The Protection of Unregistered Designs in EU Law

Pole DC	Wartość	Język
dc.contributor.author	Kropiwnicka, Magdalena	-
dc.date.accessioned	2019-10-03T10:38:40Z	-
dc.date.available	2019-10-03T10:38:40Z	-
dc.date.issued	2019	-
dc.identifier.citation	Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2019, p. 81-92	pl
dc.identifier.issn	2544-9214	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11320/8340	-
dc.description.abstract	It is significant that two forms of protection exist because some sectors of industry produce a large number of designs for products which are on the market for a very short time. Protection without registration formalities and fees is an advantage. However, there are sectors of industry which value the advantages of registration. These sectors value the possibility of longer term protection more than the shorter term protection provided by an unregistered Community design. One of the important benefits is that unregistered Community design protection does not require any documents, but the owners have to prove the exclusive right belongs to them. Another significant advantage is that an unregistered Community design can be changed to a registered design during the twelve- month grace period from the disclosure.	pl
dc.language.iso	en	pl
dc.publisher	Publishing House Temida 2	pl
dc.rights	Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/	*
dc.subject	unregistered Community design	pl
dc.subject	short term products	pl
dc.subject	protection	pl
dc.subject	industrial design	pl
dc.subject	novelty	pl
dc.subject	individual character	pl
dc.title	The Protection of Unregistered Designs in EU Law	pl
dc.type	Article	pl
dc.identifier.doi	10.15290/eejtr.2019.03.01.06	-
dc.description.Email	kropiwnickamagdalena@wp.pl	pl
dc.description.Biographicalnote	Doctoral student at the Department of Intellectual Property at the Faculty of Law at the University of Białystok.	pl
dc.description.Affiliation	University of Białystok, Poland, Department of Intellectual Property at the Faculty of Law	pl
dc.description.references	Brancusi, L. (2012). Wzór wspólnotowy i jego zakres ochrony [Community Design and its Scope of Protection]. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.	pl
dc.description.references	Bulling, A., Langohrig, A. & Hellwig, T. (2004). The Community Design: A New Right of Design Protection for the European Community. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, (86), 111-133.	pl
dc.description.references	Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 Legislation.gov.ukCouncil	pl
dc.description.references	Christiansen, C. B. (2015). Art. 7 CDR Commentary. In G. Hasselblatt (Ed.) Community Design Regulation. A Commentary. (pp. 119-120). C.H. BECK, Hart, Nomos	pl
dc.description.references	Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs, Official Journal L 003 , 05/01/2002, P. 0001 – 0024.	pl
dc.description.references	Derclaye, E. (2013). A Decade of Registered and Unregistered Design Rights Decisions in the UK: What Conclusions Can We Draw for the Future of Both Types of Rights. IP Theory, 2(3), 144-157.	pl
dc.description.references	Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 289, 28 October 1998.	pl
dc.description.references	du Vall, M., Kasprzycki, D., Ożegalska-Trybalska, J., Stanisławska-Kloc, S. & Tischner, A. (2011). Ochrona własności intelektualnej w sektorze odzieżowo-tekstylnym. Poradnik dla mikro, małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw [Intellectual Property Protection in the Clothing and Textile Sector. Guide for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises]. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Instytut Prawa Własności Intelektualnej w Krakowie.	pl
dc.description.references	Green Paper on the Legal Protection of Industrial Design, Brussel 1991, 111/F/5131/91-EN.	pl
dc.description.references	Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), 19 June 2014, Case C-345/13, , Karen Millen Fashions Ltd v Dunnes Stores, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2013.	pl
dc.description.references	Judgment of the Court in case H. Gautzsch Großhandel GmbH & Co. KG v Münchener Boulevard Möbel Joseph Duna GmbH, C‑479/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:75.	pl
dc.description.references	Judgment of the Court in Neuman and Others v José Manuel Baena Grupo, C-101/11 P and C-102/11 P, EU:C:2012:641.	pl
dc.description.references	Judgment of the Court in PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic, C-281/10 P, EU:C:2011:679.	pl
dc.description.references	Kępiński, J. (2010). Wzór przemysłowy i jego ochrona w prawie polskim i wspólnotowym [Industrial Design and its Protection in Polish and Community Law]. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.	pl
dc.description.references	Legal review on industrial design protection in Europe (2016). Under the contract with the Directorate General Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (MARKT2014/083/D).	pl
dc.description.references	Maier, P., & Schlőtelburg M. (2003), Manual on the European Community Design, Köln: Heymanns, 9-18.	pl
dc.description.references	Nowińska, E., Promińska, U., & du Vall, M. (2015). Prawo własności przemysłowej [Industrial Property Law]. Warszawa: LexisNexis.	pl
dc.description.references	Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet in case H. Gautzsch Großhandel GmbH & Co. KG v Münchener Boulevard Möbel Joseph Duna GmbH, C-479/12, 5 September 2013, ECLI:EU:C:2013:537.	pl
dc.description.references	Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet, 2 April 2014, Case C-345/13, Karen Millen Fashions Ltd v Dunnes Stores, ECLI:EU:C:2014:206.	pl
dc.description.references	Poźniak-Niedzielska, M. (2007). Ochrona wzorów przemysłowych w prawie europejskim [Industrial Designs Protection in European Law]. Europejski Przegląd Sądowy, (1), 4-11.	pl
dc.description.references	Poźniak-Niedzielska, M., & Sieńczyło-Chlabicz, J. (2016). Europejskie prawo wzorów przemysłowych [European Industrial Design Law]. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.	pl
dc.description.references	Sieńczyło-Chlabicz, J. (2008). Ochrona niezarejestrowanego wzoru wspólnotowego [Unregistered Community Design Protection]. Europejski Przegląd Sądowy, (2), 10-17.	pl
dc.description.references	Stone D. (2012). European Union Design Law: A Practitioner's Guide, Oxford University Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Szczepanowska-Kozłowska K. (2005). Ochrona wzoru w prawie europejskim [Design Protection in European law]. Przegląd Prawa Handlowego, (5), 30-34.	pl
dc.description.references	Tischner A. (2006). Niezarejestrowany wzór wspólnotowy [Unregistered Community Design]. Przegląd Prawa Handlowego, (7), 36-42.	pl
dc.description.references	Wernicka K. (2008). Nowość i indywidualny charakter wzoru przemysłowego w praktyce Urzędu ds. Harmonizacji Rynku Wewnętrznego [The Novelty and Individual Character of the Industrial Design in the Practice of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market]. Europejski Przegląd Sądowy, (8), 42-48.	pl
dc.identifier.eissn	2544-9737	-
dc.description.volume	3	-
dc.description.number	1	-
dc.description.firstpage	81	pl
dc.description.lastpage	92	pl
dc.identifier.citation2	Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations	pl
dc.identifier.orcid	0000-0003-1281-9446	-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):	Artykuły naukowe (WP) Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 2019, Vol. 3, No. 1

Pliki w tej pozycji:

Plik	Opis	Rozmiar	Format
EEJTR (2019) Vol. 3 No. 1 Magdalena Kropiwnicka.pdf		205,17 kB	Adobe PDF	Otwórz

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki

Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL