REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/13455
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorHeger, Martin-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-20T10:59:59Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-20T10:59:59Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationMiscellanea Historico-Iuridica, T. 20, Z. 2, 2021, s. 9-20pl
dc.identifier.issn1732-9132-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/13455-
dc.description.abstractThe principle of Legality (nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege) is the most fundamental principle of German criminal code since it was codified in the Bavarian Criminal Code 1813 for the first time. With the Foundation of the German Empire in 1871 it became an integral part of the new German Penal Code Reichsstrafgesetzbuch). It was constitutionalized in 1919 as a fundamental right with Art. 116 of the Weimar Constitution. It was unchallenged till the Nazi regime came to power. Not within the Empowerment Act but with other legal measures resulting from the burning of the Parliament (”Reichstagsbrand”) on 28 February 1933 till 1935 on, the Nazi regime changed the principle step by step from nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege to nullum crimen sine poena. They made Analogy in disfavor of the accused person possible and they stated criminal offences with retroactivity. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court of Justice (Reichsgericht) accepted the new provisions and used it as a basis for its sentences. After WW II the allies nullified the Nazi provisions. With Art. 103 § 2 of the new (West-)German constitution from 1949 nulla poena sine lege has been constitutionalized again. The Paper deals with that development with a special focus on the role of the Reichsgericht as the highest body of judges, who were trained in the times before the Nazis came to power.pl
dc.language.isodepl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstokupl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY-SA 4.0)-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.pl-
dc.subjectnulla poena sine legepl
dc.subjectnullum crimen sine legepl
dc.subjectRStGBpl
dc.subjectWRVpl
dc.subjectReichstagsbrandverordnungpl
dc.subjectReichsgerichtpl
dc.subjectReichstagsbrandprozesspl
dc.titleVon der Konstitutionalisierung von Nulla poena, nullum crimen sine lege in Art. 116 WRV (1919) zu dessen Umkehrung in ein Nullum crimen sine poenadurch das NS-Regimepl
dc.title.alternativeFrom the Constitutionalization of the Principle of Legality nulla poene, nullum crimen sine lege Principle within the Weimar Constitution to its Reversal to a Principle of nullum crimen sine poena by the Nazi Regimepl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderUznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY-SA 4.0)pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/mhi.2021.20.02.01-
dc.description.Emailmartin.heger@rewi.hu-berlin.depl
dc.description.AffiliationHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin (Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany)pl
dc.description.referencesBahar A., Der Reichstagsbrandprozess, [in:] Lexikon der Politischen Strafprozesse, (Hrsg.) K. Groenewold, A. Ignor, A. Koch, https://www.lexikon-der-politischen-straf prozesse.de/glossar/reichstagsbrand-prozess-1933pl
dc.description.referencesDeiseroth D., Der Reichstagsbrand-Prozess – ein rechtsstaatliches Verfahren?, „Kritische Justiz” 2009, vol. 42, no. 3.pl
dc.description.referencesGoldschmidt J., Die Rechtsgrundlagen der deutschen Strafgewalt gegen Ausländer im besetzten Feindesgebiet, „Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft” 1916, no. 37.pl
dc.description.referencesHeger M., Die Mauerschützenprozesse – Ein Ausdruck von Siegerjustiz?, „Deutsch-Georgische Strafrechtszeitschrift” 2021, no. 3pl
dc.description.referencesNaucke W., Deutsches Kolonialstrafrecht 1886–1918, „Rechtshistorisches Journal” 1988, no. 7.pl
dc.description.referencesPaiusco S., Nullum Crimen Sine Lege, the European Convention on Human Rights and the Foreseeability of the Law, Baden-Baden 2021.pl
dc.description.referencesRaithel T., Strenge I., Die Reichstagsbrandverordnung. Grundlegung der Diktatur mit den Instrumenten des Weimarer Ausnahmezustandes, „Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte” 2000, no. 48.pl
dc.description.referencesWerle G., Justiz-Strafrecht und polizeiliche Verbrechensbekämpfung im Dritten Reich, Berlin 1989.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2719-9991-
dc.description.volume20pl
dc.description.issue2pl
dc.description.firstpage9pl
dc.description.lastpage20pl
dc.identifier.citation2Miscellanea Historico-Iuridicapl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5319-218X-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica, 2021, tom XX, Z. 2

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons