REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/18757
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorGallitelli, Eleonora-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-12T06:51:30Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-12T06:51:30Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationCrossroads. A Journal of English Studies 49 (2/2025), pp. 101-118pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/18757-
dc.description.abstractThis paper focuses on the use of person deixis in the framing of a new edition of Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County almanac: And sketches here and there (1949). This celebrated non-fiction work, considered one of the most important books on ecology and environmentalism ever written, has been published in many editions in 15 languages, with more than two million copies printed. The recent 2020 OUP edition is particularly interesting from a pragmatic point of view, for the way it is targeted to a new generation of readers thanks to an introduction by the author Barbara Kingsolver. Here, deixis is effectively employed to overcome what Kingsolver calls the “full-metal culture war” between conservationists and conservatives. Her ecumenical use of several varieties of the “inclusive we” (Yule, 1996, p. 11) may be considered part of a strategic manoeuvring aimed to create “communion” (van Eemeren & Houtlosser, 1999, p. 485) between the two opposing parties, while at the same time averting a risk of cancellation that Kingsolver perceives in “the heat of modern culture wars”.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherThe University of Białystok, The Faculty of Philologypl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International License
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectperson deixispl
dc.subjectAldo Leopoldpl
dc.subjectecological discoursepl
dc.subjectstrategic manoeuvringpl
dc.subjectcancel culturepl
dc.titleAldo Leopold and us: Person deixis as a rhetorical strategy in Barbara Kingsolver’s introduction to A Sand County almanacpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/CR.2025.49.2.06-
dc.description.Emaileleonora.gallitelli@uniud.itpl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteEleonora Gallitelli is associate professor of English Language, Linguistics and Translation at the University of Udine (Dpt. of Humanities and Cultural Heritage), where she teaches English for Tourism. She holds a PhD in Translation Studies from IULM University, Milan. She is currently involved in the Erasmus + project ELITE-AI (Empowering Specialized Language Acquisition with Integrated AI) and in the University of Udine Research Unit of the Interuniversity Research Centre Dis-4Change. Her main research interests are translation and reception studies, ESP teaching, discourse analysis and ecolinguistics. Her monograph T.S. Eliot’s Four Quartets in Italy. Translations, appropriations, canonization (1944-2013) will be published in 2026 by De Gruyter Brill.pl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Udine, Italypl
dc.description.referencesAlexander, R. (2009). Framing discourse on the environment: A critical discourse approach. Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesAllardice, L. (2023, June 16). Barbara Kingsolver: ‘Rural people are so angry they want to blow up the system’, The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/jun/16/barbara-kingsolver-rural-people-are-so-angry-they-want-to-blow-up-the-systempl
dc.description.referencesAustin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBaird Callicott, J. (Ed.) (1987). Companion to A Sand County almanac: Interpretive & critical essays. The University of Wisconsin Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBaird Callicott, J. (1989). In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. SUNY Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. University of Texas Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBiber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.pl
dc.description.referencesBrennan, A., & Lo, N. Y. S. 2024. Environmental ethics. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2024 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/ethics-environmental/pl
dc.description.referencesBrower, Kenneth. (2001). Introduction. In A. Leopold, A Sand County almanac. With essays on conservation. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBrown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesCarson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Fawcett Crest.pl
dc.description.referencesCharles, G. (2020). “A Sand County almanac and sketches here and there” by Aldo Leopold. Introduction by Barbara Kingsolver, 2020. [book review] The Canadian Field-Naturalist, 134(2): 117–204.pl
dc.description.referencesDavies, M. (2013). Oppositions and ideology in news discourse. Bloomsbury.pl
dc.description.referencesDe Cock, B. (2011). Why we can be you: The use of 1st person plural forms with hearer reference in English and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11), 2762– 2775.pl
dc.description.referencesDesRoches, C. T. (2015). The world as a garden: A philosophical analysis of natural capital in economics. University of British Columbia Press.pl
dc.description.referencesEhrlich, P. R. (1968). The population bomb. Ballantine Books.pl
dc.description.referencesFabiani, L. (2016, December 1). When wilderness was strictly whites-only. Pacific Standard. https://psmag.com/news/when-wilderness-was-strictly-whites-only/pl
dc.description.referencesFairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesFinch, R. (1987). The delights and dilemmas of A Sand County almanac. In A. Leopold, A Sand County almanac and sketches here and there. Special Commemorative Edition. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesGenette, G. (1987). Seuils. Éditions du Seuil.pl
dc.description.referencesHall, E. T. et al. (1968). Proxemics comments and replies. Current Anthropology, 9, 83–108.pl
dc.description.referencesHaverkate, H. (1984). Speech acts, speakers and hearers. John Benjamins.pl
dc.description.referencesIglesias Recuero, S. (2001). Los estudios de la cortesía en el mundo hispánico: estado de la cuestión. Oralia, 4, 245–298.pl
dc.description.referencesÍñigo-Mora, I. (2004). On the use of the personal pronoun we in communities. Journal of Language and Politics, 3(1), 27–52.pl
dc.description.referencesKashwan, P. (2020, September 2). American environmentalism’s racist roots have shaped global thinking about conservation. The Conversation https://theconversation.com/american-en-vironmentalisms-racist-roots-have-shaped-global-thinking-about-conservation-143783pl
dc.description.referencesKingsolver, B. (2020). Introduction. In: A. Leopold, A Sand County almanac and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKlein, J. (1991). Zur Rhetorik politischer Fernsehdiskussionen. In Ueding, G. (Ed.), Rhetorik zwischen den Wissenschaften. Geschichte, System, Praxis als Probleme des “Historischen Wörterbuchs der Rhetorik” (pp. 353–362). Max Niemeyer Verlag.pl
dc.description.referencesKock, C. E. J., & Lantz, M. (Eds.) (2023). Rhetorical argumentation: The Copenhagen school. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, University of Windsor.pl
dc.description.referencesKövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKryk, B. (1987). The problem of deixis in argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Argumentation: Perspectives and approaches. Foris Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesLakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.pl
dc.description.referencesLakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81.pl
dc.description.referencesLeopold, A. (1949/2020). A Sand County almanac: And sketches here and there. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesLevinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesLópez Álvarez, E. (2005). Performative speech act verbs in present day English, Interlingüística, 16(2), 685–702.pl
dc.description.referencesLovelock, J. (1979). Gaia: A new look at life on earth. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesLutz Newton, J. (2006). Aldo Leopold’s odyssey: Rediscovering the author of a Sand County almanac. Island Press.pl
dc.description.referencesLyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMeadows, D. (1999). Book Review: A Sand County almanac by Aldo Leopold. Yes! Magazine, Fall.pl
dc.description.referencesMeine, C. D. (2021, January 6). Don’t cancel this conservationist just yet. The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/dont-cancel-conservationist-just-yet-175861pl
dc.description.referencesMillstein, R. L. (2018). Debunking myths about Aldo Leopold’s land ethic. Biological conservation, 217, 391–396.pl
dc.description.referencesMillstein, R. L. (2024). The land is our community: Aldo Leopold’s environmental ethic for the new millennium. (1st ed). University of Chicago Press.pl
dc.description.referencesQuirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.pl
dc.description.referencesRenkema, J. (2004). Introduction to discourse studies. John Benjamins.pl
dc.description.referencesSantulli, F., & Degano, C. (2022). Agreement in argumentation. A discursive perspective. Springer.pl
dc.description.referencesStibbe, A. (2018). Critical discourse analysis and ecology. In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 497–509). Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesStibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics. Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesThomas, C. (2018). Sustainability and the American naturalist tradition: Revisiting Henry David Thoreau, Aldo Leopold, Rachel Carson, and Edward O. Wilson. Bielefeld (Germany): transcript publishing.pl
dc.description.referencesvan Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. SAGE Publications Ltd.pl
dc.description.referencesvan Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesvan Eemeren, F. H. & Houtlosser, P. (1999). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies, 1(4), 479–497.pl
dc.description.referencesvan Eemeren, F. H. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. John Benjamins.pl
dc.description.referencesVirdis, D. F. (2022). Ecological stylistics. Ecostylistic approaches to discourses of nature, the environment and sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan.pl
dc.description.referencesWagemans, J. H. M. (2011). Argument schemes, topoi, and laws of logic. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Rozenberg/Sic Sat.pl
dc.description.referencesWalter, P. (2011). Catalysts for transformative learning in the making of scientist-environmen-talists: A Consideration of the lives of Aldo Leopold, Rachel Carson, and David Suzuki. In Adult Education Research Conference. Conference proceedings. https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2011/papers/106pl
dc.description.referencesWeigand, E. (2008). The argumentative power of words or how to move people’s minds with words. In: G. Gobber, S. Cantarini, S. Cigada, M.C. Gatti & S. Gilardoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADA Workshop Word Meaning in Argumentative Dialogue. Homage to Sorin Stati. Volume I. “L’analisi linguistica e letteraria”, XVI Special Issue 1, 73–92.pl
dc.description.referencesWilson, N. (2019). When we means you. The social meaning of English pseudo-inclusive personal pronouns. In P. Bouissac (Ed.), The social dynamics of pronominal systems: A comparative approach. John Benjamins.pl
dc.description.referencesYule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesZupnik, Y. (1994). A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 339–383.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2300-6250-
dc.description.issue49 (2/2025)pl
dc.description.firstpage101pl
dc.description.lastpage118pl
dc.identifier.citation2Crossroads. A Journal of English Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0007-2930-8075-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2025, Issue 49

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Crossroads_49_2025_E_Gallitelli_Aldo_Leopold_and_us.pdf215,67 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons