REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/16538
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorTomsej, Jakub-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-21T09:15:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-21T09:15:29Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 29 nr 2, 2024, s. 19-28pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/16538-
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the challenges faced by employees in the Czech Republic when seeking legal redress in cases of discrimination and unfair dismissal. It emphasizes the importance of accessible legal recourse as a means to rectify individual grievances and reinforce equitable employment practices. In the context of discrimination, the article discusses challenges such as low awareness of anti-discrimination rights and the ancillary nature of sanctions. Recommendations include aligning the Anti-Discrimination Act with the Civil Code, empowering NGOs or the Ombudsman to initiate lawsuits in the public interest, and raising awareness among potential victims. In the section on unfair dismissal, the article outlines the complex process involved in disputing terminations from an employee’s perspective. It discusses obstacles such as complex, costly, and lengthy legal procedures and the requirement for reinstatement. These challenges contribute to the low number of employment lawsuits in the Czech Republic. Recommendations for improvement include enhancing the visibility of court actions, providing free or subsidized legal advice, shifting the focus of lawsuits towards monetary compensation, promoting mediation, and expediting proceedings. The article identifies common challenges in discrimination and unfair dismissal cases in the Czech Republic, highlighting the need for reforms to improve access to justice, reduce financial barriers, expedite legal proceedings, and enhance the dissuasive impact of remedies. These reforms are seen as essential for creating a fair and equitable workplace environment for all employees in the country.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectdiscriminationpl
dc.subjectjudicial redresspl
dc.subjectlabour lawpl
dc.subjectunfair dismissalpl
dc.titleFrom Discrimination to Dismissal: Navigating Obstacles on the Path to Workplace Justicepl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2024 Jakub Tomsej published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Licensepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2024.29.02.02-
dc.description.Emailtomsej@prf.cuni.czpl
dc.description.AffiliationCharles University, Czech Republicpl
dc.description.referencesAct No. 198/2009 Sb. of 29 June 2009, Anti-Discrimination Act.pl
dc.description.referencesAct No. 262/2006 Sb. Of 7 June 2006, Labour Code.pl
dc.description.referencesHardy, T. (2021). Digging into deterrence: An examination of deterrence-based theories and evidence in employment standards enforcement. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 2–3, p. 133–160.pl
dc.description.referencesHusseini, M. & Kopa, M. (2021). Komentář k článku 36. Listina základních práv a svobod. Komentář. C. H. Beck.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 27 June 2013 on the case of ET Agrokonsulting-04–Velko Stoyanov v. Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’ – Razplashtatelna agentsia, C-93/12, EU:C:2013:432.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 16 January 2014 on the case of Siegfried Pohl v. ÖBB Infrastruktur AG, C‑429/12, EU:C:2014:12.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 6 October 2015 on the case of Dragoș Constantin Târșia v. Statul român and Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim Permise de Conducere si Inmatriculare a Autovehiculelor, C-69/14, EU:C:2015:662.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 January 2016 on the case of ‘Eturas’ UAB and Others v. Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba, C-74/14, EU:C:2016:42.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 20 October 2016 on the case of Evelyn Danqua v. Minister for Justice and Equality and Others, C-429/15, EU:C:2016:789.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 15 March 2017 on the case of Lucio Cesare Aquino v. Belgische Staat, C-3/16, EU:C:2017:209.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Czech Supreme Court of 21 January 2020 on the case of file number 21 Cdo 2770/2019.pl
dc.description.referencesMinistry of Justice. (2022). Annual statistical sheet of civil law disputes.pl
dc.description.referencesOffice of the Public Defender of Rights. (2018). Annual report 2018. https://www.ochrance.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/zpravy_pro_poslaneckou_snemovnu/Reports/2018/2018-Annual_Report.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesOffice of the Public Defender of Rights. (2020). Rozhodování českých soudů o diskriminačních sporech 2015–2019. https://www.ochrance.cz/dokument/rozhodovani_ceskych_soudu_o_diskriminacnich_sporech_2015_2019/2020-vyzkum_judikatura-dis.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesOffice of the Public Defender of Rights. (n.d.). Recommendations for lawyers. https://ochrance.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/ESO/40–2019-DIS-LK_summary_in_english.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesPichrt, J. (2021). Pracovní právo. C. H. Beck.pl
dc.description.referencesPichrt, J., Stefko, M., & Moravek, J. (2017). Analýza alternativních způsobů řešení sporů v pracovněprávních vztazích. Wolters Kluwer.pl
dc.description.referencesPunta, D. R. (2021). Compliance and enforcement in Italian labour law. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 2–3, p. 224–242.pl
dc.description.referencesTomsej, J. (2020). Sanction systems in the light of EU Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC: A comparative study of Slovakia, Czechia and Poland. European Equality Law Review, 2, p. 45–62.pl
dc.description.referencesTomsej, J. (2022). Country report non-discrimination Czechia. Publications Office of the European Union.pl
dc.description.referencesTomsej, J. (2023a). Zákoník práce v praxi (5th ed). Grada Publishing.pl
dc.description.referencesTomsej, J. (2023b). Řešení sporů o neplatné skončení pracovního poměru (nejen) v době recese. In J. Pichrt & J. Tomsej (Eds.), Zaměstnavatel, zaměstnanec a podnikání v ekonomicky složité době (pp. 35–67). Wolters Kluwer.pl
dc.description.referencesTomsej, J., Polak, P., Koldinska, K., & Presserova, P. (2023). Antidiskriminační zákon a související předpisy: Praktický komentář. Wolters Kluwer.pl
dc.description.referencesVosko, L. F., Noack, A. M., King, A. D. K.,Osten, V. (2021). A model regulator? Investigating reactive and proactive labour standards enforcement in Canada’s federally regulated private sector. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 2–3, p. 161–182.pl
dc.description.referencesWaas, B. (2021). Enforcement of Labour Law: The Case of Germany. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 2–3, 225–226.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2719-9452-
dc.description.volume29pl
dc.description.number2pl
dc.description.firstpage19pl
dc.description.lastpage28pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1102-2734-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2024, Vol. 29 nr 2

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_29_2_J_Tomsej_From_Discrimination_to_Dismissal.pdf217,9 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons