REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/18179
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorKārkliņa, Annija-
dc.contributor.authorRodiņa, Anita-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-10T12:21:08Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-10T12:21:08Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 30 nr 1, 2025, s. 33-47pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/18179-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the development of the understanding of the concept of the family in Latvia during the last few years, and reflects the contribution made by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia to the development of this concept. The article analyses the judgment of the Constitutional Court of 12 November 2020 (case no. 2019–33-01), in which the legislature was determined to regulate the legal relations of same-sex partners (families) and provide for the economic and social protection of all families. The article outlines the problems that were encountered during the execution of this judgment and the constitutional mechanisms with which the conservative parties represented in the Parliament tried to delay the entry into force of the law. Finally, the authors reflect on the changes in the regulatory acts that entered into force on 1 July 2024 introducing the regulation of partnership relations in Latvia, i.e. providing that adult persons will be allowed to register their partnership or cohabitation in accordance with the procedure established by law (a right which will apply also to same-sex partners). Thus, by registration of their partnership, individuals will enjoy wider social protection in various aspects, such as the other partner’s ability to make decisions about the treatment of the partner injured in an accident, the partner’s right to receive support from the state or municipality in cases specifi ed by law, more favourable provisions regarding inheritance processes, taxes, etc.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pl
dc.subjectConstitutional Courtpl
dc.subjectfamilypl
dc.subjectpartnershippl
dc.subjectsame-sex partnerspl
dc.subjectthe Constitutionpl
dc.titleProtection of the Family in Latvia: Recent Developmentspl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2025 Annija Kārkliņa, Anita Rodiņa published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2025.30.01.02-
dc.description.EmailAnnija Kārkliņa: annija.karklina@lu.lvpl
dc.description.EmailAnita Rodiņa: anita.rodina@lu.lvpl
dc.description.AffiliationAnnija Kārkliņa - University of Latvia, Latviapl
dc.description.AffiliationAnita Rodiņa - University of Latvia, Latviapl
dc.description.referencesApollo. (2023, 28 July). Court recognizes around 40 families of same-sex couples in Latvia. https://www.apollo.lv/7823189/tiesa-latvija-atzist-ap-40-viendzimuma-paru-gimenespl
dc.description.referencesBriede, J. (2022). Ģimene. Jurista Vārds, 7(1221). https://m.juristavards.lv/doc/280639-gimene/pl
dc.description.referencesCentral Election Committee of Latvia. (2024, 11 January). Th e national referendum on the repeal of the suspended law ‘Amendments to the Notariate Law’ will not be held. https://www.cvk.lv/lv/jaunums/tautas-nobalsosana-par-aptureta-likuma-grozijumi-notariata-likuma-atcelsanu-netiks-rikotapl
dc.description.referencesChen, A.Y., & Maduro, M.P. (2013). Th e judiciary and constitutional review. In M. Tushnet, T. Fleiner, & C. Saunders (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law (pp. XX–YY). Routledgepl
dc.description.referencesConstitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. (1996, 5 June). Constitutional Court Law https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/en/2016/02/04/constitutional-court-law/pl
dc.description.referencesDišlers, K. (1929). Suspensive veto of the President and absolute veto of the citizens in the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia. Tieslietu ministrijas Vēstnesis, 1(2), 14.pl
dc.description.referencesJansons, J. (2021). Any legal framework for family protection and support must be meaningful. Jurista Vārds, 24(1186).pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Administrative District Court Riga Court House of 31 May 2022 on the case of XXX, no. A420129622 (not published).pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 21 December 2009 on the case of XXX, no. 2009–43-01.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 24 April 2014 on the case of XXX, no. 2013–12-01.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 27 June 2016 on the case of XXX, no. 2015–22-01.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 5 December 2019 on the case of XXX, no. 2019–01-01.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 12 November 2020 on the case of XXX, no. 2019–33-01.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 3 December 2020 on the case of XXX, no. 2020–16-01.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 8 April 2021 on the case of XXX, no. 2020–43-03.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 21 June 2021 on the case of XXX, no. 2020–41-0106.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 28 June 2023 on the case of XXX, no. 2021–45-01.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 5 October 2023 on the case of XXX, no. 2022–34-01.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 17 January 2023 on case of Fedotova and Others v. Russia, application no. 40792/10pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Senate of the Republic of Latvia, Department of Administrative Cases, case no. SKA-[B1]/2021. https://www.at.gov.lv/fi les/uploads/fi les/3_Jaunumi/Par_tiesas_sedem/SKA-B1–2021.docxpl
dc.description.referencesJurista Vārds. (2005). Should the Constitution be amended. Jurista Vārds, 41(396). https://juristavards.lv/doc/120230-vai-jagroza-satversme/pl
dc.description.referencesJurista Vārds. (2020). On concerning trends in the enforcement of Constitutional Court judgments. Jurista Vārds, 42(1152).pl
dc.description.referencesJurista Vārds. (2022, 31 May). For the fi rst time, a court grants an application by a same-sex couple recognizing the existence of a family relationship.pl
dc.description.referencesLatvijas Vēstnesis. (2020, 29 October). Transcript of the Parliament sitting of 29 October 2020. https://www.vestnesis.lv/op/2020/216.2pl
dc.description.referencesLībiņa-Egnere, I. (2021). Unresolved issues can lead to unclear legal situations. Jurista Vārds, 24(1186).pl
dc.description.referencesLSM.lv. (2020, 29 October). Th e Parliament rejects the citizens’ initiative on the registration of same-sex partner relationships. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/saeima-noraida-pilsonu-iniciativu-par-viendzimuma-partneru-attiecibu-registresanu.a379760/pl
dc.description.referencesLSM.lv. (2023, 31 October). Th e Parliament committee is advancing the partnership framework for adoption already in the new week. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/31(10).2023-saeimas-komisija-virza-partnerattiecibu-regulejumu-pienemsanai-jau-jaunnedel.a529796/pl
dc.description.referencesLSM.lv. (2023, 9 November). Th e Parliament adopts a partnership regulation for unmarried couples; The opposition will try to hold a referendum. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/09(11).2023-saeima-pienem-nepreceto-paru-partneribas-regulejumu-opozicija-meginas-sarikot-referendumu.a530999/pl
dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (1922, 15 February). Th e Constitution of the Republic of Latvia. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/57980-the-constitution-of-the-republic-of-latviapl
dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (1937, 28 January). Civil Law. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/225418-civil-lawpl
dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (2005, 15 December). Amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/124957-grozijums-latvijas-republikas-satversmepl
dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (2021). Draft law amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia. (2021, 7 January). https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS13/saeimalivs13.nsf/0/6D9BD173B173103EC2258656003189DDpl
dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (2022, 16 June). Amendments to the Labour Law. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/333711-grozijumi-darba-likumapl
dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (2023, 9 November). Amendments to the Law on the Rights of Patients. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/347548-grozijumi-pacientu-tiesibu-likumapl
dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (2023, 9 November). Amendments to the Notariate Law. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/349238-grozijumi-notariata-likumapl
dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (2023, 13 November.) Announcement no. 18 of 13 November 2023 of the President of the Republic of Latvia on suspension of publication of the Law on Amendments to the Notariate Law. https://www.vestnesis.lv/op/2023/220A.1pl
dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (2023, 16 November). Decision no. 18 of the Central Election Commission of 16 November 2023 on the collection of signatures for the referendum on the law ‘Amendments to the Notariate Law’. https://m.likumi.lv/ta/id/347445-par-parakstu-vaksanu-tautas-nobalsosanas-ierosinasanai-par-likumu-grozijumi-notariata-likumapl
dc.identifier.eissn2719-9452-
dc.description.volume30pl
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.firstpage33pl
dc.description.lastpage47pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4992-8403-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6611-6717-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2025, Vol. 30 nr 1

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_30_1_A_Karklina_A_Rodina_Protection_of_the_Family_in_Latvia_Recent_Developments.pdf168,09 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons