Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/15491
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Leonkiewicz, Łukasz | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-22T10:13:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-22T10:13:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Elpis, T. 12, 2010, s. 195-220 | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 1508-7719 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/15491 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Pre-Christian philosophy has formed land for the development of Christian theology, but first of all it has worked out notions enabling to describe the learning announced in the Bible. Vocabulary of notions handed over by the antiquity, new Christian, showed itself the age for Christian thinkers with foundation, on which the building of theology was made. Philosophical concepts such as ousia, hypostasis whether energyshowed themselves most suitable for describing the Christian dogma, but also with a view to describing the sphere of experience, spheres of action, philosophical terms were the most adequate. Philosophy played the major part in the process of developing of Christian theology, even if itself it didn’t create the last one. Full rejecting of the ancient concept by Christian theologians wasn’t possible. Starting from St. Basil the Great among theologians ruled a view that Christianity didn’t adopt from antiquity anything apart from notions. But many notions failed in the philosophical thinking of the antiquity and even though they have other meanings now, they can have them only because they developed, they lived their own life, in every age they were differently interpreted. The separation of philosophy and theology has never taken place fully, because it couldn’t have. Otherwise we would form something what in it form would resemble the attempt of interpretation of the New Testament without taking Old into account. | pl |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku | pl |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.pl | - |
dc.subject | Metaphysics | pl |
dc.subject | ousia | pl |
dc.subject | hypostasis | pl |
dc.subject | energy | pl |
dc.subject | arete | pl |
dc.subject | psyche | pl |
dc.subject | perfection | pl |
dc.subject | philosophy | pl |
dc.subject | theology | pl |
dc.title | Terminologia filozoficzna w nauce Ojców Kościoła | pl |
dc.title.alternative | Philosophical terminology in the Teachings of the Church Fathers | pl |
dc.type | Article | pl |
dc.rights.holder | Uznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe | pl |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15290/elpis.2010.12.12 | - |
dc.description.volume | 12 | pl |
dc.description.firstpage | 195 | pl |
dc.description.lastpage | 220 | pl |
dc.identifier.citation2 | Elpis | pl |
Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Elpis, 2010, T. 12 |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Elpis_12_2010_L_Leonkiewicz_Terminologia_filozoficzna_w_nauce_Ojcow_Kosciola.pdf | 261,52 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL