REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/16549
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorJurkowska-Gomułka, Agata-
dc.contributor.authorPiszcz, Annapl
dc.contributor.authorOliveira Pais, Sofiapl
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-22T09:54:30Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-22T09:54:30Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 29 nr 2, 2024, s. 65-82pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/16549-
dc.description.abstractThe 2022 Guidelines of the European Commission on the application of EU competition law to collective agreements regarding the working conditions of solo self-employed persons apparently introduced a fresh approach towards collective agreements in a gig economy era. The main aim of this paper is to discuss whether the 2022 Guidelines are an appropriate tool to address the problems of solo self-employed persons (i.e. persons who are not in a formal employment relationship and who rely primarily on their own personal labour to provide services) from the perspective of EU competition law. To this end, we first present key competition problems related to collective agreements (section 1). Second, we analyse the regulatory framework for exemptions from competition law, with a view for a potential exemption relevant for collective agreements, as well as an approach to collective agreements in EU case law (sections 2 and 3). Third, the background for adopting the Guidelines, and their goals, is analysed (sections 4 and 5). Fourth, the Guidelines are discussed in more detail in sections 6 and 7 from the perspective of exemptions from Art. 101(1) TFEU. Finally, we examine the relationship between the Guidelines and a proposal for a platform work directive. The article attempts to verify the hypothesis that the Guidelines may be considered a pseudo-development.pl
dc.description.sponsorshipThis paper is partly the result of research carried out under a project in the programme ‘Common research grants between the Republic of Poland and the Republic of Portugal’, co-financed by the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (agreement no. BPN/BPT/2021/1/00030/U/00001) and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectcollective bargainingpl
dc.subjectcompetition lawpl
dc.subjectdigital platformspl
dc.subjectsolo self-employed personspl
dc.titleCollective agreements on working conditions of solo self-employed persons: perspective of EU competition lawpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2024 Agata Jurkowska-Gomułka et al published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2024.29.02.06-
dc.description.EmailAgata Jurkowska-Gomułka: agathajur@o2.plpl
dc.description.EmailAnna Piszcz: piszcz@uwb.edu.plpl
dc.description.EmailSofia Oliveira Pais: spais@ucp.ptpl
dc.description.AffiliationAgata Jurkowska-Gomułka - University of Information Technology and Management, Polandpl
dc.description.AffiliationAnna Piszcz - University of Bialystok, Polandpl
dc.description.AffiliationSofia Oliveira Pais - Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Portugalpl
dc.description.referencesAndriychuk, O. (2017). The normative foundations of European competition law: Assessing the goals of antitrust through the lens of legal philosophy. Edward Elgar Publishing.pl
dc.description.referencesAnkersmit, L. (2015, 3 March). Albany revisited: The Court directs NCA to carry a more social tune. European Law Blog. http://europeanlawblog.eu/?p=2695pl
dc.description.referencesBuendia Esteban, R. M. (2022). Examining recent initiatives to ensure labour rights for platform workers in the European Union to tackle the problem of domination. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 28(4), 475–487.pl
dc.description.referencesCauffman, C. (2022). Towards better working conditions for persons performing services through digital labour platforms (Editorial). Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 29(1), 3–8.pl
dc.description.referencesCengiz, F. (2021). The conflict between market competition and worker solidarity: Moving from consumer to a citizen welfare standard in competition law. Legal Studies, 41, 73–90.pl
dc.description.referencesDaskalova, V. (2017). Regulating the new self-employed in the Uber economy: What role for EU competition law? [TILEC discussion paper, 2017–028]. Tilburg Law and Economics Center.pl
dc.description.referencesDaskalova, V. (2022, 7 October). Rethinking collective bargaining for the self-employed: European Commission publishes guidelines on exemption and non-enforcement. https://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2022/10/07/rethinking-collective-bargaining-for-the-self-employed-european-commission-publishes-guidelines-on-exemption-and-non-enforcement/pl
dc.description.referencesDuggan, J., McDonnell, A., Sherman, U., & Carbery, R. (2021). Work in the gig economy: A research overview. Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2021a). Communication from the Commission – Approval of the content of a draft for a communication from the Commission guidelines on the application of EU competition law to collective agreements regarding the working conditions of solo self-employed persons, C(2021) 8838 final.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2021b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Better working conditions for a stronger social Europe: harnessing the full benefits of digitalisation for the future of work, COM(2021) 761 final.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2021c). Draft Guidelines on collective bargaining of self-employed. Feedback from BDA, the Confederation of German Employers’ Associations. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12483-Collective-bargaining-agreements-for-self-employed-scope-of-application-EU-competition-rules/F1630084_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2021d). Proposal for Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work, COM(2021) 762 final 2021/0414 (COD).pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2021e). Response from Danish Artist Unions, Copenhagen. Draft guidelines on collective bargaining of self-employed. https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/public-consultations/2021-collective-bargaining-2_en.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2022). Guidelines on the application of EU competition law to collective agreements regarding the working conditions of solo self-employed persons (O. J. 374, 30.09.2022).pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament. (2017, 15 June). Resolution on a European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy (2017/2003(INI)) (O. J. C 331, 18.09.2018).pl
dc.description.referencesFrenz, W. (2016). Handbook of EU competition law. Springer.pl
dc.description.referencesGerard, D. (2018). Fairness in EU competition policy: Significance and implications. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 9(4), 211–212.pl
dc.description.referencesGiedrewicz-Niewińska, A. & Kurzynoga, M. (2023). Zakres podmiotowy prawa do rokowań zbiorowych w Konstytucji RP a prawo międzynarodowe i unijne. Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne, 3, 10–21.pl
dc.description.referencesGiovannone, M. (2022). La contrattazione collettiva dei lavoratori autonomi nell’orizzonte UE: tra tutela della concorrenza e autotutela collettiva. Federalismi.it. Rivista di Diritto Pubblico Italiano, Comparato, Europeo, 34, 209–230.pl
dc.description.referencesIchino, P. (2001). Collective bargaining and antitrust laws: An open issue. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 17(2), 185–198.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 23 April 1991 on the case of Klaus Höfner and Fritz Elser v. Macrotron GmbH, C-41/90, EU:C:1991:161.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 September 1999 on the case of Albany International BV v. Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds Textielindustrie, C-67/96, EU:C:1999:430.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 September 1999 on the case of Brentjens’ Handelsonderneming BV v. Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds voor de Handel in Bouwmaterialen, C-115/97 to C-117/97, EU:C:1999:434.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 September 1999 on the case of Maatschappij Drijvende Bokken BV v. Stichting Pensioenfonds voor de Vervoer – en Havenbedrijven, C-219/97, EU:C:1999:437.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 12 September 2000 on the case of Pavel Pavlov and Others v. Stichting Pensioenfonds Medische Specialiste, C-180/98 to C-184/98, EU:C:2000:428.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 September 2000 on the case of Hendrik van der Woude v. Stichting Beatrixoord, C-222/98, EU:C:2000:475.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 13 December 2012 on the case of Expedia Inc., C‑226/11, EU:C:2012:795.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 4 December 2014 on the case of FNV Kunsten Informatie en Media v. Staat der Nederlanden, C-413/13, EU:C:2014:2411.pl
dc.description.referencesKhan, L. (2018). The New Brandeis movement: America’s antimonopoly debate. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 9(3), 131–132.pl
dc.description.referencesKoutsimpogiorgos, N., van Slageren, J., Herrmann, A. M., & Frenken, K. (2020). Conceptualizing the gig economy and its regulatory problems. Policy & Internet, 12(4), 525–545.pl
dc.description.referencesMcDonald, A. & Miller, W. T. (2011). The interplay between regulation, antitrust and other public policy. Global Competition Reviews: The Antitrust Review of the Americas. https://globalcompetitionreview.com/review/the-antitrust-review-of-the-americas/the-antitrust-review-of-the-americas-2011/downloadpl
dc.description.referencesMella Méndez, L. & Kurzynoga, M. (2023). The presumption of the employment relationship of platform workers as an opportunity to eliminate obstacles arising from competition law in the conclusion of a collective agreement: The example of Spain. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 28(4), 197–216.pl
dc.description.referencesMonti, G. (2021). Collective labour agreements and EU competition law: Five reconfigurations. European Competition Journal, 17(3), 714–744.pl
dc.description.referencesOECD. (2020). The future of work: Expert meeting on collective bargaining for own-account workers. Summary report. https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/Summary_Expert_Meetig_CB.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesOpinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 6 September 2012, Case C-226/11, Expedia Inc., EU:C:2012:544.pl
dc.description.referencesOpinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 11 September 2014, Case C-413/13, FNV Kunsten, EU:C:2014:2215.pl
dc.description.referencesOrlanski, L. T. (2011). Searching for the basis of international convergence in competition law and policy. Global Antitrust Review, 7–47.pl
dc.description.referencesPennings, F. J. L. (2015). Exceptie van de mededingingsbepalingen voor (schijn)zelfstandigen: de zaak FNV Kiem. Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht, 21(4), 39–44.pl
dc.description.referencesPennings, F. & Bekker, S. (2023). The increasing room for collective bargaining on behalf of self-employed persons. Utrecht Law Review, 19(3), 8–24.pl
dc.description.referencesRainone, S. (2022). Labour rights beyond employment status: Insights from the competition law guidelines on collective bargaining (pre-print). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4078079pl
dc.description.referencesRanaraja, S. (2022). Trade union responses to organizing workers on digital labour platforms: A six-country study. International Journal of Labour Research, 11(1–2), 60–89.pl
dc.description.referencesRosin, A. (2022). Towards a European employment status: The EU proposal for a directive on improving working conditions in platform work. Industrial Law Journal, 51(2), 478–493.pl
dc.description.referencesSchiek, D. & Gideon, A. (2018). Outsmarting the gig-economy through collective bargaining: EU competition law as a barrier to smart cities? International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 32(2–3), 275–294 https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3020100/1/Schiek%20and%20Gideon%20(2018%20-%20author%20accepted%20manuscript)%20Outsmarting%20the%20gig%20economy.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesSchmidt-Kessen, M. J., Bergqvist, C., Jacqueson C., Lind, Y., & Huffman, M. (2020). ‘I’ll call my union’, said the driver: Collective bargaining of gig workers under EU competition rules. Copenhagen Business School Law Research Paper Series, 20.pl
dc.description.referencesSchömann, I. (2022). Collective bargaining and the limits of competition law. ETUI Policy Brief 1.pl
dc.description.referencesStojković Zlatanović, S. & Ostojić, I. (2021). Labour law status of platform workers: Between autonomy and subordination. Regional Labour Review, 269–281.pl
dc.description.referencesUnterschütz, J. (2020). Collective bargaining for platform workers: A hope for new developments? Hungarian Labour Law e-Journal, 2, 80–94.pl
dc.description.referencesVestager, M. (2022). Fairness and competition policy, SPEECH/22/6067, Prague, 22 October 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_22_6067pl
dc.identifier.eissn2719-9452-
dc.description.volume29pl
dc.description.number2pl
dc.description.firstpage65pl
dc.description.lastpage82pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7074-6850-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7163-3292-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3721-5799-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Artykuły naukowe (WP)
Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2024, Vol. 29 nr 2

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_29_2_A_Jurkowska_Gomulka_A_Piszcz_S_Oliveira_Pais_Collective_agreements.pdf316,07 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons