REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/16960
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorMazepova, Olena-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-19T08:56:24Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-19T08:56:24Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationContemporary teaching and research in Ukraine’s universities: challenges, solutions, and perspectives. Conference proceedings, 18th November 2021, Faculty of Education, University of Białystok, edited by Marta Kowalczuk-Walędziak and Krzysztof Sawicki, Białystok 2022, s. 15-24pl
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-964970-0-0-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/16960-
dc.description.abstractIn the age of globalisation and multiculturalism, the need for developing students’ competence in intercultural communication in foreign language classes, including those of South West Asia and North Africa (i.e. the SWANA region), is steadily growing. This issue becomes especially important in the context of East-West relations, which have recently been marked by plural, intersecting geo-political tensions. This paper explores the problem of developing the pragmatic and intercultural competence of Ukrainian students, specifically in the Persian language – especially as regards the corresponding multifaceted cultural system, ta’ārof. It seems that without knowledge of this system, successful communication between non-native Persian speakers and native Persian speakers is impossible. Ta’ārof includes a broad, complex of behaviours permeating Iran’s social and cultural life, and is used for both marking differences in social status and harmonising the communications of speakers/listeners who are equal in social status. Methodologically, in this study the communication behaviours of Persian speakers is analysed based on the theory of speech acts, in particular as interpreted by Brown and Levinson (1987), respectively the American and British founders of the linguistic politeness theory whereby individuals can either ‘lose face’ or ‘save face’. The current research, however, finds that some speech acts identified by these Western researchers as ‘face-threatening’ are not when understood via the Persian politeness system.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherFaculty of Education University of Białystokpl
dc.subjectintercultural competencepl
dc.subjectintercultural communicationpl
dc.subjectcommunicative behaviourpl
dc.subjectspeech actpl
dc.subjectpoliteness systempl
dc.titleDeveloping intercultural competence in the foreign language classroom: The case of the Persian politeness system, ta’ārofpl
dc.typeBook chapterpl
dc.rights.holder© Faculty of Education, University of Białystok, Białystok, Polandpl
dc.description.Emailmazepova.olena@gmail.compl
dc.description.AffiliationTaras Shevchenko National University of Kyivpl
dc.description.referencesAhmadi, N., and F. Ahmadi. (1998). Iranian Islam: The concept of the individual. London: Mac-Millan Press.pl
dc.description.referencesAryanpur Kashani, A., and M. Aryanpur Kashani. (1986). Aryanpur Persian-English dictionary. Tehran: Amir-Kabir Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesAsjodi, M. (2001). A comparison between ta’arof in Persian and limao in Chinese. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 148, 71–92.pl
dc.description.referencesAssadi, R. (1980). Deference: Persian style. Anthropological Linguistics, 22, 221–224.pl
dc.description.referencesBeeman, W. O. (1988). Affectivity in Persian language use. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 12, 9–30.pl
dc.description.referencesBeeman, W. O. (2001). Emotion and sincerity in Persian discourse: Accomplishing and representation of inner states. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 148, 31–57.pl
dc.description.referencesBeeman, W. O. (1986). Language, status, and power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBeeman, W. O. (2020). Ta’ārof: Pragmatic key to Iranian social behavior. In: J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 203–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl
dc.description.referencesBrown, P., and S. Levinson. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesDelVecchio Good, M., and B. Good. (1988). Ritual, the state, and the transformation of emotional discourse in Iranian society. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 12, 43–63.pl
dc.description.referencesEslami, Z. R. (2005). Invitations in Persian and English: Ostensible or genuine? Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(4), 453–480.pl
dc.description.referencesEslami, Z. R. (2010). Refusals: How to develop appropriate refusal strategies. In: A. Martínez-Flor and E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 217–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl
dc.description.referencesEslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal, 59(3), 199–208.pl
dc.description.referencesGoffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Doubleday.pl
dc.description.referencesGoffman, E. (1972). On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In: J. Laver and S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in face-to-face interaction (pp. 319–346). Harmondsworth: Penguin.pl
dc.description.referencesHillmann, M. C. (1981). Language and social distinctions. In: M. Bonine and N. R. Keddie (Eds.), Modern Iran: The dialectics of continuity and change (pp. 327–340). Albany: State University of New York Press.pl
dc.description.referencesIzadi, A. (2015). Persian honorifics and im/politeness as social practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 85, 81–91.pl
dc.description.referencesKeshavarz, M. H. (2011). The role of social context, intimacy, and distance in the choice of forms of address. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 148, 5–18.pl
dc.description.referencesKoutlaki, S.A. (2002). Offers and expressions of thanks as face enhancing acts: Tæ’arof in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(12), 1733–1756.pl
dc.description.referencesKoutlaki, S.A. (2009). Two sides of the same coin: how the notion of ‘face’ is encoded in Persian communication. In: F. Bargiela-Chiappini and M. Haugh (Eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction (pp. 115–133). London: Equinox.pl
dc.description.referencesMatsumoto, Y. (1988). Re-examination of the universality of face: politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 403–426.pl
dc.description.referencesRueda, Y.T. (2006). Developing pragmatic competence in a foreign language. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 8, 169–182.pl
dc.description.referencesSalmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2012). Rethinking face and politeness. International Journal of Language Studies, 6(4), 119–140.pl
dc.description.referencesSharifian, F. (2007). L1 cultural conceptualizations in L2 learning. The case of Persianspeaking learners of English. In: F. Sharifian and G. B. Palmer (Eds.), Applied cultural linguistics: implications for second language learning and intercultural communication (pp. 33–51). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.pl
dc.description.referencesShirinbakhsh, S., and A. Eslami Rasekh. (2012). The effect of age on cultural schema: The case of Shekaste-nafsi (modesty) in Persian. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 1(1), 1–14.pl
dc.description.referencesTaleghani-Nikazm, C. (1998). Politeness in Persian interaction: The preference format of offers in Persian. Crossroads of Language, Interaction, and Culture, 1, 3–11.pl
dc.description.referencesПерсидско-русский словарь (Persian-Russian Dictionary). (1985). In 2 vols. Ed. by Yu. Rubinchik. Moskow: Russkiy yazyk.pl
dc.description.firstpage15pl
dc.description.lastpage24pl
dc.identifier.citation2Contemporary teaching and research in Ukraine’s universities: challenges, solutions, and perspectives. Conference proceedings, 18th November 2021, Faculty of Education, University of Białystok, edited by Marta Kowalczuk-Walędziak and Krzysztof Sawickipl
dc.conferenceConference "Teaching and research in a contemporary university: challenges, solutions, and perspectives", Bialystok, 18th November 2021pl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Conference "Teaching and research in a contemporary university: challenges, solutions, and perspectives", 18th November 2021

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
O_Mazepova_Developing_intercultural_competence.pdf267,13 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)