REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/17444
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorMaceratini, Arianna-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-04T09:32:04Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-04T09:32:04Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 29 nr 3, 2024, s. 271-286pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/17444-
dc.description.abstractIn the complex relationship between individual identity and its claims for recognition and protection by the legal system, the right to be forgotten is crucial, because it addresses a personal, social and legal definition of the individual as authentically as possible and highlights the uniqueness of each identity, with changes experienced in the temporal dimension. The lack of distinction in real life between the physical world and the analogue context traces new spatial and temporal coordinates, able to profoundly redefine the traditional categories of identity and difference, as well as to modify the usual dynamics of personal and social inclusion and exclusion, submitting identity to a process of dismemberment that makes the individual a complex ‘informational organism’. The multiple connections between the right to be forgotten and the protection of personal identity are confirmed by the most recent developments of European legislation and, in particular, in Italian jurisprudence, which outlines it as an identity claim in order to obtain a correct representation of oneself, resulting in the guarantee offered by the legal system of reconfiguring one’s telematic image. This describes an evolving and comprehensive right capable of protecting the originality of the individual and his/her representation and relationships.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectdigital datapl
dc.subjectdigital identitypl
dc.subjectidentitypl
dc.subjectlegal systempl
dc.subjectmemorypl
dc.subjectright to be forgottenpl
dc.titleSubjective Identity and the Right to be Forgotten: A Multifaceted Claim in the Legal Systempl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2024 Arianna Maceratini published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2024.29.03.15-
dc.description.Emailarianna.maceratini@unimc.itpl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Macerata, Italypl
dc.description.referencesAmato Mangiameli, A.C. (2019). Algoritmi e big data. Dalla carta sulla robotica. Rivista di filosofia del diritto. Journal of Legal Philosophy, 8(1), 107–124.pl
dc.description.referencesAmato Mangiameli, A.C., & Campagnoli, M.N. (2020). Strategie digitali. #diritto_educazione-tecnologie. Giappichelli.pl
dc.description.referencesBauman, Z. (2010). Consumo, dunque sono. Laterza.pl
dc.description.referencesBauman, Z. (2017). Retrotopia. Laterza.pl
dc.description.referencesCommissione per i diritti e i doveri relativi ad Internet. (2015, 13 October). Dichiarazione dei diritti in Internet. https://www.camera.it/application/xmanager/projects/leg17/commissione_internet/dichiarazione_dei_diritti_internet_pubblicata.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesCorte Costituzionale con il Tribunale costituzionale della Repubblica di Polonia. (2006, 30–31 March). I Diritti Fondamentali nella Giurisprudenzia della Corte Costituzionale. https://www.cortecostituzionale.it/documenti/convegni_seminari/STU185_principi.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesFabietti, U. (2001). Memoria e oblio nell’incontro tra culture. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 42(3), 406–422.pl
dc.description.referencesFaini, F., & Pietropaoli, S. (2021). Scienza giuridica e tecnologie informatiche. Temi e problemi. Giappichelli.pl
dc.description.referencesFerraris, A.O. (2022). La costruzione dell’identità. Bollati Boringhieri.pl
dc.description.referencesFloridi, L. (2017). La quarta rivoluzione. Come l’infosfera sta trasformando il mondo. Raffaello Cortina Ed.pl
dc.description.referencesGazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. (2014, 24 October). Decreto del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri, no. 910. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2014/12/09/14A09376/sgpl
dc.description.referencesGazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. (2022, 10 October). Decreto Legislativo, no. 150. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2022/10/17/22G00159/sgpl
dc.description.referencesHan, B.-C. (2022). Le Non Cose. Come abbiamo smesso di vivere il reale. Einaudi.pl
dc.description.referencesHan, B.-C. (2023). Nello sciame. Visioni del digitale. Nottetempo.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 13 May 2014 on the case of Google Spain SL and Google Inc v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González, C-131/12. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62012CJ0131pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Milan of 26 April, no. 5820/2013.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Milan, Civil Sect. I, no. 10374/2016.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Rome of 3 December 2015, no. 23771.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Italian Civil Court of Cassation of 9 April 1998, sec. III, no. 3679. https://www.studiozallone.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Cassazione-civile-9–4-1998-n-3679-diritto-alloblio.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Italian Civil Court of Cassation of 5 April 2012, sec. III, no. 5525. https://www.leggioggi.it/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/sentenza_cassazione_civile_5525_2012.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Italian Civil Court of Cassation of 19 May 2020, sec. I, no. 9147. https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Cassazione-civile-sezione-I-sentenza-n.-9147-del-19-maggio-2020.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Italian Civil Court of Cassation of 1 February 2024, sec. III, no. 3013. http://dirittifondamentali.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Cass.-civ.-n.-3013–2024-1.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesLongo, A., & Scorza, G. (2020). Intelligenza artificiale. L’impatto sulle nostre vite, diritti e libertà. Mondadori.pl
dc.description.referencesManiscalco, N. (2021). La personalità in rete: protezione dei dati personali, identità digitale e oblio. In T. Casadei & S. Pietropaoli (Eds.), Diritto e tecnologie informatiche (pp. 31–43). Wolters Kluwer.pl
dc.description.referencesMensi, M., & Falletta, P. (2018). Il diritto del Web. CEDAM.pl
dc.description.referencesRedazione Diritto dell’Informatica. (2020). L’identità digitale: la tutela della personalità dell’individuo sul web. https://www.dirittodellinformatica.it/privacy-e-sicurezza/lidentita-digitale-la-tutela-della-personalita-dellindividuo-sul-web.htmlpl
dc.description.referencesRegulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/ojpl
dc.description.referencesRejmaniak, R. (2021). Bias in artifi cial intelligence systems. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 26(3), 25–42.pl
dc.description.referencesRodotà, S. (2005, 28 October). L’uomo nuovo di Internet. https://www.privacy.it/archivio/rodo20051028.htmlpl
dc.description.referencesRodotà, S. (2014). Il mondo nella rete. Quali i diritti, quali i vincoli. Laterza.pl
dc.description.referencesSenato della Repubblica. (2022). Atto Senato n. 2548. https://www.senato.it/leg/18/BGT/Schede/Ddliter/testi/54807_testi.htmpl
dc.description.referencesSignorelli, A.D. (2020). Cosa c’è bisogno di sapere per vivere nell’infosfera di Luciano Floridi. https://www.che-fare.com/luciano-floridi-infosfera-essere-umanopl
dc.description.referencesSisto, D. (2020). Ricordati di me. La rivoluzione digitale tra memoria e oblio. Bollati Boringhieri.pl
dc.description.referencesZanichelli, M. (2016). Il diritto all’oblio tra privacy e identità digitale. Informatica e diritto, 42(1), 9–28.pl
dc.description.referencesZiccardi, G. (2017). Il libro digitale dei morti. Memoria, lutto, eternità e oblio nell’era dei social network. UTET.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2719-9452-
dc.description.volume29pl
dc.description.number3pl
dc.description.firstpage271pl
dc.description.lastpage286pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7519-9016-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2024, Vol. 29 nr 3

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_29_3_A_Maceratini_Subjective_Identity_and_the_Right_to_be_Forgotten.pdf161,91 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons