REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/11439
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorGajewska, Klaudia-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-02T10:16:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-02T10:16:08Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationCrossroads. A Journal of English Studies 33 (2/2021), pp. 20-38pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/11439-
dc.description.abstractThe post-method reality of ESL/EFL education, in which LT is no longer perceived as a largescale enterprise based on one universal method, has encouraged theoreticians and practitioners to search for more personalised ways of L2/FL teaching. This specifically applies to pronunciation instruction, whose models, priorities and teaching procedures ought to be considered in light of the tenets of the Post-Method Era. Even though there is no disputing the fact that the influences of methodology- and globalisation-driven transformations have been generally positive in the sense that they have individualised approaches to LT and facilitated international communication respectively, they have also lowered the status of phonodidactics, which, in effect, is disparagingly referred to as “the neglected orphan” of ESL/EFL pedagogy.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherThe University of Bialystokpl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectENLpl
dc.subjectESLpl
dc.subjectEFLpl
dc.subjectELFpl
dc.subjectphonodidacticspl
dc.subjectmethodologypl
dc.subjectglobalisationpl
dc.titleWhy has phonodidactics become “the neglected orphan” of ESL / EFL pedagogy? Explaining methodology- and ELF-related motives behind a reluctance towards pronunciation teachingpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/CR.2021.33.2.02-
dc.description.Emailklaudia.e.gajewska@gmail.compl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteKlaudia Gajewska is a PhD candidate at Maria Curie-Sklodowska University and an English teacher in a secondary school in Lublin, Poland. Her research interests centre around phonodidactics as well as technology-enhanced and mobile-assisted language learning in Polish EFL instructed settings.pl
dc.description.AffiliationMaria Curie-Sklodowska University, Polandpl
dc.description.referencesAtli, I. & Bergil, A. 2012. The effect of pronunciation instruction on students’ overall speaking skills. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 46: 3665-3671.pl
dc.description.referencesBinte Habib, R. 2013. (Un) Intelligibility in EIL pronunciation: An analysis. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 14: 21-26.pl
dc.description.referencesBoonkit, K. 2010. Enhancing the development of speaking skills for non-native speakers of English. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2: 1305-1309.pl
dc.description.referencesBrown, A. 1991. Pronunciation Models. Singapore: Singapore University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBrown, D. 1994. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.pl
dc.description.referencesBrown, D. 2001. Teaching by Principles. An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Longman.pl
dc.description.referencesBrown, G. & Yule, G. 1983. Teaching the Spoken Language. Cambridge/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBrown, D. 2002. English language teaching in the “post-method” era: Toward better diagnosis, treatment, and assessment. In: J. Richards & W. Renandya (eds.), Methodology in Language Teaching. An Anthology of Current Practice, 9-18. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBrown T. & Bown, J. 2014. Teaching Advanced Skills through Global Debate: Theory and Practice. Washington: Georgetown University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBundgaard-Nielsen, R., Best, C. & Tyler, M. 2011. Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics 32: 51-67.pl
dc.description.referencesBurns, A. & Claire, S. 2003. Clearly Speaking: Pronunciation in Action for Teachers. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.pl
dc.description.referencesBygate, M. 2009. Teaching and testing speaking. In: M. Long & C. Doughty (eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching, 412-440. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.pl
dc.description.referencesCarroll, J. 1971. Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. Paper presented at the 17th International Congress, International Association of Applied Psychology, Liege, Belgium, July 27, 1971.pl
dc.description.referencesCarroll, J . 1 990. Cognitive a bilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In: T. Parry, & C. Stansfield (eds.), 11-29, Language Aptitude Reconsidered. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.pl
dc.description.referencesCelce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. & Goodwin, J. 1996. Teaching Pronunciation. Hong Kong: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesChastain, K. 1981. Native speaker evaluation of student composition errors. Modern Language Journal 65: 288-94.pl
dc.description.referencesCruttenden, A. 2008. Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. (7th ed.). London: Hodder Education.pl
dc.description.referencesCunningham-Andersson, U. 1993. Stigmatized pronunciations in non-native Swedish. PERILUS 17: 81-106.pl
dc.description.referencesDalton, C. & Seidlhofer, B. 1994. Pronunciation (Language Teaching: A Scheme for Teacher Education). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesDemirezen, M. & Kulaksiz, E. 2015. Correct pronunciation as work ethics in teacher education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 199: 713-721.pl
dc.description.referencesDeng, J., Holtby, A., Howden-Weaver, L., Nessim, L., Nicholas, B., Nickle, K., Pannekoek, C., Stephan, S. & Sun, M. 2009. English pronunciation research: The neglected orphan of utopian goals | 35 Selected Papers from the 1st Annual Conference on Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Second Language Acquisition Studies. Prairie Metropolis Centre Working Paper Series, WP05-09, Edmonton, AB.pl
dc.description.referencesField, J. 2005. Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly 39: 399-423.pl
dc.description.referencesFlege, J. & Fletcher, K. 1992. Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91: 370-389.pl
dc.description.referencesFlege, J., Munro, M. & MacKay, I. 1995. Factors Affecting Strength of Perceived Foreign Accent in a Second Language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 3125-3134.pl
dc.description.referencesFlege, J., Bohn, O. & Sunyoung, J. 1997. Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics 4: 437-470.pl
dc.description.referencesJenkins, J. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKachru, B. 1986. The power and politics of English. World Englishes 5: 121-140.pl
dc.description.referencesKelly, L. 1969. 25 Centuries of Language Teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.pl
dc.description.referencesKetabi, S. & Saeb, F. 2015. Pronunciation teaching: Past and present. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature 4: 182-189.pl
dc.description.referencesKreidler, C. 1989. The Pronunciation of English: A Course Book in Phonology. Bodmin: Blackwell Publishing.pl
dc.description.referencesKretzschmar, W., Jr. 2008. Standard American English pronunciation. In: E. W. Schneider (ed.), The Americas and the Caribbean, 37-51. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.pl
dc.description.referencesKruger, J. & Dunning, D. 1999. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 1121-1134.pl
dc.description.referencesKumaravadivelu, B. 2006. TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL Quarterly 40: 59-81.pl
dc.description.referencesLevelt, W. 1999. Language production: A blueprint of the speaker. In: C. Brown & P. Hagoort (eds.), Neurocognition of Language, 83-122. Oxford; England: Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMoghaddam, M., Morteza N., Alireza Z. & Sepehrinia, S. 2012. Teaching pronunciation: The lost ring of the chain. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 3: 215-219.pl
dc.description.referencesMorley, J. 1991. The pronunciation component in teaching English to speakers of other languages. TESOL Quarterly 25: 481-520.pl
dc.description.referencesMunro, M. & Mann, V. 2005. Age of immersion as a predictor of foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics 26: 311-341.pl
dc.description.referencesMunro, M. & Derwing, T. 1995. Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech 38: 289-306.pl
dc.description.referencesNation, I. S. P. 2011. Second language speaking. In: E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, 444-454. New York/Oxon: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesNunan, D. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. New York: Prentice Hall.pl
dc.description.referencesNurani, S. & Rosyada, A. 2015. Improving English pronunciation of adult ESL learners through reading aloud assessments. Journal Lingua Cultura 9: 108-113.pl
dc.description.referencesPatkowski, M. 1990. Age and accent in a second language: A reply to James Emil Flege. Applied Linguistics l: 73-89.pl
dc.description.referencesPatkowski, M . 1 994. The Critical Age Hypothesis and interlanguage phonology. In: M. Yavas, (ed.), First and Second Language Phonology, 205-221. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.pl
dc.description.referencesPennington, M. & Rogerson-Revell, P. 2019. English Pronunciation Teaching and Research. Contemporary Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.pl
dc.description.referencesRodgers, T. 2001. Language teaching methodology. ERIC Issue Paper. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics: 1-6.pl
dc.description.referencesScovel, T. 2000. A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20: 213-23.pl
dc.description.referencesSeidlhofer, B. 2004. Pronunciation teaching. In: M. Byram (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning, 488-491. Abingdon: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesSeidlhofer, B. 2008. Language variation and change. The case of English as a lingua franca. In: K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & J. Przedlacka (eds.), English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene, 59-76. Bern: Peter Lang.pl
dc.description.referencesSobkowiak, W. 1996. English Phonetics for Poles. A Resource Book for Learners and Teachers. Poznań: Bene Nati.pl
dc.description.referencesSzpyra-Kozłowska, J. 2015. Pronunciation in EFL Instruction. A Research-based Approach. Bristol/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters.pl
dc.description.referencesSzpyra-Kozłowska, J. 2018. Instructional models in the global context. In: O. Kang, R. Thomson & J. Murphy (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary English Pronunciation, 232-246. Oxon/New York: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesThornbury, S. 2005. How to Teach Speaking?. Edinburgh Gate/Harlow/Essex: Pearson Education.pl
dc.description.referencesThornbury, S. 2006. An A-Z of ELT Concepts. A Dictionary of Terms and Concepts. Oxford: Macmillan Education.pl
dc.description.referencesTrudgill, P. & Hannah, J. 2013. International English. A Guide to the Varieties of Standard English. Oxon/New York: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesWaniek-Klimczak, E.2011. “I am good at speaking, but I failed my phonetics class” − Pronunciation and speaking in advanced learners of English. In: J. Majer, E.Waniek-Klimczak & M. Pawlak (eds.), Speaking and Instructed Foreign Language Acquisition, 87-95. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.pl
dc.description.referencesZawadowska-Kittel, E. 2017. Matura z języków obcych w świetle zmian edukacyjnych. Języki Obce w Szkole 4: 65-70.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2300-6250-
dc.description.issue33 (2/2021)pl
dc.description.firstpage20pl
dc.description.lastpage38pl
dc.identifier.citation2Crossroads. A Journal of English Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5796-2951-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2021, Issue 33

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Crossroads_33_2021_K_Gajewska_Why_has_phonodidactics_become_the_neglected_orphan.pdf242,42 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons