REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/15042
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorDalamu, Taofeek O.-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Ke-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-07T12:09:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-07T12:09:20Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationCrossroads. A Journal of English Studies 38 (3/2022), pp. 66-97pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/15042-
dc.description.abstractThis study explored the employment of advertising texts as tools for teaching grammar to for-eign learners of English, as their constituent organisation is assumed to enhance the understanding of some grammatical details. Ten advertisements of beverages, banks, telecommunications, condiments, cream, and soap served as the research material. After the application of the grammar of interaction to the communicative components, the tables and graphs functioned to calibrate the grammatical mnemonics and semantic resources of the clauses. This study analysed the use of orthographic clauses, Six Countries, Six Voices, and One Song;alphanumeric clauses, Dial *966*911# to stop debit transactions on your account; and compounding, DataPlus, Smartphone as qualities of advertising. One also observed novel constructions such asEazyBanking and Souper; acronyms, as in UBA United Bank for Africa; and hash-tag as in #EachForE-qual, as well as the deployment of interspersed and splintered grammatical entities such as Starting from 17:59, Olympic Gold Medalist, Cheers to those who came before us and Pledge to drink right. The authors suggest that applications of the textual devices characteristic of advertising in the university classroom might encourage learners to practise the grammar of English.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherThe University of Białystokpl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/-
dc.subjectadvertisingpl
dc.subjectgrammarpl
dc.subjectinteractionpl
dc.subjectmoodpl
dc.subjectteachingpl
dc.titleAdvertising linguistic framework: An instrument for teaching grammar in EFL university classroomspl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/CR.2022.38.3.04-
dc.description.EmailTaofeek O. Dalamu: tdalamu@aul.edu.ngpl
dc.description.EmailKe Yang: 16447093@life.hkbu.edu.hkpl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteDr. Taofeek O. Dalamu,a Senior Lecturer, obtained a Ph.D. in English Language from the University of Lagos, Akoka-Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria. As a faculty member, he currently teaches English at the Department of English and Literary Studies, Anchor University, Lagos, Nigeria. This individual specialises in Systemic Functional Linguistics, as appli-cable to Discourse Analysis, Multimodality, Social Semiotics, and Digital Humanities in relation, mostly, to advertising communications. As a functional social semiotician, Dr. Dalamu exhibits a variety of over two scores of publications in reputable interna-tional journals across the globe. See: www.researchgate.net.cdn/taofeekdalamupl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteDr. Ke Yang obtained a Ph.D. (Ed.D.) in English Education from Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong; and M.A. English Linguistics at University of Nottingham. However, he teaches cross-cultural communication and advanced English reading at the College of English, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China PR, East Asia. Some of his publications are available at: https://www.researchgate.net/pro-file/Ke-Yang-18.pl
dc.description.AffiliationTaofeek O. Dalamu - Anchor University, Lagos, Nigeriapl
dc.description.AffiliationKe Yang - Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China PRpl
dc.description.referencesAlcaraz-Mármol, G. 2019. Developing EFL oral skills through linguistic mediation in the secondary education classroom. ELIA, 19: 15-40.pl
dc.description.referencesAliasin, S. & Abbasi, S. 2020. The relationship between Iranian EFL learnersʼ emotional intelligence and metacognitive reading strategies use. JLE6(2): 31-43.pl
dc.description.referencesBauer, L. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: CUP.pl
dc.description.referencesBloor, T. & Bloor, M. 2013. The Functional Analysis of English. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesBooij, G. 2007. The Grammar of Word: An Introduction to Morphology. Oxford: OUP.pl
dc.description.referencesBrierley, S. 2002. The Advertising Handbook.London, GB: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesBušljeta, R. 2013. Effective use of teaching and learning resources. Czech-Polish Historical and Pedagogical Journal 5(2): 55–69.pl
dc.description.referencesButler, C. 1985. Systemic Linguistics: Theory And Applications. London: Batsford.pl
dc.description.referencesButler, C. 2003. Structure and Function: A Guide To Three Major Structural-Functional Theories Part I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl
dc.description.referencesCancino, M. 2020. Increasing EFL learner participation through eliciting language: Insights from conversation analysis. JLE6(2): 66-80.pl
dc.description.referencesCarter, R. & Nash, W. 2013. Seeing through Language. Lexington, KY, Blackwell.pl
dc.description.referencesCelce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. 1999. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course2. New York: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.pl
dc.description.referencesCook, G. 2001. The Discourse of Advertising.New York: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesCrystal, D. 2003. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesDalamu, T. O. & Ogunlusi, G. 2020. Revitalising cultural characteristics in advertising in Nigeria within a sketch of systemic paradigm. Anagramas Rumbos Y Sentidos De La Comunicación,19(37): 13-48.pl
dc.description.referencesDalamu, T. O. 2018a. Evaluating ʻregisterialʼ norms in advertising texts: A systemic perspective. Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics 11: 64-97.pl
dc.description.referencesDalamu, T. O. 2018b. Euphemism: The commonplace of advertising culture. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture 40(2): 1-15pl
dc.description.referencesDalamu, T. O. 2018c. Advertising communication: Constructing meaning potential through disjunctive grammar. Anagramas Rumbos y Sentidos De La Communicación 17(33): 73-104.pl
dc.description.referencesDalamu, T. O. 2021. Social Semiotic Genre: Exploring the Interplay of Words and Images in Advertising. AFLLM, 11: 19-51.pl
dc.description.referencesDalamu, T. O. 2022. Mode, the hub of multimodality: A case study of Oral-B® toothpaste advertising. DELTA, 38(2): 1-28. [in press].pl
dc.description.referencesDalamu, T. O. & Ogunlusi, G. 2020. Revitalising cultural characteristics in advertising in Nigeria within a sketch of systemic paradigm. Anagramas Rumbos Y Sentidos De La Comunicación, 19(37): 13-48.pl
dc.description.referencesDe Beaugrande, R. 1991. Linguistic Theory: The Discourse of Fundamental Works. New York: Longman.pl
dc.description.referencesDenham, K. & Lobeck, A. 2013. Linguistics for Everyone: An Introduction. Singapore: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.pl
dc.description.referencesDik, S. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar: The Structure of the Clause, Part 1.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.pl
dc.description.referencesEggins, S. 2004. Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.pl
dc.description.referencesFawcett, R. 1980. Cognitive Linguistics and Social Interaction. Heidelberg: Groos Verlag.pl
dc.description.referencesFawcett, R. 2000. A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl
dc.description.referencesFerguson, P. 2007. Festivals and ceremonies. World and its peoples: Eastern and Southern Asia. Marshall Cavendish Corporation 536.pl
dc.description.referencesFontaine, L. 2013. Analyzing English Grammar: A Systemic Functional Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.pl
dc.description.referencesFromkin, V., Rodman, R. & Hyams, N. 2003. An Introduction to Language.Boston: Heinle.pl
dc.description.referencesFry, H., Ketteridge, S. & Marshall, S. (eds). 2009. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice. London: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesGeis, M. 1982. The Language of Television Advertising. London/New York: Academic Press.pl
dc.description.referencesGeorge, A. & Salgado-Robles, F. 2018. Raising awareness about heritage language learners in the L2 Spanish classroom: Teacher beliefs and attitudes. ELIA18: 157-181.pl
dc.description.referencesGieszinger, S. 2001. The History of Advertising Language.Frankfurt: Peter Lang GmbH.pl
dc.description.referencesGivon, T. 2001. Syntax: An Introduction, Volume 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.pl
dc.description.referencesGreenbaum, S. & Nelson, G. 2002. An Introduction to English Grammar. London: Longman.pl
dc.description.referencesGreenbaum, S. 1996. The Oxford English Grammar. New York: OUP.pl
dc.description.referencesGreenbaum, S. & Nelson, G. 2002. An Introduction to English Grammar. London: Longman.pl
dc.description.referencesHalliday, M. 1995. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.pl
dc.description.referencesHalliday, M. & Matthiessen C. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesHartwell, P. 1985. Grammar, grammars, and the teaching of grammar. College English 47(2): 105-127.pl
dc.description.referencesHaspelmath, M. 2002. Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.pl
dc.description.referencesHaussamen, B. 2000. Revising the Rules: Traditional Grammar and Modern Linguistics. Dubuque, IA: Kendall.pl
dc.description.referencesHeesterman, J., Van den Hoek, A., Kolff, D. & Oort, M. 1992. Ritual, State, and History in South Asia: Essays in Honour of J.C.Heesterman. Leiden, Netherlands: BRILL.pl
dc.description.referencesHermerén, L. 1999. English for Sale: A Study of the Language of Advertising. Lund: LUP.pl
dc.description.referencesHuddleston, R. 1995. Introduction to the Grammar of English. New York: CUP.pl
dc.description.referencesKapranov, O. 2018. Pre-service primary school teachersʼ reflections on EFL studentsʼ awareness of grammatical forms in online communication. ELIA18: 183-212.pl
dc.description.referencesKeyton, J. 2006. Communication Research: Asking Questions Finding Answers. New York: McGraw-Hill.pl
dc.description.referencesKlein, W. 1986. Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.pl
dc.description.referencesKo, J., Sammons, P. & Bakkum, L. 2014. Effective Teaching. Reading.Berkshire: EDTHH.pl
dc.description.referencesKolln, M., Gray, L. & Funk, R. 2015. Understanding English Grammar. New York: Pearson Education.pl
dc.description.referencesKress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. New York: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesKress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. 2021. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesLangacker, R. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites.Stanford: SUP.pl
dc.description.referencesLeech, G. 1966. English in Advertising: A Linguistic Study of Advertising in Great Britain. London: Longman.pl
dc.description.referencesLiddicoat, A. 2019. Critical perspectives in intercultural language learning perspectives. ELIAMon. 1: 17-38pl
dc.description.referencesLieber, R. 2010. Introducing Morphology. Cambridge: CUP.pl
dc.description.referencesLiendo , P. & Massi, M. 2017. Academic literacy, genres and competences: A didactic model for teaching English to translation students. ELIA 17: 251-272.pl
dc.description.referencesLong, D. 2018. Meaning construction of personification in discourse based on concep-tual integration theory. Studies in Literature and Language17(1): 21-28.pl
dc.description.referencesMartin, J. R. & Rose, C. 2013. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. New York: Bloomsbury Academy.pl
dc.description.referencesMartin, J. R. & Zappavigna, M. 2019. Embodied meaning: Systemic functional perspec-tive on paralanguage. Functional Linguistics 6(1): 1-33.pl
dc.description.referencesMartínez, A. & De Zarobe, Y. 2017. Comparing the benefits of a metacognitive reading strategy instruction programme between CLIL and EFL primary school students. ELIA17: 71-92.pl
dc.description.referencesMaxwell, J. A. 2013. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. London: SAGE.pl
dc.description.referencesMcLaughlin, J. 1970. Aspects of the History of English.New York: HRW, Inc.pl
dc.description.referencesMoreno Rubio, C. 2009. Effective teachers – professional and personal skills, en ENSAYOS, Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete24. Retrieved from http://www.uclm.es/ab/educacion/ensayos - Consultada en fecha (dd-mm-aaaa)pl
dc.description.referencesMulroy, D. 2003. The War Against Grammar.Portsmouth: Boynton.pl
dc.description.referencesMyers, G. 1994. Words in Ads. London/New York: Arnold.pl
dc.description.referencesOgilvy, D. 2013. Confession of an Advertising Man. Harpenden: Southern Publishing.pl
dc.description.referencesOrtega, M. 2018. Black is beautiful: A Philosophy of Black Aesthetics by Paul C. Taylor. Critical Philosophy of Race,6(2): 287-292.pl
dc.description.referencesPatton, M. 2015. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.pl
dc.description.referencesPinho, M. & Gaunt, R. 2020. The determinants of paternal and maternal involvement in childcare. In: K. Nurit et al (eds.), Parent Involvement, 115-141. Nova Science Publishers, Incpl
dc.description.referencesPityana, N. 1972. What is black consciousness? In: M. Motlhabi (ed.), Essays on Black Theology, 37-43. Johannesburg: UCM.pl
dc.description.referencesPrince, E. 1991. On functional explanation in linguistics and the origin of language. Language and Communication 11(1/2): 79-82.pl
dc.description.referencesQuirk, R. 1972. The English Language and Images of Matter. London: OUP.pl
dc.description.referencesQuirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 2004. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.pl
dc.description.referencesRavelli, L. 2000. Getting started with functional analysis of texts. In: L. Unsworth (ed.), Researching Language in Schools and Communities, 1, 27-63. London: Continuum.pl
dc.description.referencesRiffo, K., Osuna, S. & Lagos, P. 2019. Lexical diversity and lexical density description of news written by journalism student. RBLA19(3): 499-528pl
dc.description.referencesRodríguez, A. & Larrea-Espinar, Á. 2019. The use of sitcoms for cultural learning in EFL: a workshop for university students. ELIA 19: 131-156.pl
dc.description.referencesRoud, S. 2006. The English Year. London: Penguin Books.pl
dc.description.referencesSchulze, M. 1998. Checking grammar – teaching grammar. Computer Assisted Language Learning 11(2): 215-227.pl
dc.description.referencesSilva, I. 2017. Speech fluency in phrases: Teaching English oral fluency in distance learning. ELIA17: 209-232.pl
dc.description.referencesSimpson, J. & Roud, S. 2000. A Dictionary of English Folklore. Oxford: OUP.pl
dc.description.referencesSimpson, J. & Weiner, S. (eds.). 1992. The Oxford English Dictionary. [CDROM]. Oxford: OUP.pl
dc.description.referencesSledd, J. 1996. Grammar awareness in time of class warfare. The English Journal 85(7): 59-63.pl
dc.description.referencesSnail, M. 2008. The Black Consciousness Movement in South Africa: A product of the entire black world. Historia Actual Online 15: 51-68.pl
dc.description.referencesSugioka, Y. 2011. Nominalization Affixes and Multi-Modularity of Word-Formation. Philadelphia: JB.pl
dc.description.referencesTaylor, P.2016. Black is Beautiful: A Philosophy of Black Aesthetics. New York: Wiley Blackwell.pl
dc.description.referencesThompson, G. 2014. Introducing Functional Grammar. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesVan de Vliet, B. 2017. Valentineʼs Day 14 February. Directory Magazine.Retrieved on 17 June 2020 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313823928_the_story_of_Saint_Valentinepl
dc.description.referencesVan Valin, R. Jr. & LaPolla, R. 2002. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: CUP.pl
dc.description.referencesVestergaard, T. & Schroder, K. 1985. The Language of Advertising. Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell.pl
dc.description.referencesWilliams, J. 2005. The Teacher’s Grammar Book. Mahwah: LEA, Inc.pl
dc.description.referencesYule, G. 2020. The Study of Language. Cambridge: CUP.pl
dc.description.referencesZapata Becerra, A. 2000. Handbook of General and Applied Linguistics. Mérida, Venezuela: TAP.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2300-6250-
dc.description.issue38 (3/2022)pl
dc.description.firstpage66pl
dc.description.lastpage97pl
dc.identifier.citation2Crossroads. A Journal of English Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5494-4854-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7357-2454-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2022, Issue 38

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Crossroads_38_2022_T_O_Dalamu_Ke_Yang_Advertising_linguistic_framework.pdf475,44 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons