
dc.description.firstpage	212	pl
dc.description.lastpage	226	pl
dc.identifier.citation2	Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications	pl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):	Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2015, Vol. 2, Issue 2

Pliki w tej pozycji:

Plik	Opis	Rozmiar	Format
Creativity_2_2_2015_A_K_Palega_Creative_Engagement_in_Everyday_Life.pdf		284,43 kB	Adobe PDF	Otwórz

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki

Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL