REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/21030
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorSimonovic, Mitar-
dc.contributor.authorGrdinic, Filip-
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-15T10:19:50Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-15T10:19:50Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 31 nr 3, 2026, s. 163-182pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/21030-
dc.description.abstractThis article sets out to present the constituent elements of a labour law-specific non-compete clause through the example of legislative solutions from several EU jurisdictions and by considering the popularity of an extreme pole of thought that has emerged as a result of tendencies to restrict the enforceability of labour non-competes. The authors focus on the EU concept of the non-compete clause, providing an overview of legislative solutions in EU Member States, and by drawing on insights from competition law, they suggest that through the implementation of the requirement of the employer’s legitimate interest, competition in the labour market is indirectly protected through a human rights narrative and framework. The authors present examples from case law, illustrating solutions that apply strict EU conditions and that also employ a proportionality-based analysis. They argue for preserving the enforcement of non-compete clauses under EU-style conditions, which include a rights-based proportionality assessment; a good model solution for a non-compete clause must be based on the principle of legal certainty (attained by explicit normative codification of clearly defined constituent elements), applied in a manner that includes a proportionality-based analysis, on a case-by-case basis. The paper also provides insight into Serbian jurisprudence and regulation on this subject, and formulates suggestions for alignment with current tendencies.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectnon-compete clausespl
dc.subjectlabour lawpl
dc.subjectcompetition lawpl
dc.subjectemployers’ legitimate interestspl
dc.titleThe Pan-European Lifeline of a Labour Non-Compete Clause. Protecting Competition in Labour Markets through a Human Rights Narrative: The Example of Serbiapl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2026 Mitar Simonovic, Filip Grdinic published by Paradigm. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2026.31.03.09-
dc.description.EmailMitar Simonovic: mitar.simonovic@nstlaw.rspl
dc.description.EmailFilip Grdinic: filip.grdinic@nstlaw.rspl
dc.description.AffiliationMitar Simonovic - Stankovic & Partners NSTLAW, Serbiapl
dc.description.AffiliationFilip Grdinic - Stankovic & Partners NSTLAW, Serbiapl
dc.description.referencesAlves, P., Serra, B., Greenberg, J., Guo, Y., Harjai, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2024). Labour market power: New evidence on non-compete agreements and the effects of M&A in the UK [Discussion paper no. 1976]. Centre for Economic Performance. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126835/1/dp1976.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesAmerican Law Institute. (1981). Restatement (Second) of Contracts. American Law Institute.pl
dc.description.referencesAresu, A., Erharter, D., & Renner-Loquenz, B. (2024, May). Antitrust in labour markets. European Commission Competition Policy Brief, 2, 1–8. https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/document/download/adb27d8b-3dd8–4202-958d-198cf0740ce3_enpl
dc.description.referencesBalasubramanian, N., Chang, J. W., Sakakibara, M., Sivadasan, J., & Starr, E. (2022). Locked in? The enforceability of covenants not to compete and the careers of high-tech workers. Journal of Human Resources, 57(S), S349–S396. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.monopsony.1218–9931R1pl
dc.description.referencesBalšić, A. (2025). The relationship between freedom of work and non-compete clauses: (Re)concilable legal institutions. Harmonius – Journal of Legal and Social Studies in South East Europe, 2025(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.51204/Harmonius_25101Apl
dc.description.referencesBarnett, J. M., & Sichelman, T. (2020). The case for noncompetes. University of Chicago Law Review, 87, 953–1002. https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/BarnettSichelman_CaseForNoncompetes_87UCLR953.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesBloomberg Law. (2023). Non-compete clauses in employment and commercial contracts. https://pro.bloomberglaw.com/insights/contracts/non-compete-clauses-in-employment-and-commercial-contracts/pl
dc.description.referencesBoeri, T., Garnero, A., & Luisetto, L. G. (2022). The use of non-compete agreements in the Italian labour market. Fondazione Rodolfo Debenedetti. https://www.frdb.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Boeri-Garnero-Luisetto-Non-compete-agreements-Italy_FINAL.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesNational Assembly of the Republic of Serbia, 2006. Constitution of the Republic of Serbia. (2006). Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, 98/2006. https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/2006/en/71120pl
dc.description.referencesDutch Parliament. (2025). Dutch Civil Code, Article 7:653. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0005290/Boek7/Titel7/Afdeling9/Artikel653pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Communities and Member States & the Republic of Serbia. (2013, 18 October). Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and Their Member States of the One Part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the Other Part (O. J. L 278,18.10.2013, p. 16; consolidated version). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02013A1018%2801%29–20211206pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission (2025), Decision of 02.06.2025. relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT. 40795 – Food delivery services), https://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases1/202530/AT_40795_1262.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament. (2003). Parliamentary question – E-1637–2002 (ASW), Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission (O. J. C 92 E). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-5–2002-1637-ASW_EN.htmpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament, Council and Commission. (2012). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. (2012/C 326/02). Official Journal of the European Union, C 326. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT#d1e751–393-1pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union. (2012, 26 October). Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, C 326, 47–390. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/tfeu_2012/oj/engpl
dc.description.referencesFederal Trade Commission. (2025, 5 September). Federal Trade Commission files to accede to vacatur of Non-Compete Clause Rule. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/09/federal-trade-commission-files-accede-vacatur-non-compete-clause-rulepl
dc.description.referencesFlorida Legislature. (2024). Florida Statutes § 542.335. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/pl
dc.description.referencesFrench Court of Cassation. (2002, 10 October). Decision on non-compete clauses, no. 00–45.135. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/JURITEXT000007046365/pl
dc.description.referencesGerman Federal Parliament. (2025). Handelsgesetzbuch (HGB). https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_hgb/englisch_hgb.htpl
dc.description.referencesItalian Parliament. (2025). Codice Civile, art. 2125. https://www.brocardi.it/codice-civile/libro-quinto/titolo-ii/capo-i/sezione-iii/art2125.htmlpl
dc.description.referencesJäger, S., Schoefer, B., & Heining, J. (2021). Labor in the boardroom. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(2), 669–725. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjab001pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Appellate Court in Belgrade (Serbia) of 19 March 2021, file ref. Gž1 1900/2020.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Appellate Court in Novi Sad (Serbia) of 3 July 2017, file ref. Gž1 1363/2017.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Commercial Appellate Court in Belgrade (Serbia) of 2 September 2021, file ref. Pž 5978/2021. Judgment of the Court of Appeals of the State of New York (US) of 13 May 1999 on the case of BDO Seidman v. Hirshberg, 712 N.E.2d 1220 (N.Y. 1999).pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the First Basic Court in Belgrade (Serbia) of 5 November 2024, file ref. P1 1716/20.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Supreme Court (Serbia) of 14 December 2023, file ref. Rev2 3218/2021.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Supreme Court (Serbia) of 28 February 2024, file ref. Rev2 1330/2022.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Supreme Court of Cassation (Serbia) of 11 March 2020, file ref. Rev2 2350/2019.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma (US) of 9 April 2002 on the case of Cardiovascular Surgical Specialists, Corp. v. Mammana, 61 P.3d 210 (Okla. Civ. App. 2002).pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Supreme Court State of North Dakota (US) of 5 September 2001 on the case of Warner and Co. v. Solberg, 634 N.W.2d 65 (N.D. 2001).pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex (US) of 12 March 1974 on the case of All Stainless, Inc. v. Colby, 308 N.E.2d 481 (Mass. 1974).pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the U.S. Supreme Court (US) of 29 March 1972 on the case of United States v. Topco Assocs., 405 U.S. 596 (1972).pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Vermont Supreme Court (US) of 19 August 2005 on the case of Summits 7, Inc. v. Kelly, 886 A.2d 365 (N.H. 2005).pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Virginia Supreme Court(US) of 16 September 2005 on the case of Omniplex World Services Corp. v. US Investigations Services Inc., 618 S.E.2d 340 (Va. 2005).pl
dc.description.referencesKesan, J. P., & Hayes, C. M. (2013). The law and policy of non-compete clauses in the United States and their implications. In M. Pittard, A. L. Monotti & J. Duns (Eds.), Business innovation and the law: Perspectives from intellectual property, labour, competition and corporate law (pp. 381–399). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001622.00033pl
dc.description.referencesLee, S. (2024). Surviving the rule of reason: An antitrust analysis of employment noncompetes. Fordham Law Review, 93, 225–271. https://fordhamlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Vol.-93_Oct_06_Lee-225–271.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesMarx, M., & Fleming, L. (2012). Non-compete agreements: Barriers to entry… and exit? Innovation Policy and the Economy, 12(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/663155pl
dc.description.referencesNaidu, S., & Posner, E. A. (2018). Antitrust remedies for labor market power. Harvard Law Review, 132(2), 536–601. https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/536–601_Online.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesNational Assembly of Serbia. (2005). Labour Law (Zakon o radu). Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, 24/2005, 61/2005, 54/2009, 32/2013, 75/2014, 13/2017, 113/2017, 95/2018, 86/2019, 155/2020, 110/2021. https://www.paragraf.rs/propisi/zakon_o_radu.htmlpl
dc.description.referencesNational Assembly of Serbia. (2009). Law on Protection of Competition. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, 51/2009, 95/2013.pl
dc.description.referencesOECD. (2020). Competition in labour markets. https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/competition-in-labour-markets-2020.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesParliament of Austria. (1921/2015). Angestelltengesetz (AngG), Art. 1 § 36 – Konkurrenzklausel (consolidated). RIS Bundesrecht konsolidiert. https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/1921/292/A1P36/NOR12092405pl
dc.description.referencesParliament of Austria. (1993/2015). Arbeitsvertragsrechts-Anpassungsgesetz (AVRAG), § 2c –Konkurrenzklausel (consolidated). RIS – Bundesrecht konsolidiert. https://ris.bka.gv.at/normdokument.wxe?abfrage=bundesnormen&gesetzesnummer=10008872&fassungvom=2022–02-14¶graf=2cpl
dc.description.referencesPortuguese Court of Appeal. (2023, 15 March). Decision on non-compete clause, no. 1234/22. https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/e99a7bb7d9d498bd80258a2f00396c0f?OpenDocumentpl
dc.description.referencesSejm of Poland. (2025). The Labour Code. Dziennik Ustaw 1974, no. 24, item 141, as amended. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19740240141pl
dc.description.referencesVaheesan, S., & Buck, M. J. (2020). Noncompetes and other contracts of dispossession. SSRN. https://download.ssrn.com/22/09/14/ssrn_id4219157_code1444154.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesWhish, R., & Bailey, D. (2021). Competition law (10th ed.). Oxford University Press.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2719-9452-
dc.description.volume31pl
dc.description.number3pl
dc.description.firstpage163pl
dc.description.lastpage182pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2026, Vol. 31 nr 3

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons