REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19803
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorMcNaughton, Katarzyna J.-
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-05T11:54:51Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-05T11:54:51Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationEastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2025, p. 45-66pl
dc.identifier.issn2544-9214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19803-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the evolving legal and institutional framework for implementing and enforcing EU sanctions against Russia in the Netherlands. It highlights key developments, including the Dutch courts’ expanding interpretation of sanctions law, the landmark Dieseko settlement involving the Crimean Bridge, and reforms to the 1977 Sanctions Act. Drawing on recent case law, interviews with legal practitioners, and analysis of enforcement mechanisms, the paper shows how Dutch authorities are balancing regulatory compliance, due process, and financial sector duties. It also addresses institutional fragmentation and the government’s proposal to establish a Central Reporting Office. Through case studies, including trade-based sanctions evasion, real estate linked to sanctioned individuals, forced buyouts of sanctioned minority shareholders, and banking sector disputes; the paper argues that Dutch courts are shaping a nuanced national model of sanctions enforcement. This model emphasizes low thresholds for criminal intent, transparency, and proportionality. The Cicerone case illustrates how courts adapt sanctions enforcement under geopolitical uncertainty, combining EU sanctions law with Ukrainian anticorruption efforts. It reflects a willingness to diverge from EU guidance to protect public interest and legal clarity. Meanwhile, the ABN AMRO case demonstrates a dual expectation of financial institutions: rigorous sanctions compliance and fair treatment of clients. Here, the duty of care doctrine counters excessive risk aversion. Together, this paper offers critical insights for regulators, compliance professionals, and scholars into how EU sanctions are interpreted and enforced at the national level under complex, highrisk conditions. It not only analyzes key court cases, but also contextualizes them within broader legal reforms, institutional dynamics, and evolving enforcement strategies in the Netherlands.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Bialystok, Faculty of Law, Polandpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0.)pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectNetherlands sanctions enforcement modelpl
dc.subjectDutch Sanctions Act Reformpl
dc.subjectduty of care in Dutch sanctions jurisprudencepl
dc.subjectsanctions enforcement in Dutch jurisprudencepl
dc.titleThe Dutch Perspective on the Enforcement of the EU Sanctions Against Russia: Legal Challenges, Case Law, and Institutional Practicepl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2025 Author. Submitted for open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0.) licensepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/eejtr.2025.09.03.05-
dc.description.EmailKatarzyna.mcnaughton@mail.mcgill.capl
dc.description.AffiliationMcGill University, Department of Political Science, Montreal, Canadapl
dc.description.referencesAmsterdam Alternative. (2024, March 19). Vossiusstraat 16 under threat – Removal of Russian oligarch Arkady Volozh from the sanctions list. https://amsterdamalternative.nl/articles/15662/vossiusstraat-16-under-threat-removal-of-russian-oligarch-arkady-volozh-from-the-sanctions-list.pl
dc.description.referencesAmar, Y. (2024). The new Dutch act on international sanctions measures: A first analysis. Den Hollander. https://denhollander.info/artikel/18425pl
dc.description.referencesAutoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM). (n.d.). About the AFM. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.afm.nl/en/over-de-afm.pl
dc.description.referencesBelastingdienst. (n.d.). CDIU cluster. https://www.belastingdienst.nl/wps/wcm/connect/bldcontenten/belastingdienst/customs/safety_health_economy_and_environment/cdiu_cluster/.pl
dc.description.referencesBureau Toetsing Investeringen. (n.d.). Sanctions overview. https://www.bureautoetsinginvesteringen.nl/het-stelsel-van-toetsen/sanctiespl
dc.description.referencesBureau Toetsing Investeringen. (n.d.). Wet veiligheidstoets investeringen, fusies en overnames. https://www.bureautoetsinginvesteringen.nl/het-stelsel-van-toetsen/wet-veiligheidstoets-investeringen-fusies-en-overnames.pl
dc.description.referencesBWC Implementation. (1950). Wet op de economische delicten [Economic Offences Act]. https://bwcimplementation.org/sites/default/files/resource/NL_Economic%20Offences%20Acr%201950_NL.pdf.pl
dc.description.referencesChapter 3, International Sanctions Measures Act. (n.d.). https://www.internetconsultatie.nl/sanctiemaatregelen/b1pl
dc.description.referencesDe Nederlandsche Bank. (n.d.). De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) – The central bank of the Netherlands. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.dnb.nl/en/.pl
dc.description.referencesDieseko Group. (2024, July). Public statement on Crimean Bridge. https://www.diesekogroup.com/press/.pl
dc.description.referencesDuane Morris LLP. (n.d.). European sanctions enforcement: Netherlands. https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/tag/netherlands/.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2021, May 27). Commission opinion on changes to the features of frozen funds. https://finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-05/210527-frozen-funds-features-opinion_en.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesFIOD. (2024, March 26). Aanhouding vanwege terrorismefinanciering met bitcoins. https://www.fiod.nl/aanhouding-vanwege-terrorismefinanciering-met-bitcoins/.pl
dc.description.referencesFIOD. (n.d.). About FIOD. https://www.fiod.nl/.pl
dc.description.referencesFiscale Inlichtingen- en Opsporingsdienst (FIOD). (n.d.). FIOD – Fiscale Inlichtingen- en Opsporingsdienst. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.fiod.nl/pl
dc.description.referencesGovernment of the Netherlands. (n.d.). Facts and figures on the sanctions against Russia and Belarus. https://www.government.nl/topics/russia-and-ukraine/sanctions-against-russia-and-belarus/facts-and-figures-on-the-sanctions-against-russia-and-belarus.pl
dc.description.referencesGovernment of the Netherlands. (n.d.). Search results for sanctions. https://www.government.nl/search?keyword=sanctions&search-submit=.pl
dc.description.referencesMinistry of Foreign Affairs, Netherlands. (n.d.). Facts and figures on the sanctions against Russia and Belarus. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.government.nl/topics/russia-and-ukraine/sanctions-against-russia-and-belarus/facts-and-figures-on-the-sanctions-against-russia-and-belarus.pl
dc.description.referencesNetherlands Public Prosecution Service. (2024). Investigation claim: The criminal investigation into Dieseko Group B.V. – Statement of facts and conclusions. National Office for Serious Fraud, Environmental Crime and Asset Confiscation (Functioneel Parket). https://www.prosecutionservice.nl/documents/publications/fp/hoge-transacties/feitenrelaas/statement-of-facts-and-conclusions-npps-diesekopl
dc.description.referencesNetherlands Public Prosecution Service. (2024, July 11). Dieseko Group B.V. accepts settlement agreement with the Netherlands Public Prosecution Service. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.prosecutionservice.nl/latest/news/2024/07/11/dieseko-group-b.v.-accepts-settlement-agreement-with-the-netherlands-public-prosecution-service.pl
dc.description.referencesOM. (n.d.). Public Prosecution Service. https://www.om.nl/.pl
dc.description.referencesOstiller, N., & The Kyiv Independent news desk. (2024, March 13). EU removes sanctions against Yandex co-founder Volozh. The Kyiv Independent. https://kyivindependent.com/eu-removes-sanctions-against-yandex-co-founder-volozh.pl
dc.description.referencesRechtspraak. (2022). Case No: C/13/717154 / KG ZA 22-388 (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2022:3141). https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2022:3141.pl
dc.description.referencesRechtspraak. (2023). Case No: 200.319.821/01 (ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2023:1058). https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2023:1058.pl
dc.description.referencesRechtspraak. (2023). Case No: C/10/665575 / KG ZA 23-835 (ECLI:NL:RBROT:2023:10109). https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBROT:2023:10109.pl
dc.description.referencesRechtspraak. (2024). Case No: 3-151106-23 (ECLI:NL:RBROT:2024:9673)pl
dc.description.referencesRechtspraak. (2024). Case No: 81.298767.21 (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2024:8568). https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2024:8568.pl
dc.description.referencesRechtspraak. (2024). Case No: ECLI:NL:PHR:2024:628. https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:PHR:2024:628.pl
dc.description.referencesWED. (1950). Wet op de economische delicten [Economic Offences Act]. BWC Implementation. https://bwcimplementation.org/sites/default/files/resource/NL_Economic%20Offences%20Acr%201950_NL.pdf.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2544-9737-
dc.description.volume9pl
dc.description.number3pl
dc.description.firstpage45pl
dc.description.lastpage66pl
dc.identifier.citation2Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relationspl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7429-4297-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 2025, Vol. 9, No. 3

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons