REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze
  4. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2019, Vol. 24 nr 1

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/7849
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorKużelewska, Elżbieta-
    dc.date.accessioned2019-05-24T08:27:32Z-
    dc.date.available2019-05-24T08:27:32Z-
    dc.date.issued2019-
    dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 24 nr 1, 2019, s. 13-27pl
    dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/7849-
    dc.description.abstractMarriage is a successful institution and it makes sense to open it to as many people as possible. The issue of same-sex marriage sparked emotional and political clashes between supporters and opponents. Denial of marriage rights to same-sex people can be seen as a kind of discrimination. This paper explores legal recognition of same-sex marriages. It thereby focuses on the role of Constitutional (Supreme) Courts engaging with the legal arguments over same-sex relationship recognition and marriage. It highlights the effects of policy evolution towards same-sex marriage as well as society’s attitudes. The paper examines the role of referendum held in five European states (Croatia, Slovakia, Ireland, Slovenia and Romania) devoted to (in general) same-sex marriage. It discusses the results of referendums and voters’ choicepl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherWydział Prawa Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, Temida 2pl
    dc.subjectdignitypl
    dc.subjectlegalisationpl
    dc.subjectpartnershippl
    dc.subjectreferendumpl
    dc.subjectsame-sex marriagepl
    dc.titleSame-Sex Marriage – A Happy End Story? The Effectiveness of Referendum on Same-Sex Marriage in Europepl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2019.24.01.01-
    dc.description.Emailekuzelewska@gmail.compl
    dc.description.BiographicalnoteProfessor of the University of Białystok, the chair of the Centre for Direct Democracy Studies at the Faculty of Law, University of Bialystok. Her research interests are focused on direct democracy, civic engagement in political life, and the social dimension on European integration. She published two monographs in Polish: “Referendum w procesie integracji europejskiej” (2005) “Ratyfikacja Traktatu ustanawiającego Konstytucję dla Europy i jego następstwa” (2011) and ca. 100 articles. She is Editor-in-Chief of the series “European Integration and Democracy Series” published by Intersentia: Cambridge-Antwerp.pl
    dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.description.referencesAyoub P.M., When States Come Out. Europe’s Sexual Minorities and the Politics of Visibility, New York 2016.pl
    dc.description.referencesBaehr v. Lewin, Hawai’i Supreme Court 74 Haw. 645, 852 P.2d 44 May 5, 1993.pl
    dc.description.referencesButković H., The Rise of Direct Democracy in Croatia: Balancing or Challenging Parliamentary Representation?, „Croatian International Relations Review” 2017, vol. XXIII(77).pl
    dc.description.referencesCase CCT234/15, www.safl ii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2016/44.pdf (access 3.01.2019).pl
    dc.description.referencesDrescher J., Out of DSM: Depathologizing Homosexuality, „Behavioral Sciences” 2015, vol. 5(4).pl
    dc.description.referencesDržavno Izborno Povjerenstvo Republike Hrvatske; Centre for Research on Direct Democracy.pl
    dc.description.referencesDurinová P., Slovakia, (in:) E. Kováts, M. Põim (eds.), Gender as a symbolic glue. The position and role of conservative and far right parties in the anti-gender mobilizations in Europe, FriedrichEbert-Stift ung Budapest 2015.pl
    dc.description.referencesElkink J.A., Farrell D.M., Reidy T., Suiter J., Understanding the 2015 Marriage Referendum in Ireland: Constitutional Convention, Campaign, and Conservative Ireland, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283714146_Understanding_the_2015_marriage_equality_referendum_in_Ireland (access 18.11.2018).pl
    dc.description.referencesFichera M. Same-Sex Marriage and the Role of Transnational Law: Changes in the European Landscape, “German Law Jurnal” 2016, vol. 17(3).pl
    dc.description.referencesFlores A.R., Park E.A., Polarized Progress. Social Acceptance of LGBT People in 141 Countries 1981-2014, Los Angeles 2018.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlass M., Kubasek N., Kiester E., Towards a European Model of Same-Sex Marriage Rights: A Viable Pathway for the U.S., “Berkeley Journal of International Law” 2011, vol. 29(1).pl
    dc.description.referencesHaček M., Kukovič S., Brezovšek M., Slovenian Politics and the State, Lanham 2017.pl
    dc.description.referencesHart-Brinson P., The Social Imagination of Homosexuality and the Rise of Same-Sex Marriage in the United States, “Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World” 2016, vol. 2.pl
    dc.description.referencesHikita K., Can human rights of a sexual minority in Japan be Guaranteed? A Comparison with Taiwan’s efforts for Gender Equality, „Journal of Asian Women’s Studies” 2017, vol. 24.pl
    dc.description.referencesHollingsworth v. Perry, 570 U.S. 693 (2013).pl
    dc.description.referencesHorton H., Austrian Constitutional Court rules same-sex couples can marry by 2019, „The Telegraph”, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/12/05/austrian-constitutional-court-rules-same-sex-couples-canmarry/ (access 03.01.2019).pl
    dc.description.referenceshttps://www.hrw.org/news/2015/02/08/slovakia-low-turnout-scuttles-discriminatory-referendum (access: 14.01.2019).pl
    dc.description.referenceshttps://www.news24.com/World/News/austrian-court-rules-that-same-sex-couples-can-marry-20171205 (access 03.01.2019).pl
    dc.description.referenceshttps://www.thejournal.ie/roscommon-south-leitrim-voted-no-why-2121899-May2015/ (access 3.01.2019).pl
    dc.description.referencesIsaacson S.E., Obergefell v Hodges: The US Supreme Court Decides the Marriage Question, “Oxford Journal of Law and Religion” 2015, vol. 4(3).pl
    dc.description.referencesJudicial Yuan Interpretation no. 748 and Reasons, www.jirs.judicial.gov.tw/GNNWS/NNWSSøø2.asp?id=267570 (access 03.01.2019).pl
    dc.description.referencesKing M., Bartlett A., What same sex civil partnership may mean for health, “Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health” 2006, vol. 60(3).pl
    dc.description.referencesKollman K., Pioneering marriage for same-sex couples in the Netherlands, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2017, vol. 24(1).pl
    dc.description.referencesKollman K., Waites M., United Kingdom: changing political opportunity structures, policy success and continuing challenges for lesbian, gay and bisexual movements, (in:) M. Tremblay, D. Paternotte, C. Johnson (eds.), The Lesbian and Gay Movement and the State: Comparative Insights into a Transformed Relationship, Farnham 2011.pl
    dc.description.referencesKostadinov B., Direct Participation of the People in Public Power – Advantages and Disadvantages of a Referendum, Croatian and European Perspective, (in:) R. Arnolde, J.I. Martínez-Estay (eds.), Rule of Law, Human Rights and Judicial Control of Power. Some Reflections from National and International Law, Springer 2017.pl
    dc.description.referencesKrašovec A., Ramet S.P., Liberal Democracy in Slovenia: From Seventh Heaven to the Lobby of Hell in Only Two Decades?, (in:) S.P. Ramet, Ch.M. Hassenstab, O. Listhaug, Building Democracy in the Yougoslav Successor States. Accomplishments, Setbacks, and Challenges since 1990, Cambridge 2017.pl
    dc.description.referencesKrašovec A., The 2015 Referendum in Slovenia, „East European Quarterly” 201, vol. 43(3).pl
    dc.description.referencesKrošlák D., The referendum on the so-called Traditional Familyi n the Slovak Republic, „Central and Eastern European Legal Studies” 2015, vol. 1.pl
    dc.description.referencesKużelewska E., How Far Can Citizens Influence the Decision-Making Process? Analyses of the Effectiveness of the Referenda in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary in 1989-2015, “Baltic Journal of European Studies” 2015, vol. 5, no. 2 (19).pl
    dc.description.referencesKużelewska E., Demokracja bezpośrednia w Słowenii, „Studia Wyborcze” 2018, tom XXV.pl
    dc.description.referencesKużelewska E., Direct Democracy in Slovakia, (in:) M. Marczewska-Rytko (ed.), Handbook of Direct Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe Aft er 1989, Opladen-Berlin-Toronto 2018.pl
    dc.description.referencesKużelewska E., Referendum ogólnokrajowe w Słowacji – nieudany eksperyment, „Acta Politica Polonica” 2018, nr 1(43).pl
    dc.description.referencesLennox Kail B., Acosta K.L., Wright E.R., State-Level Marriage Equality and the Health of Same-Sex Couples, “American Journal of Public Health” 2015, vol. 105(6).pl
    dc.description.referencesMarczewska-Rytko M., Direct Democracy in Croatia, (in:) M. Marczewska-Rytko (ed.), Handbook of Direct Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe After 1989, Opladen-Berlin-Toronto 2018.pl
    dc.description.referencesMcAleese M., Foreword, (in:) G. Healy, B. Sheehan, N. Whelan (eds.), Ireland Says Yes: The Inside Story of How the Vote for Marriage Equality Was Won, Merrion Press 2016.pl
    dc.description.referencesNational Council of State Legislatures. Same Sex Marriage Laws. Washington, DC: National Council of State Legislatures 2014.pl
    dc.description.referencesPodolnjak R., Constitutional Reforms of Citizen-Initiated Referendum. Causes of Different Outcomes in Slovenia and Croatia, „Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law” 2015, vol. 26.pl
    dc.description.referencesPortaru A., Marriage at a Crossroads in Romania, https://coalitiapentrufamilie.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Marriage-at-a-crossroads-in-Romania.pdf (access 22.01.2019).pl
    dc.description.referencesPub. L. No. 104-199, 110 Stat. 2419.pl
    dc.description.referencesRubenstein J.S., Smith J.J., Ding Dong, Is DOMA Dead?, „Trust & Estates” January 2014.pl
    dc.description.referencesRuling of the European Court of Human Rights, 2010.pl
    dc.description.referencesRyan F., Ireland’s Marriage Referendum: A Constitutional Perspective, DPCE Online 2015, vol. 2, http://eprints.maynoothuniversity.ie/8934/1/FR-Ireland-2015.pdf (access 3.01.2019).pl
    dc.description.referencesRybar M., Sovcikova A., The 2015 Referendum in Slovakia, „East European Quarterly” 2016, vol. 44, no. 1-2.pl
    dc.description.referencesSaez M., Transforming Family Law Through Same-Sex Marriage: Lessons from (and to) the Western World, “Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law” 2014, vol. 25.pl
    dc.description.referencesScali T., D’Amore S., Same-sex marriage and same-sex adoption: Socio-political context of the rights of gay and lesbian people in Belgium, „Psychology of Sexualities Review” 2015, vol. 6(1).pl
    dc.description.referencesSekerák M., Same-Sex Marriages (or Civil Unions/Registered Partnership) in Slovak Constitutional law: Challenges and possibilities, „Utrecht Law Review” 2017, vol. 13(1).pl
    dc.description.referencesSlootmaeckers K., Sircar I., Croatia, the EU, and the marriage referendum: The symbolic case of LGBT rights, ECPR General Conference 2014, https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/f3af562f-e97a4143-8292-ac4d2150062f.pdf (access 14.01.2019).pl
    dc.description.referencesTrstenjak V., General Report: The Influence of Human Rights and Basic Rights in Private Law, (in:) V. Trstenjak, P. Weingerl (eds.), The Influence of Human Rights and Basic Rights in Private Law, Springer 2016.pl
    dc.description.referencesVermeulenV., Developments in European law and European Union policy on same-sex couples: An overview of judicial, legislative and policy developments in the recognition of same-sex couples in Europe, Coder 2008.pl
    dc.description.referencesVfGH 04.12.2017, G258/2017: Distinction between marriage and registered partnership violates ban on discrimination (Summary/Bulletin on Constitutional Case-Law 2017/3).pl
    dc.description.referencesWaaldijk K., Same-Sex Partnership, International Protection, „Oxford Public International Law” 2013.pl
    dc.description.referencesWardle L.D., The Attack of Marriage as the Union of Man and a Woman, “North Dakota Law Review” 2007, vol. 83.pl
    dc.description.referencesWindsor v. United States, No. 12-2335 (2d Cir. 2012).pl
    dc.description.referencesWorld Health Organisation https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/92/9/14-135541/en/ (access 12.01.2019).pl
    dc.description.volume24-
    dc.description.number1-
    dc.description.firstpage13pl
    dc.description.lastpage27pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6092-7284-
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Artykuły naukowe (WP)
    Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2019, Vol. 24 nr 1

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    BSP_24_1_E_Kuzelewska_Same-Sex_Marriage.pdf181,12 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)