REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20087
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorPetr, Michal-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-16T11:35:18Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-16T11:35:18Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 31 nr 1, 2026, s. 155-177pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20087-
dc.description.abstractThe Digital Markets Act (DMA) became applicable in May 2023. It is completely new piece of legislation affecting a sector which has not been subject to any specific regulation before, and it introduced brand new concepts aimed at protecting the digital rights of consumers and business entities alike. What have we learned after the first years of its full application? Has the European Commission’s practice clarified the concepts that were disputed? Did it have any measurable effects on the markets? Has it brought any specific improvement in consumers’ digital rights? This paper re-interprets the DMA in the light of recent case law, evaluates its practical impact so far and tries to predict how its future application might affect the protection of digital rights.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectcore platform servicespl
dc.subjectDigital Markets Actpl
dc.subjectgatekeeperspl
dc.subjectregulatory dialoguepl
dc.titleThe Digital Markets Act: What Have We Learned after the First Years of Its Application?pl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2026 Michal Petr published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2026.31.01.09-
dc.description.Emailmichal.petr@upol.czpl
dc.description.AffiliationPalacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republicpl
dc.description.referencesAkaman, P. (2022). Regulating competition in digital platform markets: A critical assessment of the framework and approach of the EU Digital Markets Act. European Law Review, 47(1), 85–109.pl
dc.description.referencesBania, K., & Geradin, D. (Eds.). (2025). The Digital Markets Act: A guide to the regulation of big tech in the EU. Hart Publishing.pl
dc.description.referencesBaxter, R. (2024). European Commission sets sights on DMA compliance reports. Global Competition Review. https://globalcompetitionreview.com/article/european-commission-sets-sights-dma-compliance-reportspl
dc.description.referencesBotta, M. (2021). Sector regulation of digital platforms in Europe: Uno, nessuno e centomila. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12(7), 500–512.pl
dc.description.referencesCohen, J. E. (2018). Law for the platform economy. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2(2), 191–196.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Businesses. (2024) Public statement of European companies and industry groups. https://eutechalliance.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Public-statement-calling-on-Gatekeepers-to-cooperate-16-Jan-2024pdf.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2020a). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Councilon Contestable and Fair Markets in the Digital Sector (Digital Markets Act), COM/2020/842 final.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2020b). Impact assessment of the Digital Markets Act. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/impact-assessment-digital-markets-actpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2023). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/814 of 14 April 2023 on Detailed Arrangements for the Conduct of Certain Proceedings by the Commission Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2023, 4 July). Potential gatekeepers notified the Commission and provided relevant information. https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/potential-gatekeepers-notified-commission-and-provided-relevant-information-2023–07-04_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2023, 5 September). Commission Decision of 5 September 2023, case DMA.10002 et al. Alphabet. https://digital-markets-act-cases.ec.europa.eu/cases/DMA.100002pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2023, 5 September). Commission Decision of 5 September 2023, case DMA.100040 ByteDance – Online social networking services. https://digital-markets-act-cases. ec.europa.eu/cases/DMA.100040pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2023, 5 September). Commission Decision of 5 September 2023, case DMA.10020 et al. Meta. https://digital-markets-act-cases.ec.europa.eu/cases/DMA.100020pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2023, 5 September). Commission decision of 5 September 2023, case DMA.100017 et al. Microsoft https://digital-markets-act-cases.ec.europa.eu/cases/DMA.100017pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2023, 6 September). Commission designates six gatekeepers under the Digital Markets Act. https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/commission-designates-six-gatekeepers-under-digital-markets-act-2023–09-06_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2024). Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Annual Report on Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Contestable and Fair Markets in the Digital Sector and Amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act), COM(2024) 106 final. https://digital- markets-act.ec.europa.eu/about-dma/dma-annual-reports_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2024, 12 February). Commission Decision of 12 February 2024, case DMA.10022 Apple – number-independent interpersonal communications services. https://digital-markets-act-cases.ec.europa.eu/cases/DMA.100022pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2024, 13 February). Commission closes market investigations on Microsoft’s and Apple’s services under the Digital Markets Act. https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/commission-closes-market-investigations-microsofts-and-apples-services-under-digital-markets-act-2024–02-13_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2024, 1 March). Booking, ByteDance and X notify their potential gatekeeper status to the Commission under the Digital Markets Act. https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/booking-bytedance-and-x-notify-their-potential-gatekeeper-status-commission-under-digital-markets-2024–03-01_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2024, 25 March). Commission opens non-compliance investigations against Alphabet, Apple and Meta under the Digital Markets Act. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_1689pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2024, 29 April). Commission designates Apple’s iPadOS under the Digital Markets Act. https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/commission-designates-apples-ipados-under-digital-markets-act-2024–04-29_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2024, 13 May). Commission designates Booking as a gatekeeper and opens a market investigation into X. https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/commission-designates-booking-gatekeeper-and-opens-market-investigation-x-2024–05-13_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2024, 24 June). Commission sends preliminary findings to Apple and opens additional non-compliance investigation against Apple. https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/commission-sends-preliminary-findings-apple-and-opens-additional-non-compliance-investigation-2024–06-24_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2024, 1 July). Commission sends preliminary findings to Meta over its ‘pay or consent’ model for breach of the Digital Markets Act. https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/commission-sends-preliminary-findings-meta-over-its-pay-or-consent-model-breach-digitalmarkets-act-2024–07-01_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2024, 19 September). Commission starts first proceedings to specify Apple’s interoperability obligations under the Digital Markets Act. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_4761pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2024, 16 October). Commission concludes that online social networking service of X should not be designated under the Digital Markets Act. https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa. eu/commission-concludes-online-social-networking-service-x-should-not-be-designated-under-digital-2024–10-16_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2024, 18 December). DMA.100203 – Consultation on the proposed measures for interoperability between Apple’s iOS operating system and connected devices. https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/dma100203-consultation-proposed-measures-interoperability-between-apples-ios-operating-system-and_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2025a, 19 March). Commission provides guidance under Digital Markets Act to facilitate development of innovative products on Apple’s platforms. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_816pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2025b, 19 March). Commission sends preliminary findings to Alphabet under the Digital Markets Act. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_811pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2025, 22 April). Commission Decision of 22 April 2025, case DMA.100109 Apple – Online Intermediation Services – app stores – AppStore – Art. 5(4). https://digital-markets-act-cases.ec.europa.eu/cases/DMA.100109pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2025, 23 April). Commission Decision of 23 April 2025, case DMA.100185 Apple – Operating systems – iOS – Art. 6(3). https://digital-markets-act-cases.ec.europa.eu/cases/DMA.100185pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2025, 23 April). Commission Decision of 23 April 2025, case DMA.100055 Meta – Article 5(2). https://digital-markets-act-cases.ec.europa.eu/cases/DMA.100055pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2025, 12 November). Commission Decision of 12 November 2025, case DMA.100231 Alphabet – Google Search – Site reputation abuse policy. https://digital-markets-act-cases.ec.europa.eu/cases/DMA.1000231pl
dc.description.referencesCouncil of the EU. (2002). Council Regulation (EC) no. 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the Implementation of the Rules on Competition Laid Down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty. OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, pp. 1–25pl
dc.description.referencesCouncil of the EU. (2004). Council Regulation (EC) no. 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the Control of Concentrations between Undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation). OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, pp. 1–22pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament and the Council of the EU. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, pp. 1–88pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament and the Council of the EU. (2022a). Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on Contestable and Fair Markets in the Digital Sector and Amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act). OJ L 265, 12.10.2022pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament and the Council of the EU. (2022b). Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services and Amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act). OJ L 277, 27.10.2022, pp. 1–102pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament and Council of the EU. (2022c). Regulation (EU) 2022/868 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2022 on European Data Governance and Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 (Data Governance Act). OJ L 152, 3.6.2022, pp. 1–44pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament and Council of the EU. (2023). Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2023 on Harmonised Rules on Fair Access to and Use of Data and Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive (EU) 2020/1828 (Data Act). OJ L, 2023/2854, 22.12.2023, pp. 1–71pl
dc.description.referencesEvans, D. S. (2003). The antitrust economics of multisided platform markets. Yale Journal on Regulation, 20(2), 325–381.pl
dc.description.referencesFletcher, A., & Vasas, Z. (2024). Implementing the DMA: The role of behavioural insights. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 15(7), 456–462.pl
dc.description.referencesGönenç, G., Kağan, A., & Yildiz, G. (2022). Is there a need for a visible hand in digital markets? European Competition and Regulatory Law Journal, 6(4), 306–317.pl
dc.description.referencesIbáňez-Colomo, P. (2021). The draft Digital Markets Act: A legal and institutional analysis. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12(7), 561–575.pl
dc.description.referencesIngemarsson, R., & Bichet, P. (2024). Survey on the Digital Markets Act and digital policy: A year into the application of one of the most innovative regulatory tools (2023–2024). Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 15(5), 330–338.pl
dc.description.referencesJenny, F. (2021). Changing the way we think: Competition, platforms and ecosystems. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 9(1), 1–18.pl
dc.description.referencesJohn, B. (2025, 18 February). DMA branded an ‘utter failure’ as first anniversary nears. Global Competition Review. https://globalcompetitionreview.com/article/dma-branded-utter-failure-first-anniversary-nearspl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the General Court of the European Union of 17 July 2024 on the case ByteDance v. Commission, T-1077/23.pl
dc.description.referencesMartínez, R. A. (2024a). The requisite legal standard of the Digital Market Act’s designation process. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 20(4), 265–291.pl
dc.description.referencesMartínez, R. A. (2024b). Rebutting gatekeeper presumptions in the Digital Markets Act: Case T-1077/23 ByteDance Ltd v European Commission. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 15(8), 537–539.pl
dc.description.referencesMartínez, R. A. (2025). Survey on the Digital Markets Act: 2024, compliance starts. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 16(6), 390–398.pl
dc.description.referencesMonti, G. (2021). The Digital Markets Act: Improving the institutional design. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12(2), 90–101.pl
dc.description.referencesMontjoye, Y.-A., Schweitzer, H., & Crémer, J. (2019). Competition policy for the digital era. EU Publications Office.pl
dc.description.referencesMorbel, M. C. (2023). Regulating digital gatekeepers: The Digital Markets Act. European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, 8(4), 206–215.pl
dc.description.referencesNewman, J. M. (2021, 29 January). Antitrust in attention markets: Definition, power, harm [Legal Studies Research Paper no. 3744839]. University of Miami. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3745839pl
dc.description.referencesOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Ex ante regulation of digital markets: OECD Competition Committee discussion paper. OECD Publishing.pl
dc.description.referencesOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). OECD handbook on competition policy in the digital age. OECD Publishing.pl
dc.description.referencesPetr, M. (2024). Digital Markets Act and competition law: Is there an issue of ne bis in idem? Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 17(30), 155–170.pl
dc.description.referencesSchmidt, J. P., & Hübener, F. (Eds.). (2023). New Digital Markets Act: A practitioners’ guide. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.pl
dc.description.referencesSolek, L. (2021). Need to revise or apply the concept of market definition with a view to ‘zero-price’ and overarching markets. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12(8), 593–603.pl
dc.description.referencesTyagi, K., Sanders, A. K., & Cauffman, A. (Eds.). (2024). Digital platforms, competition law, and regulation. Hart Publishing.pl
dc.description.referencesVesterdorf, B., & Fountoukalos, K. (2021). A new competition tool into old bottles? Considerations on the legal design of the European Commission’s proposed NCT 2021. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12(4), 284–300.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2719-9452-
dc.description.volume31pl
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.firstpage155pl
dc.description.lastpage177pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6495-4530-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2026, Vol. 31 nr 1

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_31_1_M_Petr_The_Digital_Markets_Act.pdf202,19 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons