REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19788
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorKuźnicka-Błaszkowska, Dominika-
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-03T08:02:47Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-03T08:02:47Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationEastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2025, p. 55-67pl
dc.identifier.issn2544-9214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19788-
dc.descriptionThis research was funded in whole by National Science Centre PRELUDIUM 20, NO. 0209/0037/22, registration no: 2021/41/N/HS5/03225, contract no: UMO-2021/41/N/HS5/03225. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC-BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission.pl
dc.description.abstractThe concept of “adequate” data protection model in third country or organisation plays vital role in General Data Protection Regulation, but more importantly – in business and relations between European Union and other international actors. Understanding what “adequate” means is crucial for ensuring the security of personal data transferred outside EU. However, the European Union has not provided clear guidance on this matter, which may have negative consequences for businesses, individuals, and the EU as a whole. This paper examines the meaning of 'adequate' by analyzing the work of EU institutions through a deep-dive investigation, as well as comparative and conceptual legal research. The outcome of the research allow researchers and professionals to deeply understand adequacy requirements under General Data Protection Regulation and is viable source for further research in the area but also – in the practice of ensuring GDPR compliance by both private and public organisations.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Bialystok, Faculty of Law, Polandpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0.)-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectData transferpl
dc.subjectpersonal data protectionpl
dc.subjectEU lawpl
dc.subjectadequacypl
dc.subjectGDPRpl
dc.titleThe meaning of „adequate” under GDPR – lesson learnt from EU bodiespl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2025 Author. Submitted for open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0.) licensepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/eejtr.2025.09.01.05-
dc.description.Emaildominika.kuznicka-blaszkowska@uwr.edu.plpl
dc.description.AffiliationDepartment of Law, Administration and Economics, University of Wroclaw, Polandpl
dc.description.referencesAdvocate General Bot. (2015, September 23). Opinion in Case C-362/14, Maximillian Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner. Court of Justice of the European Union.pl
dc.description.referencesArticle 29 Working Party. (2017, November 28). Adequacy referential. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/items/612080.pl
dc.description.referencesCalia, D. (2022). Schrems II: The EU's influence on U.S. data protection and privacy laws. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 21(2), 247–272.pl
dc.description.referencesCharter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, O.J. C 326 (2012, October 26).pl
dc.description.referencesCouncil of Europe. (1981). Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (Convention 108) (as amended by Convention 108+).pl
dc.description.referencesCourt of Justice of the European Union. (2004, October 5). Commission v. Greece, C-475/01. E.C.R. I-0000.pl
dc.description.referencesCourt of Justice of the European Union. (2006, May 30). Joined Cases C-317/04 and C-318/04. E.C.R. I-0000.pl
dc.description.referencesCourt of Justice of the European Union. (2015, October 6). Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner, C-362/14. E.C.R. I-0000.pl
dc.description.referencesDahl, K. (2019). Data adequacy and China - The possibility of an adequacy decision adopted on China in accordance with the GDPR Article 45. University of Bergen. https://bora.uib.no/bora-xmlui/handle/1956/21714.pl
dc.description.referencesDirective 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data.pl
dc.description.referencesDrechsler, L. (2021a). EDPB issues guidance on personal data transfers based on adequacy decisions in the context of the Law Enforcement Directive. European Data Protection Law Review, 7(2), 221–227.pl
dc.description.referencesDrechsler, L. (2021b). Wanted: LED adequacy decisions. How the absence of any LED adequacy decision is hurting the protection of fundamental rights in a law enforcement context. International Data Privacy Law, 11(3), 182-195.pl
dc.description.referencesDuque de Carvalho, S. L. (2019). Key GDPR elements in adequacy findings of countries that have ratified Convention 108. European Data Protection Law Review, 5(1).pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2002/2/EC). Commission Decision of 20 December 2001 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC on the adequate protection of personal data provided by the Canadian Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, O.J. L 6.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2003/490/EC). Commission Decision of 30 June 2003 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC on the adequate protection of personal data in Argentina, O.J. L 168.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2003/821/EC). Commission Decision of 21 November 2003 on the adequate protection of personal data in Guernsey, O.J. L 308.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2004/411/EC). Commission Decision of 28 April 2004 on the adequate protection of personal data in the Isle of Man, O.J. L 181.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2008/393/EC). Commission Decision of 8 May 2008 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC on the adequate protection of personal data in Jersey, O.J. L 159.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2010/146/EU). Commission Decision of 5 March 2010 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC on the adequate protection provided by the Faeroese Act on processing of personal data, O.J. L 71.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2010/625/EU). Commission Decision of 19 October 2010 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC on the adequate protection of personal data in Andorra, O.J. L 281.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2011/61/EU). Commission Decision of 31 January 2011 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC on the adequate protection of personal data by the State of Israel about automated processing of personal data, O.J. L 27.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2013/65/EU). Commission Implementing Decision of 19 December 2012 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC on the adequate protection of personal data by New Zealand, O.J. L 28.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2017). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Exchanging and protecting personal data in a globalised world (COM(2017) 7 final).pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2019/419). Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/419 of 23 January 2019 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the adequate protection of personal data by Japan under the Act on the Protection of Personal Information, O.J. L 76/1.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Data Protection Board. (2018). Endorsement 1/2018. https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files/news/endorsement_of_wp29_documents.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Data Protection Board. (2021). Recommendations 01/2021 on the adequacy referential under the Law Enforcement Directive. https://edpb.europa.eupl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Data Protection Board. (2023, July 10). Information note on data transfers under the GDPR to the United States after the adoption of the adequacy decision. https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/other-guidance/information-note-data-transfers-under-gdpr-united-0_enpl
dc.description.referencesGeneral Court of the European Union. (2023). Philippe Latombe v. European Commission, T-553/23 R (pending).pl
dc.description.referencesGonzalez Domenech, J. (2019). Las decisiones de adecuación en el derecho Europeo relativas a las transferencias internacionales de datos y los mecanismos de control aplicados por los estados miembros. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, 11(1), 350–371.pl
dc.description.referencesHamilton, D., & Quinlan, J. (2020). The transatlantic economy 2020: Annual survey of jobs, trade and investment between the United States and Europe.pl
dc.description.referencesHughes, A. (2001). A question of adequacy - The European Union’s approach to assessing the Privacy Amendment (Private Sector) Act 2000 (CTH). University of New South Wales Law Journal, 25(1), 270-276.pl
dc.description.referencesIhle, J. (2010, July 8). Ireland blocks EU data sharing with Israel. Jewish Telegraphic Agency. https://www.jta.org/2010/07/08/global/ireland-blocks-eu-data-sharing-with-israel.pl
dc.description.referencesMednis, A. (2023). Kryteria uznawania odpowiedniego stopnia ochrony danych osobowych w państwie trzecim. In M. Sakowska-Baryła (Ed.), Transfer danych osobowych na podstawie RODO (pp. 115–133). Warszawa: Wydawca.pl
dc.description.referencesMurphy, H. M. (2021). Assessing the implications of Schrems II for EU–US data flow. International & Comparative Law Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589321000348.pl
dc.description.referencesNaef, T. (2021). Data protection without data protectionism: The right to protection of personal data and data transfers in EU law and international trade law. Springer.pl
dc.description.referencesnoyb. (2023). New trans-Atlantic data privacy framework largely a copy of "Privacy Shield". noyb will challenge the decision. https://noyb.eu/en/european-commission-gives-eu-us-data-transfers-third-round-cjeu.pl
dc.description.referencesPanek, W. (2024). People’s Republic of China and the adequacy – Why Chinese data protection law is not adequate within the meaning of the GDPR. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 2, 143-167.pl
dc.description.referencesRegulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), O.J. L 119/1.pl
dc.description.referencesSchwartz, P. M. (2019). Global data privacy: The EU way. New York University Law Review, 94(3), 771–817.pl
dc.description.referencesSwisher, K. (2015, February 13). Kara Swisher interviews President Barack Obama on cyber security, privacy and his relationship with Silicon Valley. Re/code.pl
dc.description.referencesVelli, F. (2019). The issue of data protection in EU trade commitments: Cross-border data transfers in GATS and bilateral free trade agreements. European Papers, 4(3), 881–894.pl
dc.description.referencesWolf, J. (2014). Delusions of adequacy - Examining the case for finding the United States adequate for cross-border EU-U.S. data transfers. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 43, 227-257pl
dc.identifier.eissn2544-9737-
dc.description.volume9pl
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.firstpage55pl
dc.description.lastpage67pl
dc.identifier.citation2Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relationspl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8804-569X-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 2025, Vol. 9, No. 1

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
EEJTR_2025_Vol_9_No_1_D_Kuznicka_Blaszkowska_The_meaning_of_adequate_under_GDPR.pdf569,14 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons