REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/17936
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorSztobryn, Karolina-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-10T10:32:48Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-10T10:32:48Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationEastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2024, p. 17-24pl
dc.identifier.issn2544-9214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/17936-
dc.description.abstractThis article addresses some issues of trademark protection in virtual worlds. The increasing presence of trademarks in the metaverse, as evidenced by the growing number of trademark applications for virtual goods and services, is likely to intensify legal conflicts related to trademarks and, consequently, to lead to litigation. The development of virtual reality thus brings challenges for the interpretation and application of traditional concepts and terms used in the trademark system. This article analyzes issues that require consideration in the context of trademark protection in metaverse. It discusses the issues of registering trademarks for virtual goods, assessing the similarities between real world goods and services and their virtual world counterparts, and the enforcement of the rights to trademarks, which were used without the owner’s consent in metaverse. The analysis presented in the article leads to the conclusion that further development of the metaverse will certainly force a redefinition of traditionally applied enforcement principles, including those related to jurisdiction, as well as certain concepts known and interpreted for the application of the trademark system in the real world, such as trademark use.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Bialystok, Faculty of Law, Polandpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution (CC BY4.0.)-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectMetaversepl
dc.subjecttrademarkspl
dc.subjectNFTpl
dc.subjectinfringementpl
dc.titleExploring some trademark issues in metaverse from EU law perspectivepl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2024 Author. Submitted for open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0.) licensepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/eejtr.2024.08.01.02-
dc.description.Emailksztobryn@wpia.uni.lodz.plpl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Łódź, Polandpl
dc.description.referencesBradley, W.A., & Kolev, J. (2023). Competitive Dynamism in Nascent Markets: Trademarks and Superstar Firm Entry in the Metaverse, USPTO Economic Working Paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4576986.pl
dc.description.referencesCarvalho, M.M, & Krishna, N. (2024). Unveiling the Digital Frontier: Exploring Trademark Protection in the EU and US IP Laws Through the Lens of NFTS, JusGov Research Paper No. 2024-01. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4711984.pl
dc.description.referencesChayka, K. (2021). Facebook wants us to live in metaverse. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite scroll/facebook-wants-us-to-live-in-the-metaverse.pl
dc.description.referencesCourt (First Chamber) judgment of 19 April 2012 in case C-523/10 Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH, ECLI:EU:C:2012:220.pl
dc.description.referencesDirective (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, point 18, OJ L 336, 23.12.2015, p. 1–26.pl
dc.description.referencesECJ judgment 5 September 2019 in Case C-172/18 AMS Neve, ECLI:EU:C:2019:674.pl
dc.description.referencesECJ judgment of 12 November 2001, in Case C-206/01, “Arsenal”, ECLI:EU:C:2002:651.pl
dc.description.referencesECJ judgment of 29 September 1998 in case Canon, C‐ 39/97, EU:C:1998:442.pl
dc.description.referencesECJ judgment of 29 September 1998, in Case C-39/97, “Canon”, ECLI:EU:C:1998:442.pl
dc.description.referencesECJ judgment of 3 March 2016 in Case C-179/15, “Daimler”, ECLI:EU:C:2016:134.pl
dc.description.referencesEUIPO (2023a). Trademarks Guidelines.pl
dc.description.referencesEUIPO (2023b, February 28). Decision R 2357/2022 - 2, METAVERSE FOOD.pl
dc.description.referencesFoerg, M. (2022). Intellectual Property Considerations and Challenges in the Metaverse. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4484745.pl
dc.description.referencesINTA (2023). Trademarks in the Metaverse White Paper. https://www.inta.org/perspectives/inta-research/trademarks-in-the-metaverse-white-paper/.pl
dc.description.referencesMichaels, A.C. (2022). NFT Litigation is Raising Novel Trademark Questions. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4194097.pl
dc.description.referencesMurray, M.D. (2022). Trademarks, NFTs, and the Law of the Metaverse. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4160233.pl
dc.description.referencesNwaeze, G. (2022). NFTs and Metaverse: Exploring the Challenges and Prospects for IP Lawyers in the Digitalized World. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4198128.pl
dc.description.referencesOkafor, R. (2022). NFTs as a medium for Trademark Infringement. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4612078.pl
dc.description.referencesÖztürk, Ö. (2023). Intellectual Property in NFTs and Legal Challenges. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4322697.pl
dc.description.referencesPark, K. (2022). Trademarks in the metaverse. WIPO Magazine. https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2022/01/article_0006.html.pl
dc.description.referencesRefusal of application for a European Union trade mark 018647205, of 8 February 2023.pl
dc.description.referencesRegulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark, OJ L 154, 16.6.2017, p. 1–99.pl
dc.description.referencesRegulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark, OJ L 154, 16.6.2017, p. 1–99.pl
dc.description.referencesRegulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, p. 1–32.pl
dc.description.referencesSaw, C.L., & Chan, Z.W.S. (2023). The Subsistence and Enforcement of Copyright and Trade Mark Rights in the Metaverse. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, SMU Centre for AI & Data Governance Research Paper No. 03/2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4452938.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2544-9737-
dc.description.volume8pl
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.firstpage17pl
dc.description.lastpage24pl
dc.identifier.citation2Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relationspl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6127-7829-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 2024, Vol. 8, No. 1

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
EEJTR_2024_Vol_8_No_1_K_Sztobryn_Exploring_some_trademark_issues.pdf509,99 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons