REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/11438
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorAkinwotu, Samuel Alaba-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-02T10:15:53Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-02T10:15:53Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationCrossroads. A Journal of English Studies 33 (2/2021), pp. 4-19pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/11438-
dc.description.abstractThis study examines persuasion and communicative intentions in Pentecostal sermons in Nigeria. Notwithstanding the high scholarly inputs in religious discourse, no single work has examined the devices employed to achieve persuasion and conviction as well as communicative intentions in Pentecostal sermons in Nigeria. This work examines twelve sermons of selected Pentecostal preachers in Nigeria by drawing insights from rhetoric and pragmatic act to account for persuasion and communicative intentions in the data. Findings reveal that preachers strategically deploy rhetorical question; direct address and direct command; metaphor; repetition and structural parallelism; and they develop convincing arguments through logic/reason. It is also revealed that preachers share experiences with their listeners and they assume divine role by speaking authoritatively to convince their listeners into accepting their propositions. Preachers perform pragmatic acts of asserting/stating, encouraging, assuring, directing, commanding, praising, etc. The study has further confirmed that Pentecostal sermons can be used for public mobilisation.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherThe University of Bialystokpl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectcommunicative intentionpl
dc.subjectChristian religious Pentecostal sermonspl
dc.subjectpragmemepl
dc.subjectrhetoricpl
dc.subjectmetaphorpl
dc.titleA pragma-rhetorical study of selected Pentecostal sermons in Nigeriapl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/CR.2021.33.2.01-
dc.description.Emailsamuelakinwotu@gmail.com, samuel.akinwotu@aaua.edu.ngpl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteDr. Samuel Alaba Akinwotu is a senior lecturer in the Department of English Studies, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Nigeria. His areas of research interest are Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis. He has published in both local and international journals.pl
dc.description.AffiliationAdekunle Ajasin University, Nigeriapl
dc.description.referencesAbdel, A. & Eldin, T.S. 2014. Critical Discourse Analysis of religious sermons in Egypt – case study of Amr Khalid’s sermons. International Education Studies Vol. 7, No. 1 1. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n11p68 www.ccsenet.org/iespl
dc.description.referencesAdam, M. 2017. Persuasion in religious discourse: Enhancing credibility in sermon titles and openings. Discourse and Interaction. Assessed from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication on 21/10/2020pl
dc.description.referencesAdegoju, A. 2005. A Stylistic Study of the Speeches of Some Key Actors of the June 12 Crisis in Nigeria (1993-98) [Unpublished PhD Thesis], Department of English, University of Ibadan.pl
dc.description.referencesAdeyanju, D. 2008. Season’s greetings from a cleric: A stylo-semantic analysis of pastor Adeboye’s new year compliments. Papers in English and Linguistics (PEL) Vol 6, 85-94.pl
dc.description.referencesAladeyomi, S. A. 2006. Phonological features of electronic media sermons. In: A. Odebunmi & O. Babajide Adeyemi (eds.), Style in Religious Communication in Nigeria. Germany: LINCOM.pl
dc.description.referencesBankole, M. A. & Ayoola, M.O. 2014. Mood and modality in Christian magazines: a systemic functional analysis of Christian Women Mirror. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4, No. 14: 138-149.pl
dc.description.referencesBhatia, V. K. & Bremner, S. (eds) 2014. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Professional Communication. London: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesCapone, A. 2005. Pragmeme (a study with reference to English and Italian). Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1355-1371.pl
dc.description.referencesDonovan, P. 1976. Religious Language. London: Sheldon Press.pl
dc.description.referencesHyland, K. 2005. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7/2: 173-192.pl
dc.description.referencesKim, E. J. 2016. Persuasive strategies in a chauvinistic religious discourse: the case of women’s ordination. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines Vol 8 (1): 58-83.pl
dc.description.referencesMey, J. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. London: Blackwell.pl
dc.description.referencesOdebunmi, A. 2006. The stylistics of religious electronic media adverts in Nigeria. In: A. Odebunmi & A. Babajide (eds.), Style in Religious Communication in Nigeria. Germany: LINCOM.pl
dc.description.referencesOdebunmi, A. 2008. Pragmatic strategies of diagnostic news delivery in Nigerian hospitals. Linguistik Online 36, 4/08: 21-37.pl
dc.description.referencesOlaniyan, K.K. & Oyekola, A.G. 2006. A stylistic study of Muslim sermons. In: A. Odebunmi & A. Babajide (eds.), Style in Religious Communication in Nigeria. Germany: LINCOM.pl
dc.description.referencesOmotunde, S. A. 2015. Rhetorical devices in the letter to the Hebrews in the Holy Bible. Ife Studies in African Literature and the Arts Vol. 40: 85-103.pl
dc.description.referencesRajtar, M. 2012. Gender in the Discursive Practices of the Jehovah’s Witnesses in the former East Germany. Social Compass 59: 102-119.pl
dc.description.referencesRapp, C 2002 Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-rhetoric/pl
dc.description.referencesRoberts, W. R. 2010. Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Poetics. New York: Random House Inc.pl
dc.description.referencesSaddhono, K. 2012. The discourse of Friday sermon in Surakarta: A socio-pragmatic study. Doi:10.17510/wjhi.v14i1.53. https://www.researchgate.netpl
dc.description.referencesTaiwo, R. 2006. Tenor in electronic media Christian discourse in Nigeria. In: A. Odebunmi & A. Babajide (eds.), Style in Religious Communication in Nigeria. Germany: LINCOM.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Redeemed Christian Church of God 2012. (RCCG) at 60. The 60th Annual Convention Programmepl
dc.description.referencesvan Dijk, T. A. 1998. Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesVan Eemeren, F.H. & Grootendorst, R. 1984. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesVan Eemeren F. H & Grootendorst, R. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: the Pragmadialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesVan Eemeren F. H & Houtlosser, P. 2002. Strategic manoeuvring: Maintaining a delicate balance. In: F.H. Van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: the Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, 131-159. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.pl
dc.description.referencesWilly, A. & Mbakop, N. 2018. A comparative analysis of the pragmatic functions of ‘Amen’ in mainstream Protestant and Pentecostal churches in Cameroon. Springer, Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs41701-018-0032-4#Sec1pl
dc.identifier.eissn2300-6250-
dc.description.issue33 (2/2021)pl
dc.description.firstpage4pl
dc.description.lastpage19pl
dc.identifier.citation2Crossroads. A Journal of English Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2404-3094-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2021, Issue 33

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons