REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/16548
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorRytel-Warzocha, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorJackiewicz, Andrzej-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-22T09:07:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-22T09:07:34Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationEastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2023, p. 105-110pl
dc.identifier.issn2544-9214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/16548-
dc.description.abstractThe commented ruling of the ECHR of 16 June 2022 in the case Żurek v Poland concerned the crucial issue of judges' freedom of expression. It is particularly significant in the context of the recent changes concerning the judiciary in Poland and the associated threats to judicial independence and the independence of judges, which were manifested, inter alia, by numerous disciplinary proceedings initiated against judges. The authors present the main facts and legal issues concerning the case, as well as the findings of the Court and the judgement. They also refer to other previous judgments relevant to this context. The authors fully endorse the position of the Court that a judge has not only the right but also a duty to speak out on the rule of law in case the reforms introduced in the country constitute a violation of the constitutional principle of a democratic state based on the rule of law.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Bialystok, Faculty of Law, Polandpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution (CC BY4.0.)pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pl
dc.subjectfreedom of expressionpl
dc.subjectrule of lawpl
dc.subjectindependence of judgespl
dc.subjectindependence of judiciarypl
dc.subjectdisciplinary proceedingspl
dc.subjectreforms of judiciarypl
dc.titleCommentary to the judgment of the ECHR of 16 June 2022 Żurek v. Poland, Chamber (Section I), Application no. 39650/18 (on freedom of expression of judges)pl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2023 Authors. Submitted for open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0.) licensepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/eejtr.2023.07.02.10-
dc.description.EmailAnna Rytel-Warzocha: anna.rytel@prawo.ug.edu.plpl
dc.description.EmailAndrzej Jackiewicz: jackiewicz@uwb.edu.plpl
dc.description.AffiliationAnna Rytel-Warzocha - University of Gdańsk, Polandpl
dc.description.AffiliationAndrzej Jackiewicz - University of Bialystok, Polandpl
dc.identifier.eissn2544-9737-
dc.description.volume7pl
dc.description.number2pl
dc.description.firstpage105pl
dc.description.lastpage110pl
dc.identifier.citation2Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relationspl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6639-8010-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6957-3139-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Artykuły naukowe (WP)
Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 2023, Vol. 7, No. 2

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons