REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19803
Tytuł: The Dutch Perspective on the Enforcement of the EU Sanctions Against Russia: Legal Challenges, Case Law, and Institutional Practice
Autorzy: McNaughton, Katarzyna J.
Słowa kluczowe: Netherlands sanctions enforcement model
Dutch Sanctions Act Reform
duty of care in Dutch sanctions jurisprudence
sanctions enforcement in Dutch jurisprudence
Data wydania: 2025
Data dodania: 5-mar-2026
Wydawca: University of Bialystok, Faculty of Law, Poland
Źródło: Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2025, p. 45-66
Abstrakt: This article examines the evolving legal and institutional framework for implementing and enforcing EU sanctions against Russia in the Netherlands. It highlights key developments, including the Dutch courts’ expanding interpretation of sanctions law, the landmark Dieseko settlement involving the Crimean Bridge, and reforms to the 1977 Sanctions Act. Drawing on recent case law, interviews with legal practitioners, and analysis of enforcement mechanisms, the paper shows how Dutch authorities are balancing regulatory compliance, due process, and financial sector duties. It also addresses institutional fragmentation and the government’s proposal to establish a Central Reporting Office. Through case studies, including trade-based sanctions evasion, real estate linked to sanctioned individuals, forced buyouts of sanctioned minority shareholders, and banking sector disputes; the paper argues that Dutch courts are shaping a nuanced national model of sanctions enforcement. This model emphasizes low thresholds for criminal intent, transparency, and proportionality. The Cicerone case illustrates how courts adapt sanctions enforcement under geopolitical uncertainty, combining EU sanctions law with Ukrainian anticorruption efforts. It reflects a willingness to diverge from EU guidance to protect public interest and legal clarity. Meanwhile, the ABN AMRO case demonstrates a dual expectation of financial institutions: rigorous sanctions compliance and fair treatment of clients. Here, the duty of care doctrine counters excessive risk aversion. Together, this paper offers critical insights for regulators, compliance professionals, and scholars into how EU sanctions are interpreted and enforced at the national level under complex, highrisk conditions. It not only analyzes key court cases, but also contextualizes them within broader legal reforms, institutional dynamics, and evolving enforcement strategies in the Netherlands.
Afiliacja: McGill University, Department of Political Science, Montreal, Canada
E-mail: Katarzyna.mcnaughton@mail.mcgill.ca
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19803
DOI: 10.15290/eejtr.2025.09.03.05
ISSN: 2544-9214
e-ISSN: 2544-9737
metadata.dc.identifier.orcid: 0000-0002-7429-4297
Typ Dokumentu: Article
metadata.dc.rights.uri: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Właściciel praw: © 2025 Author. Submitted for open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0.) license
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 2025, Vol. 9, No. 3

Pokaż pełny widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons