Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/7040
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kulesza, Cezary | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-05T07:32:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-05T07:32:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 20/A en, 2016, s. 121-132 | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 1689-7404 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/7040 | - |
dc.description | Creation of the English-language versions of the articles published in the „Białostockie Studia Prawnicze” [Białystok Legal Studies] funded under the contract no. 548/P-DUN/2016 and 548/1/P-DUN/2016 from resources of the Minister of Science and Higher Education dedicated to the popularisation of science. | pl |
dc.description.abstract | The article aims to investigate the influence of different systems of selection and appointment of judges adopted in the legal systems of the United States, England and Wales, and Germany on judicial independence. In these countries, the following methods are used for the selection of judges: appointment by the executive, appointment by the career or civil service judiciary, shared or parity appointments and appointment by judicial committees. Comparative law analysis shows that the adoption of a particular method for the selection of judges, especially in connection with the term of office, may have an impact on their independence and impartiality. Especially risky seems to be the American justice system, which rooted in the idea of “popular constitutionalism” methods of election and re-election of judges could jeopardize fair trial guarantees. In England and Wales, of great importance in strengthening the independence of the judiciary was the introduction of the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005 and the institution of the Supreme Court. In Germany, independence of the judiciary is guaranteed by the Constitution and the Constitutional Court. Further observations indicate that both in common and continental law, the universal guarantee of independence of the judiciary is for judges to follow ethical and professional dignity principles. | pl |
dc.language.iso | en | pl |
dc.publisher | Temida 2 | pl |
dc.subject | judicial selection | pl |
dc.subject | judicial independence | pl |
dc.subject | Constitution | pl |
dc.subject | fair trial | pl |
dc.subject | judicial conduct | pl |
dc.subject | wybór sędziów | pl |
dc.subject | niezawisłość sędziowska | pl |
dc.subject | konstytucja | pl |
dc.subject | rzetelny proces | pl |
dc.subject | etyka sędziowska | pl |
dc.title | Systems of Selection and Appointment of Judges and the Issue of Judicial Independence: American, English and German Experiences | pl |
dc.type | Article | pl |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15290/bsp.2016.20A.en.09 | - |
dc.description.Email | c.kulesza@uwb.edu.pl | pl |
dc.description.Affiliation | University of Białystok | pl |
dc.description.references | Brody D.C., The Use of Judicial Performance Evaluation Enhance Judicial Accountability, Judicial Independence, and Public Trust, Denver University Law Review, vol.86, 2008-2009 | pl |
dc.description.references | Bruhl P., Leib E.J., Elected Judges and Statutory Interpretation,University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 79, 2012 | pl |
dc.description.references | Fornauf M., Die Marginalisierung der Unabhängigkeit der Dritten Gewalt im System des Strafrechts, Frankfurt am Main 2010 | pl |
dc.description.references | Geyh C.G., The Endless Judicial Selection Debate and Why it Matters for Judicial Independence, The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics vol. 21, 2008 | pl |
dc.description.references | Gontarski W., Porównanie niekontradyktoryjnego (kontynentalnego) procesu karnego z procesem kontradyktoryjnym (anglosaskim), (in:) Proces karny. Rozwiązania modelowe w ujęciu prawnoporównawczym. System prawa karnego procesowego. T II (ed. P. Kruszyński), Warszawa 2014 | pl |
dc.description.references | Judges, University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 89, 2013 | pl |
dc.description.references | Kraśnicka I, Ludwichowska A., Wprowadzenie do systemu prawa Stanów Zjednoczonych, Toruń 2012 | pl |
dc.description.references | Kraśnicka I., Systemy wyborów sędziów stanowych w USA, Białostockie Studia Prawnicze 2015 | pl |
dc.description.references | Malinowski Ł, Postępowanie po wniesieniu aktu oskarżenia do sądu, (in:) P. Kruszyński (ed.), Proces karny. Rozwiązania modelowe w ujęciu prawnoporównawczym. System prawa karnego procesowego, Warszawa 2014 | pl |
dc.description.references | Przewodnik etyki sędziowskiej. Zasady etyki dla sędziów Anglii i Walii. Guide to Judicial Conduct (with the introduction by R. Sarkowicz), Warszawa 2007 | pl |
dc.description.references | Redish M.H., Aronoff J., The Real Constitutional Problem with State Judicial Selection: Due Process, Judicial Retention, and Th e Dangers of Popular Constitutionalism, William & Mary Law Review, vol. 56, 2014 | pl |
dc.description.references | Rosinek J., Some Thoughts on the Problems of Judicial Selections, Court Review, Summer 2004 | pl |
dc.description.references | Ross II B.L., Reconsidering Statutory InterpretiveDivergence between Elected and Appointed Sprack J., A Practical Approach to Criminal Procedure, Oxford 2008 | pl |
dc.description.references | Volcansek M.L., Judicial Elections and American Exceptionalism, Deapaul Law Review, vol. 60, 2010-2011 | pl |
dc.description.references | Wiliński P., H. Kuczyńska H., Rzetelny proces karny w orzecznictwie międzynarodowych trybunałów karnych (in:) Rzetelny proces karny (ed. P. Wiliński), Warszawa 2009 | pl |
dc.description.references | Wittereck F., Die Verwaltung der Dritten Gewalt, Tübingen 2006 | pl |
dc.description.references | Woodhouse D., United Kingdom. The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 – defending judicial independence the English way, The International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 5, 2007 | pl |
dc.description.volume | 20/A en | - |
dc.description.firstpage | 121 | pl |
dc.description.lastpage | 132 | pl |
dc.identifier.citation2 | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze | pl |
Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Artykuły naukowe (WP) Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2016, Vol. 20/A en |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BSP_20A_en_Kulesza.pdf | 158,2 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)