REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze
  4. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2025, Vol. 30 nr 3

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/18887
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorKarski, Karol-
    dc.contributor.authorMielniczek, Paweł-
    dc.date.accessioned2025-09-26T05:21:29Z-
    dc.date.available2025-09-26T05:21:29Z-
    dc.date.issued2025-
    dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 30 nr 3, 2025, s. 167-179pl
    dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/18887-
    dc.description.abstractThe subject of this article is an analysis of the impact of generative AI (GenAI) on international trade law, from the perspective of both the threats and the opportunities of integrating GenAI into international trade. It addresses topics including intellectual property law, international trade law principles, information security, trade negotiations, contracts, competition, liability and AI ethics. The authors employ a holistic approach, examining numerous applications of GenAI in international trade. They conclude with how the international legal framework for GenAI may help people navigate challenges and seize opportunities to benefit international trade.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
    dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
    dc.subjectgenerative artificial intelligencepl
    dc.subjectinternational trade lawpl
    dc.subjectintellectual property lawpl
    dc.subjectAI regulationspl
    dc.subjectAI standardspl
    dc.titleGenerative AI in International Trade Law: Navigating Opportunities and Challengespl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2025 Karol Karski, Paweł Mielniczek published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2025.30.03.11-
    dc.description.EmailKarol Karski: k.karski@wpia.uw.edu.plpl
    dc.description.EmailPaweł Mielniczek: pawel.mielniczek@gclawyers.eupl
    dc.description.AffiliationKarol Karski - University of Warsaw, Polandpl
    dc.description.AffiliationPaweł Mielniczek - Get Compliant Sp. z o.o., Polandpl
    dc.description.referencesAhmed, U., Naas, P., Evenett, S. J., & Kugler, K. (2024). ChatWTO: An analysis of generative artificial intelligence and international trade [White paper]. World Economic Forum – Global Future Council on International Trade and Investment.pl
    dc.description.referencesAnwansedo, F., Gbadebo, A. D., & Akinwande, O. T. (2024). Exploring the role of AI-enhanced online marketplaces in facilitating economic growth: An impact analysis on trade relations between the United States and sub-Saharan Africa. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(6), 1–15. DOI:10.24857/rgsa.v18n6–139pl
    dc.description.referencesBabikov, O., Fedorenko, I., Omelchenko, O., Lyseiuk, A., & Panova, O. (2024). The observance of human rights and freedoms during the covert obtaining of information in criminal proceedings. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 29(4), 197–215. DOI:10.15290/bsp.2024.29.04.pl
    dc.description.referencesBar, A. (2024). Identyfikacja pochodzenia i znakowanie treści syntetycznych a problem ochrony prawnoautorskiej wytworów powstających z wykorzystaniem sztucznej inteligencji. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace z Prawa Własności Intelektualnej, 3(165), 56–80.pl
    dc.description.referencesBar, A. (2025). Obrazy generowane z wykorzystaniem sztucznej inteligencji. Status prawnoautorski. Wolters Kluwer.pl
    dc.description.referencesBaran, K. (2024). The right of trade unions to information in the era of the fourth and fifth industrial revolutions. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 29(2), 29–38. DOI:10.15290/bsp.2024.29.02.03pl
    dc.description.referencesChander, A. (2021). Artifi cial intelligence and trade. In M. Burri (Ed.), Big data and global trade law (pp. 115–127). Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/9781108919234.008pl
    dc.description.referencesComunale, M., & Manera, A. (2024). The economic impacts and the regulation of AI: a review of the academic literature and policy actions [Working paper no. 24/65]. International Monetary Fund.pl
    dc.description.referencesCongress of the United States of America. (1887). Interstate commerce act. The National Archives and Records Administration. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/ interstate-commerce-actpl
    dc.description.referencesCouncil of Europe. (2024a). Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, CETS no. 225, 17 May 2024. https://www.ref-world.org/legal/agreements/coeministers/2024/en/148016pl
    dc.description.referencesCouncil of Europe. (2024b). Treaty Office: Chart of Signatures and Ratifi cations of Treaty 225: Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law: CETS no. 225. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=signatures-by-treaty&treatynum=225pl
    dc.description.referencesDempsey, P. S. (2012). The rise and fall of the interstate commerce commission: The tortuous path from regulation to deregulation of America’s infrastructure. Marquette Law Review, 95(4), 1151–1189.pl
    dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2023a, 30 October). Commission welcomes G7 leaders’ agreement on guiding principles and a code of conduct on artificial intelligence [Press release]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_5379pl
    dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2023b, 30 October). Hiroshima Process international guiding principles for advanced AI systems [Policy and legislation]. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/hiroshima-process-international-guiding-principles-advanced-ai-systempl
    dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission. (2023c, 30 October). Hiroshima Process international code of conduct for advanced AI systems [Policy and legislation]. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/hiroshima-process-international-code-conduct-advanced-ai-systemspl
    dc.description.referencesFonseca Azevedo, M. da (2024). Navigating the AI frontier in international trade law [Working paper series no. 4/2024]. World Trade Institute.pl
    dc.description.referencesGaffar, H., & Albarashdi, S. (2024). Copyright protection for AI-generated works: Exploring originality and ownership in a digital landscape. Asian Journal of International Law, 15, 23–46. DOI:10.1017/S2044251323000735pl
    dc.description.referencesGienas, K. (2024). Trenowanie AI a prawo autorskie. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace z Prawa Własności Intelektualnej, 3(165), 5–55.pl
    dc.description.referencesIgbinenikaro, E., & Adewusi, A. O. (2024a). Policy recommendations for integrating artificial intelligence into global trade agreements. International Journal of Engineering Research Updates, 6(1), 1–10. DOI:10.53430/ijeru.2024.6.1.0022pl
    dc.description.referencesIgbinenikaro, E., & Adewusi, A. O. (2024b). Navigating the legal complexities of artificial intelligence in global trade agreements. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(4), 488–505. DOI:10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.987pl
    dc.description.referencesJones, E. (2023). Digital disruption: Artificial intelligence and international trade policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 39, 70–84. DOI:10.1093/oxrep/grac049pl
    dc.description.referencesJudgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit of 18 March 2025 on the case of Thaler v. Perlmutter, 687 F. Supp. 3d 140 (D. D. C. 2023). https://media.cadc.us-courts.gov/opinions/docs/2025/03/23–5233.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesJudgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware of 11 February 2025 on the case of Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH et al. v. Ross Intelligence Inc, no. 1:20-cv-00613-SB. https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/opinions/20–613_5.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesKamiński, M. (2024). Podmiot kompetencji administracyjnej w zautomatyzowanych procesach stosowania prawa na tle problematyki legitymacji prawno-demokratycznej delegowania kompetencji na systemy sztucznej inteligencji i odpowiedzialności prawnej za ich działania lub zaniechania. Prawo i Więź, 53(6), 239–263. DOI:10.36128/PRIW.VI53.1102pl
    dc.description.referencesKarska, E. (2019). Nowe tendencje w międzynarodowym prawie ochrony praw człowieka jako odpowiedź na zmiany. In A. Tarwacka (Ed.), Tempora Mutantur Cum Legibus. Księga Jubileuszowa z okazji 20-lecia Wydziału Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie (pp. 48–58). Wolters Kluwer.pl
    dc.description.referencesKarska, E. (2021). Drafting an international legally binding instrument on business and human rights: The next step towards strengthening the protection of human rights. International Community Law Review, 23(5), 466–485. DOI:10.1163/18719732–23050004pl
    dc.description.referencesKarska, E. (2022). Biznes i prawa człowieka – perspektywa Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. In E. Cała-Wacinkiewicz, J. Menkes, J. Nowakowska-Małusecka, & W. S. Staszewski (Eds.), Stosunki sąsiedzkie w świetle prawa międzynarodowego (pp. 241–253). C. H. Beck.pl
    dc.description.referencesKarska, E., & Karski, K. (2021). Special issue editorial. Business and human rights: Legal aspects. International Community Law Review, 23(5), 427–432. DOI::10.1163/18719732–23050001pl
    dc.description.referencesKarska, E., & Karski, K. (2023). Current challenges of international and European human rights law: Introductory remarks. International Community Law Review, 25(6), 539–545. DOI:10.1163/18719732-bja10112pl
    dc.description.referencesKarski, K., & Ziemblicki, B. (2021). Commercial companies as applicants before the European Court of Human Rights. International Community Law Review, 23(5), 503–525. DOI:10.1163/18719732–23050006pl
    dc.description.referencesKhan, A. (2024). The intersection of artificial intelligence and international trade laws: Challenges and opportunities. IIUM Law Journal, 32(1), 104–107. DOI:10.31436/iiumlj.v32i1.912pl
    dc.description.referencesKleinberg, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S., & Sunstein, C. R. (2018). Discrimination in the age of algorithms. Journal of Legal Analysis, 10, 113–174. DOI:10.1093/jla/laz001pl
    dc.description.referencesKöksal, B., & Sarel, R. (in press). The smart contracts trilemma. University of Illinois Law Review, 1–64. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4689013pl
    dc.description.referencesKowalski, M. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on the future functioning of administrative courts. Prawo i Więź, 53(6), 173–185. DOI:10.36128/PRIW.VI53.988pl
    dc.description.referencesKużelewska, E., & Piekutowska, A. (2023). Belarus’ violation of international obligations in connection with artificial migration pressure on the Belarus–European Union border. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 28(1), 39–55. DOI:10.15290/bsp.2023.28.01.03pl
    dc.description.referencesLin, C.-F (2021). Public morals, trade secrets, and the dilemma of regulating automated driving systems. In S.-Y. Peng, C.-F. Lin, & T. Streinz (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and international economic law (pp. 237–254). Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/9781108954006.013pl
    dc.description.referencesMarkiewicz, R. (2023). ChatGPT i prawo autorskie Unii Europejskiej. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace z Prawa Własności Intelektualnej, 2(160), 143–171.pl
    dc.description.referencesMéndez, M. L., & Kurzynoga, M. (2023). The presumption of the employment relationship of platform workers as an opportunity to eliminate obstacles arising from competition law in the conclusion of a collective agreement: The example of Spain. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 28(4), 197–216. DOI:10.15290/bsp.2023.28.04.12pl
    dc.description.referencesMeyer, T., Marsden, C., & Brown, I. (2020). Regulating internet content with technology: Analysis of policy initiatives relevant to illegal content and disinformation online in the European Union. In G. Terzis, D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, & D. Trottier (Eds.), Disinformation and digital media as a challenge for democracy (pp. 309–326). Intersentia.pl
    dc.description.referencesMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2019). G20 AI principles. https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/g20_summit/osaka19/pdf/documents/en/annex_08.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesNizza, U. (in press). What do AIs think about the AI Act? An experimental analysis of the EU approach on artificial intelligence. European Business Law Review, 36(2), 1–20. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4976521pl
    dc.description.referencesOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2024). Revised recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence, adopted on 3 May 2024, C/MIN(2024)16/FINAL. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development https://one.oecd.org/document/C/MIN(2024)16/FINAL/en/pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesPeng, S.-Y., Lin, C.-F., & Streinz, T. (2021). Artificial intelligence and international economic law: A research and policy agenda. In S.-Y. Peng, C.-F. Lin, & T. Streinz (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and international economic law (pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/9781108954006.002pl
    dc.description.referencesShaffer, G. (2021). Trade law in a data-driven economy: The need for modesty and resilience. In S.-Y. Peng, C.-F. Lin, & T. Streinz (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and international economic law (pp. 29–53). Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/9781108954006.00pl
    dc.description.referencesThankGod, J. C. (2023). Artificial intelligence and international trade law: Navigating legal challenges in the age of automation. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4706943pl
    dc.description.referencesUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2021, 23 November). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence, adopted on 23 November 2021. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137pl
    dc.description.referencesWorld Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (1979). Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (as amended on 28 September 1979) (authentic text), TRT/BERNE/001. https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/283698pl
    dc.description.referencesWorld Trade Organization (WTO). (2017a). General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), Annex 1B. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/gats_e.htmpl
    dc.description.referencesWorld Trade Organization (WTO). (2017b). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) (as amended on 23 January 2017). Annex 1C. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/31bis_trips_e.pdfpl
    dc.identifier.eissn2719-9452-
    dc.description.volume30pl
    dc.description.number3pl
    dc.description.firstpage167pl
    dc.description.lastpage179pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0757-6283-
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3465-6326-
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2025, Vol. 30 nr 3

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    BSP_30_3_K_Karski_P_Mielniczek_Generative_AI_in_International_Trade_Law.pdf139,02 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons