Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/8034
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Blažo, Ondrej | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kováčiková, Hana | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-03T09:20:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-03T09:20:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 24 nr 2, 2019, s. 137-146 | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 1689-7404 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/8034 | - |
dc.description.abstract | According to the new European Union’ Public procurement legislation (hereinafter 2014 PP Directives), the award of public contracts by or on behalf public authority has to comply with the principles of the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, as well as the principles deriving therefrom such as equal treatment, non-discrimination, mutual recognition, proportionality and transparency and sound procedural management. We understand that the main goal of public procurement is not to protect human or fundamental rights, but to put public funds to effective use. However, by adopting the new concept of procurement, there exists space for the penetration of such rights in the public procurement arena. Human and fundamental rights protection shall be applied continuously during the process of procurement, and in both the contracting and implementation phases. The authors will focus their research especially on the competitor´s right to good administration which shall guarantee the competitor´s right for equal opportunity for fair contract. Nowadays, it is not rare a situation, when the contracting authority due to breach of the principle of sound administration prioritizes another competitor rather than one, who was supposed to win. Therefore, a competitor´s right to adequate compensation under such circumstances will also be examined. | pl |
dc.description.sponsorship | The paper was prepared within project APVV-17-0641 “Improvement of effectiveness of legal regulation of public procurement and its application within EU law context”. | pl |
dc.language.iso | en | pl |
dc.publisher | Wydział Prawa Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, Temida 2 | pl |
dc.subject | public procurement | pl |
dc.subject | fundamental rights | pl |
dc.subject | fair public contract | pl |
dc.subject | equality | pl |
dc.subject | discrimination | pl |
dc.subject | principle of sound administration | pl |
dc.subject | conflict of interests | pl |
dc.subject | principle of legal certainty | pl |
dc.subject | the principle of legitimate expectations | pl |
dc.title | Right for Equal Opportunity for Fair Public Contract? Human Rights in Public Procurement | pl |
dc.type | Article | pl |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15290/bsp.2019.24.02.07 | - |
dc.description.Email | Ondrej Blažo: ondrej.blazo@flaw.uniba.sk | pl |
dc.description.Email | Hana Kováčiková: hana.kovacikova@flaw.uniba.sk | pl |
dc.description.Biographicalnote | Ondrej Blažo – associate professor in European law specialising in competition law and economic integration, currently Director of the Institute of European Law and Vice Dean of the Faculty of Law of Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia. Previously he has been a senior state counsel at the Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic fulfilling duties as case handler and has also been responsible for preparation of legislation (he co-authored several legislative documents on Slovak competition rules) and representation at EU bodies, particularly the Commission’s advisory boards and European Competition Network. | pl |
dc.description.Biographicalnote | Hana Kováčiková – associate professor of European law at the Faculty of Law of the Comenius University in Bratislava (Slovakia). She is also a practising attorney at law registered with the Slovak Bar Association. She has visited several foreign universities as a researcher and as a visiting lecturer, as well as a speaker at international conferences. In her research, she has specialised in various areas of European Union law. In her legal practice, she specialises in commercial law, civil law and family law. | pl |
dc.description.Affiliation | Ondrej Blažo - Comenius University in Bratislava | pl |
dc.description.Affiliation | Hana Kováčiková - Comenius University in Bratislava | pl |
dc.description.references | Brugi, M., Trybus, M., Treumer, S., (eds.). Qualification, selection and exclusion in EU Procurement. Copenhagen, 2016. | pl |
dc.description.references | Comba, M., Treumer, S., (eds.) Award of Contracts in EU Procurements. Copenhagen, 2013. | pl |
dc.description.references | Steinecke, M., Vesterdorf, P., (eds.) EU Public Procurement Law. Brussels Commentary. Baden-Baden, 2018. | pl |
dc.description.references | Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility /* COM/2011/0681 final */. | pl |
dc.description.references | Decision of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic of 24 May 2019 in case Železnice Slovenskej republiky No. 3Sžf/38/2015. | pl |
dc.description.references | Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28. 3. 2014). | pl |
dc.description.references | Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28. 3. 2014). | pl |
dc.description.references | Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts (OJ L 94, 28. 3. 2014). | pl |
dc.description.references | International Learning Lab on Public Procurement and Human Rights: “Public Procurement and Human Rights: a Survey of Twenty Jurisdictions”, International Learning Lab on Public Procurement, 2016. Available at: https://www.hrprocurementlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Public-Procurement-and-Human-Rights-A-Survey-of-Twenty-Jurisdictions-Final.pdf (visited on 15 October 2019). | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgement of the General Court of 28 February 2018 in Case Vakakis kai Synergates v European Commission, T-292/15, ECLI:EU:T:2018:103. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgement of the General Court of 20 September 2011 in Case Evropaïki Dynamiki v European Investment Bank (EIB), T-461/08, ECLI:EU:T:2011:494. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgement of the CJEU of 14 June 2007 in case Medipac-Kazantzidis AE v Venizeleio-Pananeio (PE.S.Y. KRITIS), C-6/05, ECLI:EU:C:2007:337. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgement of CJEU of April 2017 in case European Ombudsman v Claire Staelen, C-337/15 P, ECLI: EU:C:2017:256. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgement of CJEU of 8 February 2018 in Case Lloyd´s of London C-144/17, ECLI:EU:C:2018:78. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgement of CJEU of 12 March 2015 in Case eVigilo Ltd v Priešgaisrinės apsaugos ir gelbėjimo departamentas prie Vidaus reikalų ministerijos, C-538-13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:166. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic of 1 July 2015 in case Národná diaľničná spoločnosť No. 8Sfž/125/2014. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Slovak republic of 18 Jun 2015 in case Allen a Overy No. 8Sžf/39/2014. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic of 15 April 2015 in case BUSE No. 2Sžf/98/2018. | pl |
dc.description.references | Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic of 17 December in case SKANSKA No. 2Sžf/96/2013. | pl |
dc.description.references | Recommendation CM/REC (2007)/7 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on good administration. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/16807096b9 (accessed 31.12. 2018). | pl |
dc.description.references | Resolution of the UN General Assembly from 25 September 2015 No. 70/1, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). | pl |
dc.description.references | United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner: “Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework”. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2011. | pl |
dc.description.volume | 24 | - |
dc.description.number | 2 | - |
dc.description.firstpage | 137 | pl |
dc.description.lastpage | 146 | pl |
dc.identifier.citation2 | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze | pl |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-9721-8724 | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-4158-0924 | - |
Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2019, Vol. 24 nr 2 |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BSP_24_2_O_Blazo_H_Kovacikova_Right_for_Equal_Opportunity.pdf | 101,99 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)