REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6819
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorGrzeszczak, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorMuchel, Mateusz-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-07T11:09:08Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-07T11:09:08Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationEastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, Vol. 2, no 1, 2018, p. 21-35pl
dc.identifier.issn2544-9214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/6819-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the article is to present the specific relationship between the EU, which is a unique international organisation, and its Member States, which are the source of integration and, paradoxically, its natural limit. The article contains an analysis of provisional measures imposed on Poland by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) as an example of a judicial and autonomous control mechanism concerning Member States and their obligations under EU law. Case European Commission v. Poland (2017) serves as a central element of the considerations. On 27 July 2017, the CJEU imposed a temporary injunction against logging in the Polish Bialowieza Forest, a UNESCO World Heritage Site and the last old-growth forest in Europe, while the case is being tried with the final Court decision expected in December 2017. Nevertheless, the Polish minister of the environment said on 31 July that the Polish government will ignore the ruling and that the logging will continue in tune with the “protective measures” for the forest, since the Bialowieza Forest seems to be under attack from the Spruce Bark Beetle. This species of beetle is a pest which colonises primarily spruce trees (Ips typographus for the lovers of the Latin language). The assumption made in the article is that provisional measures (applied under EU procedural law) have dogmatic roots in the tradition of civil proceedings in Member States. What is involved here are national procedures aimed at securing a claim in certain circumstances which establish a prima facie case on the inefficiency of the future decision. The specificity of provisional measures results from the specificity of EU law, which, in order to be effective, requires a judicial review. Provisional measures are one of the tools to guarantee its effectiveness. Despite relatively strict conditions for the applicability of provisional measures by the CJEU, they can help ensure effectiveness of UE law. The measures imposed to stop the destruction of the Białowieża Forest can be an example here.pl
dc.description.sponsorshipThe following paper constitutes a part of the research conducted within the framework of the statutory research at the Faculty of Law of the University of Warsaw.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherPublishing House Temida 2pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectEuropean Lawpl
dc.subjectEuropean Commissionpl
dc.subjectprovisional measurespl
dc.subjectBiałowieża Forestpl
dc.subjectrule of lawpl
dc.subjectPolandpl
dc.titleProvisional Measures Against EU Member States in the light of the Białowieża Forest casepl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/eejtr.2018.02.01.02-
dc.description.EmailRobert Grzeszczak: r.grzeszczak@wpia.uw.edu.plpl
dc.description.EmailMateusz Muchel: m.muchel@wpia.uw.edu.plpl
dc.description.AffiliationRobert Grzeszczak - University of Warsawpl
dc.description.AffiliationMateusz Muchel - University of Warsawpl
dc.description.referencesAnnexes to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: A new EU Framework to Strengthen the Rule of Law, Annex I: The Rule of law as a foundational principle of the Union (Brussels, 11.3.2014, COM(2014) 158, final.pl
dc.description.referencesAzoulai, L. “Integration through law” and us. (2016). International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14(2), 449–463.pl
dc.description.referencesBelgium v. European Commission, T131/16 (19 July 2016), EU:T:2016:427.pl
dc.description.referencesCambridge Healthcare Supplies v. European Commission T-137/00 R (31 October 2000).pl
dc.description.referencesComité Central d’Entreprise de la SA Vittel and Comité d’Etablissement de Pierval v. European Commission, T-12/93 R (6 July 1993).pl
dc.description.referencesComité Central d’Entreprise de la Société Générale des Grandes Sources and others v. European Commission, T-96/92 R (15 December 1992).pl
dc.description.referencesCommission Regulation (EU) No 312/2014 of 26 March 2014 establishing a Network Code on Gas Balancing of Transmission Networks (BAL NC).pl
dc.description.referencesConsolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ C 326, 26.10.2012).pl
dc.description.referencesConvention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Rome (4 November 1950). Retrieved from: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf.pl
dc.description.referencesCouncil Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7), as most recently amended by Council Directive 2013/17/EU of 13 May 2013 (OJ 2013 L 158).pl
dc.description.referencesCzachór, Z. (2013). Kryzys i zburzona dynamika Unii Europejskiej [Crisis and disturbed dynamics of the European Union]. Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy i Handlowy ELIPSA.pl
dc.description.referencesDirective 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 2010 L 20).pl
dc.description.referencesEuroalliages v. European Commission, T-132/01 (8 July 2003).pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission acts to defend judicial independence in Poland. (n.d.) Retrieved from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-5367_en.htm.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission v. Poland C-441/17. (2017). ECLI:EU:C:2017:877.pl
dc.description.referencesEvonik Degussa v. European Commission, C162/15 PR (2 March 2016). EU:C:2016:142pl
dc.description.referencesGrzeszczak, R. & Karolewski, I.P. (2017). Bialowieza Forest, the Spruce Bark Beetle and the EU Law Controversy in Poland. Retrieved from: http://verfassungsblog.de/bialowieza-forest-the-spruce-bark-beetle-and-the-eu-law-controversy-in-poland/pl
dc.description.referencesHabermas, J. (2005). Faktyczność i obowiązywanie. Teoria dyskursu wobec zagadnień prawa i demokratycznego państwa prawnego [Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.pl
dc.description.referencesHänseler GmbH v. European Commission, T-83/00 R, (31 October 2000).pl
dc.description.referencesHans-Martin Tillack v. European Commission, T-193/04 (4 October 2006).pl
dc.description.referencesIżykowski, M. (1985). Przesłanki zabezpieczenia powództwa. Palestra, 29/11(335).pl
dc.description.referencesJack Hanning v. European Parliament, C 176/88 R (11 July 1988).pl
dc.description.referencesJakubecki, A. (2017). Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz aktualizowany. Tom II [Code of Civil Procedure. Comment updated. Vol. II]. Warszawa: C. H. Beck.pl
dc.description.referencesKingdom of Belgium v. European Commission, C-142/87 R (15 June 1987).pl
dc.description.referencesKmieciak, Z. (2010). Postępowanie administracyjne i sądowoadministracyjne a prawo europejskie. Wolters Kluwer.pl
dc.description.referencesLambert and others v. France. 2015, June 5. European Court of Human Rights, No 46043/14.pl
dc.description.referencesLenaerts, K., Arts, D., Maselis, I & Bray, R. (2006). Procedural Law of the European Union. London: Sweet and Maxwell.pl
dc.description.referencesPoland approves large-scale logging in Europe’s last primeval forest (2016, March 26). The Guardian. Agence France-Presse. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/mar/26/poland-approves-large-scale-logging-in-europes-last-primevalforest.pl
dc.description.referencesPoland v. European Commission, T883/16 R (21 July 2017). ECLI:EU:T:174.pl
dc.description.referencesRosas, A. & Arnati L. (eds.). (2012). EU Constitutional Law. An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesSatya Prakash v. Commission of the EAEC, C-65-63 R (25 June 1965).pl
dc.description.referencesShapiro, M. (1980). Comparative Law and Comparative Politics. Southern California Law Review, 53(2), 537-542.pl
dc.description.referencesShaw, J., More, G. (1995). New Legal Dynamics of European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesSofrimport SARL v. European Communities, C-152/88 (10 June 1988).pl
dc.description.referencesStatute of the Permanent Court of International Justice, provided for in article 14 of the Covenant of the League of Nations (Journal of Laws of 1923, no 106, item 839).pl
dc.description.referencesStatute of the International Court of Justice. Retrieved from: http://www.icj-cij.org/en/statute.pl
dc.description.referencesThe Act of 17 November 1964 – Code of Civil Procedure (Journal of Laws of 2018, item. 155, as amended).pl
dc.description.referencesUNESCO Word Heritage Centre, Outstanding Universal Value, 02.04.2018 Retrieved from: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/33pl
dc.description.referencesWeatherill, S. (1995). Law and Integration in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesWeiler, J.H.H. (1991). The Transformation of Europe. The Yale Law Journal, 100(8), 2403-2483.pl
dc.description.referencesWHC.17/41.COM/18 Decisions adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 41st session (Cracow, Poland).pl
dc.description.referencesWyrok Sądu Najwyższego [Judgment of the Supreme Court], No. V CZ 105/12. (2013, April 17).pl
dc.description.referencesŻurek, K. (2000). Środki tymczasowe jako przejaw funkcjonowania efektywnej ochrony prawnej w systemie prawnym Unii Europejskiej. In. Biernat, S. (Ed.), Studia z prawa Unii Europejskiej. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2544-9737-
dc.description.volume2-
dc.description.number1-
dc.description.firstpage21pl
dc.description.lastpage35pl
dc.identifier.citation2Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 2018, Vol. 2, No. 1

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
EEJTR (2018) Vol. 2 No. 1 Grzeszczak & Muchel.pdf185,74 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons