REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/15491
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorLeonkiewicz, Łukasz-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-22T10:13:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-22T10:13:56Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationElpis, T. 12, 2010, s. 195-220pl
dc.identifier.issn1508-7719-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/15491-
dc.description.abstractPre-Christian philosophy has formed land for the development of Christian theology, but first of all it has worked out notions enabling to describe the learning announced in the Bible. Vocabulary of notions handed over by the antiquity, new Christian, showed itself the age for Christian thinkers with foundation, on which the building of theology was made. Philosophical concepts such as ousia, hypostasis whether energyshowed themselves most suitable for describing the Christian dogma, but also with a view to describing the sphere of experience, spheres of action, philosophical terms were the most adequate. Philosophy played the major part in the process of developing of Christian theology, even if itself it didn’t create the last one. Full rejecting of the ancient concept by Christian theologians wasn’t possible. Starting from St. Basil the Great among theologians ruled a view that Christianity didn’t adopt from antiquity anything apart from notions. But many notions failed in the philosophical thinking of the antiquity and even though they have other meanings now, they can have them only because they developed, they lived their own life, in every age they were differently interpreted. The separation of philosophy and theology has never taken place fully, because it couldn’t have. Otherwise we would form something what in it form would resemble the attempt of interpretation of the New Testament without taking Old into account.pl
dc.language.isoplpl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstokupl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.pl-
dc.subjectMetaphysicspl
dc.subjectousiapl
dc.subjecthypostasispl
dc.subjectenergypl
dc.subjectaretepl
dc.subjectpsychepl
dc.subjectperfectionpl
dc.subjectphilosophypl
dc.subjecttheologypl
dc.titleTerminologia filozoficzna w nauce Ojców Kościołapl
dc.title.alternativePhilosophical terminology in the Teachings of the Church Fatherspl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderUznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/elpis.2010.12.12-
dc.description.volume12pl
dc.description.firstpage195pl
dc.description.lastpage220pl
dc.identifier.citation2Elpispl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Elpis, 2010, T. 12

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Elpis_12_2010_L_Leonkiewicz_Terminologia_filozoficzna_w_nauce_Ojcow_Kosciola.pdf261,52 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons