REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/18295
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorGabidullina, Alla-
dc.contributor.authorSokolova, Anastasiia-
dc.contributor.authorKolesnichenko, Olena-
dc.contributor.authorZharykova, Maryna-
dc.contributor.authorShlapakov, Oleh-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-17T08:37:18Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-17T08:37:18Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationCrossroads. A Journal of English Studies 48 (1/2025), pp. 112-126pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/18295-
dc.description.abstractMetonymy and polysemy in academic and popular science texts are useful linguistic phenomena that aid in interpreting complex specialised terms by capturing various meanings in scientific terminology. The relevance of the study is determined by the necessity to clarify the functions and contextual motivation behind the use of metonymy and polysemy in conveying scientific information. The research aims to analyse theories related to metonymy and polysemy, different types of these stylistic figures, and determine which ones are most productive for scientific style. The results of the study revealed that metonymic expressions can be used to condense narratives and convey precise terms and definitions. On the other hand, polysemy assists in selecting the most appropriate among multiple meanings of the same term. The findings of this paper can be beneficial to linguists, teachers, and researchers from various scientific fields who seek to enhance the accuracy and comprehensibility of their scientific work.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherThe University of Białystok, The Faculty of Philologypl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licensepl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/pl
dc.subjecttransmission of informationpl
dc.subjectfunctionpl
dc.subjectvariant meaningspl
dc.subjectassociationpl
dc.subjecttermpl
dc.titleThe role of metonymy and polysemy in academic and popular science literaturepl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/CR.2025.48.1.06-
dc.description.EmailOLEH SHLAPAKOV : oleh_shlapakov@ukr.netpl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteALLA GABIDULLINA is a Professor, Researcher at the Department of Linguistics and Russian Language, Horlivka Institute for Foreign Languages of the Donbas State Pedagogical University. Her research interest is the influence of metonymy and polysemy on reader comprehension in popular science texts.pl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteANASTASIIA SOKOLOVA is a Lecturer at the Department of English Philology and Translation, Horlivka Institute for Foreign Languages of the Donbas State Pedagogical University. Her scientific interests include stylistic constraints on metonymy usage in formal academic genres and the impact of polysemous terms on terminological precision.pl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteOLENA KOLESNICHENKO is an Associate Professor, Researcher at the Department of Linguistics and Russian Language, Horlivka Institute for Foreign Languages of the Donbas State Pedagogical University. Her research interests are the cognitive mechanisms underlying the use of polysemy in scientific discourse and the role of text structure in facilitating or obstructing metonymic interpretation.pl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteMARYNA ZHARYKOVA is an Associate Professor, Researcher at the Department of Linguistics and Russian Language, Horlivka Institute for Foreign Languages of the Donbas State Pedagogical University. Her scientific interests include stylistic figures, scientific terminology, and functions of metonymy and polysemy in conveying information.pl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteOLEH SHLAPAKOV is an Associate Professor, Researcher at the Department of Linguistics and Russian Language, Horlivka Institute for Foreign Languages of the Donbas State Pedagogical University. His research interest is polysemy as a cognitive-linguistic resource in the development of scientific terminology. Also, he is interested in the intersemiotic translation of metonymy and polysemy in scientific communication.pl
dc.description.AffiliationALLA GABIDULLINA - Horlivka Institute for Foreign Languages of the Donbas State Pedagogical University, Dnipro, Ukrainepl
dc.description.AffiliationANASTASIIA SOKOLOVA - Horlivka Institute for Foreign Languages of the Donbas State Pedagogical University, Dnipro, Ukrainepl
dc.description.AffiliationOLENA KOLESNICHENKO - Horlivka Institute for Foreign Languages of the Donbas State Pedagogical University, Dnipro, Ukrainepl
dc.description.AffiliationMARYNA ZHARYKOVA - Horlivka Institute for Foreign Languages of the Donbas State Pedagogical University, Dnipro, Ukrainepl
dc.description.AffiliationOLEH SHLAPAKOV - Horlivka Institute for Foreign Languages of the Donbas State Pedagogical University, Dnipro, Ukrainepl
dc.description.referencesBambini, V., Bott, L., & Schumacher, P.B. (2021). It is not always a matter of time: Addressing the costs of metaphor and metonymy through a speed-accuracy trade-off study. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(2), 189–196.pl
dc.description.referencesBrdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R. (2022). Living metaphors and metonymies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 1–6.pl
dc.description.referencesBritannica. (2024). Metonymy. Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/art/metonymypl
dc.description.referencesCarston, R. (2020). Polysemy: Pragmatics and sense conventions. Mind and Language, 36(1), 108–133.pl
dc.description.referencesDiessel, H. (2019). The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesGenette, G. (1970). La rhétorique restreinte. Communications, 16, 158–171.pl
dc.description.referencesGibbs Jr., R. W. (2022). Metaphorical experience: Contiguity or cross-domain mappings? Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 7–32.pl
dc.description.referencesGillmann, M. (2021). Analogy as driving force of language change: A usage-based approach to wo and da clauses in 17th and 18th century German. Cognitive Linguistics, 32(3), 421–453.pl
dc.description.referencesGiulianelli, M., Del Tredici, M., & Fernández, R. (2020). Analysing lexical semantic change with contextualised word representations. In D. Jurafsky, J. Chai, N. Schluter & J. Tetreault (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 3960–3973). Association for Computational Linguistics.pl
dc.description.referencesGlynn, D. (2014). Polysemy and synonymy: Corpus method and cognitive theory. In D. Glynn & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy (pp. 7–38). John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl
dc.description.referencesJankowiak, K., & Korpal, P. (2018). On modality effects in bilingual emotional language processing: Evidence from galvanic skin response. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(3), 663–677.pl
dc.description.referencesKiełtyka, R. (2019). Patterns of metaphor-metonymy interaction in animal-specific complex lexical units. Linguistica Silesiana, 40, 225–256.pl
dc.description.referencesKovács, E. (2012). Polysemy in traditional vs. cognitive linguistics. Eger Journal of English Studies, 11, 3–19.pl
dc.description.referencesLenci, A. (2018). Distributional models of word meaning. Annual Review of Linguistics, 4, 151–171.pl
dc.description.referencesLittlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesOrtega-Andrés, M., & Vicente, A. (2019). Polysemy and co-predication. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 1.pl
dc.description.referencesRakhilina, E., Ryzhova, D., & Badryzlova, Y. (2022). Lexical typology and semantic maps: Perspectives and challenges. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 41(1), 231–262.pl
dc.description.referencesRamsey, R. E. (2022). Individual differences in word senses. Cognitive Linguistics, 33(1), 65–93.pl
dc.description.referencesRoque, L. S., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., & Majid, A. (2018). Universal meaning extensions of perception verbs are grounded in interaction. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(3), 371–406.pl
dc.description.referencesStevanovic, M. (2021). Monitoring and evaluating body knowledge: Metaphors and metonymies of body position in children’s music instrument instruction. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(4), 20200093.pl
dc.description.referencesTaylor, J. R. (2018). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistics. Clarendon Press.pl
dc.description.referencesWen, X., & Taylor, J. R. (2021). The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics. Routledge.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2300-6250-
dc.description.issue48 (1/2025)pl
dc.description.firstpage112pl
dc.description.lastpage126pl
dc.identifier.citation2Crossroads. A Journal of English Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4271-4103-
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0002-2306-590X-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7426-8577-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8421-8178-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2514-509X-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2025, Issue 48

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons