Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19511Pełny rekord metadanych
| Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Stawarska-Rippel, Anna | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-29T09:46:22Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-29T09:46:22Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica, T. 24, Z. 2, 2025, s. 600-615 | pl |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1732-9132 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19511 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Although the Soviet Union has collapsed and Soviet law no longer functions as a living legal system, its significance as an object of legal scholarship remains an open and pressing question. The legacy of Soviet law is not merely of historical interest; it also provides an important lens for understanding the ways in which law can be instrumentalised for political ends and how legal systems may be shaped or distorted by authoritarian power. This article argues that the continued study of Soviet law offers valuable insights into contemporary challenges to the rule of law, particularly in post-socialist contexts where legal institutions often retain traces of their Soviet heritage. In pursuing this argument, the article pays particular attention to the often-overlooked contributions of Polish legal scholars. Already in the interwar period, Polish academics provided some of the earliest and most incisive analyses of Soviet legal theory and practice. Later, the postwar Polish émigré community produced a significant body of scholarship that critically examined Soviet law from a comparative and international perspective. Their work not only enriched the broader understanding of the Soviet legal system but also highlighted its global implications for legal theory and practice. Finally, the article underscores the importance of internationalising this intellectual legacy. By bringing Polish scholarship into closer dialogue with global Soviet legal studies, we can better appreciate the complexity of Soviet law and its enduring relevance, while simultaneously broadening the scope of comparative legal history. | pl |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku | pl |
| dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY-SA 4.0) | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.pl | - |
| dc.subject | Soviet law | pl |
| dc.subject | Polish jurisprudence | pl |
| dc.subject | legal history | pl |
| dc.subject | comparative law | pl |
| dc.subject | rule of law | pl |
| dc.subject | legal instrumentalism | pl |
| dc.subject | Mariusz Mohyluk | pl |
| dc.subject | interwar Polish legal thought | pl |
| dc.subject | Soviet legal studies | pl |
| dc.title | Is Soviet Law Still Relevant to Legal Academic Research? Polish Contributions to Soviet Legal Studies: Revisiting a Forgotten Jurisprudence | pl |
| dc.type | Article | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | Uznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY-SA 4.0) | pl |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15290/mhi.2025.24.02.22 | - |
| dc.description.Email | anna.stawarska-rippel@us.edu.pl | pl |
| dc.description.Affiliation | Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach | pl |
| dc.description.references | Bereza Arkadiusz, Sąd Najwyższy 1917–2017. Prezesi, sędziowie, prokuratorzy Sądu Najwyższego [The Supreme Court 1917–1017. Presidents, Judges, Prosecutors of the Supreme Court], Warszawa 2017. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Berman Harold Joseph, Justice in the U.S.S.R., 5th edition, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1978. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Butler William, Elliot, Soviet Law, London 1983. | pl |
| dc.description.references | David René, Brierley John E.C., Major Legal System in the World Today, First American Edition, New York 1978. | pl |
| dc.description.references | De Cruz Peter, Comparative Law in a Changing World, London–Sydney 1999. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Fiedorczyk Piotr, Lityński Adam, Stawarska‑Rippel Anna, Wojny XX wieku i ich skutki dla ustrojów państwowych i prawa [20th Century Wars and their Consequences for Different Forms of Government and for Law], “Czasopismo Prawno‑Historyczne” 2019, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 57–100. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Fiedorczyk Piotr, Polscy prawnicy na emigracji o sowietyzacji prawa polskiego [Polish Lawyers in Exile on the Sovietisation of Polish Law], “Studia nad Faszyzmem i Zbrodniami Hitlerowskimi” 2011, vol. 33, pp. 481–492. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Grzybowski Kazimierz, Soviet Legal Institutions. Doctrine and Social Functions, Ann Arbor 1962. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Kornat Marek, Sowietologia polska na uchodźstwie (1945–1989). Główne idee [Polish Sovietology in Exile (1945–1989). Main Ideas], [in:] Polskie wizje i oceny komunizmu po 1939 roku [Polish Visions and Assessments of Communism after 1939], eds. Rafał Łatka, Bogdan Szlachta, Kraków 2015. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Lityński Adam, Między „białym” a „czerwonym” imperium. Rzecz o narodach w Rosji 1917–1922 [Between the “White” and the “Red” Empire. About Nations in Russia 1917–1922], Sosnowiec 2018. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Lityński Adam, Od Dzierżyńskiego do Berii. Studia o sowieckim prawie terroru (1917–1953) [From Dzerzhinsky to Beria. Studies on the Soviet Law of Terror (1917–1953)], Sosnowiec 2025. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Lityński Adam, Prawo Rosji i ZSRR 1917–1991 czyli historia wszechzwiązkowego komunistycznego prawa (bolszewików). Krótki kurs [The Law of Russia and the USSR 1917–1991, or the History of the All‑Union Communist (Bolshevik) Law. The Short Course], 3rd ed., Warszawa 2017. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Lityński Adam, Rosja i ZSRR. Krótka historia imperium bezprawia [Russia and the USSR. A Short History of the Empire of Illegality], Sosnowiec 2023. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Lukina Anna, Mishina Ekaterina, Teaching Soviet Law in the 21st Century, “The Soviet and Post‑Soviet Review” 2024, vol. 51, pp. 321–358. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Maleshin Dmitry, The Russian Style of Civil Procedure, [in:] The Reception and Transmission of Civil Procedural Law in Global Society, eds. Masahisa Deguchi, Marcel Storme, Antwerpen–Apeldoorn 2008. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Mohyluk Mariusz, Sowieckie prawo sądowe w piśmiennictwie prawniczym II Rzeczypospolitej [Soviet Judicial Law in the Legal Literature of the Second Republic of Poland], Białystok 2023. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Polskie interpretacje totalitaryzmu i autorytaryzmu [Polish Interpretations of the Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regime], eds. Marek Maciejewski, Maciej Marszał, “Studia nad Faszyzmem i Zbrodniami Hitlerowskimi” 2011, vol. 33. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Rudzinski Aleksander Witold, Soviet‑Type Audit Proceedings and Their Western Counterparts, [in:] Leon Boim, Glenn G. Morgan, Aleksander Witold Rudzinski, Legal Controls in the Soviet Union. Law in Eastern Europe. A Series of Publications Issued by the Documentation Office for East European Law University of Leyden, No. 13, ed. Zsolt Szirmai, Netherlands 1966, pp. 287–360. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Sawczuk Mieczysław, Teoria ogólna procesu [General Theory of the Court Procedure], [in:] Polska lat dziewięćdziesiątych. Przemiany państwa i prawa [Poland in the 1990s. Transformations of the State and Law], Lublin 1998. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Stawarska‑Rippel Anna, Elementy prywatne i publiczne w procesie cywilnym w świetle prac kodyfikacyjnych w Polsce (1918–1964): studium historycznoprawne [Private and Public Aspects in Civil Procedure in the Light of Codification Works in Poland (1918–1964). A Legal‑historical Study], Katowice 2015. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Stawarska‑Rippel Anna, Państwowy arbitraż w ZSRR [The State’s Economic Arbitration in the USSR], “Miscellanea Historico‑Iuridica” 2009, vol. 8, pp. 143–159. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Stawarska‑Rippel Anna, Radziecka procedura cywilna: totalitarna czy nowoczesna? [Soviet Civil Procedure: Totalitarian or Modern?], “Studia nad Faszyzmem i Zbrodniami Hitlerowskimi” 2011, vol. 33, pp. 467–479. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Szenwic Feliks, Kodeks procesowy cywilny R.S.F.S.R. [Civil Procedure Code of the RSFSR], “Palestra” 1925, vol. 1–3, pp. 564–574, 613–620, 678–684. | pl |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2719-9991 | - |
| dc.description.volume | 24 | pl |
| dc.description.issue | 2 | pl |
| dc.description.firstpage | 600 | pl |
| dc.description.lastpage | 615 | pl |
| dc.identifier.citation2 | Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica | pl |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-3252-9171 | - |
| Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica, 2025, tom XXIV, Z. 2 | |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
| Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHI_24_2_A_Stawarska_Rippel_Is_Soviet_Still_Relevant.pdf | 142,98 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL
