Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/18293
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wieczorek, Magdalena | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-17T06:39:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-06-17T06:39:02Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies 48 (1/2025), pp. 66-88 | pl |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/18293 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The paper analyses imperfect homophony as a source of wordplay, with a view to delineating the way two concepts or only one concept is valid for the discourse. Second, it investigates the source of the contextual information required for the identification of the target expression. The analysis is performed in the light of Sperber and Wilson’s Relevance Theory. It will be demonstrated that the target concept is accessed via activating a search for relevance triggered by the phonetic similarity between two concepts as well as the linguistic context. The findings of a study will demonstrate that puns stemming from imperfect homophony can be divided into those in which two concepts are facilitated and juxtaposed in linguistic context and thus their encyclopaedic entries are fully valid for the overall humorous interpretation and those in which only one novel concept is valid for the ongoing conversation. In addition, the puns under analysis can be categorised according to the criterion of the source of contextual information required for the identification of the target expression. In the paper, the key role of context will be discussed and specified, with the emphasis on the viewer’s perspective. The theoretical proposals are illustrated with imperfect homophony-based puns derived from the sitcom Modern Family. | pl |
dc.language.iso | en | pl |
dc.publisher | The University of Białystok, The Faculty of Philology | pl |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International License | pl |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | pl |
dc.subject | relevance theory | pl |
dc.subject | imperfect homophony | pl |
dc.subject | sitcom | pl |
dc.subject | humour | pl |
dc.subject | ad hoc concept | pl |
dc.subject | lexical pragmatics | pl |
dc.subject | puns | pl |
dc.title | Imperfect homophony as a source of wordplay in the sitcom Modern Family: A relevance-theoretic lexical pragmatic approach | pl |
dc.type | Article | pl |
dc.rights.holder | Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) | pl |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15290/CR.2025.48.1.04 | - |
dc.description.Email | magdalena.wieczorek@uws.edu.pl | pl |
dc.description.Biographicalnote | Magdalena Wieczorek, PhD, is an Assistant Professor at the Institute of Linguistics and Literary Studies at the University of Siedlce, where she teaches courses in linguistics. She completed her doctoral thesis at the University of Warsaw, which was focused on the various functions that a speaker can perform with humour on the viewer’s part in the sitcom Modern Family. Her research interests include the pragmatics of humour, with the main focus on sitcom discourse. | pl |
dc.description.Affiliation | University of Siedlce, Poland | pl |
dc.description.references | Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Mouton de Gruyter. | pl |
dc.description.references | Bednarek, M. A. (2010). The language of fictional television: Drama and identity. Continuum. | pl |
dc.description.references | Carston, R. (1997). Enrichment and loosening: Complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed? Linguistische Berichte, 8, 103–127. | pl |
dc.description.references | Carston, R. (2000). Explicature and semantics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 12, 1–44. | pl |
dc.description.references | Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Blackwell. | pl |
dc.description.references | Carston, R. (2010). Lexical pragmatics, ad hoc concepts and metaphor: From a relevance theory perspective. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 153–180. | pl |
dc.description.references | Carston, R. (2019). Ad hoc concepts, polysemy and the lexicon. In K. Scott, B. Clark, & R. Carston (Eds.), Relevance, pragmatics and interpretation (pp. 150–162). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290593.014 | pl |
dc.description.references | Dancygier, B., & Vandelanotte, L. (2017). Internet memes as multimodal constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(3), 565–598. | pl |
dc.description.references | Dienhart, J. (1999). A linguistic look at riddles. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(1), 95–125. | pl |
dc.description.references | Dynel, M. (2010). How do puns bear relevance? In M. Kisielewska-Krysiuk, A. Piskorska, & E. Wałaszewska (Eds.), Relevance studies in Poland Vol. 3. Exploring translation and communication problems (pp. 105–124). Wydawnictwo UniwersytetuWarszawskiego. | pl |
dc.description.references | Hall, A. (2017). Lexical pragmatics, explicature and ad hoc concepts. In I. Depraetere, & R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: Drawing a line (pp. 85–114). Springer. | pl |
dc.description.references | Hempelmann, F. C.,& Miller, T. (2017). Puns: Taxonomy and phonology. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 95–108). Routledge. | pl |
dc.description.references | Jodłowiec, M. (2015). The challenges of explicit and implicit communication: A relevance-theoretic approach. Peter Lang. 10.3726/978-3-653-05190-2 | pl |
dc.description.references | Jodłowiec, M., & Piskorska, A. (2024). Dynamism of context: A case of joke interpretation. Intercultural Pragmatics, 21(3), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2024-3006 | pl |
dc.description.references | Marmaridou, A.S. (1989). Proper names in communication. Journal of Linguistics, 25(2), 355–372. | pl |
dc.description.references | Norrick, N. R. (1993). Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Indiana University Press. | pl |
dc.description.references | Padilla Cruz, M. (2022). Is free enrichment always free? Revisiting ad hoc-concept construction. Journal of Pragmatics, 187, 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.11.006 | pl |
dc.description.references | Partington, A. (2006). The linguistics of laughter: A corpus-assisted study of laughter talk. Routledge. | pl |
dc.description.references | Piskorska, A. (2021). Humorous means, serious messages: A relevance-theoretic perspective on telling jokes to communicate propositional meanings. In E. Ifantidou, L. de Saussure, & T. Wharton (Eds.), Beyond meaning (pp. 119–132). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.324.c7 | pl |
dc.description.references | Ruiz-Gurillo, L. (2016). Metapragmatics of humor: Variability, negotiability and adaptability in humorous monologues. In L. Ruiz-Gurillo (Ed.), Metapragmatics of humor: Current research trends (pp. 79–101). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.14.05rui | pl |
dc.description.references | Sobkowiak, W. (1991). Metaphonology of English paronomasic puns. Peter Lang. | pl |
dc.description.references | Solska, A. (2012a). Relevance-theoretic comprehension procedure and processing multiple meanings in paradigmatic puns. In E. Wałaszewska, & A. Piskorska (Eds.), Relevance theory: More than understanding (pp. 167–182). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. | pl |
dc.description.references | Solska, A. (2012b). The relevance-based model of context in processing puns. Research in Language, 10(4), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-012-0001-0. | pl |
dc.description.references | Solska, A. (2021). The functions of punning utterances in English and Chinese: a cross-cultural perspective. Beiträge zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft, 10, 175–199. https://doi.org/10.23817/bzspr.10-8 | pl |
dc.description.references | Solska, A. (2023). The interpretative non-prototypicality of puns as a factor in the emergence of humor and in phatic communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 20(2), 133–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-2002 | pl |
dc.description.references | Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986 [1995]). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell. | pl |
dc.description.references | Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1997). The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 1–20. | pl |
dc.description.references | van Mulken, M., van Enschot-van Dijk, R., & Hoeken, H. (2005). Puns, relevance and appreciation in advertisements. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(5), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.09.008 | pl |
dc.description.references | Vásquez, C. & Aslan, E. (2021). “Cats be outside, how about meow”: Multimodal humor and cre ativity in an internet meme. Journal of Pragmatics, 171, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.006 | pl |
dc.description.references | Wałaszewska, E. (2015). Relevance-theoretic lexical pragmatics: Theory and applications. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. | pl |
dc.description.references | Wałaszewska, E. (2023). Non-literal uses of proper names in XYZ constructions. A relevance theory perspective. Pragmatics, 33(3), 368–392. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21070.wal | pl |
dc.description.references | Wieczorek, M. (2021). Humour as a carrier of meaning of meaning in sitcom discourse: A relevance-theoretic perspective [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of Warsaw. | pl |
dc.description.references | Wilson, D. (2003). Relevance and lexical pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica,15(2), 273–291. | pl |
dc.description.references | Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance Theory. In L. R. Horn, & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.25 | pl |
dc.description.references | Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2007). A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 230–259). Palgrave-Macmillan. | pl |
dc.description.references | Wilson, D., & Kolaiti, P. (2017). Lexical pragmatics and implicit communications. In P. Cap,& M. Dynel (Eds.), Implicitness: From lexis to discourse (pp. 147–176). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276.07wil | pl |
dc.description.references | Yus, F. (2003). Humor and the search for relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1295–1331. | pl |
dc.description.references | Zwicky, A., & Zwicky, E. (1986). Imperfect puns, markedness and phonological similarity. With fronds like these, who needs anemones. Folia Linguistica, 20(3/4), 493–503. | pl |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2300-6250 | - |
dc.description.issue | 48 (1/2025) | pl |
dc.description.firstpage | 66 | pl |
dc.description.lastpage | 88 | pl |
dc.identifier.citation2 | Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies | pl |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-3701-2884 | - |
Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2025, Issue 48 |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crossroads_48_2025_M_Wieczorek_Imperfect_homophony_as_a_source_of_ wordplay_in the sitcom.pdf | 320,59 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL