REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze
  4. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2024, Vol. 29 nr 4

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/17923
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorKużelewski, Dariusz-
    dc.date.accessioned2025-02-06T11:08:40Z-
    dc.date.available2025-02-06T11:08:40Z-
    dc.date.issued2024-
    dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 29 nr 4, 2024, s. 139-160pl
    dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/17923-
    dc.description.abstractVictim–offender mediation is considered the most widespread restorative justice measure. It is an institution based on a universal scheme of activities involving the victim and the offender, yet it occurs in a diverse legal environment. Various legal systems regulate the prerequisites for the use of mediation differently, defining in which cases it can be used and who can be a mediator, or giving an institutional framework to entities offering mediation services. One of the most interesting European mediation systems has been developed in Norway, which can be considered a pioneering country in terms of the origins of victim–offender mediation. Comprehensive legal regulation of mediation is a Norwegian peculiarity; it will be analysed in this article against the background of Polish solutions. This analysis will be a starting point for outlining the pitfalls and challenges facing mediation in Norway.pl
    dc.description.sponsorshipThis article is financially supported by the Polish Minister of Science under the Regional Initiative of Excellence (RID) programme.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
    dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0pl
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pl
    dc.subjectcriminal proceedingspl
    dc.subjectNational Mediation Servicepl
    dc.subjectrestorative justicepl
    dc.subjectvictim–offender mediationpl
    dc.titleThe Norwegian Model of Victim–Offender Mediation as an Original System Approachpl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2024 Dariusz Kużelewski published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2024.29.04.09-
    dc.description.Emaild.kuzelewski@uwb.edu.plpl
    dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Bialystok, Polandpl
    dc.description.referencesAndersen, P. (2015). Lay mediators in the future. Restorative Justice, 3(1), 114–118.pl
    dc.description.referencesBrienen, M. E. I., & Hoegen, E. H. (2000). Victims of crime in 22 European criminal justice systems: The implementation of Recommendation (85)11 of the Council of Europe on the position of the victim in the framework of criminal law and procedure. Wolf Legal Publications.pl
    dc.description.referencesCentral Administration of the National Mediation Service. (2021). The mediator’s handbook: Basic principles and practice advice for facilitators of restorative justice in the Norwegian National Mediation Services. Central Administration of the National Mediation Service. https:// konfliktraadet.no/content/uploads/2021/06/The-Mediators-Handbooks-New-visual-profile-June-21-With-bookmarks.pdpl
    dc.description.referencesChristie, N. (2015). Widening the net. Restorative Justice, 3(1), 109–113.pl
    dc.description.referencesDullum, J. (1996). The Norwegian mediation boards. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 4(4), 86–94.pl
    dc.description.referencesFalck, S. (1992). The Norwegian community mediation centres at a crossroads. In H. Messmer & H.-U. Otto (Eds.), Restorative justice on trial: Pitfalls and potentials of victim–offender mediation. International research perspectives (pp. 131–148). Kluwer Academic Publishers.pl
    dc.description.referencesJustis- og beredskapsdepartementet. (2014, 30 June). Forskrift om konfliktrådsbehandling av 30. juni 2014. https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2014-06-30-923pl
    dc.description.referencesKemény, S. I. (2000). Policy developments and the concept of restorative justice through mediation. In European Forum for Victim–Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice (Ed.), Victim–offender mediation in Europe: Making restorative justice work (pp. 83–98). Leuven University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesKemény, S. I. Victim–offender mediation with juvenile offenders in Norway. In A. Mestitz & S. Ghetti (Eds.), Victim–offender mediation with youth offenders in Europe: An overview and comparison of 15 countries (pp. 101–114). Springer.pl
    dc.description.referencesKulesza, C., & Kużelewski, D. (2018). Victim–offender mediation as an alternative to the criminal justice system in Poland. Temida, 21(1), 3–22.pl
    dc.description.referencesKużelewski, D. (2014). Ewolucja polskich uregulowań dotyczących mediacji w sprawach karnych na tle standardów europejskich. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 15, 175–183.pl
    dc.description.referencesLundgaard, J. M. (2015). Norway. In F. Dünkel, J. Grzywa-Holten, & P. Horsefield (Eds.), Restorative justice and mediation in penal matters: A stock-taking of legal issues, implementation strategies and outcomes in 36 European countries (Vol. 2) (pp. 619–636). Forum Verlag Godesberg.pl
    dc.description.referencesMestitz, A. (2005). A comparative perspective on victim–offender mediation with youth offenders throughout Europe. In A. Mestitz & S. Ghetti (Eds.), Victim–offender mediation with youth offenders in Europe: An overview and comparison of 15 countries (pp. 3–20). Springer.pl
    dc.description.referencesMinisterstwo Sprawiedliwości. (2024). Opracowania wieloletnie. https://isws.ms.gov.pl/pl/baza-statystyczna/opracowania-wieloletnie/pl
    dc.description.referencesMinistry of Justice and the Police. (1981, 22 May). Criminal Procedure Act of 22 May 1981. (Lov om rettergangsmåten i straffesaker (Straffeprosessloven)). http://www.ub.uio.no/ujur/ulovdata/lov-19810522-025-eng.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesNergård, T. B. (1993). Solving conflicts outside the court system: Experiences with the conflict resolution boards in Norway. The British Journal of Criminology, 33(1), 81–94.pl
    dc.description.referencesPaus, K. K. (2000). Victim–offender mediation in Norway. In European Forum for Victim–Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice (Ed.), Victim–offender mediation in Europe: Making restorative justice work (pp. 281–308). Leuven University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesPaus, K. K. (2005). Victim–offender mediation in Norway. In U. V. Bondeson (Ed.), Crime and justice in Scandinavia (pp. 503–527). Forlaget Thomson.pl
    dc.description.referencesPaus, K. K. (2015). National Mediation Service (NMS) – Norway: Restorative justice – a humane and awarding response to crime. https://violenceagainstchildren.un.org/sites/violenceagainstchildren.un.org/files/expert_consultations/stranghtening_communities/field_visit_presentationkaren_kristin_paus_mediation_service.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesPaus, K. K. (2017). Restorative justice in Norway, values and practices at a crossroad. In I. Nafstad & K. Papendorf (Eds.), Restorative processes from Oslo to Havana and back: Discussions on implementing and strengthening restorative justice processes in Cuba and Norway (pp. 23–56). Novus Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesPaus, K. K. (2018). The national mediation service: A top-down grassroots movement. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 31(1), 37–47.pl
    dc.description.referencesRiksadvokaten. (2015, 16 January). Ungdomsstraff, ungdomsoppfølging, oppfølging i konfliktråd – foreløpige retningslinjer. January). Ungdomsstraff, ungdomsoppfølging, oppfølging i konfliktråd– foreløpige retningslinjer. https://www.riksadvokaten.no/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Forel%C3%B8pige-retningslinjer-ungdomsstraff.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesRiksadvokaten. (2017, 9 August). Ungdomsstraff – oppdaterte. https://www.riksadvokaten.no/wp content/uploads/2017/10/Oppdaterte-retningslinjer-ungdomsstraff.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesSejm of Poland. (1997, 6 June). Code of Criminal Procedure (consolidated text: Journal of Laws of 2024, item 37, as amended). https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19970890555/U/D19970555Lj.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesSejm of Poland. (2015, 7 May). Regulation of Minister of Justice of 7 May 2015 on Mediation in Criminal Matters (Journal of Laws of 2015, item 716). https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20150000716/O/D20150716.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesSekretariatet for konfliktrådene (2023). Årsrapport 2022. Sekretariatet for konfliktrådene. https://konfliktraadet.no/ content/uploads/2023/05/Arsrapport-2022-konfliktradet-endelig-versjon.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesSekretariatet for konfliktrådene (2024). Årsrapport 2023. Sekretariatet for konfliktrådene. https://konfliktraadet.no/content/uploads/2024/05/arsrapport-konfliktradet-2023-med-revisjonsberetningen.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesStorting. (1991, 15 March). Act of 15 March 1991 Relating to Mediation by the National Mediation Service (the National Mediation Service Act). Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet. (1992, 13 August). Forskrift om megling i konfliktråd av 13. august 1992. http://www.ub.uio.no/ujur/ ulovdata/lov-19910315-003-eng.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesStorting. (2001, 18 May). Act of 18 May 2001 Relating to the Execution of Sentences, etc. (The Execution of Sentences Act). (Lov om gjennomføring av straff mv (Straffegjennomføringsloven)). https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/2001-05-18-21pl
    dc.description.referencesStorting. (2005, 20 May). Penal Code of 20 May 2005. (Lov om straff (Straffeloven)). https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/2005-05-20-28pl
    dc.description.referencesStorting. (2014, 20 June). Act of 20 June 2014 Relating to Mediation by the National Mediation Service (The Mediation Service Act). https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/2014-06-20-49.pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2719-9452-
    dc.description.volume29pl
    dc.description.number4pl
    dc.description.firstpage139pl
    dc.description.lastpage160pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8177-0768-
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Artykuły naukowe (WP)
    Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2024, Vol. 29 nr 4

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    BSP_29_4_D_Kuzelewski_The_Norwegian_Model_of_Victim_Offender_Mediation.pdf268,05 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons