REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/17849
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorAntolak‑Szymanski, Katarzyna-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T12:27:42Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-15T12:27:42Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationMiscellanea Historico-Iuridica, T. 23, Z. 1, 2024, s. 183-202pl
dc.identifier.issn1732-9132-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/17849-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this article is to analyze the historical conditions of the development of the institution of mediation in collective labor disputes in the United States. The unique historical conditions that fundamentally influenced the level of use of mediation as a form of dispute resolution, both in the early days of its development in the US and today, need to be characterized. The characterization involves a consideration of the introduction of regulations that initiated the use of mediation at the state and then federal levels. The reach of mediation in collective disputes expanded from its original use in the transportation (railroads and airlines) sectors to its subsequent application in most labor disputes in the private sector. Mediation became institutionalized, as well as professionalized, thanks to the important support activities of the federal government and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Services (FMCS). Therefore, it should be considered important to look at the actions taken by the government in the past to promote the use of the institution of mediation, including through the formation of bodies (councils) that contributed to the professionalization of the profession of mediator. The issues presented herein are relevant because mediation in the United States has reached a high level of development and overall success. An analysis of these issues becomes useful in the light of the interest in the process of implementation of the American mediation model by other countries. The sources used in the article are American publications that discuss the historical development of mediation in the US, the relevant legislation, and selected case law.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstokupl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY-SA 4.0)-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.pl-
dc.subjectmediationpl
dc.subjectlabor unionspl
dc.subjecthistory of American collective labor lawpl
dc.subjectmediatorspl
dc.subjectcollective bargaining agreementpl
dc.subjectstrikepl
dc.titleHistorical Conditions of the Development of the Institution of Mediationin Collective Labor Disputes in the United Statespl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderUznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY-SA 4.0)pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/mhi.2024.23.01.08-
dc.description.Emailkantolak@swps.edu.plpl
dc.description.AffiliationUniwersytet SWPS z siedzibą w Warszawie (SWPS University, Warsaw; Poland)pl
dc.description.referencesUnited Steelworks of America v. American Mfg. Co., 363 U.S. 564 (1960).pl
dc.description.referencesUnited Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574 (1960).pl
dc.description.referencesUnited Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Co., 363 U.S. 593 (1960).pl
dc.description.referencesIII. Collective Bargaining in the Public Sector, “Harvard Law Review” 1984, vol. 97.pl
dc.description.referencesBaker Drew, The Not So Friendly Skies: Pilots’ Attempt to Claim Employer Collusion with Rival Pilots Union During Collective Bargaining Fails in Beckington, “Journal of Air Law and Commerce” 2020, vol. 85.pl
dc.description.referencesBarnes Richard, FMCS on the Cutting Edge, “Pepperrdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal” 2002, vol. 2.pl
dc.description.referencesBarrett Jerome, The FMCS contribution to nonlabor dispute resolution, https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1985/08/art4full.pdf.pl
dc.description.referencesBarrett Jerome, Notes on: Mediation Institutions Adjusting to New Environments: The USCS and FMCS Story, “Labor Law Journal” 2017, vol. 68, no. 1.pl
dc.description.referencesBarrett Jerome, The Origin of Labor-Management Mediation: United States Conciliation Service in the U.S., Department of Labor, “Labor Law Journal” 2016, vol. 67, no. 4.pl
dc.description.referencesBrommer Carolyn, Buckingham George, Loeffle Steven, Cooperative Bargaining Styles at FMCS: A Movement Towards Choices, “Pepperrdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal” 2002.pl
dc.description.referencesBrover J., Using Mediation to Get NHL Players Back in the Winter Olympics, “Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution” 2020, vol. 22.1.pl
dc.description.referencesDavies Ross, Strike Season: Protecting Labor-Management Conflict in the Age of Terror, “Georgetown Law Journal” 2005, vol. 93.pl
dc.description.referencesGoldman Alvin, Comparative Analysis of Labor Mediation Using a Bargaining Strength Model, “Kentucky Law Journal” 1993–1994, vol. 82.pl
dc.description.referencesHeilman Michael J., The National Labor Relations Act at Fifty: Roots Revisited, Heart Rediscovered, “Duquesne Law Review”, vol. 23.pl
dc.description.referencesKramer Henry, Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Work Place, New York 2004.pl
dc.description.referencesLeRoy Michael H., Federal Jurisdiction in Sports Labor Disputes, “Utah Law Review” 2012.pl
dc.description.referencesLobel Ira, What Mediation Can and Cannot Do, “Dispute Resolution Journal” 1998, vol. 53(47).pl
dc.description.referencesLofaso Anne Marie, Deflategate: What’s the Steelworkers Trilogy Got to Do with It?, “Berkeley Journal of Entertainment and Sports Law” 2017, vol. 6.pl
dc.description.referencesMaccini Kristen Sloan, When is Mediation a Good Choice for Your Client?, “Rhode Island Bar Journal” 2017, vol. 65, no. 4.pl
dc.description.referencesMalin Martin H., Finkin Matthew W., Are Collective Bargaining Agreements Still Special?, “American Bar Association Journal of Labor & Employment Law” 2023, vol. 37.pl
dc.description.referencesMalin Martin H., Public Employees’ Right to Strike: Law and Experience, “University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform” 1993, vol. 26.pl
dc.description.referencesMcManus Jeremy, A Motion to Compel Changes to Federal Arbitration Law: How to Remedy the Abuses Consumers Face When Arbitrating Disputes, “Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice” 2017, vol. 37.pl
dc.description.referencesNoakes Adam, Mandatory Early Mediation: A Vision for Civil Lawsuits Worldwide, “Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution” 2020, vol. 36.pl
dc.description.referencesRay Douglas E., Corbett William R., Ruiz Cameron Christopher David, Labor-Management Relations: Strikes, Lockouts and Boycotts, par. 1:18 (Sept. 2017).pl
dc.description.referencesRuiz Fernando A., Labor Law – The Railway Labor Act: The Employee’s Right to Minority Union Representation at Company-Level Grievance Hearings, “Western New England Law Review” 1989, vol. 11.pl
dc.description.referencesSchmedemann Debora A., Reconciling Differences: The Theory and Law of Mediating Labor Grievances, “Industrial Relations Law Journal” 1987, vol. 9.pl
dc.description.referencesSlater Joseph E., Lessons from the Public Sector: Suggestions and a Caution, “Marquette Law Review” 2011, vol. 94.pl
dc.description.referencesSlater Joseph, Interest Arbitration as Alternative Dispute Resolution: The History from 1919 to 2011, “Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution” 2013, vol. 28.pl
dc.description.referencesSlater Joseph, The Teachers’ Strike of 2018 in Historical Perspective, “Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review” 2019, vol. 20.pl
dc.description.referencesSmith Todd A., A Comparative Analysis: The Effect of American and Canadian Labor Laws and Economic Conditions on Union Participation, “The George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics” 1991, vol. 24.pl
dc.description.referencesWeckstein Donald T., In Praise of Party Empowerment and of Mediator Activism, “Willamette Law Review 1997”, vol. 33, no. 3.pl
dc.description.referencesZelek Mark E., Labor Grievance Arbitration in the United States, “The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review” 1989, vol. 21.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2719-9991-
dc.description.volume23pl
dc.description.issue1pl
dc.description.firstpage183pl
dc.description.lastpage202pl
dc.identifier.citation2Miscellanea Historico-Iuridicapl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4853-5816-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica, 2024, tom XXIII, Z. 1

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons