REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/10058
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorLudwikowski, Rett R.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-18T12:20:46Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-18T12:20:46Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 25 nr 3, 2020, s. 27-42pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/10058-
dc.description.abstractThe main goal of this article is to present to the European reader the implications of the unstable relationships between the United States and an integrated Europe. The article focuses on the trade relations between the US and Europe in the globalization era. It explains the meaning of some basic terms used by trade experts, such as globalization, regionalization, glocalization, and strategic trade. The author also tries to explore the reasons for the recent crisis of global trade. The main part of the paper reviews the major disputes between these two regions which resulted in postponing of the negotiations of the Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement. As we have observed in the introduction of the article, the relationships between the European Union and the United States have always been complicated and the article presents the main reasons for these disagreements. In a time of renewed Trans-Atlantic negotiations, pro-American sentiments in Europe grew stronger, and European experts on trade and politics emphasized that the US significantly increased support for the European Deterrence Initiative (EDI). Still, with comments repeated by President Trump many times that “Europe needs its own army”, the European media began warning the readers that the crisis in US-EU relations may soon return.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherWydział Prawa Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, Temida 2pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Unported*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.pl*
dc.subjectAmerican unilateralismpl
dc.subjectEuropean Community/Unionpl
dc.subjectthe Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreementpl
dc.subjectglobalizationpl
dc.subjectregionalizationpl
dc.subjectstrategic tradepl
dc.subjectthe General Agreement on Tariff and Trade (GATT)pl
dc.subjectthe World Trade Organization (WTO)pl
dc.subjectThe Chicken Warpl
dc.subjectBanana Warpl
dc.subjectprinciple of parallelismpl
dc.subjectByrd’s Amendmentpl
dc.subjectCarousel Procedurepl
dc.subjectzeroingpl
dc.titleOverview of the Trade Relations Between the European Community/Union and the United States at the Threshold of Globalization and Post-globalization Erapl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0);-
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2020.25.03.02-
dc.description.Emailludwikowski@cua.edupl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteRett R. Ludwikowski – The Catholic University of America, professor of law at the Columbus School of Law since 1985 and the director of the International Business and Trade Summer Law Program in Cracow, Poland since 1991 and the director of Comparative and International Law Institute from 1985 to 2015.pl
dc.description.AffiliationCatholic University of America, United States of Americapl
dc.description.referencesP. Barkham, European Union. The banana wars explained, “The Guardian”, 03.05.1999.pl
dc.description.referencesA. Chayes, T. Erhlich, A. Lowenfeld, “International Legal Process”, Vol II, 1968.pl
dc.description.referencesT.M. Cooley, The General Principles of the Constitutional Law in the United States of America, Boston, 1891.pl
dc.description.referencesA.V. Deardorff , R.M. Stern, M.N. Greene, The Implications of Alternative Trade Strategies for the United States, [in:] The New International Economic Order. A U.S. Response, Nowy Jork 1979.pl
dc.description.referencesD. Ikenson, Ending the “Chicken War”. The Case for Abolishing the 25 Percent Truck Tariff, June 18, 2003, Center for Trade Policy Studies.pl
dc.description.referencesD. Ikenson, Byrdening Relations: U.S. Trade Policies, Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 2003.pl
dc.description.referencesJ.H. Jackson, World Trade and the Law of the GATT, Indianapolis, 1968.pl
dc.description.referencesJ. Larik, Brexit and the Future of Transatlantic Relations Brexit Institute, 04, 2018.pl
dc.description.referencesS. Lester and D. Ikenson, Core Principles for a U.S.-UK Free Trade Agreement, Cato Institute, 30.01.2020.pl
dc.description.referencesR.R. Ludwikowski, Limits of Universalism: Protection of Human Rights in Europe and America in Historical and Comparative Perspective,“Politeja”, 2/6/2006.pl
dc.description.referencesR.R. Ludwikowski, Handel Międzynarodowy, IV Wyd. C.H. Beck, 2019.pl
dc.description.referencesR. Małajny, Trzy Teorie Podzielonej Władzy, 2001.pl
dc.description.referencesL. McGee, Cracks in the Trump-Europe relationship are turning into a chasm, 04.06.2020, CNN.pl
dc.description.referencesL. Sek, Trade Retaliation: The ‘Carousel’ Approach, Congressional Research Service, 03.05.2002.pl
dc.description.referencesJ. Smith, The EU-US relationship is in crisis, The German Times, 03.2019.pl
dc.description.referencesJ. Worland, Trump Wants to Impose Steel Tariffs. It Didn’t Work for Bush, Time, March 1, 2018.pl
dc.description.volume25pl
dc.description.number3pl
dc.description.firstpage27pl
dc.description.lastpage42pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7457-3096-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2020, Vol. 25 nr 3

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_25_3_R_R_Ludwikowski_Overview_of_the_Trade_Relations.pdf140,54 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons