REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/14801
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorTalar, Sylwia-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-23T08:10:36Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-23T08:10:36Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationOptimum. Economic Studies, Nr 4(110) 2022, s. 47-65pl
dc.identifier.issn1506-7637-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/14801-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The article aims to identify the relationship between the communication shock caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the digitalization of communication channels in the transaction process, and the exports of Polish enterprises. Research method – The following methods are used: descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and non-parametric one-way analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis test) based on data from a diagnostic survey conducted on a representative sample of Polish exporters. Results – The communication shock caused by the restriction of face-to-face meetings with foreign counterparties had, among many factors, the most negative impact on Polish enterprises’ export transaction opportunities during the pandemic. However, hypotheses that there are relationships between export performance, export opportunities and the use of digital communication channels, and the digitalization of communication under pandemic conditions were rejected. The absence of such relationships refers to Solow’s paradox of the lack of efficiency effects of digital technologies implementation. Originality / value / implications / recommendations – Conclusions enhance knowledge of the digitalization of international economic transactions, and in particular, the efficiency of the uti-lization of digital communication channels in export transactions under pandemic conditions.pl
dc.description.sponsorshipThe article was financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education as part of a grant for maintaining the research potential of the Faculty of Economics of the University of Economics in Katowice.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstokupl
dc.subjectinternational transactionspl
dc.subjectdigitalizationpl
dc.subjectcommunication channelspl
dc.subjectexportspl
dc.subjectCOVID-19 pandemicpl
dc.subjectPolish enterprisespl
dc.titleDigital Communication Channels in Export Transactions of Polish Enterprises in The Conditions of The COVID-19 Pandemicpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Uniwersytet w Białymstokupl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/oes.2022.04.110.04-
dc.description.Emailsylwia.talar@ue.katowice.plpl
dc.description.AffiliationWydział Ekonomii, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicachpl
dc.description.referencesAbidi N., El -Herradi M., Sakha S., 2022, Digitalization and Resilience: Firm‑level Evidence during the COVID ‑19, “IMF Working Paper”, No. 2022/034.pl
dc.description.referencesAcemoglu D., Autor D., Dorn D., Hanson G.H., Price B., 2014, Return of the Solow Paradox? IT, Productivity, and Employment in US Manufacturing, “American Economic Review”, Vol. 104(5), pp. 394–99, DOI: 10.1257/aer.104.5.394.pl
dc.description.referencesAiyar S,. Malacrino D., Mohommad A,. Presbitero A., 2022, International Trade Spillovers from Domestic COVID ‑19 Lockdowns, “IMF Working Paper”, No. 2022/120.pl
dc.description.referencesAmankwah -Amoah J., Khan Z., Wood G., Knight G., 2021, COVID ‑19 and digitalization: The great acceleration, “Journal of Business Research”, Vol. 136, pp. 602–611, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011.pl
dc.description.referencesAmbroziak Ł., Gniadek J., Marczewski K., Sierocińska K., Wąsiński M., 2022, Polscy eksporterzy w okresie pandemii COVID ‑19. Wyniki badania ankietowego, Polski Instytut Ekonomiczny, Warszawa.pl
dc.description.referencesArendt Ł., 2016, Paradoks Solowa i determinanty wdrożenia technologii informacyjnych i telekomunikacyjnych, „Gospodarka Narodowa”, nr 1(281), pp. 29–53.pl
dc.description.referencesBaldwin R., Tomiura E., 2020, Thinking Ahead about the Trade Impact of COVID ‑19, [in:] Economics in the Time of COVID‑19, Baldwin R., Weder di Mauro B. (eds.),CEPR Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBenz S., Gonzales F., Mourougane A., 2020, The Impact of COVID ‑19 international travel restrictions on services ‑trade costs, “OECD Trade Policy Papers”, No. 237, DOI: 10.1787/e443fc6b-en.pl
dc.description.referencesBrinca P., Duarte J.B., Faria-e-Castro M., 2020, Is the COVID ‑19 Pandemic a Supply or a Demand Shock?, “Economic Synopses”, No. 31, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.pl
dc.description.referencesCerdeiro D.A., Komaromi A., 2022, Supply spillovers during the pandemic: Evidence from high ‑frequency shipping data. “The World Economy”, Vol. 00, pp. 1–24, DOI: 10.1111/twec.13306.pl
dc.description.referencesCoughlan J., Macredie R., Patel N., 2007, Moving face ‑to‑face communication to Web‑‑based systems, “Interacting with Computers”, Vol. 19(1), pp. 1–6, DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2006.07.006.pl
dc.description.referencesEffective Meetings for a Hybrid Workforce, 2021, Gartner, https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/4004138 [date of access: 3.05.2022].pl
dc.description.referencesEspitia A., Mattoo A., Rocha N., Ruta M., Winkler D., 2021, Pandemic trade: COVID ‑19, Remote Work and Global Value Chains, “Policy Research Working Paper”, No. WPS 9508.pl
dc.description.referencesFink C., Mattoo A., Neagu I.C., 2005, Assessing the Impact of Communication Costs on International Trade, “Journal of International Economics”, Vol. 67(2), pp. 428–445, DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.09.006.pl
dc.description.referencesFleischer M., 2012, Typologia komunikacji, Primum Verbum, Łódź.pl
dc.description.referencesHayakawa K., Mukunoki H., 2021, The impact of COVID ‑19 on international trade: Evidence from the first shock, “Journal of the Japanese and International Economies”, Vol. 60(C), pp. 1–12, DOI: 10.1016/j.jjie.2021.101135.pl
dc.description.referencesHu F., Qiu L., Xi X., Zhou H., Hu T., Su N., Zhou H., Li X., Yang S., Duan Z., Dong Z., Wu Z., Zhou H., Zeng M., Wan T., Wei S., 2022, Has COVID ‑19 Changed China’s Digi‑tal Trade?‑Implications for Health Economics, “Front Public Health”, Vol. 10:831549, DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.831549.pl
dc.description.referencesICCA Statistics Report Country & City Rankings – Public Abstract, 2020, ICCA, https://www.iccaworld.org/knowledge/article.cfm?artid = 701 [date of access: 3.05.2022]pl
dc.description.referencesImpact of the COVID ‑19 Pandemic on Trade and Development: Transitioning to a New Normal, 2021, UNCTAD, DOI:10.18356/9789210054485.pl
dc.description.referencesInternational trade during the COVID ‑19 pandemic: Big shifts and uncertainty, 2022, OECD Publishing, Paris, DOI: 10.1787/d1131663-en.pl
dc.description.referencesJalendry S., Verma S., 2015, A Detail Review on Voice over Internet Protocol [VoIP], “International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology”, Vol. 23(4), pp. 161–166, DOI: 10.14445/22315381/IJETT -V23P232.pl
dc.description.referencesJean S., 2020, How the COVID ‑19 Pandemic Is Reshaping the Trade Landscape and What to Do About It, “Intereconomics”, Vol. 55(3), pp. 135–139, DOI: 10.1007/s10272-020-0890-4.pl
dc.description.referencesKarl K.A., Peluchette J.V., Aghakhani N., 2022, Virtual Work Meetings During the COVID ‑19 Pandemic: The Good, Bad, and Ugly, “Small Group Research”, Vol. 53(3), pp. 343–365, DOI: 10.1177/10464964211015286.pl
dc.description.referencesKiełczewski D., 2021, Pandemia COVID ‑19 z perspektywy ekonomii złożoności, „Optimum. Economic Studies”, Vol. 3(105), s. 3–14, DOI: 10.15290/oes.2021.03.105.01.pl
dc.description.referencesKupritz V.W., Cowell E., 2011, Productive Management Communication: Online and Face‑to‑Face, “The Journal of Business Communication”, Vol. 48(1), pp. 54–82, DOI: 10.1177/0021943610385656.pl
dc.description.referencesLaskowski W., 2010, O komunikacji twarzą w twarz w perspektywie somatycznej, „Investigationes Linguisticae”, nr 22, s. 42–78, DOI: 10.14746/il.2010.22.3.pl
dc.description.referencesLiu X., Ornelas E., Shi H., 2022, The trade impact of the Covid ‑19 pandemic, “The World Economy”, Vol. 00, pp. 1–29, DOI: 10.1111/twec.13279.pl
dc.description.referencesMaurseth P.B., Medin H., 2019, Internet use, intermediaries and international trade, “NUPI Working Paper”, No. 885.pl
dc.description.referencesMheidly N., Fares M.Y., Zalzale H., Fares J., 2020, Effect of Face Masks on Interpersonal Communication During the COVID ‑19 Pandemic, “Front Public Health”, Vol. 8:582191, DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.582191.pl
dc.description.referencesSadler T.R., 2022, Pandemic Economics, Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesSousa C.M.P., Martínez -Lopez F. J., Coelho F., 2008, The determinants of export performance: a review of the research in the literature between 1998 and 2005, “International Journal of Management Reviews”, Vol. 10(4), pp. 343–374.pl
dc.description.referencesStandaert W., Muylle S., Basu A., 2021, How shall we meet? Understanding the importance of meeting mode capabilities for different meeting objectives, “Information & Management”, Vol. 58(1), 103393, DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2020.103393.pl
dc.description.referencesSuematsu C., 2014, Transaction Cost Management: Strategies and Practices for a Global Open Economy, Springer, Berlin.pl
dc.description.referencesTanaka K., 2022, What Hinders Digital Communication? Evidence from foreign firms in Japan, “RIETI Discussion Paper”, No. 22058.pl
dc.description.referencesTrevino, L. K., Lengel, R. H., Daft, R. L., 1987, Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective, “Communication Research”, Vol. 14(5), pp. 553–574, DOI: 10.1177/009365087014005006.pl
dc.description.referencesWang M.L., Choi C.H., 2019, How information and communication technology affect international trade: a comparative analysis of BRICS countries, “Information Technology for Development”, Vol. 25, pp. 455–474, DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2018.1493675.pl
dc.description.referencesWilliamson O.E., 2008, Transaction Cost Economics, [in:] Handbook of New Institutional Economics, C. Ménard, M. M. Shirley (ed.), Springer, Berlin.pl
dc.description.referencesZwass, V., 1996, Electronic Commerce: Structures and Issues, “International Journal of Electronic Commerce”, Vol. 1(1), pp. 3–23, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27750797 [date of access: 3.05.2022].pl
dc.description.number4(110)pl
dc.description.firstpage47pl
dc.description.lastpage65pl
dc.identifier.citation2Optimum. Economic Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4051-6453-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Optimum. Economic Studies, 2022, nr 4(110)

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Optimum_4_2022_S_Talar_Digital_Communication_Channels.pdf345,76 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)