REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/17940
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorOssowska-Salamonowicz, Dobrochna-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-10T11:53:49Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-10T11:53:49Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationEastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2024, p. 53-61pl
dc.identifier.issn2544-9214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/17940-
dc.description.abstractTattoos represent a multi-billion dollar industry that continues to experience growth (Global Tattoo Ink Market By Type..., 2024). In light of the expansion of this market, it is imperative to delineate the precise rights and responsibilities of tattoo parlour proprietors, artists, and their clientele. In practice, the majority of individuals with tattoos are unaware of their rights and obligations. It is not yet common practice for a client to request a release of liability signed by the tattoo artist. It is also important to recall that it is exceedingly challenging for the copyright holder of a design, or even a tattoo artist, to regulate the utilisation of the design. The paper examines the most significant case law pertaining to the legal protection of tattoos. The article employs the most recent and pivotal case law on the legal aspects of tattooing. Despite the analysis conducted (case law and literature on the subject), it is not feasible to derive consistent rules that could be applied in analogous cases.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Bialystok, Faculty of Law, Polandpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution (CC BY4.0.)-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjecttattoopl
dc.subjectCopyright Lawpl
dc.subjectProperty Rightspl
dc.subjectimplied licensepl
dc.subjectfair usepl
dc.titleThe legal future of tattoos – selected problems. An analysis of the case of Jeffrey B. Sedlik v. Katherine Von Drachenberg (Kat von D.)pl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2024 Author. Submitted for open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0.) licensepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/eejtr.2024.08.01.05-
dc.description.Emaildobrochna.ossowska@uwm.edu.plpl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Polandpl
dc.description.referencesBailey, J. (2023, May 18). How the Warhol Ruling Could Change Fair Use. https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2023/05/18/how-the-warhol-ruling-could-change-fair-use/.pl
dc.description.referencesBaumgartner, P. (2018, February 21). 'Un-Tattoo You': Russian Convict's Swastikas To Be 'Confiscated'. Radio Free Europe, available at: https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-prisoner-nazi-tattoo-confiscation-remove-self/29055107.html.pl
dc.description.referencesCascone, S. (2022, June 24). A Photographer is Suing Tattoo Artist Kat Von D After She Inked His Portrait of Miles Davis on a Friend’s Body. Artnet News, available at: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/a-photographer-is-suing-tattoo-artist-kat-von-d-after-she-inked-his-portrait-of-miles-davis-on-a-friends-body-2135112.pl
dc.description.referencesChilders, C. ( 2024, January 29). Verdict Reached in Kat Von D Copyright Trial Over Tattoo. https://loudwire.com/kat-von-d-trial-alleged-copyright-miles-davis-portrait/?utm_source=tsmclip&utm_medium=referral.pl
dc.description.referencesChintalapoodi, P. (2023, December 8), Court Dismisses Netflix “Tiger King” Tattoo Copyright Case. https://www.chiplawgroup.com/court-dismisses-netflix-tiger-king-tattoo-copyright-case.pl
dc.description.referencesClough, C. (2024, January 24). 'Nobody' Gets Photo Licenses For Tattoos, Kat Von D Testifies. Law360. https://www.law360.com/articles/1789869.pl
dc.description.referencesClough, C. (2024, January 26). Kat Von D’s Miles Davis Tattoo Didn’t Infringe Photo, Jury Says. Law360. https://www.law360.com/articles/1790793/kat-von-d-s-miles-davis-tattoo-didn-t-infringe-photo-jury-says.pl
dc.description.referencesFerrara, D. (2016, July 25). Neo-Nazi gets makeover to hide tattoos from jury. Las Vegas Review-Journal, available at: https://www.reviewjournal.com/crime/homicides/neo-nazi-gets-makeover-to-hide-tattoos-from-jury/.pl
dc.description.referencesGrasser, J. P. (2023, November 29).People Don’t Come to See the Tattoo, They Come to See the Show. Global IP and Technology Law Blog, available at: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e1ebb768-f174-44c9-9c06-0091c7266a1f.pl
dc.description.referencesGrossman, D., & Volk, M. (2020, September 26). Alexander v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.. https://www.loeb.com/en/insights/publications/2020/10/alexander-v-taketwo-interactive-software.pl
dc.description.referencesHadley, M. (2020). Whitmill v Warner Bros. and the visibility of cultural appropriation claims. European intellectual property review, 42, 223-229.pl
dc.description.referencesHibnick, M. (2002, August 16). Kat Von D Tattoo Infringement Case Moves Toward, Trial. https://copyrightalliance.org/kat-von-d-tattoo-infringement-case-trial/.pl
dc.description.referencesHodgsonRuss (2024, April 24). The Battle After Warhol: Tattoos as Artwork or Infringement?, available at: https://www.hodgsonruss.com/printpilot-publication-the-battle-after-warhol-tattoos-as-artwork-or-infringement.pdf?1732644450.pl
dc.description.referencesHyde, R. (2011). Preserving Access to Tattoos: First Amendment Trumps Municipal Ban in Anderson v. City of Hermosa Beach. https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2011/iss1/9.pl
dc.description.referencesKing, Y. M. (2016). Protection and enforcement challenges for tattoo copyrights. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 39(3), 437-440.pl
dc.description.referencesLeval, P.N. (1990). Toward a Fair Use Standard, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1105, 1111.pl
dc.description.referencesMarkin, G. (2023, February 3). Proprietary Ink: How One Tattoo Artist Took Take-Two to the Mat Over Unauthorized Use of Replica Tattoos on Wrestlers in WWE 2K Games. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/proprietary-ink-how-one-tattoo-artist-1225716/.pl
dc.description.referencesMoss, A. (2024, January 23). Kat Von D Tattoo Infringement Trial Begins (and Ends!): What You Need To Know. https://copyrightlately.com/kat-von-d-tattoo-infringement-trial-begins-what-you-need-to-know/.pl
dc.description.referencesMurphy, Brian. (2023, September 25). The Girl with the Tiger King Tattoo Loses Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Against Netflix. https://advertisinglaw.fkks.com/post/102io9r/the-girl-with-the-tiger-king-tattoo-loses-copyright-infringement-lawsuit-against.pl
dc.description.referencesO'Connor, S. D. & Supreme Court Of The United States. (1984) U.S. Reports: Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539. [Periodical] Retrieved from the Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep471539/.pl
dc.description.referencesPerzanowski, A. (2023, January 13).Tattoos, Norms, and Implied Licenses. 107 Minnesota Law Review Headnotes (2023, Forthcoming), U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 23-014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4324090.pl
dc.description.referencesSchwartz, J. (2010, December 6). Extreme Makeover: Criminal Court Edition. The New York Times, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/06/us/06tattoo.html.pl
dc.description.referencesWerbin, B. (2014, Februray). The ‘Transformation’ of Fair Use After Prince v. Cariou. https://www.herrick.com/publications/the-transformation-of-fair-use-after-prince-v-cariou/.pl
dc.description.referencesWills, K. (2021). That tattoo her shoulder: the intersection of copyright law & tattoos. Texas A&M Journal of Property Law, 7(4), 622-662.pl
dc.description.referencesWills, K., & Holt, T. L. (2024, February 12). The Legal Future of Tattoos: A Jury Rules Against Copyright Infringement, available at: https://www.perkinscoie.com/en/news-insights/the-legal-future-of-tattoos-a-jury-rules-against-copyright-infringement.html#Fexpl
dc.identifier.eissn2544-9737-
dc.description.volume8pl
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.firstpage53pl
dc.description.lastpage61pl
dc.identifier.citation2Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relationspl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6617-9096-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 2024, Vol. 8, No. 1

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
EEJTR_2024_Vol_8_No_1_D_Ossowska_Salamonowicz_The_legal_future_of_tattoos.pdf482,56 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons