REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/15767
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorBareikytė, Simona-
dc.contributor.authorDeviatnikovaitė, Ieva-
dc.contributor.authorJacevič, Barbara-
dc.contributor.authorPaužaitė-Kulvinskienė, Jurgita-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-18T10:01:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-18T10:01:47Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationMiscellanea Historico-Iuridica, T. 22, Z. 2, 2023, s. 11-42pl
dc.identifier.issn1732-9132-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/15767-
dc.description.abstractJudicial review of the legality of administrative acts is one of the most important elements of the rule of law. The institute of administrative justice began to develop in the 19th century: in 1872 The French Council of State was given a function of judicial review, the Administrative Court in Vienna (Austria-Hungary) was established in 1867, in Baden (Germany) in 1863, etc. After the First World War, administrative courts were established in several European countries. The law on the Supreme Administrative Court and its Jurisdiction in Czechoslovakia was adopted in 1918. The Law for the Supreme Administrative Court in Poland was issued in 1922. Administrative courts were also functioning in other countries (Latvia, Estonia). In Lithuania administrative courts were established for the first time in 1999, although up to fifteen draft laws on the Administrative Court were prepared in the interwar Lithuania. This article was written on the occasion of the centenary of the Polish administrative courts. Thus, the purpose of the article is to familiarize the readers with Lithuanian administrative courts, starting with the development of the institute of administrative justice from 1918 and ending with the perspectives of judicial review formed in that time. Therefore, the authors of the article set the following objectives: to remind of the origins of administrative justice in Lithuania from 1918 to 1940; to reveal the course of the establishment of administrative courts after the Restoration of the Independence of the Republic of Lithuania in 1990, briefly discussing who and on the basis of which legal acts controlled the legality of administrative acts during the Soviet era; to provide the insights of institutional evelopment as well as competence development of the administrative courts; to present contemporary administrative process, giving some insights about the status quo; to present the features of and the most relevant reforms of administrative process. Abbreviations used in the article are as follows: CSARL – Central State Archive of the Republic ofLithuania, MDWLLAS – Manuscript Department of the Wróblewski Library of the Lithuanian Academy of Sciences.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstokupl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY-SA 4.0)-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.pl-
dc.subjectadministrative courtspl
dc.subjectadministrative justicepl
dc.subjectadministrative processpl
dc.titleAdministrative Courts in Lithuania: History, Evolution, the Present, and Perspectivespl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderUznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY-SA 4.0)pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/mhi.2023.22.02.01-
dc.description.EmailSimona Bareikytė: simona.bareikyte@tf.vu.ltpl
dc.description.EmailIeva Deviatnikovaitė: ieva@mruni.eupl
dc.description.EmailBarbara Jacevič: jacevic.barbara@gmail.compl
dc.description.EmailJurgita Paužaitė-Kulvinskienė: pauzaite@gmx.depl
dc.description.AffiliationSimona Bareikytė - Vilniaus universitetas (Vilnius University, Lithuania)pl
dc.description.AffiliationIeva Deviatnikovaitė - Mykolo Romerio universitetas (Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania)pl
dc.description.AffiliationBarbara Jacevič - Mykolo Romerio universitetas (Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania)pl
dc.description.AffiliationJurgita Paužaitė-Kulvinskienė - Vilniaus universitetas (Vilnius University, Lithuania)pl
dc.description.referencesThe Constitution of the State of Lithuania, Official Gazette 1922, No. 100-799.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Outline of Lithuanian Administrative Process Reform, Official Gazette 1996, No. 2614.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Constitution of the State of Lithuania, Official Gazette 1928, No. 275-1778.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Official Gazette 1995, No. 40-987.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Instruction of the Representative of the Cohesion States in 1920 September 21 for redevelopment by the central government, Official Gazette of the Memel Territory 1920 No. 41.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Law on Administrative Proceedings of the Republic of Lithuania, Official Gazette 1999, No. 13-308.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Law on Amendments to the Law on Administrative Cases of the Republic of Lithuania, Official Gazette 2000, No. 85-2566.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Law on Courts of the Republic of Lithuania, Official Gazette 2002, No. 17-649.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Law on the Council of State, Official Gazette 1928, No. 283-1813.pl
dc.description.referencesJudicial System Act, Official Gazette 1933, No. 419-2900.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Law on Labour Income Tax, Official Gazette 1932, No. 388-2668.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Law on Land Management, Official Gazette 1935, No. 494-3446.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Law on the Establishment of Administrative Courts, Official Gazette 1999, No. 13-309.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Law on the Establishment of Administrative Courts of the Republic of Lithuania No. VIII-1030 Law amending Article 2 and repealing Article 3, Official Gazette 2016, No. 17975.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Law on the Implementation of the Law on Amending and Supplementing Articles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of the Law on the Establishment of Administrative Courts of the Republic of Lithuania and the Law on Amending the Law on Administrative Cases, Official Gazette 2000, No. 85-2568.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Law of the Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic on Civil Procedure Code, Official Gazette 1964, No. 19-139.pl
dc.description.referencesOn the Implementation Program of the Reform of the Legal System, Official Gazette, 1994, No. 45-840.pl
dc.description.referencesOn the Outline of the Reform of the Legal System and its Implementation, Official Gazette 18-12-1993, No 70-1311.pl
dc.description.referencesOn the Provisional Basic Law of the Republic of Lithuania, Official Gazette 31-03-1990, No. 9-224.pl
dc.description.referencesRegarding the Outline of the Reform of the Legal System (new version) and their Implementation, Official Gazette 08-07-1998, No 61-1736.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Commission of Legal Advisers of the Ministries, Interim Official Gazette 1920, No. 23-290 (1920).pl
dc.description.referencesThe Outline of the Lithuanian Administrative Process Reform, Official Gazette 20-09-1996, No 2614.pl
dc.description.referencesUstawa z dnia 3 sierpnia 1922 r. o Najwyższym Trybunale Administracyjnym, http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19220670600pl
dc.description.referencesZákon č. 3 ze dne 2. listopadu 1918 o nejvyšším správním soudě a o řešení kompetenčních konfliktů, http://www.nssoud.cz/historie/3_1918.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesDecision of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania Regarding the Submissionof the Draft Resolution of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania On the Outlines of the Administrative Procedure Reform and Their Implementation to the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, Official Gazette 1996, No. 1080.pl
dc.description.referencesExplanatory Note to the Draft of the Resolution of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania On the Outline of the Reform of Administrative Process, Official Gazette 1996, No. 2614.pl
dc.description.referencesDrafts of the Constitution (1936), CSARL, f. 923, a. 1., b. 989.pl
dc.description.referencesDraft Law on the Establishment of Administrative Courts (edited for adoption)1999, No. P-1272 (3).pl
dc.description.referencesExplanatory Note to the Draft Laws No P-1271-P-1275, 1998, No P-1271; https://eseimas.lrs.lt/ portal/legalAct/lt/TAK/ TAIS.58719?jfwid=-py58q4158pl
dc.description.referencesMinutes of the Morning Plenary Session of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania No. 54(217). https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAK/TAIS.59900pl
dc.description.referencesRömeris M., Administracinio teismo įstatymo aiškinamasis raštas, MDWLLAS, f. 138 (Römerių giminės aktai), unit 2325, 10-29.pl
dc.description.referencesRegarding the Creation of a Working Group to Draft Laws on the Establishment of Administrative Courts and Determination of their Competence, 1997, No. 415; https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.42249?positionInSearchResults=0& searchModelUUID=26b88f29-f040 -4a86-aa06-e0a740c3ac8bpl
dc.description.referencesTranscript of the Twenty-sixth Session of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania; https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/rs/legalact/TAK/TAIS. 240857/#zyma_9s26padminteisenpl
dc.description.referencesPreparation of the Draft of Lithuanian Constitution, CSARL, f. 1557, a. 1, b. 168, 14.pl
dc.description.references18 October, 2000 decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania.pl
dc.description.references2 June, 2002 decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania.pl
dc.description.references10 September, 2002 decision case No A-11-00888-02 of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania;pl
dc.description.references4 March, 2003 decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania.pl
dc.description.references13 December, 2004 the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania.pl
dc.description.references7 March, 2005 decision the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania.pl
dc.description.references21 January, 2008 decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania. 15 March, 2008 decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania.pl
dc.description.references15 March, 2008 decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania.pl
dc.description.references21 December, 2006 decision case no N-469-2076-06 of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania.pl
dc.description.references30 November, 2015 decision case No eA-718-602/2015 of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania.pl
dc.description.references21 September, 2016 decision case No AS-714-261/2016 of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania.pl
dc.description.references3 July, 2019 decision case No eA-1510-602/2019 of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania.pl
dc.description.references10 November, 2021 decision case No eA-2684-602/2021 of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania.pl
dc.description.references1 December, 2021 decision case No eA-73-822/2021 of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania.pl
dc.description.referencesAdministraciniai teismai Lietuvoje: nūdienos iššūkiai, Vilnius 2010.pl
dc.description.referencesAmbrasaitė G., Apeliacija administraciniame procese: teisės kreiptis į Lietuvos vyriausiąjį administracinį teismą ribojimo galimybės, „Jurisprudencija“ 2006, No. 6(84).pl
dc.description.referencesAmbrasaitė G., Apeliacija Lietuvos administraciniame procese: pagrindinės reformos kryptys, „Jurisprudencija“ 2006, No. 4(82).pl
dc.description.referencesBirmontienė T., Jarašiūnas E., Kūris E., Maksimaitis M., Lietuvos konstitucinė teisė, 2 leid. Vilnius 2002.pl
dc.description.referencesBoyron S., Mediation in administrative law: the identification of conflicting paradigms, “European Public Law” 2007, no. 13(2).pl
dc.description.referencesBilevičiūtė E., Pranevičienė B., Nuotolinio administracinio proceso ypatumai, [in:] Administracinės teisės novelos, Vilnius 2022.pl
dc.description.referencesDeviatnikovaitė I., Administracinio teismo istorija Lietuvoje 1918–1940, Kraków 2021.pl
dc.description.referencesJacevič B., Administracinių teismų kūrimosi prielaidos ir raida Lietuvoje, Magistro baigiamasis darbas, Vilnius 2022.pl
dc.description.referencesKavalnė S., Saudargaitė I., Mediation in disputes between public authorities and private parties: comparative aspects, „Jurisprudencija“ 2011, No. 18 (1).pl
dc.description.referencesPaužaitė-Kulvinskienė J., Administracinė justicija: teorija ir praktika, Vilnius 2005.pl
dc.description.referencesPaškevičienė L., Išankstinio administracinių ginčų nagrinėjimo ne teisme institutas Lietuvoje: teisinio reguliavimo aiškinimo problematika, „Teisė“ 2019, No. 111.pl
dc.description.referencesPaškevičienė L., Išankstinio administracinių ginčų nagrinėjimo ne teisme institutas Lietuvoje: idėjiniai ir vertybiniai pagrindai, „Teisė“ 2018, No. 108.pl
dc.description.referencesPaužaitė-Kulvinskienė J., Administracinio proceso modelio paieškos Lietuvos moksle, [in:] Ketvirtis amžiaus tiriant ir reformuojant Lietuvos teisinę sistemą. Recenzuotų mokslinių straipsnių rinkinys, Vilnius 2016.pl
dc.description.referencesPaužaitė-Kulvinskienė J., Teisės į apeliaciją paradigminė kaita: link ribotos apeliacijos modelio administracinių bylų teisenoje, [in:] Administracinės teisės novelos, Vilnius 2022.pl
dc.description.referencesPaužaitė-Kulvinskienė J., The principle of effective legal protection in administrative law in Lithuania, [in:] The principle of effective legal protection in administrative law: a European perspective, Abingdon 2017.pl
dc.description.referencesPaužaitė-Kulvinskienė J., Kiti ginčo sprendimo būdai administracinių bylų teisenoje ir jų praktinio taikymo problemos, „Teisė“ 2013, No. 86.pl
dc.description.referencesPaužaitė-Kulvinskienė J., Taikos sutarties sudarymo problemos ir perspektyvos Lietuvos administraciniame procese, [in:] Nepriklausomos Lietuvos teisė: praeitis, dabartis ir ateitis: recenzuotų mokslinių straipsnių rinkinys, Vilnius 2012.pl
dc.description.referencesPoška D. Asmens teisė į teisminę gynybą ir jos įgyvendinimo probleminiai aspektai Lietuvos administraciniuose teismuose, Daktaro disertacija, Socialiniai mokslai, teisė (S 01), Vilnius 2007.pl
dc.description.referencesRaižys D., Urbonas D., Administracinių bylų teisenos infrastruktūrinis modelis, „Visuomenės saugumas ir viešoji tvarka“ 2010, No. 3.pl
dc.description.referencesRaižys D., Administracinių teisės pažeidimų bylų teismingumo problemos, [in:] Administraciniai teismai Lietuvoje: nūdienos iššūkiai, Vilnius 2010.pl
dc.description.referencesRömeris M., Lietuvos konstitucinės teisės paskaitos, Vilnius 1990.pl
dc.description.referencesRömeris M., Administracinis teismas, Kaunas 1928.pl
dc.description.referencesRömeris M., Administracinio teismo įstatymo projektas, „Židinys“ 1940, No. 5/6.pl
dc.description.referencesRömeris M., Lietuvos konstitucinės teisės paskaitos, Kaunas 1937.pl
dc.description.referencesRömer M., Dziennik 1926-1928, MDWLLAS, f. 138-2258, 455.pl
dc.description.referencesSchoch F., Scmidt-Assmann E., Pietzner R., Kommentar VwGO, I Band, München 2003.pl
dc.description.referencesTrumpulis U., Teorinės ir praktinės mediacijos taikymo prielaidos sprendžiant administracinius ginčus Lietuvoje, „Jurisprudencija“ 2012, No. 19 (4).pl
dc.description.referencesŠedbaras S., Administracinio proceso teisinio reglamentavimo problemos Lietuvos Respublikoje, Vilnius 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesSaudargaitė I., Sutkevičius A., Taikos sutartis administracinių teismų praktikoje, [in:] Žmogus, teisinė valstybės ir administracinė justicija. Mokslo studija, skirta Lietuvos vyriausiojo administracinio teismo dešimtmečiui, Vilnius 2012.pl
dc.description.referencesValančius V., Norkus R., Nacionalinis teisinis diskursas dėl administracinio proceso, „Jurisprudencija“ 2006, No. 3(81).pl
dc.description.referencesŽilys J., Lietuvos Respublikos Aukščiausiosios Tarybos Prezidiumo konstitucinis statusas – santykių su vykdomąja valdžia aspektas „Jurisprudencija“ 2002, No. 29(21).pl
dc.identifier.eissn2719-9991-
dc.description.volume22pl
dc.description.issue2pl
dc.description.firstpage11pl
dc.description.lastpage42pl
dc.identifier.citation2Miscellanea Historico-Iuridicapl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4502-8619-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0982-878X-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5051-3678-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3643-6928-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica, 2023, tom XXII, Z. 2

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons