REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19821
Tytuł: Which Test of Divergent Thinking Is Best?
Autorzy: Runco, Mark A.
Abdulla, Ahmed M.
Hyeon Paek, Sue
Al-Jasim, Fatima A.
Alsuwaidi, Hanadi N.
Słowa kluczowe: Creativity
Divergent Thinking
Originality
Creativity Testing
Uses test
Problem Finding
Creative Potential
Runco Ideational Behavior Scale
Quick Estimate of Convergent Thinking
Standard Definition of Creativity
Data wydania: 2016
Data dodania: 16-mar-2026
Wydawca: University of Białystok
Źródło: Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 3, Issue 1, 2016, pp. 4-18
Abstrakt: Divergent thinking (DT) tests are probably the most common ly used measures of creative potential. Several extensive batteries are available but most research relies on one or two specific tests rather than a complete battery. This may limit generalizations because tests of DT are not equivalent. They are not always highly inter-correlated. Additionally, some DT tests appear to be better than others at eliciting originality. This is critical because originality is vital for creativity. The primary purpose of the present study was to determine which test of DT elicits the most originality. Seven measures of DTwere administered on a sample of 611 participants in eight Arabic countries. The tests were Figural, Titles, Realistic Presented Problems, Realistic Problem Generation, Instances, Uses, and Similarities. The Quick Test of Convergent Thinking, Runco’s Ideational Behavior Scale, and a demographic questionnaire were also administered. A linear mixed model analysis confirmed that the originality scores in the DT tests differed by test. Post-hoc tests indicated that the Titles and Realistic Problem Generation tests produced the highest mean originality scores, whereas the Realistic Presented Problems test produced the lowest mean originality scores. These differences confirm that research using only one DT test will not provide generalizable results.
Afiliacja: Mark A. Runco - University of Georgia, Athens, GA USA
Ahmed M. Abdulla - Arabian Gulf University, Kingdom of Bahrain
Sue Hyeon Paek - University of Georgia, Athens, GA USA
Fatima A. Al-Jasim - Arabian Gulf University, Kingdom of Bahrain
Hanadi N. Alsuwaidi - Ministry of Education, UAE
E-mail: Mark A. Runco: runco@uga.edu
Ahmed M. Abdulla: ahmedy82@uga.edu
Sue Hyeon Paek: suehpaek@gmail.com
Fatima A. Al-Jasim: gazran5552@gmail.com
Hanadi N. Alsuwaidi: h.n.alsuwaidi@hotmail.com
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19821
DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2016-0001
e-ISSN: 2354-0036
Typ Dokumentu: Article
metadata.dc.rights.uri: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Właściciel praw: © 2016 Mark A. Runco, Ahmed M. Abdulla, Sue Hyeon Paek, Fatima A. Al-Jasim, Hanadi N. Alsuwaidi, published by University of Białystok.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2016, Vol. 3, Issue 1

Pokaż pełny widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons