REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20079
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorKużelewska, Elżbieta-
dc.contributor.authorTomaszuk, Mariusz-
dc.contributor.authorMajnik, Tilen-
dc.contributor.authorPiekutowska, Agnieszka-
dc.contributor.authorŽuber, Bruna-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-16T10:15:39Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-16T10:15:39Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 31 nr 1, 2026, s. 61-81pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20079-
dc.description.abstractThe growing importance of the concept of digital citizenship reflects the integration of online participation, rights, and responsibilities into everyday life. European policies and initiatives increasingly emphasise digital inclusion, universal access, and the promotion of digital literacy as prerequisites for active citizenship in the digital era. At the same time, the question arises of whether individuals should also be entitled to a right not to use the internet without facing social, economic, or political exclusion. This article explores the European approach to digital citizenship in the context of this emerging right, highlighting tensions between policies aimed at inclusion and the freedom of individual choice. It analyses how to reconcile the promotion of digital participation with respect for the autonomy of individuals who choose to remain offline. It also argues that recognising the right not to use the internet is crucial for protecting personal freedoms and preventing forced digital dependency, while inclusive strategies should ensure that non-users are not marginalised in exercising their civic rights.pl
dc.description.sponsorshipFunded by the National Science Centre, Poland, under the OPUS call in the Weave programme (UMO-2023/51/I/HS5/01417), and the Flemish Research Foundation (FWO Funding Agreement G000325N). The article is also financially supported by the Polish Minister of Science under the ‘Regional Initiative of Excellence’ (RID) programme. This research was co-financed by the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency as part of the research project V5-2383 ‘Theoretical and Practical Aspects of the Modernisation of Administrative Procedure in Slovenia’.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectdigital citizenshippl
dc.subjectdigital inclusionpl
dc.subjectright not to use the internetpl
dc.subjectcivic rightspl
dc.subjectpersonal freedomspl
dc.titleDigital Citizenship and the Right Not to Use the Internet: The European Approachpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2026 Elżbieta Kużelewska et al. published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attri bution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2026.31.01.04-
dc.description.EmailElżbieta Kużelewska: e.kuzelewska@uwb.edu.plpl
dc.description.EmailMariusz Tomaszuk: tomaszuk.m@gmail.compl
dc.description.EmailTilen Majnik: Tilen.Majnik@pf.uni-lj.sipl
dc.description.EmailAgnieszka Piekutowska: piekutowska@uwb.edu.plpl
dc.description.EmailBruna Žuber: bruna.zuber@pf.uni-lj.sipl
dc.description.AffiliationElżbieta Kużelewska - University of Bialystok, Polandpl
dc.description.AffiliationMariusz Tomaszuk - Technical University of Warsaw, Polandpl
dc.description.AffiliationTilen Majnik - University of Ljubljana, Sloveniapl
dc.description.AffiliationAgnieszka Piekutowska - University of Bialystok, Polandpl
dc.description.AffiliationBruna Žuber - University of Ljubljana, Sloveniapl
dc.description.referencesBennett, W. L. (2007) ‘Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age’ in Bennett, W. L. (ed.) Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–24.pl
dc.description.referencesChen, Y. C., & Gant, J. (2001). Transforming local e-government services: The use of application service providers. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 343–355.pl
dc.description.referencesCouncil of Europe. (n.d.). Digital citizenship education. https://www.coe.int/en/web/education/digital-citizenship-educationpl
dc.description.referencesCusters, B. (2019). Nieuwe digitale (grond)rechten. Nederlands Juristenblad, 44, 3288–3295. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4014541pl
dc.description.referencesde Hert, P., & Kloza, D. (2012). Internet (access) as a new fundamental right: Inflating the current rights framework? European Journal of Law and Technology, 3(3). https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/123pl
dc.description.referencesde Moraes, J. A., & de Andrade, E. B. (2015). Who are the citizens of digital citizenship? International Review of Information Ethics, 23, 4–19.pl
dc.description.referencesEmejulu, A., & McGregor, C. (2019). Toward a radical digital citizenship in digital education. Critical Studies in Education, 60, 131–147.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2021a). 2030 Digital Compass: The European way for the digital decade. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0118pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2021b). State of the Union: Commission proposes a path to the digital decade to deliver the EU’s digital transformation by 2030. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_4630pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2023). eGovernment benchmark 2023: Entering a new digital government era. Publications Office of the European Union. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/egovernment-benchmark-2023pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament, Council of the European Union, & European Commission. (2023). European declaration on digital rights and principles for the digital decade (2023/C 23/01). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32023C0123(01)pl
dc.description.referencesHintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Polity Press.pl
dc.description.referencesIsin, E., & Ruppert, E. (2015). Being digital citizens. Rowman & Littlefield.pl
dc.description.referencesIsman, A., & Güngören, Ö. C. (2014). Digital citizenship. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 73–77.pl
dc.description.referencesJenkins, H., & Carpentier, N. (2013). Theorising participatory intensities: A conversation about participation and politics. Convergence, 19(3), 265–286.pl
dc.description.referencesJóźwicki, W., & Szoszkiewicz, Ł. (2025). Non-use of the internet as a human rights enabler? The curious cases of the right to privacy and the right to health. In D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, E. Lievens, & V. Verdoodt (Eds.), The right not to use the internet: Concept, contexts, consequences (pp. 106-120). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003528401–7pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 24 September 2019 on the case of Vučina v. Croatia, application no. 58955/13.pl
dc.description.referencesKaraboga, M., Matzner, T., Obersteller, H., & Ochs, C. (2017). Is there a right to offline alternatives in a digital world? In Leenes, R., van Brakel, R., Gutwirth, S., De Hert, P. (Eds.), Data protection and privacy: (In)visibilities and infrastructures (pp. 31–50). Springer.pl
dc.description.referencesKaur, H. (2021). Protecting internet access: A human rights treaty approach. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 46(2), 767–806.pl
dc.description.referencesKloza, D. (2024). The right not to use the internet. Computer Law & Security Review, 52, 105907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105907pl
dc.description.referencesKloza, D., Kużelewska, E., Lievens, E., & Verdoodt, V. (Eds.). (2025). The right not to use the internet: Concept, contexts, consequences. Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesKużelewska, E., Malinowski, D., & Tomaszuk, M. (2025). Human rights and digital choice: Rethinking the right (not) to use the internet. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 30(4), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2025.30.04.04pl
dc.description.referencesKużelewska, E., Tomaszuk, M., & Malinowski, D. (2025). The elderly digital divide: Digital exclusion versus the right not to use the internet. International Journal for Semiotics of Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196–025–10334–4pl
dc.description.referencesLucchi, N. (2013). The role of internet access in enabling individuals’ rights and freedoms [EUI RSCAS Working paper 47]. European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241276736_The_role_of_Internet_access_in_enabling_individual’s_rights_and_freedomspl
dc.description.referencesMossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2007). Digital citizenship: The internet, society and participation. MIT Press.pl
dc.description.referencesNieborak, T. (2025). Digital coercion? The financial market and the right to digital opt-out between fiction and reality. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 30(4), 119–136.pl
dc.description.referencesNowina-Konopka, M. (2017). The European concept of e-governance in the light of European Commission indicators. Zeszyty Prasoznawcze, 60(2), 329–349.pl
dc.description.referencesOECD. (2020). The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2020/10/the-oecd-digital-government-policy-framework_11dd6aa8/f64fed2a-en.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesOżóg, M., & Puchta, R. (2025a). The right not to use the internet and protection against the digital divide: Some preliminary remarks. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 30(4), 9–23. https://doi. org/10.15290/bsp.2025.30.04.01pl
dc.description.referencesOżóg, M., & Puchta, R. (2025b). The right not to use the internet: Toward a negative digital freedom in Polish law. In D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, E. Lievens, & V. Verdoodt (Eds.), The right not to use the internet (pp. 92–105). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003528401–6pl
dc.description.referencesPangrazio, L., & Sefton-Green, J. (2021). Digital rights, digital citizenship and digital literacy: What’s the difference? Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.616pl
dc.description.referencesPassaglia, P. (2022). Behind the curtain: Questioning the right to access the internet. Völkerrechtsblog. https://doi.org/10.17176/20221017–110251–0pl
dc.description.referencesPassaglia, P. (2025). Conceptualising the right to access the internet and its impact on the right not to use it. In D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, E. Lievens, & V. Verdoodt (Eds.), The right not to use the internet (pp. 29–43). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003528401–4pl
dc.description.referencesPollicino, O. (2020). The right to internet access. In A. Von Arnauld, K. Von der Decken, & M. Susi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of new human rights (pp. 263–275). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108676106.021pl
dc.description.referencesRibble, M., & Bailey, G. (2007). Digital citizenship in schools. ISTE.pl
dc.description.referencesRight to Offline Coalition. (2024). Essential services must be accessible, even offline. https://righttooffline.eupl
dc.description.referencesRobles, M. (2009). Digital citizenship. Editorial UOC.pl
dc.description.referencesRossi, J. (2025). Is there a right to be offline ‘for no reason’ in France? In D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, E. Lievens, & V. Verdoodt (Eds.), The right not to use the internet (pp. 76–91). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003528401–6pl
dc.description.referencesRutkowska-Tomaszewska, E., & Gałązka, P. (2024). The role of European supervisory authorities in consumer protection standard setting. Studies in European Affairs, 28(2), 223–232.pl
dc.description.referencesShelley, M., Thrane, L., Shulman, S., Lang, E., Beisser, S., Larson, T., & Mutiti, J. (2004). Digital citizenship: Parameters of the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review, 22(2), 256–269.pl
dc.description.referencesSusi, M. (2025). Framing the right not to use the internet. In D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, E. Lievens, & V. Verdoodt (Eds.), The right not to use the internet (pp. 44–70). Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781003528401–6pl
dc.description.referencesSwissInfo. (2025a). ‘It’s political’: Why some people refuse to have a smartphone. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/digital-democracy/its-political-why-some-people-refuse-to-have-a-smartphone/89012366pl
dc.description.referencesSwissInfo. (2025b). How Swiss federalism is helping the rise of a new digital right. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/digital-democracy/how-swiss-federalism-is-helping-the-rise-of-a-new-digital-right/89023201pl
dc.description.referencesTerzis, G. (2025). Ethical meditations for a human right to an analogue life. In D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, E. Lievens, & V. Verdoodt (Eds.), The right not to use the internet (pp. 29–43). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003528401–6pl
dc.description.referencesThrane, L., Shelley, M., Shulman, S., Beisser, S., & Larson, T. (2004). E-political empowerment: Age effects or attitudinal barriers. Journal of E-Government, 1(4), 21–37.pl
dc.description.referencesTomalty, J. (2017). Is there a human right to internet access? Philosophy Now, 118, 8–11. https://philosophynow.org/issues/118/Is_There_A_Human_Right_To_Internet_Accesspl
dc.description.referencesUnited Nations Human Rights Council. (2016). The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the internet (A/HRC/32/L.20). https://documents-ddsny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/G16/108/02/PDF/G1610802.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesWarren, S., & Brandeis, L. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220.pl
dc.description.referencesVromen, A. (2017). Digital citizenship and political engagement. Palgrave Macmillan.pl
dc.description.referencesYao, C., & Quinn, P. (2025). Bridging the digital divide. In S. Serpa & A. I. Santos (Eds.), Digital equity and literacy (pp. 1–24). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1011614pl
dc.identifier.eissn2719-9452-
dc.description.volume31pl
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.firstpage61pl
dc.description.lastpage81pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6092-7284-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4669-9745-
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0007-2367-5587-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7923-9484-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1137-4561-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Artykuły naukowe (WEiF)
Artykuły naukowe (WP)
Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2026, Vol. 31 nr 1

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_31_1_E_Kuzelewska_M_Tomaszuk_T_Majnik_A_Piekutowska_B_Žuber_Digital_Citizenship.pdf212,71 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons