REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/18293
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorWieczorek, Magdalena-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-17T06:39:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-17T06:39:02Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationCrossroads. A Journal of English Studies 48 (1/2025), pp. 66-88pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/18293-
dc.description.abstractThe paper analyses imperfect homophony as a source of wordplay, with a view to delineating the way two concepts or only one concept is valid for the discourse. Second, it investigates the source of the contextual information required for the identification of the target expression. The analysis is performed in the light of Sperber and Wilson’s Relevance Theory. It will be demonstrated that the target concept is accessed via activating a search for relevance triggered by the phonetic similarity between two concepts as well as the linguistic context. The findings of a study will demonstrate that puns stemming from imperfect homophony can be divided into those in which two concepts are facilitated and juxtaposed in linguistic context and thus their encyclopaedic entries are fully valid for the overall humorous interpretation and those in which only one novel concept is valid for the ongoing conversation. In addition, the puns under analysis can be categorised according to the criterion of the source of contextual information required for the identification of the target expression. In the paper, the key role of context will be discussed and specified, with the emphasis on the viewer’s perspective. The theoretical proposals are illustrated with imperfect homophony-based puns derived from the sitcom Modern Family.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherThe University of Białystok, The Faculty of Philologypl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licensepl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/pl
dc.subjectrelevance theorypl
dc.subjectimperfect homophonypl
dc.subjectsitcompl
dc.subjecthumourpl
dc.subjectad hoc conceptpl
dc.subjectlexical pragmaticspl
dc.subjectpunspl
dc.titleImperfect homophony as a source of wordplay in the sitcom Modern Family: A relevance-theoretic lexical pragmatic approachpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/CR.2025.48.1.04-
dc.description.Emailmagdalena.wieczorek@uws.edu.plpl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteMagdalena Wieczorek, PhD, is an Assistant Professor at the Institute of Linguistics and Literary Studies at the University of Siedlce, where she teaches courses in linguistics. She completed her doctoral thesis at the University of Warsaw, which was focused on the various functions that a speaker can perform with humour on the viewer’s part in the sitcom Modern Family. Her research interests include the pragmatics of humour, with the main focus on sitcom discourse.pl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Siedlce, Polandpl
dc.description.referencesAttardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Mouton de Gruyter.pl
dc.description.referencesBednarek, M. A. (2010). The language of fictional television: Drama and identity. Continuum.pl
dc.description.referencesCarston, R. (1997). Enrichment and loosening: Complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed? Linguistische Berichte, 8, 103–127.pl
dc.description.referencesCarston, R. (2000). Explicature and semantics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 12, 1–44.pl
dc.description.referencesCarston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Blackwell.pl
dc.description.referencesCarston, R. (2010). Lexical pragmatics, ad hoc concepts and metaphor: From a relevance theory perspective. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 153–180.pl
dc.description.referencesCarston, R. (2019). Ad hoc concepts, polysemy and the lexicon. In K. Scott, B. Clark, & R. Carston (Eds.), Relevance, pragmatics and interpretation (pp. 150–162). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290593.014pl
dc.description.referencesDancygier, B., & Vandelanotte, L. (2017). Internet memes as multimodal constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(3), 565–598.pl
dc.description.referencesDienhart, J. (1999). A linguistic look at riddles. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(1), 95–125.pl
dc.description.referencesDynel, M. (2010). How do puns bear relevance? In M. Kisielewska-Krysiuk, A. Piskorska, & E. Wałaszewska (Eds.), Relevance studies in Poland Vol. 3. Exploring translation and communication problems (pp. 105–124). Wydawnictwo UniwersytetuWarszawskiego.pl
dc.description.referencesHall, A. (2017). Lexical pragmatics, explicature and ad hoc concepts. In I. Depraetere, & R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: Drawing a line (pp. 85–114). Springer.pl
dc.description.referencesHempelmann, F. C.,& Miller, T. (2017). Puns: Taxonomy and phonology. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 95–108). Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesJodłowiec, M. (2015). The challenges of explicit and implicit communication: A relevance-theoretic approach. Peter Lang. 10.3726/978-3-653-05190-2pl
dc.description.referencesJodłowiec, M., & Piskorska, A. (2024). Dynamism of context: A case of joke interpretation. Intercultural Pragmatics, 21(3), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2024-3006pl
dc.description.referencesMarmaridou, A.S. (1989). Proper names in communication. Journal of Linguistics, 25(2), 355–372.pl
dc.description.referencesNorrick, N. R. (1993). Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Indiana University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesPadilla Cruz, M. (2022). Is free enrichment always free? Revisiting ad hoc-concept construction. Journal of Pragmatics, 187, 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.11.006pl
dc.description.referencesPartington, A. (2006). The linguistics of laughter: A corpus-assisted study of laughter talk. Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesPiskorska, A. (2021). Humorous means, serious messages: A relevance-theoretic perspective on telling jokes to communicate propositional meanings. In E. Ifantidou, L. de Saussure, & T. Wharton (Eds.), Beyond meaning (pp. 119–132). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.324.c7pl
dc.description.referencesRuiz-Gurillo, L. (2016). Metapragmatics of humor: Variability, negotiability and adaptability in humorous monologues. In L. Ruiz-Gurillo (Ed.), Metapragmatics of humor: Current research trends (pp. 79–101). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.14.05ruipl
dc.description.referencesSobkowiak, W. (1991). Metaphonology of English paronomasic puns. Peter Lang.pl
dc.description.referencesSolska, A. (2012a). Relevance-theoretic comprehension procedure and processing multiple meanings in paradigmatic puns. In E. Wałaszewska, & A. Piskorska (Eds.), Relevance theory: More than understanding (pp. 167–182). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.pl
dc.description.referencesSolska, A. (2012b). The relevance-based model of context in processing puns. Research in Language, 10(4), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-012-0001-0.pl
dc.description.referencesSolska, A. (2021). The functions of punning utterances in English and Chinese: a cross-cultural perspective. Beiträge zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft, 10, 175–199. https://doi.org/10.23817/bzspr.10-8pl
dc.description.referencesSolska, A. (2023). The interpretative non-prototypicality of puns as a factor in the emergence of humor and in phatic communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 20(2), 133–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-2002pl
dc.description.referencesSperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986 [1995]). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell.pl
dc.description.referencesSperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1997). The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 1–20.pl
dc.description.referencesvan Mulken, M., van Enschot-van Dijk, R., & Hoeken, H. (2005). Puns, relevance and appreciation in advertisements. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(5), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.09.008pl
dc.description.referencesVásquez, C. & Aslan, E. (2021). “Cats be outside, how about meow”: Multimodal humor and cre ativity in an internet meme. Journal of Pragmatics, 171, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.006pl
dc.description.referencesWałaszewska, E. (2015). Relevance-theoretic lexical pragmatics: Theory and applications. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.pl
dc.description.referencesWałaszewska, E. (2023). Non-literal uses of proper names in XYZ constructions. A relevance theory perspective. Pragmatics, 33(3), 368–392. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21070.walpl
dc.description.referencesWieczorek, M. (2021). Humour as a carrier of meaning of meaning in sitcom discourse: A relevance-theoretic perspective [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of Warsaw.pl
dc.description.referencesWilson, D. (2003). Relevance and lexical pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica,15(2), 273–291.pl
dc.description.referencesWilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance Theory. In L. R. Horn, & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.25pl
dc.description.referencesWilson, D., & Carston, R. (2007). A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 230–259). Palgrave-Macmillan.pl
dc.description.referencesWilson, D., & Kolaiti, P. (2017). Lexical pragmatics and implicit communications. In P. Cap,& M. Dynel (Eds.), Implicitness: From lexis to discourse (pp. 147–176). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276.07wilpl
dc.description.referencesYus, F. (2003). Humor and the search for relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1295–1331.pl
dc.description.referencesZwicky, A., & Zwicky, E. (1986). Imperfect puns, markedness and phonological similarity. With fronds like these, who needs anemones. Folia Linguistica, 20(3/4), 493–503.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2300-6250-
dc.description.issue48 (1/2025)pl
dc.description.firstpage66pl
dc.description.lastpage88pl
dc.identifier.citation2Crossroads. A Journal of English Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3701-2884-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2025, Issue 48

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons