W BIAŁYMSTOKU
Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/15651Pełny rekord metadanych
| Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Oliveira Pais, Sofia | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Prata Domingos, Marta | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-20T13:33:29Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-12-20T13:33:29Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 28 nr 4, 2023, s. 145-164 | pl |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1689-7404 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/15651 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This article reflects on the principle of equal treatment as a constant feature that pervades the European Union’s legal order and its specific role in competition law. Throughout history, this principle has been a foundation stone for developing the characteristics, such as freedom of movement, that one would consensually recognise as distinctive features that make the European Union a sui generis political construction. After a brief analysis of the principle’s development and ever-expanding contours, with new instruments emerging along the way and contributing to its importance, we will focus on the application of this principle to competition law. Paying particular attention to the Google Shopping case, we will demonstrate how the general principle of equal treatment remains relevant when confronted with new types of discriminatory abuses. | pl |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl |
| dc.publisher | Faculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2 | pl |
| dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | - |
| dc.subject | Google Shopping | pl |
| dc.subject | leveraging abuse | pl |
| dc.subject | principle of equal treatment | pl |
| dc.subject | self-favouring | pl |
| dc.title | The Principle of Equal Treatment in the Google Shopping Case | pl |
| dc.type | Article | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | © 2023 Sofia Oliveira Pais, Marta Prata Domingos published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercialNoDerivatives 4.0 License. | pl |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15290/bsp.2023.28.04.09 | - |
| dc.description.Email | Sofia Oliveira Pais: spais@ucp.pt | pl |
| dc.description.Email | Marta Prata Domingos: mardomingos@ucp.pt | pl |
| dc.description.Affiliation | Sofia Oliveira Pais - Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Portugal | pl |
| dc.description.Affiliation | Marta Prata Domingos - Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Portugal | pl |
| dc.description.references | Ahlborn C., Van Gerven G., Leslie W., ‘Bronner Revisited: Google Shopping and the Resurrection of Discrimination under Article 102 TFEU’, ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2022, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 87–98. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Akman P., To Abuse, or Not to Abuse: Discrimination between Consumers, ‘European Law Review’ 2007, vol. 32, pp. 492–512. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Anderson D., Murphy C.C., The Charter of Fundamental Rights, (in:) Biondi A., Eeckhout P., Ripley S. (eds.), EU Law after Lisbon, Oxford 2012. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, ed. and trans. R. Crisp (rev. ed.), Cambridge 2019. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Barnard C., The Substantive Law of the EU: The Four Freedoms (6th ed.), Oxford 2019. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Bell M., The Principle of Equal Treatment: Widening and Deepening, (in:) P. Craig, G. De Burca (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (2nd ed.), Oxford 2011. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Bork R.H., Sidak J.G., What Does the Chicago School Teach about Internet Search and the Antitrust Treatment of Google? ‘Journal of Competition Law & Economics’ 2012, vol. 4, pp. 663–700. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Bostoen F., The General Court’s Google Shopping Judgment: Finetuning the Legal Qualifications and Tests for Platform Abuse’, ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2022, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 75–85. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Bruc É., Google Shopping and Article 106 TFEU: A Legal Dystopia in the EU Constitutional Order, ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2023, pp. 1–12. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Colangelo G., The Case against Self-Preferencing as a New Antitrust Offense, https://truthonthemarket.com/2022/09/22/the-case-against-self-preferencing-as-a-new-antitrust-offense/. | pl |
| dc.description.references | di Giovanni Bezzi R., Anticompetitive Effects and Allocation of the Burden of Proof in Article 102 Cases: Lessons from the Google Shopping Case, ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2022, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 112–125. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Ducci F., Natural Monopolies in Digital Platform Markets, Cambridge 2020. | pl |
| dc.description.references | European Commission, Antitrust: Commission Sends Statement of Objections to Google Over Abusive Practices in Online Advertising Technology, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_3207. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Franklin C., The Legal Status of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights after the Treaty of Lisbon, ‘Tilburg Law Review’ 2010, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 137–162. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Gaudin G., Mantzari D., ‘Google Shopping and the As-Efficient-Competitor Test: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead’, ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’, 2022, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 125–135. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Geradin D., Petit N., Price Discrimination under EC Competition Law: Another Antitrust Doctrine in Search of Limiting Principles, ‘Journal of Competition Law & Economics’ 2006, vol. 2, pp. 479–531. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Graf T., Mostyn H., Do We Need to Regulate Equal Treatment? The Google Shopping Case and the Implications of Its Equal Treatment Principle for New Legislative Initiatives, ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2020, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 561–574. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Hoppner T., Schaper F., Westerhoff P., Google Search (Shopping) as a Precedent for Disintermediation in Other Sectors: The Example of Google for Jobs, ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2018, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 627–644. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Hornkohl L., Article 102 TFEU, Equal Treatment Discrimination after Google Shopping, ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2022, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 99–111. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Ibáñez Colomo P., Indispensability and Abuse of Dominance: From Commercial Solvents to Slovak Telekom and Google Shopping, ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2019, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 532–551. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Laitenberger J., Competition Enforcement in Digital Markets: Using Our Tools Well and a Look at the Future, ‘GCLC Conference’, 31 January 2019, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/speeches/text/sp2019_03_en.pdf. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Lindeboom J., Rules, Discretion, and Reasoning According to Law: A Dynamic-Positivist Perspective on Google Shopping, ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2022, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 63–74. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Marsden P., Google Shopping for the Empress’s New Clothes: When a Remedy Isn’t a Remedy (and How to Fix It), ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2020, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 553–559. | pl |
| dc.description.references | More G., The Principle of Equal Treatment: From Market Unifier to Fundamental Right? (in:) P. Craig, G. De Burca (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (1st ed.), Oxford 1999. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Muir E., The Essence of the Fundamental Right to Equal Treatment: Back to the Origins, ‘German Law Journal’ 2019, vol. 20, pp. 817–839. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Muir E., Davio V., Van der Meulen L., The Horizontal Equality Clauses (Arts 8 & 10 TFEU) and Their Contribution to the Course of EU Equality Law: Still and Empty Vessel? ‘European Papers’ 2022, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1381–1403. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Pandropolous P., How Should Price Discrimination Be Dealt with by Competition Authorities? ‘Concurrences’ 2007, vol. 3. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Prechal S., Non-Discrimination Does Not Fall Down from Heaven: The Context and Evolution of Non-Discrimination in EU Law, ‘Eric Stein Working Paper’ 2009, no. 4. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Psychogiopoulou E., The Horizontal Clauses of Arts 8–13 TFEU Through the Lens of the Court of Justice, ‘European Papers’ 2022, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1357–1380. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Reverdin V.M.K., Abuse of Dominance in Digital Markets: Can Amazon’s Collection and Use of ThirdParty Sellers’ Data Constitute an Abuse of a Dominant Position under the Legal Standards Developed by the European Courts for Article 102 TFEU? ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2021, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 181–199. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Schiek D., Waddington L., Bell M., Cases, Materials and Texts on National, Supranational and International Non-Discrimination Law, Hart Publishing 2007. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Torres Pérez A., The Federalizing Force of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, ‘International Journal of Constitutional Law’ 2017, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1080–1097. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Watson P., EU Social and Employment Law, Oxford 2014. | pl |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2719-9452 | - |
| dc.description.volume | 28 | pl |
| dc.description.number | 4 | pl |
| dc.description.firstpage | 145 | pl |
| dc.description.lastpage | 164 | pl |
| dc.identifier.citation2 | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze | pl |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000–0002-3721–5799 | - |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-7557-2626 | - |
| Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2023, Vol. 28 nr 4 | |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
| Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP_28_4_S_Oliveira_Pais_M_Prata_Domingos_The_Principle_of_Equal_Treatment.pdf | 293,03 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL
