REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/18000
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorŻochowska, Elżbieta-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T09:54:40Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-03T09:54:40Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationEastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2024, p. 57-69pl
dc.identifier.issn2544-9214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/18000-
dc.description.abstractThe rule of law principle is mentioned in article 2 of Treaty of European Union. This provision states, that it is one of fundamental principles of European Union. The text below is an attempt to answer the question of way of interpretation of this principle and its definition on the ground of judicial decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Judgment of 27 February 2018 in case C-64/16 Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v. Tribunal de Contas is starting point for broader reflection on principle of the rule of law in verdicts of the Court of Justice of the European Union.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Bialystok, Faculty of Law, Polandpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution (CC BY4.0.)-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectThe Court of Justice of the European Unionpl
dc.subjectthe rule of lawpl
dc.subjectindependence of judgespl
dc.subjectfundamental principles of European Unionpl
dc.titleThe Principle of the Rule of Law From Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union as a Value of the European Union and Its Components as Requirements Imposed on Member States, on the Example of a Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union Regarding Portuguese Judges, Rendered on the Basis of a Preliminary Ruling Referred by a National Courtpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2024 Author. Submitted for open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0.) licensepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/eejtr.2024.08.02.05-
dc.description.Emailelazochowska2000@gmail.compl
dc.description.AffiliationFaculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw, Polandpl
dc.description.referencesBungenberg, M., & Hazarika, A. (2019). Rule of Law in the EU Legal Order. Zeitschrift für europarechtliche Studien, 22(3), 383-406.pl
dc.description.referencesDouglas-Scott S. (2011). The European Union and Human Rights after the Treaty of Lisbon. Human Rights Law Review, 11(4), 645-682.pl
dc.description.referencesGóralski, W. (2020). Znaczenie i funkcja zasady państwa prawnego w ustroju UE. Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations, 3(56), 89-103.pl
dc.description.referencesGovaere, I. (2022). Promoting the Rule of Law in EU External Relations: A Conceptual Framework. European Legal Studies Etudes Juridiques Européennes, 3, 189-206.pl
dc.description.referencesGrzelak, A. (2018). Ramy prawne UE na rzecz umacniania praworządności. Uwagi na tle wniosku Komisji Europejskiej z 20 grudnia 2017 r. Sprawy Międzynarodowe, 2, s. 213-230.pl
dc.description.referencesHolocher, J., & Naleziński, B. (2022). Pojęcie praworządności we współczesnej debacie politycznoprawnej. Rocznik Administracji Publicznej, 8, 326-345.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 February 2017. Ramón Margarit Panicello v Pilar Hernández Martínez. Case C-503/15.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 November 2016. Openbaar Ministerie v Ruslanas Kovalkovas. Case C-477/16 PPU.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 November 2016. Openbaar Ministerie v Krzysztof Marek Poltorak. Case C-452/16 PPU.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 September 2010. Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v European Commission. Case C-550/07 P.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 December 2008. Société Arcelor Atlantique et Lorraine and Others v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Écologie et du Développement durable and Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie. Case C-127/07.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 April 2018. Vera Egenberger v Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung e.V.. Case C-414/16.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 September 2006. Graham J. Wilson v Ordre des avocats du barreau de Luxembourg. Case C-506/04.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 November 2005. Werner Mangold v Rüdiger Helm. Case C-144/04.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 July 2018. LM. Case C-216/18 PPU.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 February 2018. Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v Tribunal de Contas. Case C-64/16.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 June 2008. The Queen, on the application of International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (Intertanko) and Others v Secretary of State for Transport. Case C-308/06.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 March 2011. Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (ONEm). Case C-34/09.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 26 February 2013. Stefano Melloni v Ministerio Fiscal. Case C‑399/11.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 3 October 2013. Case C‑583/11 P.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 December 2010. DEB Deutsche Energiehandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Case C-279/09.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 November 1981. Amministrazione delle finanze dello Stato v Srl Meridionale Industria Salumi and others ; Ditta Italo Orlandi & Figlio and Ditta Vincenzo Divella v Amministrazione delle finanze dello Stato. Joined cases 212 to 217/80.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of 11 January 2000. Kingdom of the Netherlands and Gerard van der Wal v Commission of the European Communities. Joined cases C-174/98 P and C-189/98 P.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of 12 November 1969. Erich Stauder v City of Ulm - Sozialamt. Case 29-69.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of 13 February 1979. Granaria BV v Hoofdproduktschap voor Akkerbouwprodukten. Case 101/78.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of 15 July 1964. Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L. Case 6-64.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of 21 September 1989. Hoechst AG v Commission of the European Communities. Joined cases 46/87 and 227/88.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of 22 March 1961. Société nouvelle des usines de Pontlieue - Aciéries du Temple (S.N.U.P.A.T.) v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community. Joined cases 42 and 49/59.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of 23 April 1986. Parti écologiste "Les Verts" v European Parliament. Case 294/83.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the Court of 5 February 1963. NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration. Case 26-62.pl
dc.description.referencesKenig-Witkowska, M. (2017). The Concept of Sustainable Development in the European Union Policy and Law The Concept of Sustainable Development in the European Union Policy and Law. Journal of Comparative Urban Law and Policy, 1(1), 64-80.pl
dc.description.referencesKornobis-Romanowska, D. (2018). Pewność prawa w Unii Europejskiej. Pomiędzy autonomią jednostki a skutecznością prawa UE. C.H. Beck.pl
dc.description.referencesLenaerts, K., & Gutiérrez-Fons, J. (2013). To Say What the Law of the EU Is: Methods of Interpretation and the European Court of Justice. EUI Working Papers AEL, 9.pl
dc.description.referencesMarcisz, P., & Taborowski, M. (2017). Nowe ramy Unii Europejskiej na rzecz umocnienia praworządności. Krytyczna analiza analizy krytycznej (artykuł polemiczny). Państwo i Prawo, 12, 100-109.pl
dc.description.referencesMarshall, G. (1993). The Rule of Law. Its Meaning, Scope and Problems, Cahiers de philosophie politique et juridique, 24, 41-50.pl
dc.description.referencesMontesquieu (1957). The Spirit of the Laws. PWN.pl
dc.description.referencesPech, L. (2009). The Rule of Law as a Constitutional Principle of the European Union, Jean Monnet Working Paper, 04/09.pl
dc.description.referencesTaborowski, M. (2019). Mechanizmy ochrony praworządności państw członkowskich w prawie Unii Europejskiej. Studium przebudzenia systemu ponadnarodowego. Warsaw 2019. Wolters Kluwer.pl
dc.description.referencesWęcławska-Misiurek, M. (2023). Procedura kontroli praworządności jako uprawnienie Komisji Europejskiej a regulacje konstytucyjne wybranych państw członkowskich Unii Europejskiej. UMCS.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2544-9737-
dc.description.firstpage57pl
dc.description.lastpage69pl
dc.identifier.citation2Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 2024, Vol. 8, No. 2

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
EEJTR_2024_Vol_8_No_2_E_Zochowska_The_Principle_of_the_Rule_of_Law_From_Article.pdf850,63 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons