Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/16549
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jurkowska-Gomułka, Agata | - |
dc.contributor.author | Piszcz, Anna | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Oliveira Pais, Sofia | pl |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-22T09:54:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-22T09:54:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 29 nr 2, 2024, s. 65-82 | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 1689-7404 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/16549 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The 2022 Guidelines of the European Commission on the application of EU competition law to collective agreements regarding the working conditions of solo self-employed persons apparently introduced a fresh approach towards collective agreements in a gig economy era. The main aim of this paper is to discuss whether the 2022 Guidelines are an appropriate tool to address the problems of solo self-employed persons (i.e. persons who are not in a formal employment relationship and who rely primarily on their own personal labour to provide services) from the perspective of EU competition law. To this end, we first present key competition problems related to collective agreements (section 1). Second, we analyse the regulatory framework for exemptions from competition law, with a view for a potential exemption relevant for collective agreements, as well as an approach to collective agreements in EU case law (sections 2 and 3). Third, the background for adopting the Guidelines, and their goals, is analysed (sections 4 and 5). Fourth, the Guidelines are discussed in more detail in sections 6 and 7 from the perspective of exemptions from Art. 101(1) TFEU. Finally, we examine the relationship between the Guidelines and a proposal for a platform work directive. The article attempts to verify the hypothesis that the Guidelines may be considered a pseudo-development. | pl |
dc.description.sponsorship | This paper is partly the result of research carried out under a project in the programme ‘Common research grants between the Republic of Poland and the Republic of Portugal’, co-financed by the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (agreement no. BPN/BPT/2021/1/00030/U/00001) and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology. | pl |
dc.language.iso | en | pl |
dc.publisher | Faculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2 | pl |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | - |
dc.subject | collective bargaining | pl |
dc.subject | competition law | pl |
dc.subject | digital platforms | pl |
dc.subject | solo self-employed persons | pl |
dc.title | Collective agreements on working conditions of solo self-employed persons: perspective of EU competition law | pl |
dc.type | Article | pl |
dc.rights.holder | © 2024 Agata Jurkowska-Gomułka et al published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. | pl |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15290/bsp.2024.29.02.06 | - |
dc.description.Email | Agata Jurkowska-Gomułka: agathajur@o2.pl | pl |
dc.description.Email | Anna Piszcz: piszcz@uwb.edu.pl | pl |
dc.description.Email | Sofia Oliveira Pais: spais@ucp.pt | pl |
dc.description.Affiliation | Agata Jurkowska-Gomułka - University of Information Technology and Management, Poland | pl |
dc.description.Affiliation | Anna Piszcz - University of Bialystok, Poland | pl |
dc.description.Affiliation | Sofia Oliveira Pais - Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Portugal | pl |
dc.description.references | Andriychuk, O. (2017). The normative foundations of European competition law: Assessing the goals of antitrust through the lens of legal philosophy. Edward Elgar Publishing. | pl |
dc.description.references | Ankersmit, L. (2015, 3 March). Albany revisited: The Court directs NCA to carry a more social tune. European Law Blog. http://europeanlawblog.eu/?p=2695 | pl |
dc.description.references | Buendia Esteban, R. M. (2022). Examining recent initiatives to ensure labour rights for platform workers in the European Union to tackle the problem of domination. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 28(4), 475–487. | pl |
dc.description.references | Cauffman, C. (2022). Towards better working conditions for persons performing services through digital labour platforms (Editorial). Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 29(1), 3–8. | pl |
dc.description.references | Cengiz, F. (2021). The conflict between market competition and worker solidarity: Moving from consumer to a citizen welfare standard in competition law. Legal Studies, 41, 73–90. | pl |
dc.description.references | Daskalova, V. (2017). Regulating the new self-employed in the Uber economy: What role for EU competition law? [TILEC discussion paper, 2017–028]. Tilburg Law and Economics Center. | pl |
dc.description.references | Daskalova, V. (2022, 7 October). Rethinking collective bargaining for the self-employed: European Commission publishes guidelines on exemption and non-enforcement. https://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2022/10/07/rethinking-collective-bargaining-for-the-self-employed-european-commission-publishes-guidelines-on-exemption-and-non-enforcement/ | pl |
dc.description.references | Duggan, J., McDonnell, A., Sherman, U., & Carbery, R. (2021). Work in the gig economy: A research overview. Routledge. | pl |
dc.description.references | European Commission. (2021a). Communication from the Commission – Approval of the content of a draft for a communication from the Commission guidelines on the application of EU competition law to collective agreements regarding the working conditions of solo self-employed persons, C(2021) 8838 final. | pl |
dc.description.references | European Commission. (2021b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Better working conditions for a stronger social Europe: harnessing the full benefits of digitalisation for the future of work, COM(2021) 761 final. | pl |
dc.description.references | European Commission. (2021c). Draft Guidelines on collective bargaining of self-employed. Feedback from BDA, the Confederation of German Employers’ Associations. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12483-Collective-bargaining-agreements-for-self-employed-scope-of-application-EU-competition-rules/F1630084_en | pl |
dc.description.references | European Commission. (2021d). Proposal for Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work, COM(2021) 762 final 2021/0414 (COD). | pl |
dc.description.references | European Commission. (2021e). Response from Danish Artist Unions, Copenhagen. Draft guidelines on collective bargaining of self-employed. https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/public-consultations/2021-collective-bargaining-2_en. | pl |
dc.description.references | European Commission. (2022). Guidelines on the application of EU competition law to collective agreements regarding the working conditions of solo self-employed persons (O. J. 374, 30.09.2022). | pl |
dc.description.references | European Parliament. (2017, 15 June). Resolution on a European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy (2017/2003(INI)) (O. J. C 331, 18.09.2018). | pl |
dc.description.references | Frenz, W. (2016). Handbook of EU competition law. Springer. | pl |
dc.description.references | Gerard, D. (2018). Fairness in EU competition policy: Significance and implications. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 9(4), 211–212. | pl |
dc.description.references | Giedrewicz-Niewińska, A. & Kurzynoga, M. (2023). Zakres podmiotowy prawa do rokowań zbiorowych w Konstytucji RP a prawo międzynarodowe i unijne. Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne, 3, 10–21. | pl |
dc.description.references | Giovannone, M. (2022). La contrattazione collettiva dei lavoratori autonomi nell’orizzonte UE: tra tutela della concorrenza e autotutela collettiva. Federalismi.it. Rivista di Diritto Pubblico Italiano, Comparato, Europeo, 34, 209–230. | pl |
dc.description.references | Ichino, P. (2001). Collective bargaining and antitrust laws: An open issue. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 17(2), 185–198. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 23 April 1991 on the case of Klaus Höfner and Fritz Elser v. Macrotron GmbH, C-41/90, EU:C:1991:161. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 September 1999 on the case of Albany International BV v. Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds Textielindustrie, C-67/96, EU:C:1999:430. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 September 1999 on the case of Brentjens’ Handelsonderneming BV v. Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds voor de Handel in Bouwmaterialen, C-115/97 to C-117/97, EU:C:1999:434. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 September 1999 on the case of Maatschappij Drijvende Bokken BV v. Stichting Pensioenfonds voor de Vervoer – en Havenbedrijven, C-219/97, EU:C:1999:437. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 12 September 2000 on the case of Pavel Pavlov and Others v. Stichting Pensioenfonds Medische Specialiste, C-180/98 to C-184/98, EU:C:2000:428. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 September 2000 on the case of Hendrik van der Woude v. Stichting Beatrixoord, C-222/98, EU:C:2000:475. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 13 December 2012 on the case of Expedia Inc., C‑226/11, EU:C:2012:795. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 4 December 2014 on the case of FNV Kunsten Informatie en Media v. Staat der Nederlanden, C-413/13, EU:C:2014:2411. | pl |
dc.description.references | Khan, L. (2018). The New Brandeis movement: America’s antimonopoly debate. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 9(3), 131–132. | pl |
dc.description.references | Koutsimpogiorgos, N., van Slageren, J., Herrmann, A. M., & Frenken, K. (2020). Conceptualizing the gig economy and its regulatory problems. Policy & Internet, 12(4), 525–545. | pl |
dc.description.references | McDonald, A. & Miller, W. T. (2011). The interplay between regulation, antitrust and other public policy. Global Competition Reviews: The Antitrust Review of the Americas. https://globalcompetitionreview.com/review/the-antitrust-review-of-the-americas/the-antitrust-review-of-the-americas-2011/download | pl |
dc.description.references | Mella Méndez, L. & Kurzynoga, M. (2023). The presumption of the employment relationship of platform workers as an opportunity to eliminate obstacles arising from competition law in the conclusion of a collective agreement: The example of Spain. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 28(4), 197–216. | pl |
dc.description.references | Monti, G. (2021). Collective labour agreements and EU competition law: Five reconfigurations. European Competition Journal, 17(3), 714–744. | pl |
dc.description.references | OECD. (2020). The future of work: Expert meeting on collective bargaining for own-account workers. Summary report. https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/Summary_Expert_Meetig_CB.pdf | pl |
dc.description.references | Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 6 September 2012, Case C-226/11, Expedia Inc., EU:C:2012:544. | pl |
dc.description.references | Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 11 September 2014, Case C-413/13, FNV Kunsten, EU:C:2014:2215. | pl |
dc.description.references | Orlanski, L. T. (2011). Searching for the basis of international convergence in competition law and policy. Global Antitrust Review, 7–47. | pl |
dc.description.references | Pennings, F. J. L. (2015). Exceptie van de mededingingsbepalingen voor (schijn)zelfstandigen: de zaak FNV Kiem. Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht, 21(4), 39–44. | pl |
dc.description.references | Pennings, F. & Bekker, S. (2023). The increasing room for collective bargaining on behalf of self-employed persons. Utrecht Law Review, 19(3), 8–24. | pl |
dc.description.references | Rainone, S. (2022). Labour rights beyond employment status: Insights from the competition law guidelines on collective bargaining (pre-print). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4078079 | pl |
dc.description.references | Ranaraja, S. (2022). Trade union responses to organizing workers on digital labour platforms: A six-country study. International Journal of Labour Research, 11(1–2), 60–89. | pl |
dc.description.references | Rosin, A. (2022). Towards a European employment status: The EU proposal for a directive on improving working conditions in platform work. Industrial Law Journal, 51(2), 478–493. | pl |
dc.description.references | Schiek, D. & Gideon, A. (2018). Outsmarting the gig-economy through collective bargaining: EU competition law as a barrier to smart cities? International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 32(2–3), 275–294 https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3020100/1/Schiek%20and%20Gideon%20(2018%20-%20author%20accepted%20manuscript)%20Outsmarting%20the%20gig%20economy.pdf | pl |
dc.description.references | Schmidt-Kessen, M. J., Bergqvist, C., Jacqueson C., Lind, Y., & Huffman, M. (2020). ‘I’ll call my union’, said the driver: Collective bargaining of gig workers under EU competition rules. Copenhagen Business School Law Research Paper Series, 20. | pl |
dc.description.references | Schömann, I. (2022). Collective bargaining and the limits of competition law. ETUI Policy Brief 1. | pl |
dc.description.references | Stojković Zlatanović, S. & Ostojić, I. (2021). Labour law status of platform workers: Between autonomy and subordination. Regional Labour Review, 269–281. | pl |
dc.description.references | Unterschütz, J. (2020). Collective bargaining for platform workers: A hope for new developments? Hungarian Labour Law e-Journal, 2, 80–94. | pl |
dc.description.references | Vestager, M. (2022). Fairness and competition policy, SPEECH/22/6067, Prague, 22 October 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_22_6067 | pl |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2719-9452 | - |
dc.description.volume | 29 | pl |
dc.description.number | 2 | pl |
dc.description.firstpage | 65 | pl |
dc.description.lastpage | 82 | pl |
dc.identifier.citation2 | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze | pl |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-7074-6850 | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-7163-3292 | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-3721-5799 | - |
Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Artykuły naukowe (WP) Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2024, Vol. 29 nr 2 |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BSP_29_2_A_Jurkowska_Gomulka_A_Piszcz_S_Oliveira_Pais_Collective_agreements.pdf | 316,07 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL