Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/16538
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tomsej, Jakub | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-21T09:15:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-21T09:15:29Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 29 nr 2, 2024, s. 19-28 | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 1689-7404 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/16538 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article explores the challenges faced by employees in the Czech Republic when seeking legal redress in cases of discrimination and unfair dismissal. It emphasizes the importance of accessible legal recourse as a means to rectify individual grievances and reinforce equitable employment practices. In the context of discrimination, the article discusses challenges such as low awareness of anti-discrimination rights and the ancillary nature of sanctions. Recommendations include aligning the Anti-Discrimination Act with the Civil Code, empowering NGOs or the Ombudsman to initiate lawsuits in the public interest, and raising awareness among potential victims. In the section on unfair dismissal, the article outlines the complex process involved in disputing terminations from an employee’s perspective. It discusses obstacles such as complex, costly, and lengthy legal procedures and the requirement for reinstatement. These challenges contribute to the low number of employment lawsuits in the Czech Republic. Recommendations for improvement include enhancing the visibility of court actions, providing free or subsidized legal advice, shifting the focus of lawsuits towards monetary compensation, promoting mediation, and expediting proceedings. The article identifies common challenges in discrimination and unfair dismissal cases in the Czech Republic, highlighting the need for reforms to improve access to justice, reduce financial barriers, expedite legal proceedings, and enhance the dissuasive impact of remedies. These reforms are seen as essential for creating a fair and equitable workplace environment for all employees in the country. | pl |
dc.language.iso | en | pl |
dc.publisher | Faculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2 | pl |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | - |
dc.subject | discrimination | pl |
dc.subject | judicial redress | pl |
dc.subject | labour law | pl |
dc.subject | unfair dismissal | pl |
dc.title | From Discrimination to Dismissal: Navigating Obstacles on the Path to Workplace Justice | pl |
dc.type | Article | pl |
dc.rights.holder | © 2024 Jakub Tomsej published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License | pl |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15290/bsp.2024.29.02.02 | - |
dc.description.Email | tomsej@prf.cuni.cz | pl |
dc.description.Affiliation | Charles University, Czech Republic | pl |
dc.description.references | Act No. 198/2009 Sb. of 29 June 2009, Anti-Discrimination Act. | pl |
dc.description.references | Act No. 262/2006 Sb. Of 7 June 2006, Labour Code. | pl |
dc.description.references | Hardy, T. (2021). Digging into deterrence: An examination of deterrence-based theories and evidence in employment standards enforcement. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 2–3, p. 133–160. | pl |
dc.description.references | Husseini, M. & Kopa, M. (2021). Komentář k článku 36. Listina základních práv a svobod. Komentář. C. H. Beck. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 27 June 2013 on the case of ET Agrokonsulting-04–Velko Stoyanov v. Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’ – Razplashtatelna agentsia, C-93/12, EU:C:2013:432. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 16 January 2014 on the case of Siegfried Pohl v. ÖBB Infrastruktur AG, C‑429/12, EU:C:2014:12. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 6 October 2015 on the case of Dragoș Constantin Târșia v. Statul român and Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim Permise de Conducere si Inmatriculare a Autovehiculelor, C-69/14, EU:C:2015:662. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 January 2016 on the case of ‘Eturas’ UAB and Others v. Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba, C-74/14, EU:C:2016:42. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 20 October 2016 on the case of Evelyn Danqua v. Minister for Justice and Equality and Others, C-429/15, EU:C:2016:789. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 15 March 2017 on the case of Lucio Cesare Aquino v. Belgische Staat, C-3/16, EU:C:2017:209. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgment of the Czech Supreme Court of 21 January 2020 on the case of file number 21 Cdo 2770/2019. | pl |
dc.description.references | Ministry of Justice. (2022). Annual statistical sheet of civil law disputes. | pl |
dc.description.references | Office of the Public Defender of Rights. (2018). Annual report 2018. https://www.ochrance.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/zpravy_pro_poslaneckou_snemovnu/Reports/2018/2018-Annual_Report.pdf | pl |
dc.description.references | Office of the Public Defender of Rights. (2020). Rozhodování českých soudů o diskriminačních sporech 2015–2019. https://www.ochrance.cz/dokument/rozhodovani_ceskych_soudu_o_diskriminacnich_sporech_2015_2019/2020-vyzkum_judikatura-dis.pdf | pl |
dc.description.references | Office of the Public Defender of Rights. (n.d.). Recommendations for lawyers. https://ochrance.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/ESO/40–2019-DIS-LK_summary_in_english.pdf | pl |
dc.description.references | Pichrt, J. (2021). Pracovní právo. C. H. Beck. | pl |
dc.description.references | Pichrt, J., Stefko, M., & Moravek, J. (2017). Analýza alternativních způsobů řešení sporů v pracovněprávních vztazích. Wolters Kluwer. | pl |
dc.description.references | Punta, D. R. (2021). Compliance and enforcement in Italian labour law. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 2–3, p. 224–242. | pl |
dc.description.references | Tomsej, J. (2020). Sanction systems in the light of EU Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC: A comparative study of Slovakia, Czechia and Poland. European Equality Law Review, 2, p. 45–62. | pl |
dc.description.references | Tomsej, J. (2022). Country report non-discrimination Czechia. Publications Office of the European Union. | pl |
dc.description.references | Tomsej, J. (2023a). Zákoník práce v praxi (5th ed). Grada Publishing. | pl |
dc.description.references | Tomsej, J. (2023b). Řešení sporů o neplatné skončení pracovního poměru (nejen) v době recese. In J. Pichrt & J. Tomsej (Eds.), Zaměstnavatel, zaměstnanec a podnikání v ekonomicky složité době (pp. 35–67). Wolters Kluwer. | pl |
dc.description.references | Tomsej, J., Polak, P., Koldinska, K., & Presserova, P. (2023). Antidiskriminační zákon a související předpisy: Praktický komentář. Wolters Kluwer. | pl |
dc.description.references | Vosko, L. F., Noack, A. M., King, A. D. K.,Osten, V. (2021). A model regulator? Investigating reactive and proactive labour standards enforcement in Canada’s federally regulated private sector. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 2–3, p. 161–182. | pl |
dc.description.references | Waas, B. (2021). Enforcement of Labour Law: The Case of Germany. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 2–3, 225–226. | pl |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2719-9452 | - |
dc.description.volume | 29 | pl |
dc.description.number | 2 | pl |
dc.description.firstpage | 19 | pl |
dc.description.lastpage | 28 | pl |
dc.identifier.citation2 | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze | pl |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-1102-2734 | - |
Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2024, Vol. 29 nr 2 |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BSP_29_2_J_Tomsej_From_Discrimination_to_Dismissal.pdf | 217,9 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL