Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/16560
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Korycińska-Rządca, Paulina | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-24T06:44:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-24T06:44:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 29 nr 2, 2024, s. 163-176 | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 1689-7404 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/16560 | - |
dc.description.abstract | One of the natural consequences of the development of technology is that an entrepreneur’s confidential information, including trade secrets, is commonly stored in electronic files. This form of information storage inevitably entails challenges in the area of its protection. The coronavirus pandemic has drastically accelerated the process of dissemination of new models of employment, in particular remote (distance) work and cloud working, and has made the protection of an entrepreneur’s secrets against unauthorised use even more complicated. This is due to the fact that in such models of employment, employees obtain access to their employer’s data remotely, which may decrease the employer’s level of control. To remedy this, employers may undertake various steps aimed at ensuring that their secrets are well protected; however, such actions may affect the free movement and mobility of workers. The purpose of this article is to verify how, in these circumstances, the measures provided for in EU law face the challenges of protecting an employer’s secrets against unauthorised use by employees and how they define the scope to which they can be applied without the abuse of employees’ rights and unjustified restrictions on their mobility. For that purpose, the author analyses in particular Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the Protection of Undisclosed Know-How and Business Information (Trade Secrets) against Their Unlawful Acquisition, Use and Disclosure. This research is based mainly on the dogmatic method of analysis. | pl |
dc.language.iso | en | pl |
dc.publisher | Faculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2 | pl |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | - |
dc.subject | Directive (EU) 2016/943 | pl |
dc.subject | employees | pl |
dc.subject | employment relationship | pl |
dc.subject | trade secrets | pl |
dc.title | Trade Secrets in the Digital Age: How Do the Measures Provided for in EU Law Face the Challenges of Protecting an Employer’s Trade Secrets against Unauthorised Acquisition, Use and Disclosure by Its Employees? | pl |
dc.type | Article | pl |
dc.rights.holder | © 2024 Paulina Korycińska-Rządca published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15290/bsp.2024.29.02.12 | - |
dc.description.Email | p.korycinska@uwb.edu.pl | pl |
dc.description.Affiliation | University of Bialystok, Poland | pl |
dc.description.references | Act of 26 June 1974 – Labour Code (consolidated text, Journal of Laws 2023 item 1465). | pl |
dc.description.references | Act of 16 April 1993 on Combating Unfair Competition (consolidated text, Journal of Laws 2022, item 1233). | pl |
dc.description.references | Będkowski-Kozioł, M. (2014). Commentary to art. 4 point 17. In T. Skoczny (Ed.). Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz. C. H. Beck. | pl |
dc.description.references | Domeij, B. (2020). The Trade Secret Directive and employees. In T. Minssen, T. Riis & J. Schovsbo (Eds.), The harmonization and protection of trade secrets in the EU (pp. 149–170). Edward Elgar. | pl |
dc.description.references | du Vall, M. & Nowińska, E. (2013). Ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji. Komentarz. LexisNexis. | pl |
dc.description.references | European Convention on Human Rights. (1950, 4 November). Available at https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ENG. Accessed 30 September 2023. | pl |
dc.description.references | European Commission (2012). Public consultation on the protection against misappropriation of trade secrets and confidential business information. Summary of responses, 11 December 2012, available at https://ec.europa.eu/growth/content/public-consultation-protection-against-misappropriationtrade-secrets-and-confidential_en. Accessed 30 September 2023. | pl |
dc.description.references | Irgens-Jensen, H. (2023). Departing employees, confidentiality clauses and European trade secret protection. IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 54 (pp. 495–526). | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Kraków of 6 December 2013, no. I ACa 1196/13. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 12 December 2006 on the case of Wojtunik v. Poland, no. 64212/01. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Polish Supreme Court of 3 April 2019, no. II PK 334/17. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Polish Supreme Administrative Court of 9 May 2023, no. III OSK 2257/21. | pl |
dc.description.references | Kolasa, M. (2018). Trade secrets and employee mobility. Cambridge University Press. | pl |
dc.description.references | Korus, K. (2002). Commentary to art. 11. In K. Korus (Ed.), Zwalczanie nieuczciwej konkurencji. Komentarz do zmian wprowadzonych ustawą z dnia 5 lipca 2002 r. o zmianie ustawy o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji. LEX/el. | pl |
dc.description.references | Korycińska-Rządca, P. (2020). Ochrona tajemnic strony postępowania antymonopolowego w sprawach praktyk ograniczających konkurencję. C. H. Beck. | pl |
dc.description.references | Michalak, A. (2006). Ochrona tajemnicy przedsiębiorstwa. Zagadnienia cywilnoprawne. Zakamycze. | pl |
dc.description.references | Michalak, A. (2016). Commentary to art. 11. In M. Sieradzka & M. Zdyb (Eds.), Ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji. Komentarz (pp. 386–446). Wolters Kluwer Polska. | pl |
dc.description.references | Nowińska, E. (2018). Commentary to art. 11. In E. Nowińska &K. Szczepanowska-Kozłowska (Eds.), Ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji. Komentarz. | pl |
dc.description.references | Nowińska, E. (2022). Commentary to art. 11. In E. Nowińska & K. Szczepanowska-Kozłowska (Eds.), Ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji. Komentarz (pp. 234–281). | pl |
dc.description.references | Sołtysiński, S. & Gogulski, S. (2019). Commentary to art. 11. In J. Szwaja (Ed.). Ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji. Komentarz. C. H. Beck. | pl |
dc.description.references | Traple, E. (2003). Ochrona informacji stanowiących tajemnicę przedsiębiorstwa w ZNKU a ochrona tajemnic niejawnych w trakcie negocjacji. Monitor Prawniczy, 21. | pl |
dc.description.references | Wiśniewski, A. (2023). The protection of entrepreneurs and the European Convention on Human Rights. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 28(4) (pp. 11–33). DOI: 10.15290/bsp.2023.28.04.01 | pl |
dc.description.references | Wojcieszko-Głuszko, E. (2002). Ochrona prawna know-how w prawie polskim na tle prawnoporównawczym. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Prace z wynalazczości i ochrony własności intelektualnej, 81 (pp. 1–195). | pl |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2719-9452 | - |
dc.description.volume | 29 | pl |
dc.description.number | 2 | pl |
dc.description.firstpage | 163 | pl |
dc.description.lastpage | 176 | pl |
dc.identifier.citation2 | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze | pl |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-6177-7409 | - |
Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Artykuły naukowe (WP) Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2024, Vol. 29 nr 2 |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BSP_29_2_P_Korycinska_Rzadca_Trade_Secrets_in_the_Digital_Age.pdf | 176,36 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL