REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/18753
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorDwivedi, Prabha Shankar-
dc.contributor.authorPandeya, Shashwat-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-11T08:10:45Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-11T08:10:45Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationCrossroads. A Journal of English Studies 49 (2/2025), pp. 47-63pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/18753-
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores the Śiva Mahāpurāṇa through an ecoaesthetical lens, revealing its relevance in countering the anthropocentric worldview that emerged from European Enlightenment ideals. While modernity often established a hierarchical divide between humans and nature, Hindu philosophy, as seen in the Śiva Mahāpurāṇa, emphasizes the interconnectedness of all beings and the inherent divinity within both human and non-human entities. The text advocates for an ethical, non-exploitative relationship with the environment, highlighting reverence, responsibility, and harmonious coexistence. By integrating theological reflections with ecological consciousness, the Śiva Mahāpurāṇa presents a compelling framework for fostering eco-centric ethics. This study underscores the text’s potential to inspire a deeper spiritual connection to nature, providing valuable insights for addressing contemporary ecological challenges. Ultimately, the Śiva Mahāpurāṇa transcends its theological origins to serve as a profound ecoaesthetical guide, urging us to rethink our relationship with the natural world and to embrace a more sustainable, compassionate approach to ecological stewardship.pl
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to acknowledge the research grant received from the JPN Centre of Excellence in the Humanities, IIT Indore (IITI/JPNC/PRJ/2023/07/P002) to carry out this study.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherThe University of Białystok, The Faculty of Philologypl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International License
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectEco-aestheticspl
dc.subjectTheo-ethicspl
dc.subjectŚiva Mahāpurāṇapl
dc.subjectDeep Ecologypl
dc.subjectAnthropocentrismpl
dc.subjectSacralization of Naturepl
dc.subjectBrahmanpl
dc.subjectEcological ethicspl
dc.titleTheology or discourse on ecology? Reading Śiva Mahāpurāṇa as an ecoaesthetical textpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/CR.2025.49.2.03-
dc.description.EmailPrabha Shankar Dwivedi: prabhas.dwivedi@bhu.ac.inpl
dc.description.BiographicalnotePrabha Shankar Dwivedi is a Professor at the Department of English, Faculty of Arts, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. He has also worked at the Dept. of Humanities and Social Sciences, IIT Tirupati and the Dept. of English, Sagar Central University, M. P. His research interests largely lie in the intersections of Indian classics and ecosophy, Indian poetics, and comparative literary studies.pl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteShashwat Pandeya is a PhD scholar of the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. He has also worked as a Research Assistant at the same Institute.pl
dc.description.AffiliationPrabha Shankar Dwivedi - Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Indiapl
dc.description.AffiliationShashwat Pandeya - Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, Indiapl
dc.description.referencesBacon, F. (1969). The advancement of learning and New Atlantis. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesCalarco, M. (2015). Thinking through animals: Identity, difference, indistinction. Stanford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesDevall, B., & Sessions, G. (1985). Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered. Peregrine Smith Books.pl
dc.description.referencesDrengson, A., Devall, B., & Schroll, M. (2011). The deep ecology movement: Origins, development, and future prospects (toward a transpersonal ecosophy). International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 30(1–2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2011.30.1-2.101pl
dc.description.referencesFox, W. (1984). Deep ecology: A new philosophy of our time? The Ecologist, 14(5/6), 194–200.pl
dc.description.referencesGiner, S., & Tábara, D. (1999). Cosmic piety and ecological rationality. International Sociology, 14(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580999014001004pl
dc.description.referencesHorkheimer, M., Adorno, T. W., & Noeri, G. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment. Stanford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesJenkins, W. J., Tucker, M. E., & Grim, J. (2016). Routledge handbook of religion and ecology. Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesJervis, J. L., & Merchant, C. (1982). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. Technology and Culture, 23(4), 653. https://doi.org/10.2307/3104822pl
dc.description.referencesNaess, A. (1986). The deep ecology movement: Some philosophical aspects. Philosophical Inquiry, 8(1-2), pp. 10–31.pl
dc.description.referencesNæss, A. (1988). Identification as a source of deep ecological attitudes. In M. Tobias (Ed.), Deep ecology (2nd ed., pp. 256–270). Avant Books.pl
dc.description.referencesNaess, A. (1990). Ecology, community and lifestyle: Outline of an ecosophy. Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesNæss, A. (2008). Self-realization: An ecological approach to being in the world. In A. Drengson & B. Devall (Eds.), The ecology of wisdom: Writings by Arne Naess (pp. 81–96). Counterpoint. Also in A. Drengson & Y. Inoue (Eds.), The deep ecology movement: An introductory anthology (pp. 13–30). North Atlantic Books; and in G. Sessions (Ed.), Deep ecology for the twenty-first century: Readings on the philosophy and practice of the new environmentalism (pp. 225–239). Shambhala Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesNagar, S. L. (2007). Śiva-mahāpurāṇa: Māhātmyam, Vidyeśvara saṁhitā, Rudra saṁhitā (Sr̥ ṣṭi khaṇḍa, Satī khaṇḍa and Pārvatī khaṇḍa). Parimal Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesRigby, K. (2014). Romanticism and ecocriticism. In Greg Garrard (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of ecocriticism (pp. 60–79). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199742929.013.003pl
dc.description.referencesSessions, G. (1995). Deep ecology for the twenty-first century: Readings on the philosophy and practice of the new environmentalism. Shambhala Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesSwahananda, S. (2022). Chandogya UPANISAD. Sri Ramakrishna Math.pl
dc.description.referencesWhite, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203pl
dc.identifier.eissn2300-6250-
dc.description.issue49 (2/2025)pl
dc.description.firstpage47pl
dc.description.lastpage63pl
dc.identifier.citation2Crossroads. A Journal of English Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1620-2830-
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0001-1571-9574-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2025, Issue 49

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
PS_Dwivedi_S_Pandeya_Theology_or_discourse_on_ecology.pdf217,34 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons