Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19821| Tytuł: | Which Test of Divergent Thinking Is Best? |
| Autorzy: | Runco, Mark A. Abdulla, Ahmed M. Hyeon Paek, Sue Al-Jasim, Fatima A. Alsuwaidi, Hanadi N. |
| Słowa kluczowe: | Creativity Divergent Thinking Originality Creativity Testing Uses test Problem Finding Creative Potential Runco Ideational Behavior Scale Quick Estimate of Convergent Thinking Standard Definition of Creativity |
| Data wydania: | 2016 |
| Data dodania: | 16-mar-2026 |
| Wydawca: | University of Białystok |
| Źródło: | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 3, Issue 1, 2016, pp. 4-18 |
| Abstrakt: | Divergent thinking (DT) tests are probably the most common ly used measures of creative potential. Several extensive batteries are available but most research relies on one or two specific tests rather than a complete battery. This may limit generalizations because tests of DT are not equivalent. They are not always highly inter-correlated. Additionally, some DT tests appear to be better than others at eliciting originality. This is critical because originality is vital for creativity. The primary purpose of the present study was to determine which test of DT elicits the most originality. Seven measures of DTwere administered on a sample of 611 participants in eight Arabic countries. The tests were Figural, Titles, Realistic Presented Problems, Realistic Problem Generation, Instances, Uses, and Similarities. The Quick Test of Convergent Thinking, Runco’s Ideational Behavior Scale, and a demographic questionnaire were also administered. A linear mixed model analysis confirmed that the originality scores in the DT tests differed by test. Post-hoc tests indicated that the Titles and Realistic Problem Generation tests produced the highest mean originality scores, whereas the Realistic Presented Problems test produced the lowest mean originality scores. These differences confirm that research using only one DT test will not provide generalizable results. |
| Afiliacja: | Mark A. Runco - University of Georgia, Athens, GA USA Ahmed M. Abdulla - Arabian Gulf University, Kingdom of Bahrain Sue Hyeon Paek - University of Georgia, Athens, GA USA Fatima A. Al-Jasim - Arabian Gulf University, Kingdom of Bahrain Hanadi N. Alsuwaidi - Ministry of Education, UAE |
| E-mail: | Mark A. Runco: runco@uga.edu Ahmed M. Abdulla: ahmedy82@uga.edu Sue Hyeon Paek: suehpaek@gmail.com Fatima A. Al-Jasim: gazran5552@gmail.com Hanadi N. Alsuwaidi: h.n.alsuwaidi@hotmail.com |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19821 |
| DOI: | 10.1515/ctra-2016-0001 |
| e-ISSN: | 2354-0036 |
| Typ Dokumentu: | Article |
| metadata.dc.rights.uri: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
| Właściciel praw: | © 2016 Mark A. Runco, Ahmed M. Abdulla, Sue Hyeon Paek, Fatima A. Al-Jasim, Hanadi N. Alsuwaidi, published by University of Białystok. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. |
| Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2016, Vol. 3, Issue 1 |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
| Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creativity_3_1_2016_M_A_Runco_A_M_Abdulla_S_Hyeon_Peak_at_al_Which_Test_of_Divergent_Thinking_Is_Best.pdf | 567,78 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL
