REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze
  4. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2025, Vol. 30 nr 1

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/18177
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorJackiewicz, Andrzej-
    dc.contributor.authorEngīzers, Kalvis-
    dc.contributor.authorPleps, Jānis-
    dc.contributor.authorRytel-Warzocha, Anna-
    dc.date.accessioned2025-04-10T11:37:45Z-
    dc.date.available2025-04-10T11:37:45Z-
    dc.date.issued2025-
    dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 30 nr 1, 2025, s. 9-31pl
    dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/18177-
    dc.description.abstractThe authors offer a deep insight into the recent development of same-sex partnership regulation in Latvia. The judgments of the Constitutional Court of 12 November 2020 and 8 April 2021 required the guarantee of legal, social and economic protection for same-sex families and respect for their human dignity. In response to these judgments, the Saeima adopted same-sex partnership legislation on 9 November 2023. The authors analyse the content of these regulations and the previous legislative discussions that led to the adoption of this law. The implementation of the Constitutional Court judgments was ensured by the administrative courts in specific cases even before the Saeima adopted the relevant laws. According to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 10 December 2021, the administrative courts began to recognize same-sex families legally. Relevant case law is also analysed in this article.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
    dc.subjectcase lawpl
    dc.subjectcivil partnershippl
    dc.subjecthuman dignitypl
    dc.subjectLatviapl
    dc.subjectpopular vetopl
    dc.subjectsame-sex couplespl
    dc.titleFrom Social Invisibility to Legal Recognition: Same-Sex Partnership in Latviapl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2025 Andrzej Jackiewicz et al. published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2025.30.01.01-
    dc.description.EmailAndrzej Jackiewicz: jackiewicz@uwb.edu.plpl
    dc.description.EmailKalvis Engīzers: kalvis.engizers@lu.lvpl
    dc.description.EmailJānis Pleps: janis.pleps@lu.lvpl
    dc.description.EmailAnna Rytel-Warzocha: anna.rytel@prawo.ug.edu.plpl
    dc.description.AffiliationAndrzej Jackiewicz - University of Bialystok, Polandpl
    dc.description.AffiliationKalvis Engīzers - University of Latvia, Latviapl
    dc.description.AffiliationJānis Pleps - University of Latvia, Latviapl
    dc.description.AffiliationAnna Rytel-Warzocha - University of Gdansk, Polandpl
    dc.description.referencesBalodis, R. (2021). Th e procedure for amending the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and the substance of restrictions established by it. Journal of the University of Latvia: Law, 14, 21–48.pl
    dc.description.referencesBNS. (2014, 7 November). Straujuma: Latvijā juridiski nav atrisināts jautājums par partnerattiecībām. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/straujuma-latvija-juridiskinav-atrisinats-jautajums-par-partnerattiecibam.a105467/pl
    dc.description.referencesCabinet of Ministers. (2022, 14 December). Declaration on the action plan of the Cabinet of Ministers led by Arturs Krisjanis Karins. https://www.mk.gov.lv/lv/media/14490/downloadpl
    dc.description.referencesCabinet of Ministers. (2023, 15 September). Declaration on the action plan of the Cabinet of Ministers led by Evika Silina. https://www.mk.gov.lv/lv/media/16704/downloadpl
    dc.description.referencesCerna, C. M. (2010). European Court of Human Rights: Schalk & Kopf v. Austria. International Legal Materials, 49(5), 1302–1324. DOI:10.5305/intelegamate.49.5.1302pl
    dc.description.referencesDelfi . (2012, 1 June). TM darba kārtībā nav jautājuma par viendzimuma partnerattiecību reģistrāciju. Delfi. https://www.delfi .lv/193/politics/42402772/tm-darba-kartiba-nav-jautajuma-parviendzimuma-partnerattiecibu-registracijupl
    dc.description.referencesDelfi . (2024, 2 November). Izmantojot jauno likuma regulējumu, četros mēnešos nodibinātas 277 partnerattiecības. Delfi. https://www.delfi .lv/193/politics/120048716/izmantojot-jauno-likuma-regulejumu-cetros-menesos-nodibinatas-277-partnerattiecibaspl
    dc.description.referencesDiversity Shop. (n.d.). Mātei Latvijai [‘Latvia loves all its children’]. https://diversityshop.org/product-category/0_9_9_8_matei_latvijaipl
    dc.description.referencesEniņa, Z. (2023) Tiesnese par viendzimuma pāru attiecību atzīšanu: Tiesas ir gājušas pa priekšu likumdevējam. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/28.07.2023-tiesnese-par-viendzimuma-paru-attiecibu-atzisanu-tiesas-ir-gajusas-pa-prieksu-likumdevejam.a518041/pl
    dc.description.referencesEng.LSM.lv. (2022, 31 May). Court legally recognizes same-sex relationships for the fi rst time in Latvia. https://eng.lsm.lv/article/societypl
    dc.description.referencesEngīzers, K., & Melnika, M. (2021, 2 February). Defining the modern family: Th e Latvian Constitutional Court, the defi nition of ‘family’, and parliamentary bitterness. Verfassungsblog.DOI:10.17176/20210202-235854-0pl
    dc.description.referencesGarlicki, L. (2007). Constitutional courts versus supreme courts. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(1), 44–68.pl
    dc.description.referencesGiles, J. (2016). Oliari and Others v. Italy: Application nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11: European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section): Hirvelä, Raimondi, Bianku, Tsotsoria, Mahoney, Vehabović, Grozev JJ; Mahoney, joined by Tsotsoria and Vehabović concurring: 21 July 2015. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 5(1), 176–177. DOI:10.1093/ojlr/rwv054pl
    dc.description.referencesGill-Pedro, E. (2023, 27 January). No new rights in Fedotova. Verfassungsblog. DOI:10.17176/20230130-202753-0pl
    dc.description.referencesHodson, L. (2011). A marriage by any other name? Schalk and Kopf v. Austria. Human Rights Law Review, 11(1), 170–179. DOI:10.1093/hrlr/ngq054pl
    dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 7 November 2018 on the case “On Compliance of Section 50.4 of the Sentence Execution Code of Latvia (hereinaft er – the Code) establishes the regime for serving the sentence in closed prisons, interalia, that men, who have been sentenced to the deprivation of liberty for committing a serious or a particularly serious crime, serve the sentence in a closed prison”, no. 2018-25-01. https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/web/viewer.html?fi le=https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/2018-25-01_ Judgement.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 12 November 2020 on the case “On compliance of Section 155(1) of the Labour Law with the fi rst sentence of Article 110 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia”, no. 2019-33-01. https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/web/ viewer.html?file=https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2019-33-01_Judgment.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesJudgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 24 June 2010 on the case of Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, application no. 30141/04.pl
    dc.description.referencesJudgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 21 July 2015 on the case of Oliari and Others v. Italy, application nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11.pl
    dc.description.referencesJudgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 17 January 2023 on the case of Fedotova and Others v. Russia, applications nos. 40792/10, 30538/14 and 43439/14.pl
    dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Supreme Court (Senate) of 10 December 2021 on the case “Th e State’s Duty to Legally Recognize Families Formed by Same-Sex Couples and Acknowledge the Existence of Legal Relationships Between Family Members”, no. SKA-[B1]/2021 https://www.at.gov.lv/ downloadlawfi le/8243pl
    dc.description.referencesLegal Affairs Committee of the Saeima. (2005). Explanatory Report of the Draft Law ‘Amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia’. https://www.saeima.lv/Lapas/8Sae_Lprj/lasadd=LP1400_0.htmpl
    dc.description.referencesLegal Affairs Committee of the Saeima. (2015). Minutes of Sitting no. 35 of 24 February 2015. https://titania.saeima.lv/livs/saeimasnotikumi.nsf/0/860b9e221fc9de81c2257df100391469/$FILE/PR_24_02_2015_10_00_JK.docpl
    dc.description.referencesLegal Affairs Committee of the Saeima. (2021). Minutes of Sitting no. 169 of 19 January 2021. https://titania.Parliament.lv/livs/Parliamentsnotikumi.nsf/0/b96c87ffadfb7a12c225865c004d8464/$FILE/PR_2021_01_19_10_00_JK.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesLipša, I. (2017). LGBTI vēsture Latvijā pēdējos 100 gados. Dardedze hologrāfi ja.pl
    dc.description.referencesLSM. (2018, 7 March). Saeimas Komisijas Zoraida Kopdzīves likuma iniciatīvu. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/saeimas-komisija-noraida-kopdzives-likuma-iniciativu.a270507/pl
    dc.description.referencesLSM. (2022, 31 March). Saeimā sāk skatīt Civilās savienības likumu viendzimuma pāru ģimeņu aizsardzībai. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/saeima-sakskatit-civilas-savienibas-likumu-viendzimuma-paru-gimenu-aizsardzibai.a450431/pl
    dc.description.referencesLSM. (2024, 11 January). CVK ofi ciāli apstiprina – referenduma par partnerības regulējumu nebūs. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/11.01.2024-cvk-ofi cialiapstiprina-referenduma-par-partneribas-regulejumu-nebus.a538599/pl
    dc.description.referencesLSM. (2024, 1 July). Stājas spēkā Partnerības regulējums; pirmais viendzimuma pāris reģistrē attiecības. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/01.07.2024-stajas-speka-partneribas-regulejums-pirmais-viendzimuma-paris-registre-attiecibas.a559690/pl
    dc.description.referencesLSM. (2024, 1 August). Mēneša laikā partnerību noslēguši 95 pāri. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/01.08.2024-menesa-laika-partneribu-noslegusi-95-pari.a563521/pl
    dc.description.referencesmanabalss.lv. (2015, 23 March). Par kopdzīves likuma pieņemšanu latvijā. https://manabalss.lv/par-kopdzives-likuma-pienemsanu-latvija/showpl
    dc.description.referencesMandates, Ethics and Submissions Committee of the Saeima. (2018). Minutes of Sitting no. 127 of 31 January 2018. https://titania.saeima.lv/livs/saeimasnotikumi.nsf/0/9d1c971e95fc349ac22582240027420c/$FILE/Nr.127_PR_2018_31_01_1200_MEIK.docpl
    dc.description.referencesMarzano, V. J. (2017). Oliari and the European Court of Human Rights: Where the court failed. Pace International Law Review, 29(1), 250–287. DOI:10.58948/2331-3536.1370pl
    dc.description.referencesTieslietu ministrija. (2023, 26 October). Par likumprojektu iesniegšanu. https://www.tm.gov.lv/sites/tm/files/media_file/tm_pavadvestule_261023.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesMita, D. (2024). Cieņa pret atšķirīgo. In Senatore Dace Mita (p. 31). Augstākā tiesa.pl
    dc.description.referencesMonciunskaite, B. (2022). Th e risks to judicial independence in Latvia: A view eighteen years since EU accession. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 18, 129–149.pl
    dc.description.referencesMos, M. (2020). Th e anticipatory politics of homophobia: Explaining constitutional bans on same-sex marriage in post-communist Europe. East European Politics, 36(3), 395–416. DOI:10.1080/21599165.2020.1733983.pl
    dc.description.referencesMozaīka. (2021, 11 December). Viendzimuma partner ģimenes atzīšana tiesas ceļā. https://www.mozaika.lv/l/mozaika-nodrosinas-atbalstu-tiesa-atzit-viendzimuma-partneru-gimenes-pastavesanas-faktu/pl
    dc.description.referencesOmbudsman. (2018). Report of 29 October 2018 ‘On the Recognition of Diff erent Forms of Families’. https://www.tiesibsargs.lv/wp-content/uploads/migrate_2022/content/atzinumi/atzinums_lieta_nr_2018_38_26g_1541406373.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesPalazzo, N. (2023). Fedotova and Others v. Russia: Dawn of a new era for European LGBTQ families? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 30(2), 216–228. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4612696pl
    dc.description.referencesPlepa, D. (2024). Satversmīga kopdzīve jeb radniecības un ģimenes tiesību tvērums Latvijas likumkopā.In K. Sedlenieka (Ed.), Radniecība un valsts īstenošana mūsdienu Latvijā (pp. 147–178). Rīgas Stradiņa Universitāte.pl
    dc.description.referencesPleps, J., Pastars, E., & Plakane, I. (2022). Constitutional law. Latvijas Vēstnesis. https://juristavards.lv/wwwraksti/JV/BIBLIOTEKA/GRAMATAS/KT_ENG.PDFpl
    dc.description.referencesPolgári, E. (2022). Fedotova v. Russ (Eur. Ct. H. R.). International Legal Materials, 61(3), 438–452. DOI:10.1017/ilm.2021.55pl
    dc.description.referencesPrime Minister of Latvia. (2022, 21 March). On the submission of a draft law. https://titania.Parliament.lv/LIVS13/Parliamentlivs13.nsf/0/84487ED0DCD7420CC225880C00497AA4?OpenDocumentpl
    dc.description.referencesPustorino, P. (2014). Same-sex couples before the ECtHR: Th e right to marriage. In D. Gallo, L. Paladini, & P. Pustorino (Eds.), Same-sex couples before national, supranational and international jurisdictions (pp. 399–408). Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-973-642-35434-2_17pl
    dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (1922). The Constitution of the Republic of Latvia. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/57980-the-constitution-of-the-republic-of-latviapl
    dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (1996). The Constitutional Court Law of the Republic of Latvia. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/63354-constitutional-court-lawpl
    dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (2001). Labour Law of 20 June 2001 (consolidated text of 2022, article 155, as amended). https://likumi.lv/ta/id/26019-darba-likumspl
    dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (2023a). Amendments of 9 November 2023 to the Notariate Law. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/349238-grozijumi-notariata-likumapl
    dc.description.referencesRepublic of Latvia. (2023b). Amendments of 9 November 2023 to the Register of Natural Persons Law. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/347527-grozijumi-fi zisko-personu-registra-likumapl
    dc.description.referencesRezevska, D. (2024). General principles of law: Natural rights, legal methods and system principles. Brill/Nijhoff .pl
    dc.description.referencesRodiņa, A., & Spale, A. (2012). Constitutional status of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Конституционное Правосудие [Constitutional Justice], 4, 36–80. https://www.concourt.am/pdf/uploads/62c81a405baba_4(58)%202012.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesSaeima of Latvia. (2005). Transcript of the Plenary Session of 5 December 2005. https://saeima.lv/Likumdosana/8S_DK/lasdk-dd=20051215.htmpl
    dc.description.referencesSaeima of Latvia. (2018a). Agenda of the Sitting of the Mandates, Ethics, and Submissions Committee of the Saeima of 31 January 2018. https://titania.saeima.lv/livs/saeimasnotikumi.nsf/0/9D1C971E95FC349AC22582240027420Cpl
    dc.description.referencesSaeima of Latvia. (2018b). Transcript of the Plenary Session of 15 March 2018. https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS12/saeimalivs_lmp.nsf/0/24EEC09C320F58B1C2258267003FBD0Fpl
    dc.description.referencesSaeima of Latvia. (2019). Transcript of the Plenary Session of 20 June 2019. https://titania.saeima.lv/ LIVS13/saeimalivs13.nsf/0/3B2A66723AFECB61C225885300358630pl
    dc.description.referencesSaeima of Latvia. (2020). Transcript of the Plenary Session of 29 October 2020. https://titania.saeima.lv/ LIVS13/saeimalivs_lmp.nsf/0/A892369C38C20F3DC22586230049F9A1pl
    dc.description.referencesSaeima of Latvia. (2022a). Transcript of Plenary Session of 26 May 2022. https://titania.Parliament.lv/ LIVS13/Parliamentlivs13.nsf/0/15D9FED46F96EA50C2258869002F1DFE?OpenDocumentpl
    dc.description.referencesSaeima of Latvia. (2022b). Transcript of Plenary Session of 15 December 2022. https://titania.Parliament. lv/LIVS14/Parliamentlivs14.nsf/0/A92703427893BD8EC22589210038EC20?OpenDocumentpl
    dc.description.referencesSaeima of Latvia. (2023, 10 November). Saeima: Two adults will be able to enter into a partnership to be registered by a notary. https://www.Parliament.lv/en/news/Parliament-news/32825-Parliament-two-adults-will-be-able-to-enter-into-a-partnership-to-be-registered-by-a-notarypl
    dc.description.referencesSpolītis, V. (2015, 30 January). On proposals for draft law ‘Amendments to the Civil Code’. https://titania. saeima.lv/LIVS12/SaeimaLIVS12.nsf/0/AE031B89B11B728AC2257DDD004EA58Epl
    dc.description.referencesTiesībsargs. (2018a). 21. gadsimta ģimenei nepieciešams atbilstošs juridisks ietvars. https://www.tiesibsargs.lv/news/21-gadsimta-gimenei-nepieciesams-atbilstoss-juridisks-ietvars/pl
    dc.description.referencesTiesībsargs. (2018b). Par dažādu ģimenes formu atzīšanu. Atzinums pārbaudes lietā Nr.2018-38-26G. https://www.tiesibsargs.lv/wp-content/uploads/migrate_2022/content/atzinumi/atzinums_lieta_nr_2018_38_26g_1541406373.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesTrabucco, F. R. (2020). Th e Latvian direct democracy tools in a comparative European context. Onati Socio-Legal Series, 10(4), 744–788. DOI:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1075pl
    dc.description.referencesTh e Baltic Times (2022). 26 LGBT couples ask court to recognize their relationships as de facto families. https://www.baltictimes.com/26_lgbt_couples_ask_court_to_recognize_their_relationships_as_de_facto_families/pl
    dc.description.referencesViens pret vienu (2020). Tiesnese Osipova: Patiesa vienlīdzība ir iespējama vien tad, ja ir iecietība. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/tiesnese-osipova-patiesa-vienlidziba-ir-iespejama-vientad-ja-ir-iecietiba.a384401/pl
    dc.description.referencesVikarská, Z. (2023, 24 January). Th e many troubles of the Fedotova judgment. Verfassungsblog. https://verfassungsblog.de/the-many-troubles-of-the-fedotova-judgment/.DOI:10.17176/20230124-215932-0pl
    dc.description.referencesVišņakova, G. (2024). Atmiņas. In Senatore Dace Mita (p. 208). Augstākā tiesa.pl
    dc.description.referencesZālītis, K. (2023). Nepieciešams cieņpilns partnerattiecību regulējums, lai izvairītos no tiesvedībām. https://ir.lv/2023/10/23/nepieciesams-cienpilns-partnerattiecibu-regulejums-lai-izvairitos-no-tiesvedibam/pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2719-9452-
    dc.description.volume30pl
    dc.description.firstpage9pl
    dc.description.lastpage31pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6957-3139-
    dc.identifier.orcid0009-0007-0364-8442-
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7407-4959-
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8972-4088-
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Artykuły naukowe (WP)
    Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2025, Vol. 30 nr 1

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    BSP_30_1_A_Jackiewicz_K_Engizers_J_Plebs_A_Rytel_Warzocha_From_Social_Invisibility_to_Legal_Recognition.pdf258,92 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)