REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/18754
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorFloquet, Florence-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-11T08:33:39Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-11T08:33:39Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationCrossroads. A Journal of English Studies 49 (2/2025), pp. 64-88pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/18754-
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses the way the waste problem is depicted in Robin “Rob” Greenfield’s TEDx Talk “I wore all my trash for 30 days.” It first explains the chosen framework – critical stylistics and conceptual metaphor theory – to conduct the analysis. Secondly, it studies the staging of the talk and of the problem, as well as the nouns and verbs used to refer to, respectively, the problem and its origin. Then, it explores the metaphors used by the speaker to denounce consumerism as linked to the exponential production of trash. Finally, it analyses how solutions are mentioned, and how the individual is depicted as having a role to play in tackling and solving the problem. This study demonstrates that, for the speaker, the individual is accountable and must take responsibility for the problem humanity and the planet are facing: by acknowledging the waste problem and showing people the power in their hands, and encouraging them to act rather than wait for other actors to make a move, the discourse appears as a beneficial one having a potentially very positive impact on our vision of the trash problem and on its tackling.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherThe University of Białystok, The Faculty of Philologypl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International License
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectcritical stylisticspl
dc.subjectecostylisticspl
dc.subjectecolinguisticspl
dc.subjectconsumerismpl
dc.subjectwaste studiespl
dc.subjectmetaphorspl
dc.subjectTEDx Talkpl
dc.titleDepicting and tackling the waste problem: An (eco)stylistic study of Rob Greenfield’s “I wore all my trash for 30 days” TEDx Talkpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/CR.2025.49.2.04-
dc.description.Emailflorence.floquet@univ-montp3.frpl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteFlorence Floquet is a Senior lecturer at the Université de Montpellier Paul Valéry, France, where she teaches linguistics, phonology, and literary stylistics. She worked on the grammar of interior monologue in literary texts for her doctoral thesis, but is also interested in the link between linguistics, stylistics, and environmental issues. She is the treasurer of the SSADA (The French Society of English Stylistics and Discourse Analysis).pl
dc.description.AffiliationUniv Montpellier Paul Valéry, EMMA EA741, F34000, Montpellier, Francepl
dc.description.referencesAlbrecht, G. (2005). Solastalgia: A new concept in human health and identity. PAN Partners, 3, 44–59. https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/journal_contribution/_Solastalgia_a_new_concept_in_health_and_identity/4311905?file=7031096pl
dc.description.referencesAlbrecht, G. (2011). Chronic environmental change: Emerging ‘psychoterratic’ syndromes. In I. Weissbecker (Ed.), Climate change and human well-being: global challenges and opportunities (pp. 43–56). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4419-9742-5_3pl
dc.description.referencesCharteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.pl
dc.description.referencesClayton, S., Manning, C. M., Speiser, M., & Hill, A. N. (2021). Mental health and our changing climate: Impacts, inequities, responses. American Psychological Association, and ecoAmerica. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/mental-health-climate-change.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesEisenstein, C. (2021). Sacred economics: Money, gift & society in the age of transition. North Atlantic Books.pl
dc.description.referencesDamele, G. (2016). Adventures of a metaphor. Apian imagery in the history of political thought. In E. Gola & F. Ervas (Eds.), Metaphor and communication (pp.173–188). John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl
dc.description.referencesFairclough, N. (1992). Critical discourse awareness. Longman.pl
dc.description.referencesFairclough, N. (2014). Language and power (3rd ed.). Longman.pl
dc.description.referencesFill, A. & Mühlhäusler, P. (2001). The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology, and environment. Continuum.pl
dc.description.referencesFowler, R., Hodge, B, Kress, G., & Trew, T. (Eds.). (1979). Language and control. Routledge and Kegan Paul.pl
dc.description.referencesGabriel, Y., & Lang T. (2006). The unmanageable consumer (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesGibbs, R. (2013). Why do some people dislike conceptual metaphor theory?. Cognitive Semiotics, 5, 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.14pl
dc.description.referencesGibbs, R. W., & Perlman, M. (2006). The contested impact of cognitive linguistic research on the psycholinguistics of metaphor understanding. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 211–228). Mouton de Gruyter.pl
dc.description.referencesGreenfield, R. (2017, June 22). Be the change in the messed up world. TEDxIHEParis. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhKevstJyrcpl
dc.description.referencesGreenfield, R. (2022, August 6). I wore all my trash for 30 days. TEDxUCLA. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xay1YKpu6Nkpl
dc.description.referencesGoatly, A. (2000). Critical reading and writing: An introductory coursebook. Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesGoatly, A. (2007). Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. John Benjamins.pl
dc.description.referencesJeffries, L. (2010). Critical stylistics: The power of English. Palgrave Macmillan.pl
dc.description.referencesJeffries, L. (2014). Critical stylistics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 408–420). Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesJohnson, B. (2016, July 6) Two adults, two kids, zero waste. TEDxFoggy Bottom. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSUmo-40pqApl
dc.description.referencesKennedy, G. (2007). An ontology of trash: The disposable and its problematic nature. State University of New York Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor. A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKnowles, M., & Moon, R. (2006). Introducing metaphor (2nd ed.). Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesLakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.pl
dc.description.referencesLynch, K. (1990). Wasting away. Edited by Michael Southworth. Sierra Club Books.pl
dc.description.referencesMerriam-Webster. (n.d.). Trash. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved November 7, 2024, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/trashpl
dc.description.referencesMyerson, G., & Rydin, Y. (1996). The language of environment: A new rhetoric. Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesNaess, A. (1995). The shallow and the long range, deep ecology movement. In A. Dregson & Y. Inoue (Eds.), The deep ecology movement: An introductory anthology (pp. 3–10). North Atlantic Books.pl
dc.description.referencesOxford English Dictionary. (n.d.). Create. In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved November 7, 2024, from https://www.oed.com/dictionary/create_v?tab=meaning_and_usepl
dc.description.referencesPeyretou, P. (2020, November 20). Climat: 10 minutes pour cadrer un débat “Maintenant on fait quoi ?” [Post]. Medium. https://pierre-peyretou.medium.com/climat-10-minutes-pour-cadrer-un-d%C3%A9bat-maintenant-on-fait-quoi-361beb5b8251pl
dc.description.referencesPaprotte, W., & Dirven, R. (Eds.). (1985). The ubiquity of metaphor: Metaphor in language and thought. John Benjamins.pl
dc.description.referencesPawelec, A. (2009). CMT and the “work” of metaphor. Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.153.pl
dc.description.referencesResche, C. (2022). La théorie de la métaphore conceptuelle peut-elle rendre compte des métaphores constitutives de théories dans les domaines spécialisés?, ASp, 82, 63–80. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.8057.pl
dc.description.referencesResche, C. (2023). Reflections on metaphors and models in connection with theory building in economics. In M. Prandi & M. Rossi (Eds.), Researching metaphors: Towards a comprehensive account (pp. 148–160). Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesRitchie, L. D. (2013). Metaphor. Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesSimpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology, and point of view. Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesSinger, L. (2015, May 27). Why I live a zero waste life. TEDxTeen. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF72px2R3Hgpl
dc.description.referencesStibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesTED. (n.d.a). TED Talks. https://www.ted.com/about/programs-initiatives/ted-talkspl
dc.description.referencesTED. (n.d.b). TEDx Rules. https://www.ted.com/participate/organize-a-local-tedx-event/before-you-start/tedx-rulespl
dc.description.referencesTEDx. (n.d.). About. [YouTube channel]. YouTube. Retrieved November 7, 2024, from https://www.youtube.com/@TEDxpl
dc.description.referencesVan Dijk, T. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis, Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006.pl
dc.description.referencesVirdis, D. F. (2022). Ecological stylistics: Ecostylistic approaches to discourses of nature, the environment and sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan.pl
dc.description.referencesWodak, R. & Meyer, M (Eds.). (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2300-6250-
dc.description.issue49 (2/2025)pl
dc.description.firstpage64pl
dc.description.lastpage88pl
dc.identifier.citation2Crossroads. A Journal of English Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9502-5881-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2025, Issue 49

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Crossroads_49_2025_F_Floquet_Depicting_and_tackling_the_waste_problem.pdf533,82 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons