REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/15314
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorKrajewski, Piotr-
dc.contributor.authorPiłat, Katarzyna-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-20T09:10:00Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-20T09:10:00Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationOptimum. Economic Studies, Nr 2(112) 2023, s. 19-37pl
dc.identifier.issn1506-7637-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/15314-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The purpose of the article is to compare the macroeconomic effects of military and non-military government spending on the Polish economy, which is particularly relevant in the context of the rapid rise in military spending after the outbreak of the war in Ukraine. Research method – The research is based on a new-Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model estimated for the Polish economy. The model developed for the study takes into account differences between 3 types of government spending – military spending, non-military current spending and non-military investment. Results – On the one hand, the empirical results show that in the short and medium term, increasing military spending is a more effective method of stimulating GDP than rising non-military spending. On the other hand, the impulse response functions indicate that increasing non-military spending is a better tool for enhancing effective consumption. Originality / value / implications / recommendations – This is the first research exploring the macroeconomic effects of military spending in a CEE country, which is based on stochastic general equilibrium model accounting for heterogeneity of government spending. Assessing these effects at a time of unprecedented growth in military spending in Poland is an important added value of the study. The main implication of the research is to recommend increasing military spending to boost GDP, while rising non-military spending to stimulate effective consumption.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstokupl
dc.subjectmilitary spendingpl
dc.subjectnon-military spendingpl
dc.subjectfiscal policypl
dc.titleThe comparison of the impact of military and non-military government spending on GDP and consumption in Polandpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Uniwersytet w Białymstokupl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/oes.2023.02.112.02-
dc.description.EmailPiotr Krajewski: piotr.krajewski@uni.lodz.plpl
dc.description.EmailKatarzyna Piłat: katarzyna.pilat@uni.lodz.plpl
dc.description.AffiliationPiotr Krajewski - University of Lodzpl
dc.description.AffiliationKatarzyna Piłat - University of Lodzpl
dc.description.referencesAdolfson M., Laseen S., Linde J., Villani M., 2007, Bayesian estimation of an open economy DSGE model with incomplete pass-through, “Journal of International Economics”, Vol. 72(2), pp. 481–511, DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.01.003.pl
dc.description.referencesAfonso A., Baxa J., Slavik M., 2018, Fiscal Developments and Financial Stress: A Threshold VAR Analysis, “Empirical Economics”, Vol. 54(2), pp. 395–423, DOI: 10.1007/s00181-016-1210-5.pl
dc.description.referencesAtesoglu H.S., Mueller M.J., 1990, Defence Spending and Economic Growth, “Defence Economics”, Vol. 2(1), pp. 19–27, DOI: 10.1080/10430719008404675.pl
dc.description.referencesBecerra-Vicario, R., Alaminos D., Cisneros-Ruiz A., Solano S., Miguel A., 2020, Estimating Optimal Military Spending Policy in DSGE Model: Empirical vs Theoretical Approach, “Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research”, Vol. 79, pp. 193–196, DOI: 10.56042/jsir.v79i3.68635.pl
dc.description.referencesBarro R., 1974, Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?, “Journal of Political Economy”, Vol. 82(6), pp. 1095–1117, DOI: 10.1086/260266.pl
dc.description.referencesBrumm H.J., 1997, Military Spending, Government Disarray, and Economic Growth: A Cross-country Empirical Analysis, “Journal of Macroeconomics”, Vol. 19(4), pp. 827–838, DOI: 10.1016/S0164-0704(97)00044-X.pl
dc.description.referencesCalvo G.A., 1983, Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework, “Journal of Monetary Economics”, Vol. 12(3), pp. 383–398, DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(83)90060-0.pl
dc.description.referencesCarter J., Ondercin H.L., Palmer G., 2021, Guns, Butter, and Growth: The Consequences of Military Spending Reconsidered, “Political Research Quarterly”, Vol. 74(1), pp. 148–165, DOI: 10.1177/1065912919890417.pl
dc.description.referencesChen P.F., Lee C.C., Chiu Y.B., 2014, The Nexus between Defense Expenditure and Economic Growth: New Global Evidence, “Economic Modelling”, Vol. 36(C), pp. 474–483, DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.10.019.pl
dc.description.referencesChristiano L.J., Eichenbaum M., 1992, Current Real Business Cycle Theory and Aggregate Labor Market Fluctuations, “American Economic Review”, Vol. 82(3), pp. 430–450, DOI: jstor.org/stable/i337064.pl
dc.description.referencesCompton R., Paterson B., 2016, Military Spending and Growth: The Role of Institutions, “Defence and Peace Economics”, Vol. 27(3), pp. 301–322, DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2015.1060022.pl
dc.description.referencesd’Agostino G., Dunne J.P., Pieroni L., 2012, Assessing the Effects of Military Expenditure on Growth, [in:] The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Peace and Conflict, Garfinkel M.R., Skaperdas S. (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.pl
dc.description.referencesDunne J.P., Tian N., 2013, Military Expenditure and Economic Growth: A survey, “The Economics of Peace and Security Journal”, Vol. 8(1), DOI: 10.15355/epsj.8.1.5.pl
dc.description.referencesDunne J.P., Tian N., 2015, Military Expenditure, Economic Growth and Heterogeneity, “Defence and Peace Economics”, Vol. 26(1), pp. 15–31, DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2013.848575.pl
dc.description.referencesErceg Ch.J., Henderson D.W., Levin A.T., 2000, Optimal monetary policy with staggered wage and price contracts, “Journal of Monetary Economics”, Vol. 46(2), pp. 281–313, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3932(00)00028-3.pl
dc.description.referencesErcolani V., e Azevedo J.V., 2014, The effects of public spending externalities, “Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control”, Vol. 46(C), pp. 173–199, DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.06.016.pl
dc.description.referencesGalí J., López-Salido J.D, Vallés J., 2004, Rule-of-Thumb Consumers and the Design of Interest Rate Rules, “Journal of Money, Credit and Banking”, Vol. 36(4), pp. 739–764, DOI: 10.1353/mcb.2004.0064.pl
dc.description.referencesHeijdra B., Ligthart J.E., 1997, Keynesian Mulitpliers, Direct, Crowding Out, and the Optimal Provision of Public Goods, “Journal of Macroeconomics”, Vol. 19(4), pp. 803–826, DOI: 10.1016/S0164-0704(97)00043-8.pl
dc.description.referencesHulten C., Schwab R., 1993, Public Capital Formation and the Growth of Regional Manufacturing Industries, “National Tax Journal”, Vol. 46(3), pp. 261–273, DOI: 10.1086/NTJ41789019.pl
dc.description.referencesHung-Pin L., Wang T.-L., 2022, Does Military Expenditure Promote Economic Growth and Social Welfare? Theoretical and Empirical Evidence in Taiwan, “Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research”, Vol. 56(2), DOI: 10.24818/18423264/56.2.22.05.pl
dc.description.referencesKamps Ch., 2004, The Dynamic Macroeconomic Effects of Public Capital: Theory and Evidence for OECD Countries, Springer, Berlin.pl
dc.description.referencesKaramanis D., 2022, Defence Partnerships, Military Expenditure, Investment, and Economic Growth: An Analysis in Pesco Countries, “Hellenic Observatory Discussion Papers”, No. 173, London School of Economics and Political Science.pl
dc.description.referencesKarras G., 1994, Government Spending and Private Consumption: Some International Evidence, “Journal of Money, Credit and Banking”, Vol. 26(1), pp. 9–22, DOI: 10.2307/2078031.pl
dc.description.referencesKollmann R., 2001, The Exchange Rate in a Dynamic-Optimizing Business Cycle Model with Nominal Rigidities: A Quantitative Investigation, “Journal of International Economics”, Vol. 55(2), pp. 243–262, DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00087-3.pl
dc.description.referencesKwan Y.K., 2006, The Direct Substitution Between Government and Private Consumption in East Asia, “NBER Working Papers”, No. 12431, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.pl
dc.description.referencesLobont O.R., Glont O.R., Badea L., Vatavu S., 2019, Correlation of Military Expenditures and Economic Growth: Lessons for Romania, “Quality & Quantity”, Vol. 53, pp. 2957–2968, DOI: 10.1007/s11135-019-00910-9.pl
dc.description.referencesLorusso M., Pieroni L., 2017, The Effects of Military and Non-Military Government Expenditures on Private Consumption, “Journal of Peace Research”, Vol. 54(3), pp. 442–456, DOI: 10.1177/0022343316687017.pl
dc.description.referencesMohanty R.K., Panda S., Bhuyan B., 2020, Does Defence Spending and Its Composition Affect Economic Growth in India?, “Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research”, Vol. 14(1), pp. 62–85, DOI: 10.1177/0973801019886486.pl
dc.description.referencesTaylor J.B., 1993, Discretion versus policy rules in practice, “Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy”, Vol. 39(1), pp. 195–214, DOI: 10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-L.pl
dc.description.number2(112)pl
dc.description.firstpage19pl
dc.description.lastpage37pl
dc.identifier.citation2Optimum. Economic Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5377-9578-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9364-8863-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Optimum. Economic Studies, 2023, nr 2(112)

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)