REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6528
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorFiodorova, Anna-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-25T11:40:06Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-25T11:40:06Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 22 nr 4, 2017, s. 193-202pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/6528-
dc.description.abstractThe European Union created a common market with free movement of persons, goods, services and capital, which has resulted in the “Europeanisation” of many civil relations, including trade, contracts and family issues. In recent years, at least 30% of companies within the European Union were involved in cross-border civil and commercial activities. Such commerce is not limited to big multinational companies but also engages small and medium size enterprises, which form the core of the economy. Nevertheless, a lot of companies still refrain from cross-border relations because each commercial activity inevitably carries at least a minimum risk of legal conflict and, consequently, involvement in a cross-border judicial process. Cross-border judicial processes can bring inconveniences, beginning from the language of the process and finalizing with the foreign regulation of civil procedure and possible application of foreign substantial law. For some small and medium size enterprises this can mean a significant loss and in some instances it can ruin the business. This article presents mediation as an alternative to the judicial process and considers the advantages and deficiencies that still prevent it from becoming a totally effective tool.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherTemida 2pl
dc.subjectcross-border mediationpl
dc.subjectSMEpl
dc.subjectjudicial processpl
dc.subjectDirective 2008/52pl
dc.subjectenforceability of agreementpl
dc.titleCross-Border Mediation and Small and Medium Enterprisespl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2017.22.04.14-
dc.description.Emailanna.fiodorova@uc3m.espl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteAnna Fiodorova – adiunkt w Zakładzie Prawa Karnego, Prawa Procesowego i Historii Prawa na Wydziale Prawa Uniwersytetu Carlosa III w Madrycie (Hiszpania). Członek Instytutu Sprawiedliwości i Postępowania Sądowego „Alonzo Martinez”. Specjalizuje się w prawie procesowym oraz współpracy międzynarodowej. Były policjant i doradca w Stałej Reprezentacji Litwy dla UE.pl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteAnna Fiodorova – Professor, University Carlos III of Madrid, Department of Criminal Law, Procedural Law and History of Law, member of the “Alonso Martínez” Institute for Justice and Litigation, specialist in procedural law and international cooperation. Former police officer and Home Affairs (Police) Counselor in the Permanent Representation of Lithuania to the European Union working with files on Freedom, Security and Justice.pl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversidad Carlos III de Madridpl
dc.description.referencesADR Center, The Cost of Non ADR – Surveying and Showing the Actual Costs of Intra-Community Commercial Litigation. Rome 2010, http://www.adrcenter.com/jamsinternational/civil-justice/ Survey_Data_Report.pdf.pl
dc.description.referencesCrawford E., Carruthers J.M., United Kingdom, (in:) C. Esplugues, J.L. Iglesias, G. Palao (eds.), Civil and Commercial Mediation in Europe, Cambridge 2013.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, Study on the functioning of judicial systems in the EU Member States: Facts and figures from the CEPEJ questionnaires 2010-2012-2013, Brussels 2015.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission, Flash Eurobarometer 421: Internationalisation of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, Brussels 2015.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on the application of Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters, Brussels, COM(2016) 542 final.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. Study for an evaluation and implementation of Directive 2008/52/EC – the “Mediation Directive”, Brussels 2013.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Quantifying the cost of not using mediation – a data analysis, Brussels 2011.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Rebooting the Mediation Directive: Assessing the Limited Impact of its Implementation and Proposing Measures to Increase the number of Mediations in the EU, Brussels 2014.pl
dc.description.referencesFrauenberger-Pfeiler U., Austria, (in:) C. Esplugues, J.L. Iglesias, G. Palao (eds.). Civil and Commercial Mediation in Europe, Cambridge 2013.pl
dc.description.referencesGisbert Pomata M., Díez Riaza S., El contrato de mediación y el acuerdo de mediación civil y mercantil, Navarra 2014.pl
dc.description.referencesIglesias Buhigues J.L., Esplugues Mota C., Palao Moreno G., Espinosa Calabuig R., Azcárraga Monzonís C., Spain, (in:) C. Esplugues, J.L. Iglesias, G. Palao (eds.), Civil and Commercial Mediation in Europe, Cambridge 2013.pl
dc.description.referencesLinklaters, Commercial Mediation – A Comparative Review 2013, http://www.linklaters.com/Insights/commercial-mediation-comparative-review-2013/Pages/Index.aspx.pl
dc.description.referencesLo C.F., Desirability of a new international legal framework for cross-border enforcement of certain mediated settlement agreements, “Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal” 2014, vol. 7, No. 1.pl
dc.description.referencesLópez-Barajas Perea I., La mediación civil y mercantil y sus garantías: un paso más en la creación del espacio judicial europeo, “Revista general de Derecho Europeo” 2012, No. 27.pl
dc.description.referencesLoss de Andrade J., Reconocimiento y eficacia de los acuerdos de mediación mercantil internacional, (in:) H. Dalla Dernardina de Pinho, J. Loss de Andrade. Contemporary Tendencies in Mediation, Madrid 2015.pl
dc.description.referencesMartínez Iglesias M.J., La Directiva de la Unión Europea sobre ciertos aspectos de la mediación en asuntos civiles y mercantiles y su aplicación, (in:) M. García Tomé, J.L. Guzón Nestar, La mediación en Europa, Salamanca 2015.pl
dc.description.referencesMenkel-Meadow C.J., Love L.P., Schneider A.K., Mediation: Practice, Policy and Ethics, New York 2013.pl
dc.description.referencesSoleto Muñoz H., Mediación y resolución de conflictos: técnicas y ámbitos, Madrid 2011.pl
dc.description.volume22
dc.description.number4
dc.description.firstpage193pl
dc.description.lastpage202pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2017, Vol. 22 nr 4

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_22_4_A_Fiodorova_Cross-Border_Mediation_and_Small_and_Medium_Enterprises.pdf160,89 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)