REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/10400
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorPiszcz, Anna-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-12T10:24:20Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-12T10:24:20Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-62813-14-8-
dc.identifier.issn2083-9790-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/10400-
dc.description.abstractThis book presents and discusses a selection of major topics within various areas of competition laws. It is divided into 8 parts. The first three parts contain introductory materials, as well as reviews of competition authorities and some basic concepts of competition law. Parts 4 and 5 present the prohibition of anti–competitive agreements and the prohibition of the abuse of a dominant position. Part 6 discusses legal sanctions for prohibited practices and procedures relating to such practices. Part 7 is devoted to the control of concentrations. The last part adds some information on the relation between competition and the state. The purpose of this study is to introduce the readers to the basic information on competition law of the European Union and national competition laws of Poland, United Kingdom, Spain and the Czech Republic. For such selection of material I take sole responsibility. This is not the first book on competition law in comparative perspective. However, there are rarely any studies that offer such a combination of the competition laws being compared. Although I had been working on this book for a long time, I was able to complete it owing to circumstances created for me by the Dean of the Faculty of Law, University of Bialystok. I am grateful also to fellow lecturers and students who encouraged me to develop a book in English on competition law. Without discussions with them, the completion of this work would not have been possible; they inspired me to make several corrections and improvements to the text of the book. The exchange of experience and access to various, sometimes diffi cult to find foreign books, were essential stages of the book’s completion. A significant range of bibliographic resources that I had access to forced me to select material. In the footnotes, however, I tried to focus on sources in English. Those who are interested in the details thereof are referred to them for further information. Anna Piszczpl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherTemida 2pl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiałystok Law Books;6-
dc.titleCompetition law in comparative perspectivepl
dc.typeBookpl
dc.rights.holderCopyright ©2011 by Temida 2;-
dc.description.Emailpiszcz@uwb.edu.plpl
dc.description.referencesAcoca B., The interface between consumer and competition policy: activities of the OECD Committee on Consumer Policy [in:] Consumer Protection and Competition Policy – working together?, Warsaw, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesAdamczyk Ł., Poland [in:] G. Maisto, International and EC Tax Aspects of Groups of Companies, Amsterdam, 2008.pl
dc.description.referencesAmand F., French model of competition and consumer protection [in:] Consumer Protection and Competition Policy – working together?, Warsaw, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesAmerican Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Health Care Handbook, Chicago, 2010.pl
dc.description.referencesAmerican Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law, Criminal Antitrust Litigation Handbook, Chicago, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesAmerican Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law, The Merger Review Process. A Step–by–step Guide to Federal Merger Review, Chicago, 2001.pl
dc.description.referencesAnderson J.E., Public Policymaking: An Introduction, Boston, 2010.pl
dc.description.referencesAndreangeli A., EU Competition Enforcement and Human Rights, Cheltenham, 2008.pl
dc.description.referencesAntapassis A., Athanassiou L., Rosaeg E., Competition and Regulation in Shipping and Shipping Related Industries, Leiden, 2009.pl
dc.description.referencesBaker R.J., Pricing on Purpose: Creating and Capturing Value, Hoboken, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesBeach Ch.F., A Treatise on the Law of Monopolies and Industrial Trusts, As Administered in England and in the United States of America, Clark, 2007.pl
dc.description.referencesBell G.F., The U.S. Legal Tradition in Western Legal Systems [in:] J.C. Ginsburg, Legal Methods. Cases and materials, Westbury, 1996.pl
dc.description.referencesBlanke G., Landolt P. (eds.), EU and US Antitrust Arbitration. A Handbook for Practitioners, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2010.pl
dc.description.referencesBradley M., Colvin J., Perkins M., Assessing Liberalization in Context [in:] M.A. Crew, P.R. Kleindorfer, Postal and Delivery Services: Pricing, Productivity, Regulation and Strategy, Norwell, 2002.pl
dc.description.referencesvon Braunmühl P., The strengths and weaknesses of the German model of consumer protection and competition: the consumer perspective [in:] Consumer Protection and Competition Policy – working together?, Warsaw, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesBroberg M.P., The European Commission’s Jurisdiction to Scrutinise Mergers, Hague, 2003.pl
dc.description.referencesBroder D.F., Maitland–Walker J., A Guide to US Antitrust Law, London, 2005.pl
dc.description.referencesCahill D., The Modernisation of EU Competition Law Enforcement in the European Union: FIDE 2004 National Reports, Cambridge, 2004.pl
dc.description.referencesCases L., Competition Law and Policy in Spain: Implementation in an Interventionist Tradition [in:] G. Majone, Regulating Europe, London, 1996.pl
dc.description.referencesCebula B., Impact of concentration on pluralism in media [in:] Consumer Protection and Competition Policy – working together?, Warsaw, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesChalmers D., Hadjiemmanuil C., Monti G., Tomkins A., European Union Law: Text and Materials, New York, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesChalmers D., Davies G., Monti G., European Union Law: Text and Materials, New York, 2010.pl
dc.description.referencesCseres K.J., Competition Law and Consumer Protection, Hague, 2005.pl
dc.description.referencesCseres K.J., Schinkel M.P., Vogelaar F.O.W., Criminalization of Competition Law Enforcement: Economic and Legal Implications for the EU Member States, Cheltenham–Northampton, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesDeguchi M., The Recent Legislation on the Consumer Group Action in Japan [w:] The Recent Tendencies of Development in Civil Procedure Law – between East and West, Vilnius, 2007.pl
dc.description.referencesDratler J., Licensing of Intellectual Property, New York, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesEwing K.P., Competition Rules for the 21st Century: Principles from America’s Experience, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesFarrington R.H., Lee A.J., Moore Ch., Federal Trade Commission Revises Rules on Acquisitions of Foreign Assets and Voting Securities [in:] J.M. Gidley, G.L. Paul, Worldwide Merger Notifi cation Requirements, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2009.pl
dc.description.referencesFreyer T.A., Antitrust and Global Capitalism, 1930–2004, Cambridge, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesGéradin D., Kerf M., Controlling Market Power in Telecommunications: Antitrust vs Sector–Specific Regulation, New York, 2003.pl
dc.description.referencesGerber D.J., Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus, New York, 2001.pl
dc.description.referencesGoeteyn G., Remedies in the Air Transport Sector [in:] D. Géradin, Remedies in Network Industries: EC Competition Law vs. Sector–Specific Regulation, Antwerp–Oxford, 2004.pl
dc.description.referencesHaley J.O., Error, Irony and Convergence: A Comparative Study of the Origins and Development of Competition Policy in Postwar Germany and Japan [in:] B. Grossfeld, W. Fikentscher, Festschrift für Wolfgang Fikentscher zum 70. Geburtstag, Tübingen, 1998.pl
dc.description.referencesHanks E.H., Herz M.E., Nemerson S.S., Elements of Law, New York, 2010.pl
dc.description.referencesHarding C., Joshua J., Regulating Cartels in Europe: a Study of Legal Control of Corporate Delinquency, Oxford, 2003.pl
dc.description.referencesHarris H.S., Goldman C.S., Competition Laws outside the United States, Volume 2, Chicago, 2001.pl
dc.description.referencesHenning–Bodewig F., Unfair Competition Law: European Union and Member States, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesHesselink M.W., The New European Private Law: Essays on the Future of Private Law in Europe, Hague, 2002.pl
dc.description.referencesHuybrechts M., Port Competitiveness. An Economic and Legal Analysis of the Factors Determining the Competitiveness of Seaports, Antwerp, 2002.pl
dc.description.referencesHylton K.N., Antitrust Law: Economic Theory and Common Law Evolution, New York, 2003.pl
dc.description.referencesJackson H.E., Kaplow L., Shavell S.M., Viscusi W.K., Cope D., Analytical Methods for Lawyers, New York, 2011.pl
dc.description.referencesJacobs S.H., Regulatory Reform in the United States, Paris, 1999.pl
dc.description.referencesJennings H., Competition and consumer protection in the United Kingdom [in:] Consumer Protection and Competition Policy – working together?, Warsaw, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesJones A., Sufrin B., EC Competition Law: Text, Cases and Materials, Oxford, 2007.pl
dc.description.referencesKeeling D.T., Intellectual Property Rights in EU Law: Free Movement and Competition Law, New York, 2003.pl
dc.description.referencesKjeldahl R., Competition and consumer protection in Europe: the consumer perspective [in:] Consumer Protection and Competition Policy – working together?, Warsaw, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesLaing D.J., Gomez L.A., Global Merger Control Manual, London, 2007.pl
dc.description.referencesLifl and W.T., State Antitrust Law, New York, 1984.pl
dc.description.referencesLongley D., James R., Administrative Justice: Central Issues in UK and European Administrative Law, London, 1999.pl
dc.description.referencesMartin S., Valbonesi P., State aid to business, [in:] P. Bianchi, S. Labory (eds.), International handbook on industrial policy, Cheltenham – Northampton, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesMashaw J.L., Merrill R.A., Shane P.M., Administrative Law. The American Public Law System. Cases and Materials, St. Paul, 2009.pl
dc.description.referencesMöllers T.M.J., Heinemann A., The Enforcement of Competition Law in Europe, New York, 2007.pl
dc.description.referencesMolski R., Prawo antymonopolowe w obliczu globalizacji, Bydgoszcz–Szczecin, 2008.pl
dc.description.referencesNedelka M., Linhartová J., Czech Republic [in:] S. Goodman (ed.), The Public Competition Enforcement Review, London 2010.pl
dc.description.referencesNeumann M., Competition Policy: History, Theory and Practice, Cheltenham, 2001.pl
dc.description.referencesNiepokulczycka M., European Economic and Social Committee recommendations on consumer and competition protection policy in the European Union [in:] Consumer Protection and Competition Policy – working together?, Warsaw, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesOECD, China in the Global Economy: Governance in China, Paris, 2005.pl
dc.description.referencesOECD, OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform: Australia 2010 – Towards a Seamless National Economy, Paris, 2010.pl
dc.description.referencesOECD, OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform: Regulatory Reform in the Czech Republic, Paris, 2001.pl
dc.description.referencesParr N., Finbow R., Hughes M., UK Merger Control, London, 2005.pl
dc.description.referencesPiszcz A., Ekonomizacja prawa antymonopolowego [in:] P. Chmielnicki, A. Dybała (eds.), Nowe kierunki działań administracji publicznej w Polsce i Unii Europejskiej, Warsaw 2009.pl
dc.description.referencesPiszcz A., Legal sanctions against unfair commercial practices in Poland [in:] M. Popławski, D. Šramkova (eds.), Legal sanctions: theoretical and practical aspects in Poland and the Czech Republic, Brno, 2008.pl
dc.description.referencesPiszcz A., Wybrane problemy związane ze stosowaniem prawa antymonopolowego Unii Europejskiej przez sądy krajowe [in:] N. Szczęch (ed.), Księga Jubileuszowa z okazji 5-lecia Wydziału Prawa Wyższej Szkoły Menedżerskiej w Legnicy “Ius est ars boni et aequi”, Legnica, 2010.pl
dc.description.referencesPiwowarska R., Consumer protection in the telecommunications market in Poland. Alternative Dispute Resolution [in:] Consumer Protection and Competition Policy – working together?, Warsaw, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesReich A., German model of competition and consumer protection – present state of affairs and predicted changes [in:] Consumer Protection and Competition Policy – working together?, Warsaw, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesRivière y Martí J.A., Consumer and competition policy working together at the European Commission [in:] Consumer Protection and Competition Policy – working together?, Warsaw, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesRobinson C., Utility Regulation in Competitive Markets: Problems and Progress, Cheltenham, 2007.pl
dc.description.referencesRowe F.M., Jacobs F.G., Joelson M.R. (eds.), Enterprise Law of the 80s: European and American Perspectives on Competition and Industrial Organization, Chicago, 1980.pl
dc.description.referencesRzepliński A., Principles and Practice of Socialist Justice in Poland [in:] G. Bender, U. Falk (eds.), Recht im Sozialismus: Analysen zur Normdurchsetzung in Osteuropäischen Nachkriegsgesellschaften (1944/45–1989), Frankfurt am Main, 1999.pl
dc.description.referencesSchlegelmilch B., Marketing Ethics. An International Perspective, London, 1998.pl
dc.description.referencesSchwarz F., Intermodal Freight Network Modelling [in:] J.W. Konings, H. Priemus, P. Nijkamp, The Future of Intermodal Freight Transport: Operations, Design and Policy, Cheltenham, 2008.pl
dc.description.referencesScott J., Participation [in:] H. Jonuschat, M. Knoll (eds.), Regional Transformation Processes in Central and Eastern Europe, Berlin, 2008.pl
dc.description.referencesSenden L., Soft Law in European Community Law, Oxford, 2004.pl
dc.description.referencesSkoczny T., Polish Competition Law in the 1990s – on the Way to Higher Effectiveness and Deeper Conformity with EC Competition Rules [in:] T. Einhorn (ed.), Spontaneous Order, Organization and the Law. Roads to a European Civil Society. Liber Amicorum Ernst–Joachim Mestmäcker, Cambridge, 2003.pl
dc.description.referencesSkoczny T., Jurkowska A., Miąsik D. (eds.), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz, Warsaw, 2009.pl
dc.description.referencesSkoczny T., Ustawodawstwo antymonopolowe na świecie w latach 1890–1989, Warsaw, 1990.pl
dc.description.referencesSlot P.J., Johnston A., An Introduction to Competition Law, Oxford–Portland, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesStaszyńska K., Synergy of consumer and competition policies in the view of entrepreneurs and consumer associations [in:] Consumer Protection and Competition Policy – working together?, Warsaw, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesStolz S.M., Bank Capital and Risk–taking: the Impact of Capital Regulation, Charter Value, and the Business Cycle, Berlin–New York, 2007.pl
dc.description.referencesStuyck J., Gilliams H. (eds.), Modernisation of European Competition Law: the Commission’s Proposal for a New Regulation Implementing Articles 81 and 82 EC, Antwerp–Oxford–New York, 2002.pl
dc.description.referencesSubiotto R., Snelders R., Antitrust Developments in Europe 2006, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2007.pl
dc.description.referencesSuzuki K., Competition Law Reform in Britain and Japan: Comparative Analysis of Policy Networks, London–New York, 2002.pl
dc.description.referencesTosato G.L., Bellodi L., EU Competition Law. Volume I. Procedure. Antitrust – Mergers – State Aid, Leuven, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesTurliński A., Miejsce sądu ochrony konkurencji i konsumentów w systemie organów ochrony prawnej [in:] C. Banasiński (ed.), Ochrona konkurencji i konsumentów w Polsce i Unii Europejskiej (studia prawno–ekonomiczne), Warsaw, 2005.pl
dc.description.referencesUllrich H. (ed.), The Evolution of European Competition Law: Whose Regulation, which Competition?, Cheltenham, 2006.pl
dc.description.referencesVan Bockel B., The Ne Bis In Idem Principle in EU Law, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2010.pl
dc.description.referencesvan de Walle de Ghelcke B., Modernisation: Will It Increase Litigation in the National Courts and before National Authorities [in:] D. Géradin, Modernisation and Enlargement: Two Major Challenges for EC Competition Law, Antwerp–Oxford, 2004.pl
dc.description.referencesWesseling R., The Modernisation of EC Antitrust Law, Portland, 2000.pl
dc.description.referencesAndriychuk O., Does Competition Matter? An Attempt of Analytical “Unbundling” of Competition from Consumer Welfare: A Response to Miąsik, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesBernatt M., Right to Be Heard or Protection of the Confi dential Information? Competing Values of Procedural Fairness in the Proceedings in Front of the Competition Authority, “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesBernatt M., The control of Polish courts over the infringements of procedural rules by the national competition authority Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court of 19 August 2009 – Marquard Media Polska (Ref. No. III SK 5/09), “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesBernatt M., The legal status of an undertaking – should local governments be treated more favourably in relation to the penalties for breaching Polish antitrust law? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 5 January 2007 – City Ostrołęka (Ref. No. III SK 16/06), “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesBędkowski–Kozioł M., What is the link between Article 6 Section 3a of the Energy Law Act and Article 490 of the Civil Code regarding the right of a grid operator to suspend the supply of electricity? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court Judgment of 5 June 2007 – GZE (Ref No. III SK 11/07), “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesBobińska K., The Defense of Monopoly as a Determinant of the Process of Transformation of State–owned Infrastructure Sectors in Poland, “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesBolecki A., Gratuitous transfer of ownership of energy transmission infrastructure as an abuse of a dominant position. Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court of 16 October 2008 – Kolej Gondolowa (Ref. No. III SK 2/08), “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesCzernicki F., Legislative Developments in the Civil Aviation Sector in 2008, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesCzernicki F., Legislative Developments in the Civil Aviation Sector in 2009, “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesDe Ridder P., The Regional State Aid Maps for 2007–2013: Less and Better Targeted Regional Aid, “Competition Policy Newsletter” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesDudzik S., Enforceability of Regulatory Decisions and Protection of Rights of Telecommunications Undertakings, “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesElżanowski F., Legislative Developments in the Energy Sector in 2008, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesFornalczyk A., Economic Approach to Counteracting Cartels, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesForrester I.S., Dawes A., Parallel Trade in Prescription Medicines in the European Union: The Age of Reason?, “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesGalewska E.J., How to determine a price of wholesale line rental? Case comment to the judgment of the Court of the Competition and Consumer Protection of 10 December 2007 – Tele2 (Ref. No. XVII AmT 17/07), “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesGéradin D., Henry D., The EC fi ning policy for violations of competition law: An empirical review of the Commission decisional practice and the Community courts’ judgments, “The Global Competition Law Centre Working Papers Series” 3/2005.pl
dc.description.referencesHarbord D., Hoehn T., Barriers to Entry and Exit in European Competition Policy, “International. Review of Law and Economics” 14/1994.pl
dc.description.referencesIllinicz R., Legislative Developments in the Postal Sector in 2008, “YARS”, 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesJeżewska J., Possible objective justifi cation of a network monopoly’s refusal to conclude an agreement on an interconnected market. Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court of 14 January 2009 – Commune Rychwał (Ref. No. III SK 24/08), “YARS” 3/2010, p. 272.pl
dc.description.referencesJurkowska A., A courier service as a postal universal service – can a court asses the correctness of a legal qualifi cation of a service of a courier company that was not contested by the company in an earlier decision taken by the postal regulator? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 25 April 2007 – Courier services (Ref. No. III SK 2/07), “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesJurkowska A., Antitrust Private Enforcement – Case of Poland, “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesJurkowska–Gomułka A., Polish Antitrust Legislation and Case Law Review 2009, “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesKohutek K., A local government’s right to determine the conditions of operating on the market for communal waste collection. Can such conditions lead to an anticompetitive foreclosure of that market? Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court of 14 November 2008 – City Kalisz (Ref. No. III SK 9/08), “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesKohutek K., Impact of the New Approach to Article 102 TFEU on the Enforcement of the Polish Prohibition of Dominant Position Abuse, “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesKohutek K., Shall selective, above–cost price cutting in the newspaper market be qualifi ed as anti–competitive exclusion? Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court of 19 August 2009 – Marquard Media Polska (Ref. No. III SK 5/09), “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesKohutek K., When will the imposition of the requirement to co–fi nance the construction of necessary facilities constitute an abuse of a dominant position? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 5 January 2007 – Kolej Gondolowa (Ref. No. III SK 17/06), “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesKolasiński M., Infl uence of General Principles of Community Law on the Polish Antitrust Procedure, “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesKolasiński M., The economic approach in Polish courts: permitted agency agreements or prohibited price fixing? Case comment to the judgment of the Appeal Court in Warsaw of 13 February 2007 – Roche and Hand–Prod (Ref. No. VI AcA 819/06), “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesKosmala K., Legislative Developments in the Telecoms Sector in 2008, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesKosmala K., 2009 Legislative and Juridical Developments in Telecommunications, “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesKośka D., Kuik K., 2008 and 2009 EU Competition Law and Sector–specific Regulatory Case Law Developments with a Nexus to Poland, “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesKowalik–Bańczyk K., The Publication of the European Commission’s Guidelines in an Offi cial Language of a New Member State as a Condition for their Application. Case Comment to the Order of the Polish Supreme Court of 3 September 2009 (Ref. No. III SK 16/09) to Refer a Preliminary Question to the Court of Justice of the European Union (C–410/99 Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej), “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesKozak M., Wide scope of administrative discretion justifi ed by features of telecommunications markets. Case comment to the judgment of the Polish Supreme Court of 2 April 2009 – TP SA v. the President of the Electronic Communications Offi ce (Ref. No. III SK 28/08), “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesKozieł T., Commitment Decisions under the Polish Competition Act – Enforcement Practice and Future Perspectives, “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesKról M., Benefi ts and Costs of Vertical Separation in Network Industries. The Case of Railway Transport in the European Environment, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesKról M., Liberalization without a Regulator. The Rail Freight Transport Market in Poland in the Years 1996–2009, “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesKuik K., 2007 EC Competition Law and Sector–specifi c Regulatory Case Law Developments with a Nexus to Poland, “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesLienemeyer M., The Restructuring of Huta Czestochowa — the Commission’s Decision Finding Compliance with Private Creditor Test but Ordering Recovery of Some Previously Granted Restructuring Aid, “Competition Policy Newsletter” 1/2006.pl
dc.description.referencesMiąsik D., A Short Comment on Andriychuk, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesMiąsik D., Controlled Chaos with Consumer Welfare as the Winner – a Study of the Goals of Polish Antitrust Law, “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesMiąsik D., Solvents to the Rescue – a Historical Outline of the Impact of EU Law on the Application of Polish Competition Law by Polish Courts, “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesMolski R., Polish Antitrust Law in its Fight Against Cartels – Awaiting a Breakthrough, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesMolski R., The legal status of foreign undertakings – could undertakings with a registered seat abroad be regarded as undertakings entitled to file a request for the institution of antimonopoly proceedings under Polish antitrust law? Case comments to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 10 May 2007 – Netherlands Antilles (Ref. No. III SK 24/06), “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesNowak A., Challenges of Liberalisation. The Case of Polish Electricity and Gas Sectors, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesPiątek S., Investment and Regulation in Telecommunications, “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesPiątek S., Stopping the creeping telecoms regulation. Case comment to the judgment of the European Court of Justice of 13 November 2008 European Commission v. Republic of Poland (Case C–227/07), “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesPiszcz A., Antitrust in Times of Financial Crisis, “Innovative Issues and Approaches in Social Sciences” 3/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesPiszcz A., Czynnik czasu w prawie antymonopolowym [in:] C. Kosikowski (ed.), Czas w prawie, “Białostockie Studia Prawnicze” 7/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesPiszcz A., Does forcing services on suppliers constitute an abuse of a dominant position? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 19 February 2009 – DROP (Ref. No. III SK 31/08), “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesPodrecki P., Civil Law Actions in the Context of Competition Restricting Practices under Polish Law, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesPoździk R., Does a selection of contractors in a public tender constitute an infringement of a prohibition of competition restricting agreements? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 25 April 2007 – STALEXPORT – TRANSROUTE (Ref. No. III SK 3/07), “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesRumak E., Sitarek P., Polish Leniency Programme and its Intersection with Private Enforcement of Competition Law, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesSage E.D., Who Controls Polish Transmission Masts? At the Intersection of Antitrust and Regulation, “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesSkoczny T., Ochrona konkurencji a prokonkurencyjna regulacja sektorowa, “Problemy Zarządzania” 3/2004.pl
dc.description.referencesSroczyński J., Permissibility of Exclusive Transactions: Few Remarks in the Context of Media Rights Exploitation, “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesStankiewicz R., Does an undertaking’s reputation affect its market power on the relevant market? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 2 April 2009 – PPKS (Ref. No. III SK 30/08), “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesStefaniuk M., 2007 Antitrust and Regulatory Developments in Legislation in Poland, “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesStefaniuk M., 2008 Antitrust Law Developments in Poland, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesTosza K., Payment Card Systems as an Example of Two–sided Markets – a Challenge for Antitrust Authorities, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesWach M., Should a fee for mobile phone number portability be determined solely by subscriber preferences? Comments to the judgments of the Court of Competition and Consumers Protection of 8 January 2007 (Ref. No. XVII AmT 29/06) and 6 March 2007 (Ref. No. XVII AmT 33/06) – Portability fee, “YARS” 1/2008.pl
dc.description.referencesWalsh D.J., Carrots and Sticks – Leniency and Fines in EC Cartel Cases, “European Competition Law Review” 1/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesZawisza K., Legislative Developments in Rail Transport in 2008, “YARS” 2/2009.pl
dc.description.referencesZawisza K., Legislative Developments in Rail Transport in 2009, “YARS” 3/2010.pl
dc.description.number6pl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Książki / Rozdziały (Temida2)
Książki/Rozdziały (WP)

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)