Collective Bargang in Technology-Based Employment

Pole DC	Wartość	Język
dc.contributor.author	Jaspers, Teun	-
dc.contributor.author	Mądrzycki, Błażej	-
dc.contributor.author	Pisarczyk, Łukasz	-
dc.date.accessioned	2024-05-22T07:03:36Z	-
dc.date.available	2024-05-22T07:03:36Z	-
dc.date.issued	2024	-
dc.identifier.citation	Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 29 nr 2, 2024, s. 39-52	pl
dc.identifier.issn	1689-7404	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11320/16542	-
dc.description.abstract	New technology has profoundly influenced the world of work. The use of technology brings advantages for all – employers, workers and their representatives – but also some risks and hazards for working people. Despite technological development, workers still need effective protection that will ensure safety and sustainable development. The legal framework for this protection, both at European and national levels, is still under construction. An important role in filling the regulatory gap may be also played by collective bargaining. Moreover, modern technologies open up new possibilities for social partners to build their capacity and organize the process of negotiations. However, collective bargaining in the area of tech-based work remains in statu nascendi. This article analyses the need for and the advantages of collective protection in tech-based employment, its role in improving working standards and the influence of new technology on industrial relations.	pl
dc.language.iso	en	pl
dc.publisher	Faculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2	pl
dc.rights	Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0	-
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	-
dc.subject	collective bargaining	pl
dc.subject	digitalization	pl
dc.subject	new technology	pl
dc.subject	workers	pl
dc.title	Collective Bargang in Technology-Based Employment	pl
dc.type	Article	pl
dc.rights.holder	© 2024 Teun Jaspers, Błażej Mądrzycki et al published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License	pl
dc.identifier.doi	10.15290/bsp.2024.29.02.04	-
dc.description.Email	Teun Jaspers: a.jaspers@uu.nl	pl
dc.description.Email	Błażej Mądrzycki: blazej.madrzycki@us.edu.pl	pl
dc.description.Email	Łukasz Pisarczyk: lukasz.pisarczyk@us.edu.pl; l.pisarczyk@wpa.uz.zgora.pl	pl
dc.description.Affiliation	Teun Jaspers - University of Utrecht, Netherlands	pl
dc.description.Affiliation	Błażej Mądrzycki - Silesia University, Poland	pl
dc.description.Affiliation	Łukasz Pisarczyk - Silesia University, Poland; University of Zielona Góra, Poland	pl
dc.description.references	Adams-Prassl, J., Binns, R., & Kelly-Lyth, A. (2023). Directly discriminatory algorithms. Modern Law Review, 6, 144–175.	pl
dc.description.references	Adams-Prassl, J., Laulom, S., & Maneiro Vázquez, Y. (2022). The role of national courts in protecting platform workers: A comparative analysis. In J. M. Boto and E. Brameshuber (Eds.), Collective bargaining and the gig economy: A traditional tool for new business models (pp. 75–97). Hart Publishing.	pl
dc.description.references	Barthès, I. & Velicu, P. (2023, 3 July). AI at the workplace: Collective bargaining needed to ensure worker involvement. The Future of Work. https://republic.gr/futureofwork/techniti-noimo-syni-ston-choro-ergasias-anagki-syllogikon-diapragmateyseon-gia-ti-diasfalisi-tis-symmetochis-ton-ergazomenon/	pl
dc.description.references	Boto, J. M. (2022). Collective bargaining and the gig economy: Reality and possibilities. In J. M. Boto and E. Brameshuber (Eds.), Collective bargaining and the gig economy: A traditional tool for new business models (pp. 3–18). Hart Publishing.	pl
dc.description.references	Biasi, M. (2018) We will all laugh at gilded butterflies. The shadow of antitrust law on the collective negotiation of fair fees for self-employed workers. European Labour Law Journal 9(4), 354–373.	pl
dc.description.references	Brockmann, J. (2022). Voluntary Commitments as Alternative Instruments for Standard-setting? The Example of the German ‘Code of Conduct – Paid Crowdsourcing for the Better’. In J. M. Boto and E. Brameshuber (Eds.), Collective bargaining and the gig economy: A traditional tool for new business models (pp. 117–132). Hart Publishing.	pl
dc.description.references	Council of the European Union. (2023, 7 June). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work, COM (2021) 762 final. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10107–2023-INIT/en/pdf	pl
dc.description.references	Davidov, G. (2016). A purposive approach to labour law. Oxford University Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Directive (EU) 2022/2041 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on adequate minimum wages in the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32022L2041	pl
dc.description.references	De Stefano, V. (2019). ‘Negotiating the algorithm’: Automation, artificial intelligence and labour protection. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 41(1), 1–32.	pl
dc.description.references	Deskalova, V. (2021). The competition law framework and collective bargaining agreements for self-employed: Analysing restrictions and mapping exemption opportunities. In B. Waas and Ch. Hießl (Eds.), Collective bargaining for self-employed workers in Europe (pp. 19–51). Wolters Kluwer.	pl
dc.description.references	High Court Den Haag 9 July 2013, (FN V Kunsten). ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2013:5381.	pl
dc.description.references	High Court Den Haag 1 September 2015, (FN V Kunsten). ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:2305.	pl
dc.description.references	European Commission. (2022). Guidelines on the application of Union competition law to collective agreements regarding the working conditions of solo self-employed persons, 2022/C 374/02.	pl
dc.description.references	European Framework Agreement. (2020, June). European social partners framework agreement on digitalisation. https://www.etuc.org/system/files/document/file2020–06/Final%2022%2006%2020_Agreement%20on%20Digitalisation%202020.pdf	pl
dc.description.references	European Council. (2023). EU rules on platform work. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/platform-work-eu/	pl
dc.description.references	European pillar of social rights. (2017). https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/ce37482a-d0ca-11e7-a7df-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-62666461	pl
dc.description.references	European Parliament resolution of 21 January 2021 with recommendations to the Commission on the right to disconnect (2019/2181(INL)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9–2021-0021_EN.pdf	pl
dc.description.references	Gyulavári, T. (2020). Collective rights of platform workers: The role of EU law. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 27(4), 406–424.	pl
dc.description.references	Gyulavári, T. & Kártyás, G. (2022). Why collective bargaining is a ‘must’ for platform workers and how to achieve it. In J. M. Boto and E. Brameshuber (Eds.), Collective bargaining and the gig economy: A traditional tool for new business models (pp. 99–116). Hart Publishing.	pl
dc.description.references	International Labour Organisation. (2022). Social dialogue report 2022: Collective bargaining for an inclusive, sustainable and resilient recovery. International Labour Organisation.	pl
dc.description.references	Jaspers, T., Pennings F. and Peters S. (eds.) (2024). European Labour Law, Intersentia.	pl
dc.description.references	Klengel, E. & Wenckebach, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence, work, power imbalance and democracy – why co-determination is essential. Italian Labour Law e-Journal, 14(2), 157–171.	pl
dc.description.references	Krämer, C. & Cazes, S. (2022). Shaping the transition: Artificial intelligence and social dialogue, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 279, OECD Publishing.	pl
dc.description.references	Lamannis M. (2023). Collective bargaining in the platform economy: a mapping exercise of existing initiatives, European Trade Union Institute.	pl
dc.description.references	Lane, M., Williams, M., & Broecke, S. (2023). The impact of AI on the workplace: Main findings from the OECD AI surveys of employers and workers [OECD social, employment and migration working papers 288]. OECD Publishing.	pl
dc.description.references	Langille, B. (2011). Labour law’s theory of justice. In G. Davidov & B. Langille (Eds.), The idea of labour law (pp. 101–119). Oxford University Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Laulom, S. (2018). From decentralisation of collective bargaining to de-collectivisation of industrial relations systems? In S. Laulom (Ed.), Collective bargaining developments in times of crisis: Bulletin of comparative labour relations (pp. 15–28). Wolters Kluwer.	pl
dc.description.references	Pérez del Prado, D. (n.d.) The legal framework of platform work in Spain: The new Spanish ‘riders’ law’. Retrieved 25 September 2023, from https://cllpj.law.illinois.edu/content/dispatches/2021/Dispatch-No.-36.pdf	pl
dc.description.references	Ponce del Castillo, A. (2020). Labour in the age of AI: Why regulation is needed to protect workers. European Trade Union Institute. https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/ForesightBriefs2020.pdf	pl
dc.description.references	Prassl, J. (2018). Humans as a service: The promise and perils of work in the gig economy. Oxford University Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Ratti, L. (2022). A long road towards the regulation of platform work in the EU. In J. M. Boto and E. Brameshuber (Eds.), Collective bargaining and the gig economy: A traditional tool for new business models (pp. 39–59). Hart Publishing.	pl
dc.description.references	Roşioru, F. (2022). The ‘smart’ trade union: New strategies for a digitalised labour market. In J. M. Boto and E. Brameshuber (Eds.) Collective bargaining and the gig economy: A traditional tool for new business models (pp. 135–152). Hart Publishing.	pl
dc.description.references	Rotila, V. (2019). The future of social dialogue in the age of artificial intelligence. Postmodern Openings, 10(3), 151–189.	pl
dc.description.references	Salvi del Pero, A., Wyckoff, P., & Vourc’h, A. (2022). Using artificial intelligence in the workplace: What are the main ethical risks? [OECD social, employment and migration working papers 273]. OECD Publishing.	pl
dc.description.references	Supreme Court Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, 19 February 2021, (Uber BV v Aslam). UKSC 5 (75).	pl
dc.description.references	Supreme Court The Netherlands 24 March 2023, (Deliveroo). ECLI:NL:HR:2023:443.	pl
dc.description.references	Unterschütz, J. (2019), Digital work – real bargaining: how can the sustainability of social dialogue be ensured in the digital era? In: J. Kenner, I. Florczak, M. Otto (eds.), Precarious Work. The Challenge for Labour Law in Europe (pp. 222–241). Edward Elgar.	pl
dc.description.references	Voss, E. Bertossa, D. (2022) Collective Bargaining and Digitalization: A Global Survey of Union Use of Collective Bargaining to Increase Worker Control over Digitalization. New England Journal of Public Policy, 34(1), Article 10, 1–35.	pl
dc.description.references	Voss, E., Riede, H. (2018), Digitalisation and workers participation: what trade unions, company level workers and online platform workers in Europe think, European Trade Union Institute.	pl
dc.identifier.eissn	2719-9452	-
dc.description.volume	29	pl
dc.description.number	2	pl
dc.description.firstpage	39	pl
dc.description.lastpage	52	pl
dc.identifier.citation2	Białostockie Studia Prawnicze	pl
dc.identifier.orcid	brakorcid	-
dc.identifier.orcid	0000-0001-9165-6168	-
dc.identifier.orcid	0000-0001-9312-7489	-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):	Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2024, Vol. 29 nr 2

Pliki w tej pozycji:

Plik	Opis	Rozmiar	Format
BSP_29_2_T_Jaspers_B_Madrzycki_L_Pisarczyk_Collective_Bargang.pdf		322,7 kB	Adobe PDF	Otwórz

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki

Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL