REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19342
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorWojtkiewicz, Katarzyna Barbara-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-28T10:37:28Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-28T10:37:28Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 30 nr 4, 2025, s. 197-209pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19342-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) as a cornerstone of contemporary digitalised governance. Originally introduced in response to the 2008 financial crisis to address systemic opacity in financial markets, the LEI has since evolved into a global public-good infrastructure that enables interoperability, transparency, and accountability across jurisdictions and sectors. This study investigates the extent to which the LEI can be effectively implemented in Poland and the European Union, and what legal, institutional, and economic barriers constrain its universal adoption. The research employs a multi-method design, combining doctrinal and comparative analysis with empirical evidence from European supervisory projects (the EIOPA, ESMA, ECB, and EBA) and a Polish case study conducted under an NCN project on tax administration. Findings confirm that the LEI strengthens systemic risk monitoring, audit quality, and SME participation in global trade, but also reveal persistent barriers, including renewal costs, administrative burdens, and fragmented domestic identifiers. The analysis identifies four pillars of reform – universality, interoperability, continuity, and public co-financing – necessary to embed the LEI within governance systems. Comparative lessons from the United States and Japan demonstrate that statutory identifiers can extend beyond finance and support innovation while oversight is maintained. The article concludes that only by recognising the LEI as a structural component of digitalised governance can its transformative potential for transparent, resilient, and inclusive public administration be fully realised.pl
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article was written as part of the implementation of the NCN grant no. 2024/08/X/HS5/00945, titled ‘Identyfikacja podmiotów prawnych w systemach governance administracji publicznej: Studium przypadku administracji skarbowej w Polsce’ [Identification of legal entities in public administration governance systems: A case study of tax administration in Poland], funded by the National Science Centre (NCN), Poland.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectLegal Entity Identifier (LEI)pl
dc.subjectdigital governancepl
dc.subjectlegal harmonisationpl
dc.subjectinteroperability of registerspl
dc.subjectpublic lawpl
dc.subjectlaw reformpl
dc.titleThe Legal Entity Identifier and Legacy Systems: Harmonisation, Interoperability, and Balance in Digital Governancepl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2025 Katarzyna Barbara Wojtkiewicz published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2025.30.04.12-
dc.description.Emailkwojtkiewicz@swps.edu.plpl
dc.description.AffiliationSWPS University, Polandpl
dc.description.referencesBeck, S., Sutken, C., Estrada, C., Doyle, R., & Malaket, A. (2019). Trade and the Legal Entity Identifier. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/BRF190490–2pl
dc.description.referencesBrownsword, R. (2023). Law, regulation, and technology: The bigger picture of good governance. In B. Brożek, O. Kanevskaia, & P. Pałka (Eds.), Research handbook on law and technology (pp. 12–27). Edward Elgar Publishing.pl
dc.description.referencesCode of Federal Regulations. (2025, 3 January). Part 25: Unique entity identifier and system for award management. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-2/subtitle-A/chapter-I/part-25pl
dc.description.referencesCongressional Research Service. (2025, 25 August). Financial Data Transparency Act: Implementation status of data standards. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13093pl
dc.description.referencesCzaplicki, P. (2021). The electronic bill of exchange concept from an international perspective. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 26(5), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2021.26.05.11pl
dc.description.referencesData Foundation & Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation. (2018). Envisioning comprehensive entity identification for the US federal government. Global LEI Foundation. Retrieved from https://datafoundation.org/news/reports/508/508-Envisioning-Comprehensive-Entity-Identification-for-the-US-Federal-Governmenpl
dc.description.referencesDirective 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (recast). Official Journal of the European Union, L 173, published on 12 June 2014. Retrieved from https:// eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0065pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Central Bank. (2024, June 15). Cost–benefit analysis of the Integrated Reporting Framework (IReF). European Central Bank. Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/ecb_statistics/consultations/html/complementary-assessment.en.htmlpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. (2014a, October 7). Guidelines on the use of the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) (EIOPA-BoS-14/133). European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. Retrieved from https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/publications/guidelines-use-legal-entity-identifier_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. (2014b, November 13). Final report on public consultation no. 14/037: Proposal for guidelines on the use of the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI). European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. Retrieved from https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/publications/guidelines-use-legal-entity-identifier_enpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Securities and Markets Authority. (2015, November 11). Cost–benefit analysis: Annex II to draft RTS/ITS under MiFID II/MiFIR (ESMA/2015/1464). European Securities and Markets Authority. Retrieved from https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2015/11/2015-esma-1464_annex_ii_-cba-_draft_rts_and_its_on_mifid_ii_and_mifir.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Securities and Markets Authority. (2017, 20 December). ESMA issues statement on LEI implementation under MiFID II. European Securities and Markets Authority. Retrieved from https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-issues-statement-lei-implementation-under-mifid-iipl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Securities and Markets Authority. (2018, 20 June). ESMA statement on LEI requirements under MiFIR (ESMA70–145-872). European Securities and Markets Authority. Retrieved from https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma70–145-872_public_statement_ on_lei.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Systemic Risk Board. (2021, December 15). The benefits of the Legal Entity Identifier for monitoring systemic risk: Evidence from Germany (Occasional Paper No. 18). European Systemic Risk Board. Retrieved from https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/occasional/esrb.op.18~7977fb4f23.en.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union. (2012, 4 July). Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on OTC Derivatives, Central Counterparties and Trade Repositories (EMIR).Official Journal of the European Union, L 201, published on 27 July 2012. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32012R0648pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union. (2014, 15 May). Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Markets in Financial Instruments (MiFIR). Official Journal of the European Union, L 173, published on 12 June 2014. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0600pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union. (2014, 23 July). Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Improving Securities Settlement in the European Union and on Central Securities Depositories (CSDR). Official Journal of the European Union, L 257, published on 28 August 2014. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0909pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union. (2015, 25 November). Regulation (EU) 2015/2365 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Transparency of Securities Financing Transactions and of Reuse (SFTR). Official Journal of the European Union, L 337, published on 23 December 2015. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32015R2365pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union. (2018, 30 May). Directive (EU) 2018/843 of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purposes of Money Laundering or Terrorist Financing (AMLD V). Official Journal of the European Union, L 156, published on 19 June 2018. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018L0843pl
dc.description.referencesFinancial Stability Board. (2024, 21 October). Implementation of the Legal Entity Identifier: Progress report. Financial Stability Board. Retrieved from https://www.fsb.org/uploads/P211024–2.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesGlobal LEI Foundation (n.d.). Global LEI index. Retrieved 30 June 2024, from https://www.gleif.org/en/lei-data/global-lei-indexpl
dc.description.referencesGlobal LEI Foundation. (n.d.). The LEI: The key to unlocking financial inclusion in developing economies. Retrieved 30 June 2024, from https://www.gleif.org/en/lei-solutions/the-lei-the-key-to-unlocking-financial-inclusion-in-developing-economies/pl
dc.description.referencesJenkinson, N., & Leonova, I. S. (2013). The importance of data quality for effective financial stability policies-Legal entity identifier: a first step towards necessary financial data reforms. Financial Stability Review, 17, 101–10. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2538229pl
dc.description.referencesKettl, D. F. (2015). The transformation of governance: Public administration for the twenty-first century. JHU Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKornhauser, L. A. (2022). Law as an achievement of governance. Journal of Legal Philosophy, 47(1), 1–23pl
dc.description.referencesLegal Entity Identifier Regulatory Oversight Committee. (2015, March 11). Survey on regulatory uses of the LEI: Final report. https://www.leiroc.org/publications/gls/lou_20151105–1.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesMorales, A., Ortega, M., Rivero, J., & Sala, S. (2024). How to Identify All Companies Worldwide: Experience with the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI). https://doi.org/10.53479/36259pl
dc.description.referencesOffice of the Comptroller of the Currency. (2024, 22 August). Financial Data Transparency Act of 2022: Proposed joint data standards Bulletin, 2024–24). https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/bulletins/2024/bulletin-2024–24.htmlpl
dc.description.referencesPowell, L. F., Montoya, M., & Shuvalov, E. (2011). Legal entity identifier: What else do you need to know? http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1956664pl
dc.description.referencesRumsey, M., Data Foundation, & Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation. (2018, September 12). Envisioning comprehensive entity identification for the U.S. federal government. Data Foundation & Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.gleif.org/_documents/ blog/20180912-envisioning-comprehensive-entity-identification-for-the-u-s-federal-government/2018–09-12_GLEIF-and-Data-Foundation_Research-Report_Envisioning-Comprehensive-Entity-Identification-for-the-US-Federal-Government.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesSas-Kulczycka (Wojtkiewicz), K. B. (2014). Instytucje wspólnego inwestowania w Polsce: Fundusze inwestycyjne i emerytalne. WIG-Press. (Original work published 1998)pl
dc.description.referencesSejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. (1995). Ustawa z dnia 13 października 1995 r. o zasadach ewidencji i identyfikacji podatników i płatników (Dz.U. 1995 Nr 142, poz. 702).pl
dc.description.referencesSejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. (1995). Ustawa z dnia 29 czerwca 1995 r. o statystyce publicznej (t.j. Dz.U. 2015, poz. 2009).pl
dc.description.referencesSejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. (1997). Ustawa z dnia 20 sierpnia 1997 r. o Krajowym Rejestrze Sądowym (Dz.U. 1997 Nr 121, poz. 769).pl
dc.description.referencesSejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. (1997). Ustawa z dnia 28 sierpnia 1997 r. o organizacji i funkcjonowaniu funduszy emerytalnych (Dz.U. 1998 Nr 69, poz. 456).pl
dc.description.referencesSejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. (2004). Ustawa z dnia 27 maja 2004 r. o funduszach inwestycyjnych (t.j. Dz.U. 2016, poz. 2188).pl
dc.description.referencesUS Federal Register. (2024, 22 August). Financial Data Transparency Act: Joint data standards (proposed rule). US Government Publishing Office. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/08/22/2024–18415/financial-data-transparency-act-joint-data-standardspl
dc.description.referencesWojtkiewicz, K. B. (2018). Efektywne zarządzanie informacją jako strategiczny czynnik sukcesu nadzoru rynku finansowego. In T. Czerwińska & A. Z. Nowak (Eds.), Rynek kapitałowy – regulacje i fundamenty (Vol. 5) (pp. 25–40). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.pl
dc.description.referencesWojtkiewicz, K. B. (2022a). Applying the business-process-oriented approach to data designs, governance, and management: Case study of the EIOPA. In A. Szpaderski, P. Cywiński, W. Karczewski, C. P. Neck, & K. B. Wojtkiewicz (Eds.), International leadership and management: Emerging, contemporary, and unorthodox perspectives (pp. 163–176). SWPS University and Institute of Leadership and Management.pl
dc.description.referencesWojtkiewicz, K. B. (2022b). Identification of legal entities in financial market infrastructures: ‘Who is who on the digitized market?’ In A. Szpaderski, P. Cywiński, W. Karczewski, C. P. Neck, & K. B. Wojtkiewicz (Eds.), International leadership and management: Emerging, contemporary, and unorthodox perspectives (pp. 143–162). SWPS University and Institute of Leadership and Management.pl
dc.description.referencesWojtkiewicz, K. B. (2024–2025). Identification of legal entities in public administration governance systems: A case study of tax administration in Poland [Research project, National Science Centre (NCN), Grant No. 2024/08/X/HS5/00945]. National Science Centre, Poland.pl
dc.description.referencesWojtkiewicz, K. B. (2025a). The role of legal entity identification in modern governance and data management. In E. Dawidziuk, A. Tarwacka, & S. Kursa (Eds.), Historical and contemporary issues of democracy, person and human rights (pp. 467–482). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b23045pl
dc.description.referencesWojtkiewicz, K. B. (2025b). Project final report on the implementation of Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) standards in Polish administrative registers [Unpublished research report]. SWPS University, Warsaw.pl
dc.description.referencesYen, J. C., & Wang, T. D. (2024). Legal Entity Identifier and Future Research Directions. International Journal of Computer Auditing, 6(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.53106/256299802024120601001pl
dc.identifier.eissn2719-9452-
dc.description.volume30pl
dc.description.number4pl
dc.description.firstpage197pl
dc.description.lastpage209pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0630-4139-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2025, Vol. 30 nr 4

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_30_4_K_B_Wojtkiewicz_The_Legal_Entity_Identifier_and_Legacy_Systems.pdf188,45 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons