REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/17928
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorBabikov, Oleksandr-
dc.contributor.authorFedorenko, Ihor-
dc.contributor.authorOmelchenko, Oleksandr-
dc.contributor.authorLyseiuk, Andrii-
dc.contributor.authorPanova, Oksana-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-07T07:22:04Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-07T07:22:04Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 29 nr 4, 2024, s. 197-215pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/17928-
dc.description.abstractThis article focuses on the analysis of problematic aspects of the system of internal control and judicial review over the protection of human rights and freedoms in the context of covert obtaining of information for the needs of criminal justice. Focusing on control measures and striking a balance between justice and human rights, the article dwells upon the effectiveness of supervision mechanisms and the factors affecting their efficiency. Analysis of legislation and case law of various European countries is therefore carried out to assess the effectiveness of control measures. Various factors that determine the effectiveness of control measures are examined. In addition, ways of solving these issues in the legislation of European countries and other jurisdictions are considered. As a result, the main problems and obstacles in ensuring the rights and freedoms of citizens while secretly obtaining information for criminal justice are identified. Furthermore, the effectiveness of mechanisms of internal control and judicial review in criminal proceedings is evaluated. Finally, a course of actions is suggested to maintain the balance of interests between criminal justice and human rights and freedoms.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pl
dc.subjectcovert obtaining of informationpl
dc.subjectcriminal justicepl
dc.subjecthuman rights and freedomspl
dc.subjectinternal controlpl
dc.subjectjudicial reviewpl
dc.titleThe Observance of Human Rights and Freedoms during the Covert Obtaining of Information in Criminal Proceedingspl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2024 Oleksandr Babikov et al. published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2024.29.04.12-
dc.description.EmailOleksandr Babikov: babikov672@gmail.compl
dc.description.EmailIhor Fedorenko: fedorenko.ipds@gmail.compl
dc.description.EmailOleksandr Omelchenko: alexomel@ukr.netpl
dc.description.EmailAndrii Lyseiuk: andrii_lyseiuk@sci-univ.compl
dc.description.EmailOksana Panova: oksana_panova@edu-nau.com.uapl
dc.description.AffiliationOleksandr Babikov - Kyiv National Aviation University, Ukrainepl
dc.description.AffiliationIhor Fedorenko - University of New Technologies, Ukrainepl
dc.description.AffiliationOleksandr Omelchenko - University of New Technologies, Ukrainepl
dc.description.AffiliationAndrii Lyseiuk - National Academy of the Security Service of Ukraine, Ukrainepl
dc.description.AffiliationOksana Panova - Kyiv National Aviation University, Ukrainepl
dc.description.referencesBureau of Economic Security. (2024). Letter of response, ‘Regarding the provision of information regarding the work of pretrial investigation bodies of the Bureau of Economic Security, entered by registrars in the Unified Register of Pretrial Investigations’, no. ZPI/6/0/13. Limited access, available on request.pl
dc.description.referencesBusiness Ombudsman Council. (2024). Response to the Request of the Business Ombudsman Council dated 18 January 2024. https://boi.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/3q-2024-ua-30102024–1.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesCouncil of Europe. (2015). On the freedom of expression of judges. Venice Commission Report, no. CDL AD(2015)018-e. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2015)018-epl
dc.description.referencesDavies, S. (1996). Big Brother: Britain’s Web of Surveillance and the New Technological Order. Pan.pl
dc.description.referencesElectronic Privacy Information Centre and Privacy International. (2002). Privacy and human rights 2002: An international survey of privacy rights and developments. Electronic Privacy Information.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union. (2010). Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union with Protocols and Declarations, No. 994_B06. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT:en:PDFpl
dc.description.referencesGavison, R. (1980). Privacy and the limits of law. Yale Law Journal, 89, 421–428.pl
dc.description.referencesGerman Federal Ministry of Justice. (1987). Code of Criminal Procedure. https://www.gesetze-im internet.de/englisch_stpo/englisch_stpo.htmlpl
dc.description.referencesGronowska, B. (2021). Commentary to the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 16 September 2021 in the case of X v. Poland (appl. no. 20741/10). Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 27(3), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2022.27.03.14.pl
dc.description.referencesHigh Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine. (2024a). https://first.vaks.gov.ua/publications/statystyka-vaks/pl
dc.description.referencesHigh Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine. (2024b). Letter of response, ‘Regarding the number of petitions for the conduct of secret investigative (investigative) actions received for consideration by investigative judges of the Higher Anti-Corruption Court and the results of their consideration’, no. 140/24Vx. Limited access, available on request.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 20 July 2021 on the case of Zoltán Varga v. Slovakia, case no. 58361/12. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001–211180pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 16 December 1992 on the case of Niemietz v. Germany, case no. 13710/88. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001–57887pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 4 December 2015 on the case of Roman Zakharov v. Russia, case no. 47143/06. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001–159324pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 22 July 2021 on the case of Azer Ahmadov v. Azerbaijan, case no. 3409/10. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001–211101pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 25 May 2021 on the case of Big Brother Watch and Others v. The United Kingdom, case nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001–210077pl
dc.description.referencesJudicial Authority of Ukraine. (2024). Judicial statistics. https://court.gov.ua/inshe/sudova_statystyka/pl
dc.description.referencesKoval, A. (2019). Zabezpechennia prav liudyny pry provadzhenni nehlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii: monohrafiia [Ensuring human rights in production covert investigative (search) actions: monograph]. Petro Mohyla Black Sea National Universitypl
dc.description.referencesKubuj, K. (2022). The role of general clause of (public) morals based on selected European Court of Human Rights’ judgments. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 27(4), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2022.27.04.07pl
dc.description.referencesLeiva, A. (2024). ‘It’s all about who you know’: Investigating the involvement process in regard to organised criminal groups within Australia. Social Sciences, 13(9), article number 473.pl
dc.description.referencesLetwin, J. (2023). Proportionality, stringency and utility in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights Law Review, 23(3), article number ngad014. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngad014pl
dc.description.referencesNational Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine. (2024a). Letter of response, ‘Regarding issues related to the issuance by prosecutors of resolutions on control over the commission of crimes, the introduction by prosecutors of acts of prosecutorial response, bringing prosecutors, investigators to disciplinary or criminal responsibility, and regarding the provision of static information concerning confidential investigative (search) actions’, no. 27/3–26 ext-24. Limited access, available on request.pl
dc.description.referencesNational Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine. (2024b). Letter of response, ‘Regarding the number of requests submitted by investigators, inquirers, prosecutors for permission to conduct secret investigative (search) actions, the results of their consideration by investigative judges, about keeping records of the number of permits granted by investigative judges to conduct types of secret investigative actions in criminal proceedings’, no. 27/3–24 ext-24. Limited access, available on request.pl
dc.description.referencesNational Police of Ukraine. (2024). Response letter, ‘Regarding the provision of information on the number of requests submitted by investigators, investigators, and prosecutors for permission to conduct secret investigative (search) actions’, no. 8689–2024. Limited access, available on request.pl
dc.description.referencesOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). Specialized institutions for combating corruption: A review of models. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/corruption/acn/39972270.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesRakipova, I., Pidgorodynsk, A., & Melnyk, A. (2023). Concepts, forms, types and main categories of human rights communication of the victim in criminal proceedings. Legal Horizons, 16(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.54477/LH.25192353.2023.1.pl
dc.description.referencesRepublic of Estonia. (2004). Criminal Procedure Code https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/530102013093/consolidepl
dc.description.referencesRepublic of Kazakhstan. (1994). Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan ‘On operational investigative activities’, no. 154–XIII. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z940004000_#z76pl
dc.description.referencesRepublic of Moldova. (2003). Criminal Procedure Code. https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/2003/en/104339pl
dc.description.referencesRepublic of Ukraine. (2013). Criminal Procedure Code. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651–4617#Textpl
dc.description.referencesSmith, R. E. (2000). Ben Franklin’s Web Site. Sheridan Books.pl
dc.description.referencesState Judicial Administration of Ukraine. (2024). Letter no. inf/BB-24–29/24 https://dsa.court.gov.ua/dsa/inshe/14/pl
dc.description.referencesStoykova, R. (2024). A governance model for digital evidence in criminal proceedings. Computer Law and Security Review, 55, article number 106040.pl
dc.description.referencesSuleymanli, S. (2023). The key principles of international law as the legal grounds for the fight against illegal traffic of cultural heritage objects. Legal Horizons, 16(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.54477/LH.25192353.2023.1.pp.57–64pl
dc.description.referencesVaško, A. (2022). The legal regulation of special means by the Intelligence Agency of the Slovak Republic within the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 3(15), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18–5.3-a000309pl
dc.description.referencesVerkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2012). Instructions on the organization of covert investigative (search) actions and the use of their results in criminal proceedings. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0114900–12#Textpl
dc.description.referencesVerkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2021a). Decree of the President of Ukraine, ‘About the national strategy in the field of human rights’, no. 119/2021. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/119/2021.pl
dc.description.referencesVerkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2021b). Decree of the President of Ukraine, ‘National strategy for the development of civil society in Ukraine for 2021–2026’, no. 487/2021. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/487/2021.pl
dc.description.referencesVerkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2024). Letter Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine, no. 27/3–24 ext-24. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0027900–19pl
dc.description.referencesYuhno, O. O. (2013). Certain aspects of the legislation and practice of the use of covert investigative (detective) actions in criminal proceedings. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 3, 169–178.pl
dc.description.referencesZafar, A. (2024). Balancing the scale: Navigating ethical and practical challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) integration in legal practices. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1), article number 27.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2719–9452-
dc.description.volume29pl
dc.description.number4pl
dc.description.firstpage197pl
dc.description.lastpage215pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2024, Vol. 29 nr 4

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_29_4_O_Babikov_I_Fedorenko_at_al_The_Observance_of_Human_Rights_and_Freedoms.pdf193,15 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons